How Britain’s and Colombia’s Privileged Partnerships with the United States Influenced Their Respective Journeys through the European Community and UNASUR
Copyright (c) 2022 Palotás László
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The copyright to this article is transferred to the University of Public Service Budapest, Hungary (for U.S. government employees: to the extent transferable) effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The author warrants that this contribution is original and that he/she has full power to make this grant. The author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors.
An author may make an article published by University of Public Service available on a personal home page provided the source of the published article is cited and University of Public Service is mentioned as copyright holder
Abstract
This paper explores how Britain’s and Colombia’s privileged relations with the United States (U.S.) influenced their journey through the European Community (EC) and the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR). The Anglo–American Special Relationship (AASR) was compatible with British participation in the European Single Market, but not with adherence to creating the EC’s common currency, nor with leadership in building a European defence structure autonomous from NATO. Thus, since the start of the Iraq war, Britain played a rather obstructive role in what later was called European Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP). The US–Colombia Partnership (USCP), based on a longstanding military association reinforced under Plan Colombia, naturally discouraged any meaningful Colombian participation in UNASUR’s South American Security Council (CDS), a regional cooperative security project, promoted by Brazil. Cherished projects of the liberal CAP – such as triangular cooperation (to export Colombian security expertise to Central America with U.S. co-financing and oversight) and NATO partnership – also distracted Colombia’s interest from UNASUR, diminishing the latter’s relevance collaterally. A role for UNASUR – alongside the Organization of American States (OAS) – in South American security management was compatible with the liberal CAP, but not with the neoconservative CAP. Even a lopsided complementation – such as the one between NATO and the CSDP – proved unviable between the OAS and UNASUR.
Keywords:
How to Cite
References
Ahumada, Consuelo, ‘Santos y el acuerdo militar con Estados Unidos: de la sumisión al pragmatismo’. Portafolio, 13 January 2011. Online: www.portafolio.co/opinion/redaccion-portafolio/santos-acuerdo-militar-estados-unidos-sumision-pragmatismo-151104
Ardila, Martha and Juan Andrés Amado, ‘Continuidades y cambios en las relaciones de Colombia con sus países vecinos: 2008–2009, año crítico con Ecuador y Venezuela’. OASIS no 14 (2009), 55–70. Online: https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/view/2459/2094
Ashton, Nigel, ‘Harold Macmillan and the ‘Golden Days’ of Anglo–American relations revisited, 1957–63’. Diplomatic History 29, no 4 (2005), 691–723. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7709.2005.00511.x
Brooks, Stephen and William Wohlforth, ‘Hard Times for Soft Balancing’. International Security 30, no 1 (2005), 72–108. Online: https://doi.org/10.1162/0162288054894634
Brown, Rebekah, ‘History of the Anglo–American Special Relationship’. Ashbrook Statesmanship Thesis, 2012. Online: https://ashbrook.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/ShermanBrown-Printable.pdf
Cladi, Lorenzo and Andrea Locatelli, ‘Keep Calm and Carry On (Differently): NATO and CSDP after Brexit’. Global Policy 11, no 1 (2020), 5–14. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12747
Dabène, Olivier, ‘La cuarta ola de regionalismo’, in Los desafíos del desarrollo en América Latina, ed. by Carlos Quenan and Sébastian Velut. Paris: Institut des Amériques, 2014, 64–95. Online: www.afd.fr/es/ressources/los-desafios-del-desarrollo-en-america-latina-dinamicas-socioeconomicas-y-politicas-publicas
EFE, ‘Colombia notifica a la Unasur que deja el bloque por no denunciar la crisis venezolana’, 28 August 2018. Online: www.efe.com/efe/america/portada/colombia-notifica-a-la-unasur-que-deja-el-bloque-por-no-denunciar-crisis-venezolana/20000064-3731560
El Universo, ‘A Ecuador y Brasil les preocupa la relación Colombia–OTAN, comentario del ministro de defensa brasileño’, 07 June 2013. Online: www.eluniverso.com/noticias/2013/06/07/nota/999936/preocupa-relacion-colombia-otan
Flemes, Daniel and Rafael Castro, ‘Institutional Contestation: Colombia in the Pacific Alliance’. Bulletin of Latin American Research 35, no 1 (2016), 78–92. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.12411
Flemes, Daniel and Leslie Wehner, ‘Drivers of strategic contestation: The case of South America’. International Politics 52, no 2 (2015), 163–177. Online: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2014.45
Frank, Robert, Être ou ne pas être Européen? Les Britanniques et l’Europe du XVIIe siècle au Brexit. Paris: Belin, 2018.
Freedman, Lawrence, ‘Britain Adrift. The United Kingdom’s Search for a Post-Brexit Role’. Foreign Affairs, May–June 2020. Online: www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-kingdom/2020-04-13/britain-adrift
He, Kai, ‘Contested Regional Orders and Institutional Balancing in the Asia Pacific’. International Politics 52, no 2 (2015). Online: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2014.46
IRIS France, ‘Être ou ne pas être européen? Les Britanniques et l’Europe du XVIIe siècle au Brexit – 3 questions à Robert Frank’. Le point de vue de Pascal Boniface, 28 March 2019. Online: www.pascalboniface.com/2019/03/28/etre-ou-ne-pas-etre-europeen-les-britanniques-et-leurope-du-xviie-siecle-au-brexit-3-questions-a-robert-frank
Isacson, Adam, ‘It’s Not Too Late for the Land of Mercenaries’. The New York Times, 05 August 2021. Online: www.nytimes.com/2021/08/05/opinion/colombia-mercenaries-haiti.html
Jiménez García, Edgar, ‘El ejército europeo y la PESCO: OTAN o nada’. Instituto Español de Estudios Estratégicos, Documento de Opinión no 97 (2019). Online: www.ieee.es/Galerias/fichero/docs_opinion/2019/DIEEEO97_2019EDGJIM_EjercitoEuropeo.pdf
‘Joint Declaration on European Defence, issued at the British–French Summit, Saint-Malo’, 04 December 1998. Online: www.cvce.eu/obj/franco_british_st_malo_declaration_4_december_1998-en-f3cd16fb-fc37-4d52-936fc8e9bc80f24f.html
Koppa, Maria Eleni, ‘The relationship between CSDP and NATO after Brexit and the EU’s Global Strategy’. FEPS Studies, April 2019. Online: www.feps-europe.eu/attachments/content/relationship_cspd_nato_after_brexit.pdf
La Prensa, ‘Kerry apoya mediación de Unasur en Venezuela’, 08 April 2014. Online: www.laprensa.com.ni/2014/04/08/internacionales/190185-kerry-apoya-mediacion-de-unasur-en-venezuela
Lake, David, ‘International Legitimacy Lost? Rule and Resistance when America is First’. Perspectives on Politics 16, no 1 (2018), 6–21. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592717003085
Lee, Seungjoo, ‘Institutional Balancing and the Politics of Mega-FTAs in East Asia’. Asian Survey 56, no 6 (2016), 1055–1076. Online: https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2016.56.6.1055
Lepage, Mélanie, Vers le développement d’une communauté de sécurité pluraliste en Amérique du Sud avec la mise en place de l’Union des nations sud-américaines. Essai de maîtrise, dirigé par Gordon Mace. Université Laval, IQHEI, Avril 2011. Online: www.cms.fss.ulaval.ca/recherche/upload/cei/fichiers/essai_melanie_lepage_unasur.pdf
Lippert, Barbara and Nicolai Ondarza, ‘Der Brexit als Neuland’. SWP Aktuell no 42 (2016). Online: www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/aktuell/2016A42_lpt_orz.pdf
Long, Tom, Sebastián Bitar and Gabriel Jiménez-Peña, ‘Domestic Contestation and Presidential Prerogative in Colombian Foreign Policy’. Bulletin of Latin American Research 39, no 4 (2020), 466–482. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.12987
Mauro, Frédéric, ‘European defence: Mourning England’. Tribune, IRIS France, 22 January 2020. Online: www.iris-france.org/143794-european-defence-mourning-england
Mijares, Victor, ‘Filling the structural gap: Geopolitical links explaining the South American Defense Council’. Colombia Internacional no 101 (2019), 3–28. Online: https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint101.2020.01
Mijares, Victor, ‘Performance of the South American Defense Council Under Autonomy Pressures’. Latin American Policy 9, no 2 (2018), 258–281. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/lamp.12146
Mijares, Victor and Detlef Nolte, ‘Regionalismo posthegemónico en crisis’. Revista FAL 18, no 3 (2018), 105–112. Online: http://revistafal.com/numeros-anteriores/fal-18-3
Morales, Mateo and Arlene Tickner, ‘Narrando la historia del éxito: experticia en seguridad y política exterior en Colombia’, in Nuevos enfoques para el estudio de las relaciones internacionales de Colombia, ed. by Arlene Tickner and Sebastián Bitar. Bogotá: Ediciones Uniandes, 2017, 239–262. Online: https://doi.org/10.7440/2017.52
‘NATO and Colombia have concluded a partnership agreement’, 19 May 2017. Online: www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_143936.htm
Nolte, Detlef, ‘Costs and Benefits of Overlapping Regional Organizations in Latin America: The Case of the OAS and UNASUR’. Latin American Politics and Society 60, no 1 (2018), 128–153. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2017.8
Pastrana, Eduardo and Diego Vera, ‘Colombia y su agenda de seguridad. Del gobierno de Juan Manuel Santos al gobierno de Iván Duque’, in La región frente a los cambios globales en materia de seguridad, ed. by Sandra Namihas. Lima: Equis Equis, 2019.
Posen, Barry, ‘EU security and defence policy: Response to unipolarity?’ Security Studies 15, no 2 (2006), 149–186. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/09636410600829356
Radseck, Michael, ‘Las relaciones colombo-brasileñas de defensa: panorama actual’, in Estado y perspectivas de las relaciones colombo-brasileñas, ed. by Daniel Flemes, Eduardo Pastrana and María Carpes. Bogotá: Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, 2017, 57–92. Online: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv86dgnp.5
Rees, Wyn, ‘America, Brexit and the security of Europe’. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19, no 3 (2017), 558–572. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117711400
Reynolds, David, ‘A ‘special relationship’? America, Britain and the international order since the Second World War’. International Affairs 62, no 1 (1985), 1–20. Online: https://doi.org/10.2307/2618063
‘The Untapped Potential of the US–Colombia Partnership: Creating a Modernized Plan for the Bilateral Relationship’. Independent Task Force Report, Washington: Atlantic Council, 2019. Online: www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/untapped-potential-us-colombia-partnership
Valášek, Tomáš, ‘European defense vs. NATO: Not the right fight’. Politico, 19 February 2018. Online: www.politico.eu/article/european-defense-vs-nato-not-the-right-fight
Weiffen, Brigitte, Leslie Wehner and Detlef Nolte, ‘Overlapping regional security institutions in South America: The case of OAS and UNASUR’. International Area Studies Review 16, no 4 (2013), 370–389. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/2233865913503466