Boosting Effect of Startup Ecosystems through Next Generation Digital Technologies in Hungary
Copyright (c) 2023 Szakos Judit
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The copyright to this article is transferred to the University of Public Service Budapest, Hungary (for U.S. government employees: to the extent transferable) effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The author warrants that this contribution is original and that he/she has full power to make this grant. The author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors.
An author may make an article published by University of Public Service available on a personal home page provided the source of the published article is cited and University of Public Service is mentioned as copyright holder
Abstract
In time of crisis, developing Next Generation Digital Technologies in the innovation network, with special attention to startup companies, can be a key to economic thrive. This paper reviews the current and emerging technological trends and how they are connected to the hype surrounding startup companies and their ecosystem, with particular attention to the role of the state. The analyses use Ramstad’s Expanded Triple Helix Model as a framework but with opening its workplace dimensions to subgroups.
In Hungary, digital or technology-led startups are relevant in their numerical and economic volume. Narrowing them further down to artificial intelligence-based companies, one can see that innovation-led cooperations are already state facilitated and could cover every aspect of the ecosystem model. Analysing its operation could lead to good practices for further usage in other technological fields. On the other hand, further qualitative research on their innovation partnership should be conducted to avoid any bias.
Keywords:
How to Cite
References
Carayannis, Elias G. – Barth , Thorsten D. – Campbell, David F. J. (2012): The Quintuple Helix Innovation Model: Global Warming as a Challenge and Driver for Innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 1–12. Online: https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-1-2
Carayannis, Elias G. – Campbell, David F. J. (2009): “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: Toward a 21st Century Fractal Innovation Ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3–4), 201–234. Online: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374
Carayannis, Elias G. – Campbell, David F. J. (2010): Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and How Do Knowledge, Innovation and the Environment Relate to Each Other? A Proposed Framework for a Trans-disciplinary Analysis of Sustainable Development and Social Ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41–69. Online: https://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2010010105
Etzkowitz, Henry (2008): The Triple Helix. University–Industry–Government Innovation in Action. New York: Routledge. Online: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203929605
European Commission (1995): Green Paper on Innovation. Online: https://europa.eu/documents/comm/green_papers/pdf/com95_688_en.pdf
Government of Hungary (2020): Government Resolution 1573/2020 (IX.9.) on the Artificial Intelligence Strategy of Hungary.
Government of Hungary (2021): Government Decree 1393/2021 (VI.24.) on the National Military Strategy of Hungary.
Hungarian Central Statistical Office (2022a): 9.1.1.19. Startupalapítók, vállalkozások megoszlása főbb jellemzők szerint. STADAT-Táblák. Online: https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/gsz/hu/gsz0065.html
Hungarian Central Statistical Office (2022b): 9.1.1.20. Startupvállalkozások aránya az adott évben igénybe vett finanszírozási források szerint az összes startupvállalkozás százalékában. STADAT-táblák. Online: https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/gsz/hu/gsz0066.html
Hungarian Central Statistical Office (2022c): 9.1.1.21. Startupvállalkozások átlagos nettó árbevétele és a foglalkoztatottak átlagos létszáma a startupéletciklus fázisai szerint. STADAT-Táblák. Online: https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/gsz/hu/gsz0067.html
Cho, Jaehan – DeStefano, Timothy – Kim, Hanhin – Kim, Inchul – Paik, Jin Hyun (2023): What’s Driving the Diffusion of Next-Generation Digital Technologies? Technovation, 119, 1–10. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102477
Jáki, Erika – Molnár, Endre Mihály – Kádár, Béla (2019): Characteristics and Challenges of the Hungarian Startup Ecosystem. Vezetéstudomány – Budapest Management Review, 50(5), 2–12. Online: https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2019.05.01
Kattel , Rainer – Drechsler, Wolfgang – Karo, Erkki (2022): How to Make an Entrepreneurial State. Why Innovation Needs Bureaucracy. New Haven – London: Yale University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300235371
Kollmann, Tobias – Stöckmann, Christoph – Hensellek, Simon – Kensbock, Julia (2016): European Startup Monitor 2016. German Startups Association.
Kornai, János (2010): Innováció és dinamizmus. Kölcsönhatás a rendszerek és a technikai haladás között. Közgazdasági Szemle, 57(1), 1–36.
Lányi, Beatrix (2017): A startup vállalkozók személyiségjellemzőinek hatása az innovatív piaci jelenlétre – Különös tekintettel az egészségügyi és orvosi biotechnológiai ágazatra. Közép-Európai Közlemények, 10(2), 77–90.
Perri, Lori (2022): What’s New in the 2022 Gartner Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies. Gartner, 10 August 2022. Online: https://www.gartner.com/en/articles/what-s-new-in-the-2022-gartner-hype-cycle-for-emerging-technologies
Lu, Chaochao – Tang, Xiaoou (2015): Surpassing Human-Level Face Verification Performance on LFW with GaussianFace. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 29(1), 1–13. Online: https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v29i1.9797
Lundvall, Bengt-Åke (2016): The Learning Economy and the Economics of Hope. London – New York: Anthem Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_626406
Makó, Csaba – Illéssy, Miklós (2014): A szervezeti innovációk a közszféra szervezeteiben (A jó állam létrehozásának és tartós fenntartásának elhanyagolt dimenziója). Pro Publico Bono – Magyar Közigazgatás, (4), 4–20.
Makó, Csaba – Illésy, Miklós – Számadó, Róza – Szakos, Judit (2020): Workplace Innovation: Concepts, Regulation and Increasing Role of Knowledge Management: Theoretical Considerations and European Experiences. Pro Publico Bono – Magyar Közigazgatás, 8(1), 96–123. Online: https://doi.org/10.32575/ppb.2020.1.6
Marinova, Dora – Phillimore, John (2003): Models of Innovation. In Shavinina , Larisa V. (eds.): The International Handbook on Innovation. Oxford: Pergamon. 44–53. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044198-6/50005-X
Mazzucato, Mariana (2016): From Market Fixing to Market-creating: A New Framework for Innovation Policy. Industry and Innovation, 23(2), 140–156. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1146124
NATO (2022): Emerging and Disruptive Technologies. NATO, 08 December 2022. Online: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_184303.htm
OECD (2018): Oslo Manual 2018. Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation. The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities. Paris: OECD. Online: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en
OECD (2020): OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2020. Paris: OECD. Online: https://doi.org/10.1787/bb167041-en
Perez, Carlota (2002): Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital. The Dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages. Cheltenham–Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing. Online: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781005323
Ramstad , Elise (2009): Developmental Evaluation Framework for Innovation and Learning Networks: Integration of the Structure, Process and Outcomes. Journal of Workplace Learning, 21(3), 181–197. Online: https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620910943924
Startup Hungary (2022): Hungarian Startup Report 2021.