Full Issue


object(Publication)#157 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(30) { ["id"]=> int(6045) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2022-01-10" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2022-01-17 09:39:28" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(7405) ["sectionId"]=> int(104) ["seq"]=> int(1) ["submissionId"]=> int(5921) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(633) "Cinelli, M., Quattrociocchi, W., Galeazzi, A. et al. (2020). The COVID-19 social media infodemic. Scientific Reports, 10(16598). Online: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73510-5 Hoffman, I., & Balázs, I. (2021). Administrative Law in the Time of Corona(virus): Resilience and Trust-building. Public Governance, Administration and Finances Law Review, 6(1), 35–50. Online: https://doi.org/10.53116/pgaflr.2021.1.4 Karácsony, A., & Nagypál, Sz. (2021). The Rule of Law and the Extraordinary Situation. Public Governance, Administration and Finances Law Review, 6(1), 65–72. Online: https://doi.org/10.53116/pgaflr.2021.1.6 " ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2022) ["issueId"]=> int(450) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(43) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(3) "5-6" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(24) "10.53116/pgaflr.2021.2.1" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(68) "András Koltay, Miklós Könczöl, András Lapsánszky; Tussay Ákos" } ["prefix"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["subtitle"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(37) "Privacy and Governmental Transparency" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(9) "Editorial" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(4) { [0]=> object(Author)#83 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(7454) ["email"]=> string(24) "koltay.andras@uni-nke.hu" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(6045) ["seq"]=> int(1) ["userGroupId"]=> int(286) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4991-4343" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Koltay" } ["givenName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(7) "András" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } [1]=> object(Author)#877 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(7456) ["email"]=> string(20) "konczol.miklos@tk.hu" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(6045) ["seq"]=> int(1) ["userGroupId"]=> int(286) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8789-4291" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(9) "Könczöl" } ["givenName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(7) "Miklós" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } [2]=> object(Author)#872 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(7455) ["email"]=> string(24) "lapsanszky.andras@sze.hu" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(6045) ["seq"]=> int(1) ["userGroupId"]=> int(286) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3555-6802" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(11) "Lapsánszky" } ["givenName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(7) "András" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } [3]=> object(Author)#874 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(14) { ["id"]=> int(7405) ["email"]=> string(22) "tussay.akos@uni-nke.hu" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(6045) ["seq"]=> int(1) ["userGroupId"]=> int(275) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0592-2587" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(28) "University of Public Service" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["biography"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Tussay" ["hu_HU"]=> string(6) "Tussay" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(5) "Ákos" ["hu_HU"]=> string(5) "Ákos" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(1) { [0]=> string(9) "editorial" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#876 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(21335) ["id"]=> int(4762) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(6045) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }

Conference Proceedings

object(Publication)#791 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(29) { ["id"]=> int(5919) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2022-01-10" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2022-01-17 09:40:51" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(7245) ["sectionId"]=> int(105) ["seq"]=> int(1) ["submissionId"]=> int(5795) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(3619) "Brems, E. et al. (2014). The Belgian “burqa ban” confronted with insider realities. In E. Brems (Ed.), The Experiences of Face Veil Wearers in Europe and the Law (pp. 77–114). Cambridge University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415591 Edwards, S. S. M. (2014). No Burqas We’re French! The Wide Margin of Appreciation and the ECtHR Burqa Ruling. Denning Law Journal, 26, 246–260. Online: https://doi.org/10.5750/dlj.v26i0.931 Gabriel, S. (2014, May 14). Unsere politischen Konsequenzen aus der Google-Debatte. FAZ. Giles, B. (2017, August 23). Legislator to draft law to unmask protesters he compares to Ku Klux Klan. Arizona Capitol Times. Online: https://bit.ly/3kOWtok Johnson, J. H. (2001). Versailles, meet Les Halles: Masks, carnival, and the French Revolution. Representations, (73), 89–116. Online: https://doi.org/10.1525/rep.2001.73.1.89 Judkis, M. (2017, August 14). Charlottesville White Nationalist Demonstrator Loses Job at a Libertarian Hot Dog Shop. The Washington Post. Online: https://wapo.st/3DsRe5b Kahn, R. (2019a). The Long Road Back to Skokie: Returning the First Amendment to Mask Wearers. Brooklyn Journal of Law and Policy, 28 (1), 71–149. Online: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3451477 Kahn, R. (2019b). Mask bans as expressions of memory politics in the United States. Online: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3434689 Kahn, R. (2020). Masks, culture wars, and public health expertise: Confessions of a mask “expert”. University of St. Thomas Legal Studies, Working Paper, No. 20-08. Online: https://bit.ly/32i35W4 Kahn, R. (2021). “My face, my choice?” Mask mandates, bans, and burqas in the COVID age. New York University Journal of Law and Liberty, 14 (3), 651–708. Kahn, R. A. (2011). Are Muslims the new Catholics? Europe’s headscarf laws in comparative political perspective. University of St. Thomas Legal Studies, Working Paper, No. 20-08. Kashmir, J. (2020, January 18). The secretive company that may end privacy as we know it. The New York Times, updated 18 March 2021. Online: https://nyti.ms/32gMQbP Lawrence, C. V. et al. (2020). Masking up: A COVID-19 face-off between anti-mask laws and mandatory mask orders for black Americans. California Law Review, 11, 479–516. Online: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3695257 Mastrangelo, D. (2021, April 27). Tucker Carlson: “Contact child protective services” if you see kids wearing masks outdoors. The Hill. Online: https://bit.ly/3nuKk9U Mechoulan, S. (2018). The case against the face-veil: A European perspective. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 16 (4), 1267–1292. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moy099 Michaels, R. (2018). Banning burqas: The perspective of postsecular comparative law. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, 28, 213–245. Mitsutoshi H. (2014). Why Do the Japanese Wear Masks. Electronic Journal of Contemporary Japanese Studies, 14 (2). Shakargy, S. (2020). You name it: On the cross-border regulation of names. American Journal of Comparative Law, 68 (3), 647–688. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avaa026 Skinner-Thompson, S. (2017). Performative privacy. University of California Davis Law Review, 50 (4), 1673–1740. Solove, D. J., & Schwarz, P. M. (Eds.) (2017). Information Privacy Law. Aspen. Strucke, J. (2006, October 6). Straw: “I’d rather no one wore veils”. The Guardian. Online: https://bit.ly/3qSsTlK Westin, A. (1967). Privacy and Freedom. Atheneum. Whitman, J. Q. (2004). The two Western cultures of privacy: Dignity versus liberty. Yale Law Journal, 113, 1151–1221. Online: https://doi.org/10.2307/4135723" ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2021) ["issueId"]=> int(450) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(43) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(4) "7-20" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(25) "10.53116/ pgaflr.2021.2.2" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(922) "

The “living together” concept poses a puzzle. Why did Europeans decide that life in a modern democracy requires showing one’s face? One explanation is opposition to Muslims and Islam. But the enforcement of face veil bans against non-religious mask wearing raises doubts. This essay poses an alternative explanation. What if the face veil bans persist because of European conceptions of privacy? Von Hannover v. Germany held that one be private in public. Given this, why wear a mask? What is there to hide? To explore this idea, the essay turns to the United States, where one cannot be “private in public” and mask wearing has been opposed on narrow grounds such as public security and the content of specific masks. At the same time, the United States respects the decisional privacy of someone to wear a mask even for “irrational” reasons, something the “living together” idea tends to ignore.

" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(11) "Robert Kahn" } ["subtitle"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(35) "What’s Privacy Got to Do with It?" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(47) "Masks, Face Veil Bans and “Living Together”" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(Author)#834 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(7245) ["email"]=> string(19) "rakahn@stthomas.edu" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(5919) ["seq"]=> int(1) ["userGroupId"]=> int(286) ["country"]=> string(2) "US" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7246-9252" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(23) "Saint Thomas University" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["biography"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(4) "Kahn" ["hu_HU"]=> string(4) "Kahn" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Robert" ["hu_HU"]=> string(6) "Robert" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(5) { [0]=> string(5) "masks" [1]=> string(10) "face veils" [2]=> string(16) " living together" [3]=> string(7) "privacy" [4]=> string(23) "Von Hannover v. Germany" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#847 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(20637) ["id"]=> int(4739) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(5919) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }
object(Publication)#845 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(29) { ["id"]=> int(5918) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2021-11-30" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2022-01-17 09:42:17" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(7244) ["sectionId"]=> int(105) ["seq"]=> int(2) ["submissionId"]=> int(5794) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(2891) "Aougab, T. et al. (2020). Letter to American Mathematics Society Notices: Boycott collaboration to police. Online: https://bit.ly/312vLls Calo, R. (2018). Artificial Intelligence Policy: A Primer and Roadmap. University of Bologna Law Review, 3 (2), 180–218. Online: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3015350 Chalmers, D. (2010). The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 17 (9–10), 7–65. Davidson, R. (2019, August 8). Automated Threat Detection and the Future of Policing. US FBI Bulletin. Deeks, A. S. (2018). Predicting Enemies. Virginia Law Review, 104 (8). First Report of the Axon Artificial Intelligence and Policing Technology Ethics Board, June 2019. Franke, K. & Srihari, S. N. (2007, August 29–31). Computational Forensics: Towards Hybrid-Intelligent Crime Investigation. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Information Assurance and Security. Online: https://doi.org/10.1109/IAS.2007.84 Gotterbarn, D., Miller, K. & Rogerson, S. (1997). Software engineering code of ethics. Communications of the ACM, 40 (11), 110–118. Online: https://doi.org/10.1145/265684.265699 Gouvernement de France (2020, June 17). Launch of the Global Partnership on Artificial Intelligence. Online: https://bit.ly/3r6jxTz Keneally, E. et al. (2012, August 3). The Menlo Report: Ethical Principles Guiding Information and Communication Technology Research. Online: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2445102 Makker, S. R. (2017). Overcoming “Foggy” Notions of Privacy: How Data Minimization Will Enable Privacy in the Internet of Things. UMKC Law Review, 85 (4), 895–915. Office of the Inspector General (2019, June 12). Review of Selected Los Angeles Police Department Data-Driver Policing Strategies. Online: https://bit.ly/3cIfEvJ O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Mass Destruction. Crown Publishing. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2020, June 15). OCED to host Secretariat of new Global Partnership on Artificial Intelligence. Online: https://bit.ly/3l89BFl Uberti, D. (2020, June 1). Algorithms Used in Policing Face Policy Review. Artificial Intelligence Daily, Wall Street Journal. Yampolskiy, R. V. (2012a). Leakproofing the Singularity Artificial Intelligence Confinement Problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 19 (1–2), 194–214. Yampolskiy, R. V. (2012b). Artificial Intelligence Safety Engineering: Why Machine Ethics Is a Wrong Approach. In V. C. Müller (Ed.), Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence (pp. 389–396). Springer. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31674-6_29 Yampolskiy, R. V. & Fox, J. (2013). Safety Engineering for Artificial General Intelligence. Topoi, 32 (2), 217–226. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-012-9128-9 Yemini, M. (2018). The New Irony of Free Speech. Columbia Science and Technology Law Review, 20 (1). Online: https://doi.org/10.7916/stlr.v20i1.4769" ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2021) ["issueId"]=> int(450) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(43) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(5) "21-34" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(24) "10.53116/pgaflr.2021.2.3" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(566) "

Pattern recognition, machine learning and artificial intelligence offer tremendous opportunities for efficient operations, management and governance. They can optimise processes for object, text, graphics, speech and pattern recognition. In doing so the algorithmic processing may be subject to unknown biases that do harm rather than good. We examine how this may happen, what damage may occur and the resulting ethical/legal impact and newly manifest obligations to avoid harm to others from these systems. But what are the risks, given the Human Condition?

" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(15) "Michael Losavio" } ["subtitle"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(99) "Risks in Pattern Recognition, Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence for Justice and Fairness" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(31) "Algorithms of Machines and Law:" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(Author)#885 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(7244) ["email"]=> string(30) "michael.losavio@louisville.edu" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(5918) ["seq"]=> int(2) ["userGroupId"]=> int(286) ["country"]=> string(2) "US" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4542-8599" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(24) "University of Louisville" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["biography"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(7) "Losavio" ["hu_HU"]=> string(7) "Losavio" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(7) "Michael" ["hu_HU"]=> string(7) "Michael" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(7) { [0]=> string(19) "pattern recognition" [1]=> string(23) "artificial intelligence" [2]=> string(10) "governance" [3]=> string(10) "management" [4]=> string(7) "justice" [5]=> string(6) "ethics" [6]=> string(15) "human condition" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#892 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(20638) ["id"]=> int(4740) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(5918) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }
object(Publication)#882 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(28) { ["id"]=> int(5957) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2022-01-10" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2022-01-17 09:43:58" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(7294) ["sectionId"]=> int(105) ["seq"]=> int(3) ["submissionId"]=> int(5833) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(7271) "Abrahamsson, O. (2006). Integritetsskyddet i lagstiftningen. Svensk Juristtidning, pp. 410–424. Ackerman, J. M. & Sandoval-Ballesteros, I. E. (2006). The Global Explosion of Freedom of Information Laws. Administrative Law Review, 58(1), 85–130. Online: https://bit.ly/31blx1P Andersson, C. (2004). Tudelad trots allt: dualismens överlevnad i den svenska staten 1718–1987. Statsvetenskapliga institutionen, Stockholms universitet. Axberger, H.-G. (2014). JO – i riksdagens tjänst. Elanders. Axberger, H.-G. (2017). Yttrandefrihetsgrundlagarna (3rd edition). Wolters Kluwer. Axberger, H.-G. (2020). Rättigheter I. Svensk Juristtidning, pp. 759–786. Bohlin, A. (2015). Offentlighetsprincipen (8th edition). Stockholm: Norstedts förlag. Bull, T. (1999). Självständighet och pluralism – om vertikal maktdelning i Sverige. In L. Marcusson (Ed.), Festskrift till Fredrik Sterzel (pp. 107–133). Iustus. Bull, T. (2013). Global governance; need for a new theory or the return of an old friend? In A.-S. Lind & J. Reichel (Eds.), Administrative law beyond the state: Nordic Perspectives (pp. 230–239). Nijhoff Publishers. Bull, T. & Sterzel, F. (2015). Regeringsformen: En kommentar (3rd edition). SNS förlag. Chamberlain, J. (2020). Integritet och skadestånd: Om skyddet för personuppgifter och privatliv i svensk rätt. Iustus. D’Arcy, M., Nistotskaya, M. & Elis, R. (2015). State-building, democracy and taxation: Why Ireland will never be Sweden. University of Tokyo Journal of Law and Politics, 12(Summer), 110–123. Edquist, S. (2017). Ethical Destruction? Privacy concerns regarding Swedish social services records. In P. Jonason & A. Rosengren (Eds.), The Right to access to information and the right to privacy. A democratic balancing act (pp. 11–39). Södertörns högskola. Edling, N. (2013). The Primacy of Welfare Politics. Notes on the language of the Swedish Social Democrats and their adversaries in the 1930s. In H. Haggrén, J. Rainio-Niemi & J. Vauhkonen (Eds.), Multi-layered Historicity of the Present: Approaches to Social Science History (pp. 125–150). University of Helsinki. Enzell, M. (2002). Requiem for a Constitution: Constitutionalism and Political Culture in Early 20th Century Sweden. Stockholm University. Friberg von Sydow, R. (2017). Medical Records – the different Data Carriers Used in Sweden from the End of the 19th Century Until Today and Their Impact on Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability. In P. Jonason & A. Rosengren (Eds.), The Right to Access to Information and the Right to Privacy. A democratic balancing act (pp. 41– 60). Södertörns högskola. Gartner, D. (2013). Uncovering Bretton Woods: Conditional Transparency, the World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund. George Washington International Law Review, 45, 121–148. Hall, P. (2016). The Swedish Administrative Model. In J. Pierre (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Swedish Politics (pp. 299–314). Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199665679.013.17 Hirschfeldt, J. (2017). Free Access to Public Documents – A Heritage From 1766. In A.-S. Lind, J. Reichel & I. Österdahl (Eds.), Transparency in the Future – Swedish Openness 250 Years (pp. 21–28). Ragulka. Jacobsson, B. & Sundström, G. (2016). Governing the State. In J. Pierre (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Swedish Politics (pp. 348–362). Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199665679.013.20 Kingsbury, B. (2009). The Concept of ‘Law’ in Global Administrative Law. The European Journal of International Law, 20(1), 23–57. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chp005 Kumlien, M. (2019). Professorspolitik och samhällsförändring. En rättshistorisk undersökning av den svenska förvaltningsrättens uppkomst. Stockholm: Institutet för rättshistorisk forskning. Lind, A.-S. (2009). Sociala rättigheter i förändring: En konstitutionellrättslig studie. Iustus. Lind, A.-S. (2015). Sweden: Free Press as a First Fundamental Right. In M. Suksi, M. Nowak, K. Agapiou-Josephides & J.-P. Lehners (Eds.), First Fundamental Rights Documents in Europe. Commemorating 800 Years of Magna Carta (pp. 151–162). Intersentia. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780685281.013 Lindvall, J. & Rothstein, B. (2006). Sweden: The Fall of the Strong State. Scandinavian Political Studies, 29(1), 47–63. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2006.00141.x Öman, S. (2006). Särskilda registerförfattningar. In C. Magnusson Sjöberg & P. Wahlgren (Eds.), Festskrift till Peter Seipel (pp. 685–705). Norstedts juridik. Österdahl, I. (1998). Openness v. Secrecy: Public Access to Documents in Sweden and the European Union. European Law Review, 23(4), 336–356. Österdahl, I. (2015). Transparency versus secrecy in an international context: a Swedish dilemma. In A.-S. Lind, J. Reichel & I. Österdahl (Eds.), Information and Law in Transition: Freedom of Speech, the Internet, Privacy and Democracy in the 21st Century (pp. 74–99). Liber. Reichel, J. (2018). Public Access or Data Protection as a Guiding Principle in the EU’s Composite Administration? An Analysis of the ReNEUAL Model Code in the Light of Swedish and European Case law. In P. Wahlgren (Ed.), 50 Years of Law and IT (pp. 285–308). Jure. Reichel, J. (2020a). Transparency and Openness. In P. Cane, H. C. H. Hofmann, E. C. Ip & P. L. Lindseth (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Administrative Law (pp. 935–956). Oxford University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198799986.013.52 Reichel, J. (2020b). What is it the public has a right to know? The right to privacy for public officials and the right of access to official documents – European and Swedish perspectives. In A. Koltay & P. Wragg (Eds.), Comparative Privacy and Defamation: Research Handbook in Comparative Law (pp. 112–129). Edward Elgar Publishing. Online: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788970594.00014 Rothstein, B. (2020). Myndigheter att lita på. Den svenska demokratins grundbult. In L. Sandström & C. Peterson (Eds.), Den svenska förvaltningsmodellen (pp. 44–77). Institutet för rättshistorisk forskning. Rynning, E. (2007). Public Trust and Privacy in Shared Electronic Health Records. European Journal of Health Law, 14(2), 105–112. Online: https://doi.org/10.1163/092902707X211668 Stenbeck, M., Eaker Fält, S. & Reichel, J. (2021): Swedish law on personal data in biobank research: permissible but complex. In S. Slokenberga, O. Tzortzatou & J. Reichel (Eds.), Individual Rights, the Public Interest and Biobank Research – Article 89 GDPR and European Legal Responses (pp. 379–394). Springer International. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49388-2_21 Sterzel, F. (2009). Författning i utveckling: Tjugo studier kring Sveriges författning (2nd edition). Iustus. Taube, C. (2004). Regeringsformen: positiv rätt eller redskap för rättshaverister? In E. Smith & O. Petersson (Eds.), Konstitutionell demokrati (pp. 42–70). SNS förlag. Warnling-Nerep, W. (2008). Rätten till domstolsprövning och rättsprövning (3rd edition). Stockholm Jure. Zamboni, M. (2019). The Positioning of the Supreme Courts in Sweden – A Democratic Oddity? European Constitutional Law Review, 15(4), 668–690. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019619000361" ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2022) ["issueId"]=> int(450) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(43) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(5) "35-52" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(24) "10.53116/pgaflr.2021.2.4" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(1161) "

Sweden has a long tradition of transparency and keeping public archives and registries for the benefit of the society at large. Access to comprehensive public information, including registries with containing individualised data, has been an integral part in the building of the Swedish welfare state. An important explanatory factor for the acceptance of is the high level of social trust in the Swedish society, in that citizens to a large extent trust each other, the government and the public authorities and other institutions in the society. Over the last few decades, changes have taken place connected to digitalisation of the society and an increased awareness of the possible privacy intrusion that may follow. A number of Swedish “register scandals” have been unearthed in media, involving both private and public entities. In order to protect the Swedish cultural heritage of accessible archives and public information and retain social trust, the Swedish legislator should carefully balance the interest in transparency against the right to privacy and data protection following case law of the European Court of Human Rights and EU law.

" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(33) "Jane Reichel, Johanna Chamberlain" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(102) "Public Registries as Tools for Realising the Swedish Welfare State – Can the State still Be Trusted?" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(2) { [0]=> object(Author)#899 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(7294) ["email"]=> string(28) "jane.reichel@juridicum.su.se" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(5957) ["seq"]=> int(3) ["userGroupId"]=> int(286) ["country"]=> string(2) "SE" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7509-4804" ["url"]=> string(91) "https://www.su.se/english/profiles/reich-1.379854?open-collapse-boxes=research-publications" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(47) "a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:21:"Stockholm University ";}" ["hu_HU"]=> string(47) "a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:21:"Stockholm University ";}" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(90) "

Professor in Administrative Law

Faculty of Law

Stockholm University

" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(7) "Reichel" ["hu_HU"]=> string(7) "Reichel" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(4) "Jane" ["hu_HU"]=> string(4) "Jane" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(12) "Jane Reichel" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } [1]=> object(Author)#891 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(7295) ["email"]=> string(29) "johanna.chamberlain@fek.uu.se" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(5957) ["seq"]=> int(3) ["userGroupId"]=> int(286) ["country"]=> string(2) "SE" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0473-2076" ["url"]=> string(42) "https://katalog.uu.se/profile/?id=N12-1188" ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(18) "Uppsala University" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(112) "

Post doc at the Department of Business Studies

Uppsala University

" } ["familyName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(11) "Chamberlain" } ["givenName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(7) "Johanna" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(19) "Johanna Chamberlain" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(7) { [0]=> string(12) "Transparency" [1]=> string(10) "Registries" [2]=> string(8) "Archives" [3]=> string(7) "Privacy" [4]=> string(15) "Data protection" [5]=> string(12) "Social trust" [6]=> string(20) "Freedom of the Press" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#893 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(21336) ["id"]=> int(4763) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(5957) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }
object(Publication)#896 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(28) { ["id"]=> int(5920) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2022-01-10" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2022-01-17 09:45:54" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(7246) ["sectionId"]=> int(105) ["seq"]=> int(4) ["submissionId"]=> int(5796) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(3919) "American Civil Liberties Union (2021). 2019 Proved We Can Stop Face Recognition Surveillance. Online: https://bit.ly/3oHLNJB Amsterdam, A. G. (1974). Perspectives on the Fourth Amendment. Minnesota Law Review, 58, 349–477. Basha, R. M. (2003). Kyllo v. United States: The Fourth Amendment triumphs over technology. Brandeis L. J., 41, 939. BBC (2010, October 13). 7 July bombers spotted on CCTV after exhaustive hunt. Online: www.bbc.com/news/uk-11534951 Bennett, W. C. (2014). Civilian drones, privacy, and the federal-state balance. The Brookings Institution. Online: https://brook.gs/3cv40UM Blakley, A. F., Garrie, D. B., & Armstrong, M. J. (2005). Coddling spies: Why the law doesn’t adequately address computer spyware. Duke Law & Technology Review, 25 (1). Broberg, J. (2001). From CALEA to Carnivore: How Uncle Sam Conscripted Private Industry in Order to Wiretape Digital Telecommunications. North Dakota Law Review, 77 (4), 795–825. CB Insights (2020, January 9). 38 ways drones will impact society: From fighting war to forecasting weather, UAVs change everything. Online: https://bit.ly/3kTEDR8 CNN (2020, June 18). 7 July 2005 London Bombings Fast Facts. Online: https://cnn.it/3qQOI5f Collins, T. (2019, December 23). Facial recognition: Do you really control how your face is being used? USA Today. Electronic Privacy Information Center (s. a.). Next Generation Identification – FBI. Online: https://epic.org/privacy/fbi/ngi.html Foley, J. (2007). Are Google searches private? An originalist interpretation of the Fourth Amendment in online communication cases. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 22 (1), 447–475. Greenberg, A. (2010, September 9). Scanner vans allow drive-by snooping. Forbes. Online: https://bit.ly/3cvMlMV Harwell, D., & Timberg, C. (2021, April 2). How America’s surveillance networks helped the FBI catch the Capitol mob. The Washington Post. Online: https://wapo.st/3qRN57j Higgins, H. (2020, January 20). Search and rescue teams use drone to help injured hiker in Southern Utah. Fox 13. Online: https://bit.ly/3cpiq98 Human Rights Watch (s. a.). Mass Surveillance in China. Online: https://bit.ly/3DywxVw IFSEC Global (2021). Role of CCTV Cameras: Public, Privacy and Protection. Online: https://bit.ly/3kQ5VYN Kelly, H. (2013, April 26). After Boston: The pros and cons of surveillance cameras. CNN Business. Online: https://cnn.it/2Z0xff4 Laperruque, J., & Janovsky, D. (2018, September 25). These police drones are watching you. Project on Government Oversight. Online: https://bit.ly/30EaWw8 O’Brien, S. (2020, March 9). Time to face up to Big Brother. New Haven Independent. Online: https://bit.ly/3qQBe9C Orwell, G. (1949). Nineteen Eighty-Four. Secker & Warburg. Peters, J. (2020, June 8). IBM will no longer offer, develop, or research facial recognition technology. The Verge. Online: https://bit.ly/3x13Q0S Plautz, J. (2019, September 23). Six US cities top list of world’s most surveilled. Smart Cities Dive. Online: https://bit.ly/3x4zo5X Romero, D. (2018, December 4). NYPD to deploy drone fleet, stoking fears of Big Brother. U.S. News. Online: https://nbcnews.to/3Hy3gN4 Slobogin, Ch. (2002). Public Privacy: Camera Surveillance of Public Places and the Right to Anonymity. Mississippi Law Journal, 72, 213–299. Online: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.364600 Sullivan, G. P. (2013, July 9). Big Brother’s tracking shines light on emerging facial recognition technology. Forbes. Online: https://bit.ly/3oIp7sx Temple-Raston, D., & Smith, R. (2007, July 8). U.S. Eyes U.K.’s Surveillance Cameras. National Public Radio. Online: https://n.pr/3cufOqo Weaver, R. L. (2019). From Gutenberg to the Internet: Free Speech, Advancing Technology and the Implications for Democracy. 2nd ed. Carolina Academic Press. Weaver, R. L. (2011). The James Otis Lecture: The Fourth Amendment, Privacy and Advancing Technology. Mississippi Law Journal, 80, 1131–1227." ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2021) ["issueId"]=> int(450) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(43) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(5) "53-65" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(24) "10.53116/pgaflr.2021.2.5" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(1043) "

Over the centuries, new forms of surveillance technology have emerged. At the founding of the U.S., the government did not have sophisticated spying and surveillance technologies at its disposal. In the eighteenth century, the police might have tried to eavesdrop on their fellow citizens in taverns or other public settings, or they might have listened outside a suspect’s window. However, without the advanced technologies that exist today, the opportunities for successful eavesdropping were very limited. Today, surveillance technologies have gone high tech, creating Orwellian possibilities for snooping. As one commentator observed as far back as 1974, “rapid technological advances and the consequent recognition of the ‘frightening paraphernalia which the vaunted marvels of an electronic age may visit upon human society’ have underlined the possibility of worse horrors yet to come”. This article examines how the U.S. courts are dealing with three different types of technology: CCTV, facial recognition and drones.

" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(14) "Russell Weaver" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(81) "The Constitutional Implications of Drones, Facial Recognition Technology and CCTV" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(Author)#904 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(14) { ["id"]=> int(7246) ["email"]=> string(26) "russ.weaver@louisville.edu" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(5920) ["seq"]=> int(4) ["userGroupId"]=> int(286) ["country"]=> string(2) "US" ["orcid"]=> string(0) "" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(24) "University of Louisville" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["biography"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Weaver" ["hu_HU"]=> string(6) "Weaver" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(7) "Russell" ["hu_HU"]=> string(7) "Russell" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(4) { [0]=> string(18) "search and seizure" [1]=> string(10) "technology" [2]=> string(12) "surveillance" [3]=> string(21) "police investigations" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#906 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(20639) ["id"]=> int(4741) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(5920) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }


object(Publication)#82 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(28) { ["id"]=> int(5909) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2022-01-10" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2022-01-17 09:51:11" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(7230) ["sectionId"]=> int(31) ["seq"]=> int(1) ["submissionId"]=> int(5785) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(3647) "Báthory, Zs. (2005). Az IMD és a Weforum versenyképességi jelentéseinek struktúrája és módszertani háttere. Műhelytanulmány (working paper). Budapest, Vállalatgazdaságtan Intézet. Departmental Improvement Plans. GOV.UK. (2015). Online: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/departmental-improvement-plans De Kerviler, I. (2011). La compétitivité: enjeu d’un nouveau modèle de développement. Journal officiel de la République française, 20– 25. Online: https://www.lecese.fr/sites/default/files/pdf/Avis/2011/2011_11_competitivite.pdf Fogarasi, J. (1995). A közigazgatás személyi állománya (pp. 205–209). Unió. Európai Tanács (2011). La compétitivité: enjeu d’un nouveau modèle de développement. Online: https://www.lecese.fr/sites/default/files/votes/professions-liberales_competitivite.pdf Gajduschek, G. (2008). Közszolgálat – A magyar közigazgatás személyi állománya és személyzeti rendszere az empirikus adatok tükrében (közigazgatási olvasmányok). Magyar Közigazgatási Intézet. Gáspár, M., & Szakács, G. (2018). Munkaköralapú humánerőforrás gazdálkodás intézményesítésének nemzetközi gyakorlata (országtanulmányok) (1st ed., pp. 413–438). Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem. Hazafi, Z. (2020). Munkakör- és kompetencia-alapú stratégiai humán erőforrás gazdálkodás a francia közszolgálatban. In Gáspár, M. & Szakács, G. (Eds.), Munkaköralapú humánerőforrás gazdálkodás intézményesítésének nemzetközi gyakorlata (országtanulmányok) (pp. 413–438). Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem. Imre, M. (2009). Az állam és a közigazgatás gazdasági szerepe és feladatai. In Verebélyi, I., & Imre, M. (Eds.), Jobb közigazgatás helyben járás és visszafejlődés helyett (pp. 28–36). Századvég Kiadó. Johansen, R. (2012). Leaders Make the Future: Ten New Leadership Skills for an Uncertain World. 2nd ed. Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Linder, V. (2010). Személyzet politika – Humán stratégia a közigazgatásban (PhD thesis). Lőrincz, L. (1995). A közigazgatás létszámáról. In Fogarasi, J. (Ed.), A közigazgatás személyi állománya (pp. 205–209). Unió Lap- és Könyvkiadó Kereskedelmi Kft. Lőrincz, L. (2010). A közigazgatás alapintézményei. HVG-ORAC. Melchor, O. H. (2013). The Government Workforce of the Future: Innovation in Strategic Workforce Planning in OECD Countries. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, pp. 22–26. Online: https://doi.org/10.1787/5k487727gwvb-en Molnár L., & Udvardi A. (2016). Versenyképességi évkönyv Magyarország helyzetének változása a régiós versenyben. GKI Gazdaságkutató Zrt. és Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. OECD (2011). Public Servants as Partners for Growth: Toward a Stronger, Leaner and More Equitable Workforce. OECD Publishing. Online: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264166707-en OECD (2019). Panorama des administrations publiques 2019. Éditions OECD. Online: https://doi.org/10.1787/8be847c0-fr OECD (2021). Panorama des administrations publiques 2021. Éditions OECD. Online: https://doi.org/10.1787/9556b25a-fr Ruiz, É. (2017). Des économies très politiques. Cahiers d’histoire. Revue d’histoire critique, 134, 65–85. Online: https://doi.org/10.4000/chrhc.5753 Soliman, K. (2017). Vision 2020: Sustainable Economic development, Innovation Management, and Global Growth. Proceedings of the 30th International Business Information Management Association Conference (pp. 904–916). Madrid, IBIMA. Verebélyi, I., Miklós, M., & Gellén, J. (2009). Jobb közigazgatás helyben járás és visszafejlődés helyett (pp. 28–36). Századvég." ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2021) ["issueId"]=> int(450) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(43) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(5) "67-82" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(24) "10.53116/pgaflr.2021.2.6" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(783) "

The most significant project of governmental HRM after 2010 has been the “Strategic Support for Succession Planning in a Competitive Civil Service”. The name of the project underlines the focus placed on enhancing competitiveness and ensuring a sustainable, continuous supply of the workforce. Neither can be pursued without data-driven HR planning, so having an HRM decision support system in place is a critical element of the improvement. This study aims to address the issue of optimal headcount with regard to both domestic and foreign context, emphasise the importance of strategic HR planning and explore its results abroad. It suggests that by establishing the new HRM system, Hungary may become a country at the forefront of public service HRM and digitalisation.

" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(41) "Hazafi Zoltán, Kovácsné Szekér Enikő" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(87) "Introduction of the Personal Decision Support IT System in the Hungarian Public Service" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(2) { [0]=> object(Author)#843 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(7230) ["email"]=> string(24) "Hazafi.Zoltan@uni-nke.hu" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(5909) ["seq"]=> int(1) ["userGroupId"]=> int(286) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7931-5512" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["biography"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Hazafi" ["hu_HU"]=> string(10) "Dr. Hazafi" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(7) "Zoltán" ["hu_HU"]=> string(7) "Zoltán" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } [1]=> object(Author)#820 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(7231) ["email"]=> string(22) "szeker.eniko@bm.gov.hu" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(5909) ["seq"]=> int(1) ["userGroupId"]=> int(286) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3979-398X" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(29) "University of Public Service " } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(19) "Kovácsné Szekér " } ["givenName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Enikő" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(6) { [0]=> string(11) "HR Planning" [1]=> string(14) "Public Service" [2]=> string(25) "Human Resource Management" [3]=> string(6) "Supply" [4]=> string(14) "Digitalization" [5]=> string(10) "Statistics" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#870 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(20640) ["id"]=> int(4742) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(5909) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }

Socio-economic Governance in the EU

Orosz Ágnes, Szijártó Norbert
doi: 10.53116/pgaflr.2021.2.7
object(Publication)#79 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(28) { ["id"]=> int(6000) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2022-01-10" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2022-01-17 09:52:38" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(7343) ["sectionId"]=> int(31) ["seq"]=> int(2) ["submissionId"]=> int(5876) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(9731) "Armstrong, K. A. (2012). EU social policy and the governance architecture of Europe 2020. European Review of Labour and Research, 18(3), 285–300. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258912448600 Bache, I., Bartle, I., & Flinders, M. (2016). Multi-level Governance. In Ch. Ansell & J. Torfing (Ed.), Handbook on Theories of Governance. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham. Online: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782548508.00052 Bevir, M. (2012). Governance. A very short introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199606412.001.0001 Bongardt, A. & Torres, F. (2010). The Competitiveness Rationale, Sustainable Growth and the Need for Enhanced Economic Coordination. Intereconomics, 45(3), 136–141. Büchs, M. (2009). The open method of coordination – effectively preventing welfare state retrenchment? European Integration Online Papers (EIoP), 13(1), 1–20. Online: http://doi.org.10.1695/2009011 Caminada, K., Goudswaard, K. & Van Vliet, O. (2010). Patterns of Welfare State Indicators in the EU: Is there Convergence? Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(3), 529–556. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02063.x De Grauwe, P. (2013). The European Central Bank as Lender of Last Resort in the Government Bond Markets. CESifo Economic Studies, 59(3), 520–535. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/ift012 De la Porte, C. & Heins, E. (2015). A new era of European Integration? Governance of labour market and social policy since the sovereign debt crisis. Comparative European Politics, 13(1), 8–28. Online: https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2014.39 Dixit, A. (2003). On Modes of Economic Governance. Econometrica, 72(1), 449–481. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00415 Dixit, A. (2009). Governance Institutions and Economic Activity. American Economic Review, 99(1), 5–24. Online: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.1.5 EUR-Lex (2008). COM/2008/0418 final. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – “A renewed commitment to social Europe: Reinforcing the Open Method of Coordination for Social Protection and Social Inclusio” {SEC(2008) 2153} {SEC(2008) 2169} {SEC(2008) 2170} {SEC(2008) 2179} Online: https://bit.ly/3rHEmoH Eurofound (2010). Open method of coordination. Online: https://bit.ly/3dpDsEW European Commission (2014). Social Protection & Social Inclusion. Online: https://bit.ly/3IpktbS European Commission (2020). Communication, ‘The EU budget powering the recovery plan for Europe’. Annex thereto in a separate document, COM (2020) 442 final, 27 May 2020. European Parliament (2000). Lisbon European Council 23 and 24 March 2000: Presidency Conclusions. Online: https://bit.ly/3oqsaH1 European Parliament (2019). Economic Governance. Fact Sheets on the European Union. Online: https:// bit.ly/3Im3jMe European Parliament (2021). Social and Employment Policy: General Principles. Fact Sheets on the European Union. Online: https://bit.ly/3oqPvZa Eurostat (2014). Glossary: Open method of coordination (OMC). Eurostat. Online: https://bit.ly/3dlPgYK Eyraud, L. & Wu, T. (2015). Playing by the Rules: Reforming Fiscal Governance in Europe. IMF Working Paper No. WP/15/67. Online: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484300282.001 Farrell, H. & Newman, A. L. (2010). Making global markets: Historical institutionalism in international political economy. Review of International Political Economy, 17(4), 609–638. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/09692291003723672 Ferrera, M. (1996). The “Southern” Model of Welfare State in Social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1), 17–37. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/095892879600600102 Ferrera, M. & Rhodes, M. (2000). Building a Sustainable Welfare State. West European Politics, 23(2), 257–282. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380008425375 Fukuyama, F. (2013). What is Governance? Center for Global Development, Working Paper No. 314. Gocaj, L. & Meunier, S. (2013). Time will tell: The EFSF, the ESM and the euro crisis. Journal of European Integration, 35(3), 239–253. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2013.774778 Graziano, Paolo and Hartlapp, Miriam (2019). The end of social Europe? Understanding EU social policy change. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(10), 1484–1501. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1531911 Hall, P. A. & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x Hantrais, L. (2007). Social Policy in the European Union (3rd edition). Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke. Heise, A. (2012). Governance Without Government or, The Euro Crisis and What Went Wrong with European Economic Governance. International Journal of Political Economy, 41(2), 42–60. Online: https://doi.org/10.2753/IJP0891-1916410203 Hodson, D. & Maher, I. (2001). The Open Method as a New Mode of Governance. Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(4), 719–746. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00328 Howarth, D. & Quaglia, L. (2014). The Steep Road to European Banking Union: Constructing the Single Resolution Mechanism. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52, 125–140. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12178 Jones, E. R., Kelemen, D. & Meunier, S. (2015). Failing Forward? The Euro Crisis and the Incomplete Nature of European Integration. Comparative Political Studies, 49(7), 1010–1034. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414015617966 Kohler-Koch, B. & Rittberger, B. (2006). Review Article: The ‘Governance Turn’ in EU Studies. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(Annual Review), 27–49. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00642.x Majone, G. (1996). Regulating Europe. Routledge, London. Online: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203439197 Marks, G., Hooghe, L. & Blank, K. (1996). European Integration from the 1980s: State-centric v. Multi-level Governance. Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(3), 341–378. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1996.tb00577.x Martin, A. & Ross, G. (2004). Euros and Europeans: Monetary Integration and the European Model of Society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492020 Michalski, A. (2013). Democratic Governance and Policy Coordination in the EU. In D. G. Mayes, D. G. & A. Michalski (Eds.), The Changing Welfare State In Europe: The Implications for Democracy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Northampton, MA. Online: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782546573.00016 Milotay, N. (2020). Social governance in the European Union: Managing complex systems. In-depth Analysis, European Parliamentary Research Service. Online: https://doi.org/10.2861/81099 Monnet, J. (1976). Mémoires. Librairie Arthéme Fayard, Paris. Natali, D. (2010). The Lisbon Strategy, Europe 2020 and the crisis in between. European Social Observatory Deliverable, 4(31), 3–26. Online: https://bit.ly/31n0mux Peters, G. (1999). Institutional theory in political science – The “new institutionalism”. Pinter, London. Peters, G. & Pierre, J. (2009). Governance Approaches. In A. Wiener & T. Diez (Eds.), European Integration Theory (pp. 91–104). Oxford University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198737315.001.0001 Pierre, J. (2000). Introduction: Understanding Governance. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating Governance. Authority, Steering and Democracy. Oxford University Press. Pierson, C. (2007). Beyond the Welfare State? The New Political Economy of Welfare. Polity Press, Cambridge. Pierson, P. (1994). The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Perspective. CES Germany & Europe Working Papers No. 5.2. Online: https://bit.ly/3xWyZ62 Scharpf, F. W. (2002). The European social model: Coping with the challenges of diversity. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(4), 645–670. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00392 Scharpf, F. W. (2003). Problem-Solving Effectiveness and Democratic Accountability in the EU. Max-Planck- Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, Working Paper No. 1. Online: https://bit.ly/3pwZuLC Thelen, K. (1999). Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 369–404. Online: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369 Thelen, K. & Steinmo, S. (1992). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. In S. Steinmo, K. Thelen & F. Longstreth (Eds.), Structuring Politics – Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis (pp. 1–32). Cambridge University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511528125.002 Vanhercke, B., Ghailani, D., Spasova, S. & Pochet, P. (2020). Social policy in the European Union 1999–2019: the long and winding road. Brussels, European Trade Union Institute (ETUI) and European Social Observatory (OSE). Verdun, A. (2015). A historical institutionalist explanation of the EU’s responses to the euro area financial crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(2), 219–237. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.994023 Verdun, A. & Zeitlin, J. (2018). Introduction: the European Semester as a new architecture of EU socioeconomic governance in theory and practice. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(2), 137–148. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1363807 Zambeta, E. (2014). Education in times of crisis. Education Inquiry, 5(1), 1–6. Online: https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v5.24042 Zeitlin, J. & Vanhercke, B. (2018). Socializing the European Semester: EU social and economic policy coordination in crisis and beyond, Journal of European Public Policy, 25(2), 149–174. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1363269" ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2022) ["issueId"]=> int(450) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(43) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(6) "83-100" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(24) "10.53116/pgaflr.2021.2.7" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(1324) "

This paper focuses on the complexity of socio-economic governance in the European Union. We define socio-economic governance as the process of governing societies in a situation where no single actor can claim absolute dominance thus socio-economic governance is the outcome of the interaction between European Union institutions (European Union decision-makers) and member states (national policy-makers). Since the onset of the global financial crisis and the euro crisis a decade ago, social issues have become substantially prominent in EU governance and policy debate. Furthermore, the Covid-19 crisis brought again social issues to the fore. There is no dedicated social governance framework in the European Union but there are several mechanisms (strategies, initiatives and regulations) through which social governance is practiced. At the same time, the framework for European economic governance has substantially been strengthened as a consequence of the global financial crisis and the euro crisis and can be characterised by a matured but incomplete framework. On the one hand, this paper aims to collect and investigate all governance tools related to economic and social issues in the European Union, and on the other hand, this research examines the impacts of those governance tools on member states.

" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(32) "Orosz Ágnes, Szijártó Norbert" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(35) "Socio-economic Governance in the EU" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(2) { [0]=> object(Author)#883 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(7343) ["email"]=> string(21) "oroszagnes@uni-nke.hu" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(6000) ["seq"]=> int(2) ["userGroupId"]=> int(286) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0197-4363" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(28) "a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:3:"NKE";}" ["hu_HU"]=> string(28) "a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:3:"NKE";}" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(5) "Orosz" ["hu_HU"]=> string(5) "Orosz" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Ágnes" ["hu_HU"]=> string(6) "Ágnes" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } [1]=> object(Author)#844 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(7457) ["email"]=> string(25) "norbertszijarto@gmail.com" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(6000) ["seq"]=> int(2) ["userGroupId"]=> int(286) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7669-6583" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(10) "Szijártó" } ["givenName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(7) "Norbert" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(4) { [0]=> string(19) "economic governance" [1]=> string(13) "social policy" [2]=> string(25) "socio-economic governance" [3]=> string(14) "European Union" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#884 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(21337) ["id"]=> int(4764) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(6000) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }
object(Publication)#871 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(29) { ["id"]=> int(6024) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2022-01-10" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2022-01-17 09:54:17" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(7378) ["sectionId"]=> int(31) ["seq"]=> int(3) ["submissionId"]=> int(5900) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(16927) "Aitchison, G. (2018). Rights, citizenship and political struggle. European Journal of Political Theory, 17(1), 147–148. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885115578052 Alač, M., Movellan, J. & Tanaka, F. (2011). When a robot is social: Spatial arrangements and multimodal semiotic engagement in the practice of social robotics. Social Studies of Science, 41(6). Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312711420565 Anderson, K., Reisner, D. & Waxman, M. (2014). Adapting the Law of Armed Conflict to Autonomous Weapon Systems. International Law Studies, 90, 386–411. Online: https://bit.ly/3CvnPWG Anderson, S. L. (2008). Asimov’s “Three Laws of Robotics” and Machine Metaethics. AI and Society, 22(4), 477–493. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-007-0094-5 Armstrong, C. & Mason, A. (2011). Introduction: Democratic citizenship and its futures. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 14(5), 553–560. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2011.617118 Ashley, K. D. (2017). Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics. New Tools for Law Practice in the Digital Age. Cambridge University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316761380 Atabekov, A. & Yastrebov, O. (2018). Legal Status of Artificial Intelligence Across Countries: Legislation on the Move. European Research Studies Journal, 21(4), 773–782. Online: https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/1245 Balkin, J. B. (2015). The Path of Robotics Law. The Circuit, Paper 72. Online: https://bit.ly/3noAPsJ Barber, M. D. (2008). The Participating Citizen. Human Studies, 31(2), 229–232. Barfield, W. & Pagallo, U. (2018). Research Handbook on the Law of Artificial Intelligence. Edward Elgar Publishing. Online: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786439055 Beck, S. (2016). The Problem of Ascribing Legal Responsibility in the Case of Robotics. Artificial Intelligence and Society, 31(4), 473–481. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-015-0624-5 Bellini, P. (2016). Virtualization of the Real and Citizenship. People, Power, Society, and Persons. Philosophy and Public Issues (New Series), 6(3), 79–93. Online: https://bit.ly/30DkGqM Benhabib, S. (2006). Democratic Boundaries and Economic Citizenship. Enhancing the “Rights of Others”. Social Philosophy Today, 22, 249–260. Online: https://doi.org/10.5840/socphiltoday20062211 Brettschneider, C. (2011). Free and Equal Citizenship and Non-Profit Status. Political Theory, 39(6), 785–792. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591711419475 Brinck, I. & Balkenius, C. (2020). Mutual Recognition in Human-Robot Interaction: a Deflationary Account. Philosophy and Technology, 33(1), 1–18. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0339-x Brożek, B. & Jakubiec, M. (2017). On the legal responsibility of autonomous machines. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 25(3), 293–304. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-017-9207-8 Buchstein, H. (2000). Cybercitizens and theory of democracy. Filosofický časopis, 48(6), 973–998. Buiten, M. C. (2019). Towards Intelligent Regulation of Artificial Intelligence. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 10(1), 41–59. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2019.8 Calo, R., Froomkin, A. M. & Kerr, I. (2016). Robot Law. Edward Elgar Publishing. Online: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783476732 Castro, V. F. (2014). Shaping Robotic Minds. In J. Seibt, R. Hakli & M. Norskov (Eds.), Sociable Robots and the Future of Social Relations (pp. 71–78). IOS Press. Cerka, P., Grigiene, J. & Sirbikyte, G. (2017): Is it possible to grant legal personality to artificial intelligence software systems? Computer Law & Security Review, 33(5), 685–699. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2017.03.022 Chen, J. & Burgess, P. (2019). The boundaries of legal personhood: how spontaneous intelligence can problematise differences between humans, artificial intelligence, companies and animals. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 27(1), 73–92. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-018-9229-x Chopra, S. & Laurence, F. W. (2011). The Legal Theory of Autonomous Artificial Agents. University of Michigan Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.356801 Comstock, G. (2015). Do Machines Have Prima Facie Duties? In S. P. van Rysewyk & M. Pontier (Eds.), Machine Medical Ethics (pp. 79–92). Springer. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08108-3_6 Contissa, G., Lagioia, F. & Sartor, G. (2017). The Ethical Knob: ethically-customisable automated vehicles and the law. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 25(3), 365–378. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-017-9211-z Cuthbertson, A. (2017, November 6). Tokyo: Artificial Intelligence ‘Boy’ Shibuya Mirai Becomes World’s First AI Bot to Be Granted Residency. Tech & Science. Online: https://bit.ly/3DdzJpn Dabass, J. & Dabass, B. S. (2018). Scope of Artificial Intelligence in Law. Preprints, 2018060474. Online: https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201806.0474.v1 Dahiyat, E. A. R. (2021). Law and software agents: Are they “Agents” by the way? Artificial Intelligence and Law, 29(1), 59–86. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-020-09265-1 Danaher, J. (2016). Robots, law and the retribution gap. Ethics and Information Technology, 18(4), 299–309. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-016-9403-3 De Cock Buning, M., Belder, L. & de Bruin, R. (2012). Mapping the legal and normative framework for the sustainable development of Autonomous Intelligent Systems in Society. In S. Muller, S. Zouridis, M. Frishman & L. Kistemaker (Eds.), The Law of the Future and the Future of Law (Vol. 2, pp. 195–210). Torkel Opsahl Academic Publisher. Deva, S. (2012). Can Robots have Human Rights Obligations? A Futuristic Exploration. In S. Muller, S. Zouridis, M. Frishman & L. Kistemaker (Eds.), The Law of the Future and the Future of Law (Vol. 2, pp. 185–194). Torkel Opsahl Academic Publisher. Di Bello, M. & Verheij, B. (2020). Evidence & decision making in the law: theoretical, computational and empirical approaches. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 28(1), 1–5. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-019-09253-0 Donaldson, S. & Kymlicka, W. (2013). Reply: Animal Citizenship, Liberal Theory and the Historical Moment. Dialogue, 52(4), 769–786. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217313000863 Eidenmueller, H. G. M. (2017). The Rise of Robots and the Law of Humans. Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper, 27, 1–15. Online: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2941001 Elton, M. (1997). Robots and Rights: the ethical demands of Artificial Agents. Ends and Means, 1(2). Ferracioli, L. (2017). Citizenship Allocation and Withdrawal: Some Normative Issues. Philosophy Compass, 12(12). Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12459 Fischer, K. (2014). People do not interact with Robots like they do with dogs. Interaction Studies, 15(2), 201–204. Online: https://doi.org/10.1075/is.15.2.07fis Fossa, F. (2018a). Artificial Moral Agents: Moral Mentors or Sensible Tools? Ethics and Information Technology, 20(2), 115–126. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9451-y Fossa, F. (2018b). Legal Fictions and the Essence of Robots: Thoughts on Essentialism and Pragmatism in the Regulation of Robotics. In M. Coeckelbergh, J. Loh, M. Funk, J. Seibt & M. Nørskov (Eds.), Envisioning Robots in Society – Power, Politics, and Public Space (pp. 103–111). IOS Press. Gohd, Ch. (2018, July 11). Here’s What Sophia, the First Robot Citizen, Thinks About Gender andConsciousness. Live Science. Online: https://bit.ly/3cpGQPP Gunkel, D. J. (2018). The Other Question: Can and Should Robots Have Rights? Ethics and Information Technology, 20(2), 87–99. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-017-9442-4 Hacker, P., Krestel, R., Grundmann, S. & Naumann, F. (2020). Explainable AI under contract and tort law: legal incentives and technical challenges. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 28(4), 415–439. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-020-09260-6 Hage, J. (2017). Theoretical foundations for the responsiblity of autonomous agents. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 25(3), 255–271. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-017-9208-7 Hakli, R. & Mäkelä, P. (2016). Robots, Autonomy, and Responsibility. In J. Seibt, M. Nørskov & S. S. Andersen (Eds.), What Social Robots Can and Should Do: Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2016 (pp. 145–154). IOS Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-708-5-145 Hakli, R. & Seibt, J. (Eds.) (2017). Sociality and Normativity for Robots. Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality. Springer. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53133-5 Hallevy, G. (2013). When Robots Kill – Artificial Intelligence Under Criminal Law. Northeastern University Press. Hart, R. D. (2018, February 14). Saudi Arabia’s robot citizen is eroding human rights. Quartz. Online: https://qz.com/1205017/saudi-arabias-robot-citizen-is-eroding-human-rights/ Hovdal-Moan, M. (2014). Unequal Residence Statuses and the Ideal of Non-Domination. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 17(1), 70–89. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2013.851483 Khisamova, Z. I., Begishev, I. R. & Gaifutdinov, R. R. (2019). On Methods to Legal Regulation of Artificial Intelligence in the World. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 9(1), 5159–5162. Online: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.A9220.119119 Kingston, J. (2017). Using artificial intelligence to support compliance with the general data protection regulation. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 25(3), 429–443. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-017-9206-9 Lindemann, G. (2016). Social interaction with robots: three questions. AI & Society, 31, 573–575. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-015-0633-4 Luetge, Ch. (2017). The German Ethics Code for Automated and Connected Driving. Philosophy and Technology, 30( 4), 547–558. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0284-0 MacDorman, K. F. & Kahn, P. H. Jr. (2007). Introduction to the Special Issue on Psychological Benchmarks of Human–Robot Interaction. Interaction Studies, 8(3), 359–362. Online: https://doi.org/10.1075/is.8.3.02mac Magrani, E. (2019). New perspectives on ethics and the laws of artificial intelligence. Internet Policy Review, 8(3), 1–19. Online: https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.3.1420 McFarland, D., Bosser, T., Cherian, S. & Troxell, W. O. (1997). Intelligent behavior in animals and robots. Minds and Machines, 7(3), 452–455. Online: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008253713397 Miller, L. F. (2015). Granting Automata Human Rights: Challenge to a Basis of Full-Rights Privilege. Human Rights Review, 16(4), 369–391. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-015-0387-x Mitterauer, B. J. (2013). Robots with Consciousness: Creating a Third Nature. International Journal of Machine Consciousness, 5(2), 179–193. Online: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793843013500054 Müller, V. C. (2021). Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 Edition). Online: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/ethics-ai/ Nomura, T., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T. & Kato, K. (2006). Measurement of Negative Attitudes Toward Robots. Interaction Studies, 7(3), 437–454. Online: https://doi.org/10.1075/is.7.3.14nom Nurse, A. & Ryland, D. (2013). A question of citizenship. Journal of Animal Ethics, 3(2), 201–207. Online: https://doi.org/10.5406/janimalethics.3.2.0201 Palmerini, E., Bertolini, A., Battaglia, F., Koops, B.-J., Carnevale, A. & Salvini, P. (2016). RoboLaw: Towards a European framework for robotics regulation. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 86, 78–85. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2016.08.026 Perina, M. L. (2006). Race and the Politics of Citizenship: The Conflict Over Jus Soli and Jus Sanguinis. International Studies in Philosophy, 38(2), 123–139. Online: https://doi.org/10.5840/intstudphil20063827 Rem, D. & Gasper, D. (2018). Citizens and Citizenship. International Journal of Social Quality, 8(1), 21–48. Online: https://doi.org/10.3167/IJSQ.2018.080103 Retto, J. (2017). Sophia, First Citizen Robot of the World. Manuscript. Online: https://bit.ly/3nrcLWl Reynolds, E. (2018, June 1). The agony of Sophia, the world’s first robot citizen condemned to a lifeless career in marketing. Wired. Online: https://bit.ly/3wNMzbl Rose, R., Scheutz, M. & Schermerhorn, P. (2010). Towards a Conceptual and Methodological Framework for Determining Robot Believability. Interaction Studies: Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 11(2), 314–335. Online: https://doi.org/10.1075/is.11.2.21ros Schellekens, M. (2015). Self-driving cars and the chilling effect of liability law. Computer Law & Security Review, 31(4), 506–517. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2015.05.012 Scherer, M. U. (2016). Regulating Artificial Intelligence Systems: Risks, Challenges, Competencies, and Strategies. Harvard Review of Law and Technology, 29(2), 354–400. Online: https://bit.ly/30uHs4g Schwitzgebel, E. & Garza, M. (2015). A Defense of the Rights of Artificial Intelligences. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 39(1), 98–119. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/misp.12032 Sharkey, A. (2014). Robots and Human Dignity: A Consideration of the Effects of Robot Care on the Dignity of Older People. Ethics and Information Technology, 16(1), 63–75. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-014-9338-5 Simmler, M. & Markwalder, N. (2019). Guilty Robots? – Rethinking the Nature of Culpability and Legal Personhood in an Age of Artificial Intelligence. Criminal Law Forum, 30(1), 1–31. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-018-9360-0 Solaiman, S. M. (2017). Legal personality of robots, corporations, idols and chimpanzees: a quest for legitimacy. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 25(2), 155–179. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-016-9192-3 Solum, L. B. (1992). Legal Personhood for Artificial Intelligences. North Carolina Law Review, 70(4), 1231–1287. Online: https://unc.live/30pRvYm Stone, Z. (2017, November 7). Everything You Need To Know About Sophia, The World’s First Robot Citizen. Forbes. Online: https://bit.ly/3H9joUV Verheij, B. (2020). Artificial intelligence as law. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 28(1), 181–206. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-020-09266-0 Veruggio, G. & Operto, F. (2006). Roboethics: A Bottom-Up Interdisciplinary Discourse in the Field of Applied Ethics in Robotics. International Review of Information Ethics, 6, 2–8. Online: https://doi.org/10.29173/irie133 Wallach, W. & Allen, C. (2010). Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong. Oxford University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195374049.001.0001 Walsh, A. (2017, October 28). Saudi Arabia grants citizenship to robot Sophia. Deutsche Welle. Online: https://bit.ly/3wLZgU6 Weller, Ch. (2017, October 26). A robot that once said it would ‘destroy humans’ just became the first robot citizen. Insider. Online: https://bit.ly/324KGvN Wheeler, B. (2017). Giving Robots a Voice: Testimony, Intentionality, and the Law. In S. Thompson (Ed.), Androids, Cyborgs, and Robots in Contemporary Society and Culture (pp. 1–34). Hershey. Online: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2973-6.ch001 Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C. & Geyer, C. (2018). Artificial Intelligence and the Public Sector – Applications and Challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596–615. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103 Wirtz, B. W. & Müller, W. M. (2018). An integrated artificial intelligence framework for public management. Public Management Review, 21(7), 1076–1100. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1549268 Zebrowski, N. (2007, December 3). Dr. Sobel on Personhood and Rights. Northwestern Chronicle. Legal sources Draft Report with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)) (31 May 2016). European Parliament, Committee on Legal Affairs. Online: https://bit.ly/3n1yTXb Regulation 679/2016. The protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). European Parliament and Council. Online: https://bit.ly/3wzBPx8 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions (30 November 2016). A European Strategy on Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems, a Milestone Towards Cooperative, Connected and Automated Mobility. Online: https://bit.ly/3n3WTc1 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions (17 May 2018). Europe on the Move. Sustainable Mobility for Europe: Safe, Connected, and Clean. Online: https://bit.ly/3kt5aVi" ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2022) ["issueId"]=> int(450) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(43) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(7) "101-119" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(24) "10.53116/pgaflr.2021.2.8" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(2333) "

The Collingridge dilemma or ‘dilemma of control’ presents a problem at the intersection of law, society and technology. New technologies can still be influenced, whether by regulation or policy, in their early stage of development, but their impact on society remains unpredictable. In contrast, once new technologies have become embedded in society, their implications and consequences are clear, but their development can no longer be affected. Resulting in the great challenge of the pacing problem – how technological development increasingly outpaces the creation of appropriate laws and regulations. My paper examines the problematic entanglement and relationship of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and a key aspect of the rule of law, legal certainty. AI is our modern age’s fastest developing and most important technological advancement, a key driver for global socio-economic development, encompassing a broad spectrum of technologies between simple automation and autonomous decision-making. It has the potential to improve healthcare, transportation, communication and to contribute to climate change mitigation. However, its development carries an equal amount of risk, including opaque decision-making, gender-based or other kinds of discrimination, intrusion into private lives and misuse for criminal purposes. The transformative nature of AI technology impacts and challenges law and policymaking. The paper considers the impact of AI through legal certainty on the rule of law, how it may undermine its various elements, among others foreseeability, comprehensibility and clarity of norms. It does so by elaborating on AI’s potential threat brought on by its opacity (‘black box effect’), complexity, unpredictability and partially autonomous behaviour, which all can impede the effective verification of compliance with and the enforcement of new as well as already existing legal rules in international, European and national systems. My paper offers insight into a human-centric and risk-based approach towards AI, based on consideration of legal and ethical questions surrounding the topic, to help ensure transparency and legal certainty in regulatory interventions for the benefit of optimising efficiency of new technologies as well as protecting the existing safeguards of legal certainty.

" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(27) "Szentgáli-Tóth Boldizsár" } ["subtitle"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(75) "Could artificial intelligences be subject to the same laws as human beings?" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(71) "The source of unexplored opportunities or an unpredictable risk factor?" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(Author)#895 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(14) { ["id"]=> int(7378) ["email"]=> string(30) "szentgali-toth.boldizsar@tk.hu" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(6024) ["seq"]=> int(3) ["userGroupId"]=> int(286) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5637-8991" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(26) "Centre for Social Sciences" ["hu_HU"]=> string(26) "Centre for Social Sciences" } ["biography"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(16) "Szentgáli-Tóth" ["hu_HU"]=> string(16) "Szentgáli-Tóth" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(10) "Boldizsár" ["hu_HU"]=> string(10) "Boldizsár" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(5) { [0]=> string(23) "artificial intelligence" [1]=> string(17) "modern technology" [2]=> string(16) "legal personhood" [3]=> string(13) "human dignity" [4]=> string(11) "rule of law" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#888 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(21338) ["id"]=> int(4765) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(6024) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }
object(Publication)#848 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(28) { ["id"]=> int(6029) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2022-01-10" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2022-01-17 09:55:50" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(7386) ["sectionId"]=> int(31) ["seq"]=> int(4) ["submissionId"]=> int(5905) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(6364) "Ádám, A. (2000). Az önkormányzati rendszer alkotmányi összefüggéseiről. In I. Verebélyi (Ed.), Egy évtized önkormányzati mérlege és a jövő kilátásai. MKI & MTA PTI & MTA RKK. Árva, Zs. (2014). A helyi önkormányzás alkotmányos keretei, szervezeti rendszere, az önkormányzatok típusai Magyarországon. In I. Balázs (Ed.), Helyi önkormányzatok. Debreceni Egyetemi Kiadó. Balázs, I. (2014). Új tendenciák a helyi önkormányzati rendszer szabályozásában Magyarországon és az Európai Unió tagországaiban. In I. Balázs (Ed.), Helyi önkormányzatok. Debreceni Egyetemi Kiadó. Berényi, J. (2003). Az európai közigazgatási rendszerek intézményei. Rejtjel. Berthet, T. & Cuntigh, P. (2006). Local Mirrors of State Modernisation: The Case of the Territorialisation of Employment Policy in France. In V. Hoffmann-Martinot & H. Wollmann (Eds.), State and Local Government Reforms in France and Germany. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90271-5_10 Constant, B. (1997). A régiek és a modernek szabadsága. Atlantisz. Constant, B. (1862). Az alkotmányos politica tana. Trattner–Károlyi. Constant, B. (1836). Cours de politique constitutionnelle, ed. by Jean-Pierre Pagès. Didier. Csalló, K. (2014). Önkormányzás, autonómia. A helyi önkormányzatok szabályozási típusai Európában. In Cs. Feik, (Ed.), Magyarország helyi önkormányzatai. NKE KTK. Csink, L. (2014). Mozaikok a hatalommegosztáshoz. Pázmány Press. Dezső, M. & Somody, B. (2007). A szuverenitás. In I. Kukorelli (Ed.), Alkotmánytan I. Alapfogalmak, alkotmányos intézmények. Osiris. Ereky, I. (1932). Közigazgatási reform és a nagyvárosok önkormányzata. Budapest Székesfőváros Házinyomdája. Ereky, I. (1939). Közigazgatás és önkormányzat. Szeged Városi Nyomda és Könyvkiadó. Erdős, Cs. & Smuk, P. (2017). Parlament és hatalommegosztás. In P. Takács (Ed.), Unitas multiplex. Ünnepi tanulmányok Szigeti Péter 65. születésnapjára. Gondolat & SZE DFK. Fogarasi, J., Ivancsics, I. & Kiss, L. (1994). A helyi önkormányzatok kézikönyve. Unió. Frivaldszky, J. (2006). Szubszidiaritás és az európai identitás a közösségek Európájáért. In J. Frivaldszky (Ed.), Szubszidiaritás és szolidaritás az Európai Unióban. Faludi Ferenc Akadémia. Hendler, R. (2007). Grundbegriffe der Selbstverwaltung. In T. Mann & G. Püttner (Eds.), Handbuch der kommunalen Wissenschaft und Praxis. Band 1 Grundlagen und Kommunalverfassung. Dritte, völlig neu bearbeitete Auflage. Springer. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68884-6_1 Hoffman, I. (2015). Gondolatok a 21. századi önkormányzati jog fontosabb intézményeiről és modelljeiről. A nyugati demokráciák és Magyarország szabályozásainak, valamint azok változásainak tükrében. ELTE Eötvös. Hoffmann-Axthelm, D. (2004). Lokale Selbstverwaltung – Möglichkeit und Grenzen direkter Demokratie. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-81024-3 Ivancsics, I. (1996). A helyi és területi közigazgatás alkotmányi szabályozásának néhány alapkérdése és alternatívája. In I. Verebélyi (Ed.), A helyi önkormányzatok alkotmányi szabályozása. KJK – MTA ÁJTI. Kaltenbach, J. (1991). Az önkormányzati felügyelet. Universum. Kelsen, H. (1927). Az államelmélet alapvonalai. Szeged Városi Nyomda és Könyvkiadó. Knemeyer, F.-L. (1990). Subsidiarität – Föderalismus, Dezentralisation: Initiativen zu einem „Europa der Regionen“. Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik, (5), 176–186. Küpper, H. (2009). A helyi önkormányzás joga. In A. Jakab (Ed.), Az Alkotmány kommentárja II. Századvég. Ladner, A., Keuffer, N., Baldersheim, H., Hlepas, N., Swianiewicz, P., Steyvers, K. & Navarro, C. (2019). Patterns of Local Autonomy in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95642-8 Magyary, Z. (1930). A magyar közigazgatás racionalizálása. Királyi Magyar Egyetemi Nyomda. Magyary, Z. (1942). Magyar közigazgatás – A közigazgatás szerepe a XX. sz. államában a magyar közigazgatás szervezete működése és jogi rendje. Királyi Magyar Egyetemi Nyomda. Petrétei, J. (2018). Hatalommegosztás. In A. Jakab & B. Fekete (Eds.), Internetes jogtudományi enciklopédia. Online: http://ijoten.hu/szocikk/alkotmanyjog-hatalommegosztas Pálné Kovács, I. (1996). A helyi önkormányzatok alkotmányos szabályozása. In I. Verebélyi (Ed.), A helyi önkormányzatok alkotmányi szabályozása. KJK & MTA ÁJTI. Pálné Kovács, I. (2008). Helyi kormányzás Magyarországon. Dialóg Campus. Online: https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.22.1.1152 Peters, H. (1926). Grenzen der kommunalen Selbstverwaltung in Preussen. Springer. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-47664-8 Sári, J. (2007). A hatalommegosztás és a társadalmi-többségi elv. In I. Kukorelli (Ed.), Alkotmánytan I. Alapfogalmak, alkotmányos intézmények. Osiris. Soós, E. (2010). A szubszidiaritás mint a többszintű kormányzás működését meghatározó alapelv. In P. Á. Ferwagner & Z. Kalmár (Eds.), Távolabbra tekintve: tanulmányok J. Nagy László 65. születésnapjára. Universitas Szeged. Sólyom, L. (2001). Az alkotmánybíráskodás kezdetei Magyarországon. Osiris. Stern, K. (1981). Die Verfassungsgarantie der kommunalen Selbstverwaltung. In G. Püttner (Ed.), Handbuch der kommunalen Wissenschaft und Praxis. Band 1 Grundlagen. Zweite, völlig neu bearbeitete Auflage. Springer. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-11967-9_14 Szegvári, P. (2017). A helyi önkormányzatok szerepváltozása a rendszerváltozás utáni alkotmányos rendszerben. In N. Chronowski, P. Smuk, Zs. Szabó & Z. Szentmiklósy (Eds.), A szabadságszerető embernek. Liber Amicorum István Kukorelli. Gondolat. Szoboszlai, Gy. (2011). Búcsú a jogállamtól. A hatalommegosztás modellje a 2011. évi alaptörvényben. Eszmélet, (2), 5–31. Varga, Zs. A. (2019). From Ideal to Idol? The Concept of the Rule of Law. Dialóg Campus. Veress, E. (2005). A hatalommegosztás aktualitása. Magyar Kisebbség, (3–4), 236–297. Waschkuhn, A. (1995). Was ist Subsidiarität? Ein sozialphilosophisches Ordnungsprinzip: Von Thomas von Aquin bis zur “Civil Society”. Springer. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-12443-6" ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2022) ["issueId"]=> int(450) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(43) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(7) "121-132" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(24) "10.53116/pgaflr.2021.2.9" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(1358) "

Local self-governments cannot be defined as entities against the state, nor do they merely assist in executing the central will. The significance of local self-governments lies in their role in the division and balancing of powers. In light of the principle of subsidiarity, the need for autonomy through decentralisation necessarily leads to the central bodies of the state being marginalised in these matters, in a sense, the latter lose their ability to solve the issues raised within their own sphere of competence.
From a certain point of view, this can even be considered a vertical division of power. The division of executive power between the public administration subordinated to the Government and independent local self-governments, does not call into question the local self-government’s affiliation with the executive power. As such, it is practically an internal division of powers. In essence, it manifests itself as a kind of limited autonomy, which – due to the unity of the state – subsists only within the confines of the relevant laws.
In light of the foregoing, jointly applied principles lead to a vertical division of power. Power is divided, which, nonetheless, does not mean that one sovereign body limits another; it is rather the case of the state restraining itself by virtue of the principle of democracy.

" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(12) "Varga Ádám" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(57) "Local Self-Governments and the Vertical Division of Power" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(Author)#889 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(7386) ["email"]=> string(21) "Varga.Adam@uni-nke.hu" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(6029) ["seq"]=> int(4) ["userGroupId"]=> int(286) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2960-0195" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["biography"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(5) "Varga" ["hu_HU"]=> string(5) "Varga" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Ádám" ["hu_HU"]=> string(6) "Ádám" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(4) { [0]=> string(30) "right to local self-government" [1]=> string(26) "vertical division of power" [2]=> string(25) "separated branch of power" [3]=> string(16) "protected powers" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#905 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(21339) ["id"]=> int(4766) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(6029) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }

Book Reviews

object(Publication)#159 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(30) { ["id"]=> int(6061) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2022-01-10" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2022-01-17 09:57:12" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(7429) ["sectionId"]=> int(78) ["seq"]=> int(1) ["submissionId"]=> int(5937) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(731) "Bouchard, G. & Taylor, C. (2008). Building the Future. A Time for Reconciliation. Report. Online: www.mce.gouv.qc.ca/publications/CCPARDC/rapport-final-integral-en.pdf CBC News (2018, October 11). Ontario to allow turban-wearing Sikhs to ride motorcycles without helmets. Online: https://bit.ly/3e1feB6 Cohen-Almagor, R. (2021). Just, Reasonable Multiculturalism. Liberalism, Culture and Coercion. Cambridge University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108567213 Deutsche Welt (2019, April 07). German court: Sikhs have to wear helmets on motorbikes. Online: https://bit.ly/3F336vB Multani v. Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys, [2006] 1 SCR 256. Online: https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/15/index.do" ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2022) ["issueId"]=> int(450) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(43) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(7) "133-135" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(25) "10.53116/pgaflr.2021.2.10" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(12) "Berkes Lilla" } ["prefix"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["subtitle"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(126) "Raphael Cohen-Almagor, Just, Reasonable Multiculturalism. Liberalism, Culture and Coercion. (Cambridge University Press, 2021)" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(Author)#879 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(14) { ["id"]=> int(7429) ["email"]=> string(25) "dr.berkes.lilla@gmail.com" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(6061) ["seq"]=> int(1) ["userGroupId"]=> int(286) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8068-5852" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(36) "Pázmány Péter Catholic University" ["hu_HU"]=> string(36) "Pázmány Péter Catholic University" } ["biography"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Berkes" ["hu_HU"]=> string(6) "Berkes" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(5) "Lilla" ["hu_HU"]=> string(5) "Lilla" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(1) { [0]=> string(11) "book review" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#875 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(21340) ["id"]=> int(4767) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(6061) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }