object(Publication)#803 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(28) { ["id"]=> int(7275) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2024-12-17" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2024-12-17 22:36:19" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(9087) ["sectionId"]=> int(31) ["seq"]=> int(1) ["submissionId"]=> int(7151) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(2792) "Faludi, G. (2023). § 57/A-E. In D. Legeza & Gyertyánfy P. (Eds.), Nagykommentár a szerzői jogról szóló 1999. évi LXXVI. törvényhez. 1 January 2023, “Jogtár” Format Edition. Frosio, G. & Mendis, S. (2020). Monitoring and Filtering: European Reform or Global Trend? In G. Frosio (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Online Intermediary Liability (pp. 544–565). Oxford University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198837138.013.28 Harkai, I. & Mezei, P. (2022). End-User Flexibilities and Platform Responsibility in the Light of the 17th Edition of the CDSM Directive. In B. Török & Zs. Ződi (Eds.), The Age of Internet Platforms. (pp. 109–127). Ludovika University Press. Husovec, M. (2023). The DSA as a Creator’s Charter? Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 18(2), 71–73. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpac116 Leistner, M. (2020). European Copyright Licensing and Infringement Liability under Art. 17 DSM-Directive Compared to Secondary Liability of Content Platforms in the U.S. – Can We Make the New European System a Global Opportunity Instead of a Local Challenge? Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum/Intellectual Property Journal (ZGE/IPJ), (2), 123–214. Mendis, S. (2023, May 18). The Magic Bullet That Isn’t! The Limited Efficacy of Article 14 DSA in Safeguarding Copyright Exceptions to Quotation and Parody on Social Media Platforms. Verfassungsblog. Online: https://verfassungsblog.de/no-magic-bullet/ Mezei, P. & Harkai, I. (2022). Self-Regulating Platforms? An Analysis of the Enforcement of End-User Rights in the Light of the Transposition of Article 17 of the CDSM Directive. Public Governance, Administration and Finances Law Review, 7(1), 109–122. Online: https://doi.org/10.53116/pgaflr.2022.1.8 Quintais, J. P. (2020). The New Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive: A Critical Look. European Intellectual Property Review, 42(1), 28–41. Quintais, J. P. & Schwemer, S. F. (2022). The Interplay between the Digital Services Act and Sector Regulation: How Special Is Copyright? European Journal of Risk Regulation, 13(2), 191–217. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2022.1 Rosati, E. (2020). The Legal Nature of Article 17 of the Copyright DSM Directive, the (Lack of) Freedom of Member States and Why the German Implementation Proposal is not Compatible with EU Law. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 15(11), 874–878. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpaa163 Rosati, E. (2021). The Digital Services Act and Copyright Enforcement: The Case of Article 17 of the DSM Directive. In M. Cappello (Ed.), Unravelling the Digital Services Act Package (pp. 59–74). European Audiovisual Observatory. Online: https://rm.coe.int/iris-special-2021-01en-dsa-package/1680a43e45 " ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2024) ["issueId"]=> int(599) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(43) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(6) "5–23" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(20) "10.53116/pgaflr.7151" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(498) "

The study examines the changing liability regime for intermediary service providers. It analyses the rules introduced by the CDSM Directive for content sharing platform providers, before contextualising these rules within the Digital Services Act (DSA) and reviews the changes in terms of liability for copyright infringement of other intermediary service providers. Finally, the paper considers the extent to which the DSA complements the new liability regime set out in the CDSM Directive.

" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(18) "Grad-Gyenge Anikó" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(129) "Evolution of Liability of Content Sharing Platform Providers and Other Intermediary Service Providers for Copyright Infringement " } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(Author)#846 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(9087) ["email"]=> string(28) "grad-gyenge.aniko@gtk.bme.hu" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7275) ["seq"]=> int(1) ["userGroupId"]=> int(286) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9184-0870" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(47) "Budapest University of Technology and Economics" ["hu_HU"]=> string(32) "a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:7:"BME GTK";}" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(164) "

Associate Professor, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Department of Business Law, Budapest, Hungary

" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(11) "Grad-Gyenge" ["hu_HU"]=> string(11) "Grad-Gyenge" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Anikó" ["hu_HU"]=> string(6) "Anikó" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(6) { [0]=> string(42) "responsibility for copyright infringements" [1]=> string(34) "content sharing platform providers" [2]=> string(27) "very large online platforms" [3]=> string(18) "safe harbour rules" [4]=> string(20) "notice and take down" [5]=> string(20) "notice and stay down" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#859 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(37095) ["id"]=> int(6126) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(7275) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }

object(Publication)#77 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(30) { ["id"]=> int(7436) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2024-12-17" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2024-12-17 22:36:19" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(9321) ["sectionId"]=> int(31) ["seq"]=> int(2) ["submissionId"]=> int(7312) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(4746) "Allegri, M. R. (2021). Il futuro digitale dell’Unione europea: nuove categorie di intermediari digitali, nuove forme di responsabilità. Rivista Italiana di Informatica e Diritto, 3(2), 7–23. Online: https://doi.org/10.32091/RIID0036 Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity. Sage. Calzolaio, S. (2023). Vulnerabilità della società digitale e ordinamento costituzionale dei dati. Rivista Italiana di Informatica e Diritto, 5(2), 13–33. Online: https://doi.org/10.32091/RIID0131 Canotilho, M. (2022). A vulnerabilidade como conceito constitucional: Um elemento para a construção de um constitucionalismo do comum. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 12(1), 138–163. Online: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1262 Castro, R. B. (2023). Direito Constitucional. Ciberespaço e Tecnologia. Declínio do Constitucionalismo na UE? Almedina. Farinho, D. S. (2023). O Regulamento dos Serviços Digitais da União Europeia (EU Digital Services Act): Uma visão a partir do Direito Administrativo Regulatório. Revista de Direito Administrativo, 18, 29–41. Fineman, M. A. (2010). The Vulnerable Subject and the Responsive State. Emory Law Journal, 60(2), 251–275. Online: https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/elj/vol60/iss2/1 Fortes Martín, A. (2019). La Resiliencia Ambiental y el (Re)posicionamiento del Derecho Ante una Nueva Era Sostenible de Obligada Adaptación al Cambio. Actualidad Jurídica Ambiental, 92, 1–21. Online: https://shorturl.at/OuksP Frediani, E. (2021). The Administrative Precautionary Approach at the Time of Covid-19: The Law of Uncertain Science and the Italian Answer to Emergency. Utrecht Law Review, 17(3), 6–17. Online: https://doi.org/10.36633/ulr.644 Freitas, S. G. (2022). Governação na Promoção da Transformação Digital e o Estado como Agente de Vulnerabilização. In A. F. Silva (Ed.), Vulnerabilidade e Direito Administrativo (pp. 105–122). Almedina. Garcia, M. G. (2018). Direito das Políticas Públicas (reprint). Almedina. Gonçalves, P. C. (2019). Manual de Direito Administrativo (Vol. I). Almedina. Leão, A. C. (2022). O Estado perante a vulnerabilidade. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 12(1), 86–107. Online: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1240 Liedo, B. (2021). Vulnerabilidad. Eunomía. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad, 20, 242–257. Online: https://doi.org/10.20318/eunomia.2021.6074 Mendonça, J. T. (2021). Sobre o Uso do Termo Vulnerabilidade. Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa, 62(1), 71–76. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10451/61888 Morin, E. (2017). Introdução ao Pensamento Complexo (6th ed.). Instituto Piaget. Novais, J. R. (2018). Contributo para uma Teoria do Estado de Direito (reprint). Almedina. Otero, P. (2019). Manual de Direito Administrativo. Vol. I (3rd reprint). Almedina. Otero, P. (2020). Direito Constitucional Português. Vol. I (4th reprint). Almedina. Pinto, E. V-C. (2021). Direito Vulnerável: o combate jurídico pelo Estado Republicano, Democrático e Social de Direito na Europa pós-pandémica. Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa, 62(1), 185–208. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10451/61893 Ponce Solé, J. (2021). El fracaso de la administración garante. Mitos, falacias y lecciones de la pandemia para las administraciones públicas, el derecho administrativo y la jurisdicción contencioso-administrativa. Revista General de Derecho Administrativo, (58). Online: www.iustel.com/v2/revistas/detalle_revista.asp?id_noticia=424237 Pope Francis (2022). Message of His Holiness Pope Francis for the 56th World Day of Peace (1 January 2023). Vatican. Online: https://shorturl.at/hx0Ea Rixen, S. (2021). Verwaltungsrecht der vulnerablen Gesellschaft. In C. Walter (Ed.), Veröffentlichungen der Vereinigung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer: Vol. 80. Staat und Gesellschaft in der Pandemie (pp. 37–67). De Gruyter. Online: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110711196-003 Rocha, J. F. (2013). Contributo para um conceito de democracia plena. Universidade do Minho. Online: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/37516 Roque, M. P. (2021a). A adaptabilidade constitucional e a necessidade de revisão: Uma Constituição para o séc. XXI. Revista de Direito Comercial, 1197–1228. Online: https://shorturl.at/a4c9w Roque, M. P. (2021b). Tratado de Governação Pública. Vol. I. AAFDL Editora. Santaniello, M. (2022). Sovranità digitale e diritti fondamentali: un modello europeo di Internet governance. Rivista Italiana di Informatica e Diritto, 4(1), 47–51. Online: https://doi.org/10.32091/RIID0058 Silva, A. F. (2022). Vulnerabilidade no Direito Administrativo: um Ensaio. In A. F. Silva (Ed.), Vulnerabilidade e Direito Administrativo (pp. 11–23). Almedina. " ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2024) ["issueId"]=> int(599) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(43) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(7) "25–40" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(20) "10.53116/pgaflr.7312" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(1169) "

This text, aiming to contribute to the reflection of the main challenges faced by today's Societies, seeks, in essence, to draw attention to the importance of deepening the relations between Administrative Law and Public Governance, reflecting, for this purpose, on a framework of tension between a Vulnerable Society and the need for its resilient transformation,  associated with disruptive phenomena such as the pandemic, globalisation and the digital transition. In this sense, the exercise that we propose here, necessarily of an introductory nature, involves, at first, an approximation to the concept of "vulnerability", seeking to direct it to the legal level, and in particular seeking to cut it in the spectrum of Administrative Law, so that, at a subsequent moment, it becomes possible to point out the need for greater responsiveness – and, so too, "resilience" – on the part of public authorities, in an appeal to a dynamic but complex intersection between public policies and instruments of democratic governance and legal regulation, based on a matrix that privileges the dignity of the human person and fundamental constitutional values.

" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(23) " Pinto João Vilas Boas" } ["prefix"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["subtitle"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(108) "A Short Introduction to the Challenges of Administrative Law and Public Governance in the Age of Uncertainty" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(28) "Vulnerability and Resilience" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(Author)#832 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(9321) ["email"]=> string(24) "jpinto@direito.uminho.pt" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7436) ["seq"]=> int(2) ["userGroupId"]=> int(286) ["country"]=> string(2) "PT" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2127-0750" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(19) "University of Minho" ["hu_HU"]=> string(19) "University of Minho" } ["biography"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) " Pinto" ["hu_HU"]=> string(16) "Vilas Boas Pinto" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(16) "João Vilas Boas" ["hu_HU"]=> string(5) "João" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(6) { [0]=> string(17) "public governance" [1]=> string(18) "administrative law" [2]=> string(11) "uncertainty" [3]=> string(13) "vulnerability" [4]=> string(10) "resilience" [5]=> string(23) "sustainable development" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#882 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(37094) ["id"]=> int(5999) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(7436) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }

object(Publication)#154 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(29) { ["id"]=> int(7626) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2024-12-17" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2024-12-17 22:36:19" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(9563) ["sectionId"]=> int(31) ["seq"]=> int(3) ["submissionId"]=> int(7502) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(12423) "Abgeordnetenhaus Berlin (2022a, November 14). Wortprotokoll. Wahlperiode 19. Online: https://tinyurl.com/mt2mssby Abgeordnetenhaus Berlin (2022b, November 24). Wortprotokoll. Wahlperiode 19. Online: https://tinyurl.com/27hakzdz Abizadeh, A. (2008). Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders. Political Theory, 36(1), 37–65. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591707310090 Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Verso. Agamben, G. (1998). Homo Sacer. Stanford University Press. Aradau, C., Huysmans, J. & Squire, V. (2010). Acts of European Citizenship: A Political Sociology of Mobility. Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(4), 945–965. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02081.x Arendt, H. (1968). The Origins of Totalitarianism. Harcourt Inc. Arrighi, J. T. & Bauböck, R. (2016). A Multilevel Puzzle: Migrants’ Voting Rights in National and Local Elections. European Journal of Political Research, 56(3), 619–639. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12176 Ataç, I. (2013). Die Selbstkonstituierung der Flüchtlingsbewegung als politisches Subjekt. Transversal. Online: https://transversal.at/transversal/0313/atac/de Ataç, I., Kron, S., Schilliger, S., Schwiertz, H. & Stierl, M. (2015). Struggles of Migration as in-/visible Politics. Journal für kritische Migrations- und Grenzregimeforschung, 1(2). Online: https://tinyurl.com/2p4xyd3n Balibar, E. (1994). Masses, Classes, Ideas. Studies on Politics and Philosophy Before and After Marx. Transl. by J. Swenson. Routledge. Balibar, E. (2001). Outlines of a Topography of Cruelty: Citizenship and Civility in the Era of Global Violence. Constellations, 8(1), 15–29. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.00213 Badiou, A. (2009). Theory of the Subject. Continuum. Banai, A. & Kreide, R. (2017). Securitization of Migration in Germany: The Ambivalences of Citizenship and Human Rights. Citizenship Studies, 21(8), 903–917. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2017.1380649 Bauböck, R. (2005). Expansive Citizenship – Voting beyond Territory and Membership. Political Science and Politics, 38(4), 683–687. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096505050341 Bauböck, R. (2006). Migration und politische Beteiligung Wahlrecht jenseits von Staatsgebiet und Staatsangehörigkeit. In M. Oberlechner (Ed.), Die missglückte Integration? Wege und Irrwege in Europa (pp. 115–129). Braunmüller. Bauböck, R. (2008). Stakeholder Citizenship: An Idea Whose Time Has Come? Migration Policy Institute. Report. Online: https://tinyurl.com/3tew2efs Beckman, L. (2006). Citizenship and Voting Rights: Should Resident Aliens Vote. Citizenship Studies, 10(2), 153–165. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13621020600633093 Beckman, L. (2009). The Frontiers of Democracy. The Right to Vote and Its Limits. Palgrave Macmillan. Benhabib, S. (2004). The Rights of Others. Cambridge University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790799 Benhabib, S. & Post, R. Eds. (2006). Another Cosmopolitanism. Oxford University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195183221.001.0001 Blatter, J., Schmid, S. D. & Blättler, A. C. (2017). Democratic Deficits in Europe: The Overlooked Exclusiveness of Nation-States and the Positive Role of the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(3), 449–467. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12491 Bohman, J. (2004). Republican Cosmopolitanism. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 12(3), 336–352. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00203.x Bosniak, L. (2006). The Citizen and the Alien. Dilemmas of Contemporary Membership. Princeton University Press. Brentler, A. (2021, September 23). 10 Millionen dürfen nicht wählen – obwohl sie hier leben. Jacobin. Online: https://tinyurl.com/y8dmses8 Brysk, A. & Shafir, G. Eds. (2004). People Out of Place. Globalisation, Human Rights and the Citizenship Gap. Routledge. Coll, K. (2011). Citizenship Acts and Immigrant Voting Rights Movements in the US. Citizenship Studies, 15(8), 993¬–1009. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2011.627766 Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and Its Critics. Yale University Press. De Graauw, E. (2014). Municipal ID Cards for Undocumented Immigrants: Local Bureaucratic Membership in a Federal System. Politics & Society, 42(3), 309–330. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329214543256 Diehl, C. & Blohm, M. (2003). Rights or Identity? Naturalization Processes among “Labor Migrants” in Germany. International Migration Review, 37(1), 133–162. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2003.tb00132.x Earnest, D. (2003, August 28–31). Noncitizen Voting Rights: A Survey of an Emerging Democratic Norm [Conference presentation]. 2003 Annual Convention of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, USA. Online: https://tinyurl.com/7j5rbrsr Foucault, M. (1983). Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. University of Chicago Press. Garbe, S. (2021, September 22). Wählen sollte ein Recht und kein Privileg sein. Der Spiegel. Online: https://tinyurl.com/38tt4nth Garcia, J. A. (2011). Immigrants and Suffrage: Adding to the Discourse by Integrating State Versus National Citizenship, Dual Domestic Residency, and Dual Citizenship. Harvard Journal of Hispanic Policy, 24(1), 21–42. Gerald, L. N. (1992). “We are the People”: Alien Suffrage in German and American Perspective. Michigan Journal of International Law, 13(2), 259–335. Online: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol13/iss2/1 Hayduk, R. (2015). Political Rights in the Age of Migration: Lessons from the United States. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 16(1), 99–118. Online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12134-014-0336-6 Hayduk, R. & Coll, K. (2018). Urban Citizenship: Campaigns to Restore Immigrant Voting Rights in the US. New Political Science, 40(2), 336–352. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2018.1449408 Heater, D. (1999). What Is Citizenship? Polity Press. Held, D. (2004). Global Covenant. The Social Democratic Alternative to the Washington Consensus. Polity. Online: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20034221 Huntington, S. P. (1996). The Clash of Civilizations or the Remaking of World Order. Simon & Schuster. IOM (International Organization for Migration) (2022). World Migration Report. Online: https://publications.iom.int/books/world-migration-report-2022 Isin, E. F. & Nielsen, G. M. Eds. (2008). Acts of Citizenship. Palgrave Macmillan. Johnson, H. L. (2015). These Fine Lines: Locating Noncitizenship in Political Protest in Europe. Citizenship Studies, 19(8), 951–965. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2015.1110287 Joswig, G. (2021, June 22). Letzter Aufruf zur Enteignung. TAZ. Online: https://tinyurl.com/yc58hshn Kanalan, I. (2015). Jugendliche ohne Grenzen. Zehn Jahre Proteste und Kämpfe von geflüchteten Jugendlichen – Creating Utopia? Movements. Journal für kritische Migrations- und Grenzregimeforschung, 1(2). Online: https://tinyurl.com/2pvv8772 López-Guerra, C. (2005). Should Expatriates Vote? Journal of Political Philosophy, 13(2), 216–234. Online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2005.00221.x Margolis, H. (1982). Selfishness, Altruism and Rationality. A Theory of Social Choice. The University of Chicago Press. MacIntyre, A. (2007). After Virtue. A Study in Moral Theory. University of Notre Dame Press. Marshall, T. H. (1950). Citizenship and Social Class. Cambridge University Press. Marx, K. (1844). On the Jewish Question. Online: https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/jewish-question/ Menke, C. (2015). Kritik der Rechte. Suhrkamp. Monforte, P. & Dufour, P. (2013). Comparing the Protests of Undocumented Migrants Beyond Contexts: Collective Actions as Acts of Emancipation. European Political Science Review, 5(1), 83–104. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773912000045 Nail, T. (2015a). The Figure of the Migrant. Stanford University Press. Nail, T. (2015b). Alain Badiou and the Sans-Papiers. Angelaki, 20(4), 109–130. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2015.1096637 Neuman, G. (1992). “We are the People”: Alien Suffrage in German and American Perspective. Michigan Journal of International Law, 13(2), 259–335. Oliveri, F. (2012). Migrants as Activist Citizens in Italy: Understanding the New Cycle of Struggles. Citizenship Studies, 16(5–6), 793–806. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2012.698509 Owen, D. (2012). Constituting the Polity, Constituting the Demos: On the Place of the All Affected Interests Principle in Democratic Theory and in Resolving the Democratic Boundary Problem. Ethics and Global Affairs, 5(3), 129–152. Online: https://doi.org/10.3402/egp.v5i3.18617 Papadopoulos, D., Stephenson, N. & Tsianos, V. (2008). Escape Routes. Control and Subversion in the 21st Century. Pluto Press. Pedroza, L. (2014). How Do the Others Do It? Extensions of Voting Rights to Foreign Residents in the German Neighbourhood and Beyond. In M. Morlok, T. Poguntke & S. Bukow (Eds.), Parteien, Demokratie und Staatsbürgerschaft. Politische Partizipation und Repräsentation in der Zuwanderungsgesellschaft (pp. 103–118). Nomos. Online: https://doi.org/10.5771/97838 45257211_103 Prösser, C. (2022, March 9). Das ist machbar. TAZ. Online: https://tinyurl.com/276mxkx4 Rajaram, K. P. & Grundy-Warr, C. (2004). The Irregular Migrant as Homo Sacer: Migration and Detention in Australia, Malaysia and Thailand. International Migration, 42(1), 33–64. Online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-7985.2004.00273.x Raskin, J. B. (1993). Legal Aliens, Local Citizens: The Historical, Constitutional and Theoretical Meanings of Alien Suffrage. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 141(4), 1391–1470. Online: https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/penn_law_review/vol141/iss4/3 Rawls, J. (1996). Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press. Reinach, A. (1983). The Apriori Foundations of the Civil Law. The International Academy of Philosophy Press. Rocco, R. (2007). The Formation of Latino Citizenship in Southeast Los Angeles. Citizenship Studies, 3(2), 253–266. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13621029908420713 Sarrazin, T. (2010). Deutschland schafft sich ab. DVA. Sen, A. (2009). The Idea of Justice. Harvard University Press. Shachar, A. (2014). Introduction: Citizenship and the ‘Right to Have Rights’. Citizenship Studies, 18(2), 114–124. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2014.886389 Shapiro, I. (2003). The Moral Foundations of Politics. Yale University Press. Shaw, J. (2007). The Transformation of Citizenship in the European Union. Electoral Rights and the Restructuring of Political Space. Cambridge University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139171403 Schmitt, C. (2005). Political Theology. Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. The University of Chicago Press. Song, S. (2009). Democracy and Noncitizen Voting Rights. Citizenship Studies, 13(6), 607–620. Online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13621020903309607 Sontag, K., Herzog, M. & Lässer, S. (2022). Struggles for Democracy: Strategies and Resources of Initiatives for Non Citizen Voting Rights at Local Levels in Europe. Comparative Migration Studies, 10(1), 1–17. Online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40878-022-00286-0 Soysal, Y. N. (1994). Limits of Citizenship. Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe. The University of Chicago Press. SPD, Grünen & Linke (2021). Entwurf zur Beschlussfassung des Koalitionsvertrages 2021–2026. Online: https://tinyurl.com/av2yescd Tambakaki, P. (2010). Human Rights, or Citizenship? Birkbeck Law Press. Tasioulas, J. (2012). Towards a Philosophy of Human Rights. Current Legal Problems, 65(1), 1–30. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cus013 Toscano, J. (2023). On Citizening. Performing Citizenship as a Practical Form of Kinship. Journal of Identity and Migration Studies, 17(2), 142–160. Online: https://tinyurl.com/3uxt7k9m Varsanyi, M. W. (2005). The Rise and Fall (and Rise?) of Non-Citizen Voting: Immigration and the Shifting Scales of Citizenship and Suffrage in the United States. Space and Polity, 9(2), 113–134. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562570500304956 Whelan, F. G. (1983). Prologue: Democratic Theory and the Boundary Problem. In J. R. Pennock & J. W. Chapman (Eds.), Liberal Democracy. Nomos XXV (pp. 13–47). New York University Press." ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2024) ["issueId"]=> int(599) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(43) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(7) "41–58" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(20) "10.53116/pgaflr.7502" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(1021) "

The right to vote stands as a cornerstone in contemporary liberal democracies, but its limits, particularly regarding who holds this privilege, remains a contentious issue, pitting democracy against the intricate dynamics of migration. Acknowledging this tension, this article asserts that a more illuminating perspective on the nexus between voting rights, migration and democracy emerges when viewed through the lens of human rights, as opposed to the conventional framework of citizenship rights. The article develops a theoretical framework based on a practical case from Germany, where the Demokratie für Alle movement advocates for voting rights for non-citizens, underlining thus the importance of a human-rights-based framework in shaping political demands. The article explores the articulation of a practice and the emergent theory upon which it can be sustained, exploring thus the concept of a performing representativity within an actual and evolving context.

" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(14) "Toscano Javier" } ["subtitle"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(76) "Human Rights as a Blueprint to Demand Voting Rights for Non-citizen Migrants" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(48) "Performing Representativity, Expanding Democracy" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(Author)#849 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(9563) ["email"]=> string(16) "tosgue@yahoo.com" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7626) ["seq"]=> int(3) ["userGroupId"]=> int(286) ["country"]=> string(2) "DE" ["orcid"]=> string(0) "" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(26) "Humboldt University Berlin" ["hu_HU"]=> string(52) "a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:26:"Humboldt University Berlin";}" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(96) "

Fellow, InHerit Centre for Advanced Study, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany

" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(7) "Toscano" ["hu_HU"]=> string(7) "Toscano" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Javier" ["hu_HU"]=> string(6) "Javier" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(5) { [0]=> string(9) "migration" [1]=> string(12) "human rights" [2]=> string(13) "voting rights" [3]=> string(18) "citizenship rights" [4]=> string(24) "practice-based knowledge" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#856 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(37092) ["id"]=> int(6140) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(7626) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }

object(Publication)#149 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(31) { ["id"]=> int(7643) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2024-12-17" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2024-12-17 22:36:19" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(9588) ["sectionId"]=> int(31) ["seq"]=> int(4) ["submissionId"]=> int(7519) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(13580) "Abdulkareem, A. K. (2024). E-Government in Nigeria: Can Generative AI Serve as a Tool for Civic Engagement? Public Governance, Administration and Finances Law Review, 9(1), 75–90. Online: https://doi.org/10.53116/pgaflr.7068 AfDB-WB Report (2017). The Gambia Fragility Risk and Resilience Assessment. A Joint AfDB-WB Report, Report No: 117432-GM. Armstrong, S. J., Cools, E. & Sadler-Smith, E. (2012). Role of Cognitive Styles in Business and Management: Reviewing 40 Years of Research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(3), 238–262. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00315.x Bass, B. M. & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Berry, F. S. & Wechsler, B. (1995). State Agencies’ Experience with Strategic Planning: Findings from a National Survey. Public Administration Review, 55(2), 159–168. Boris, O. H. (2015). Challenges Confronting Local Government Administration in Efficient and Effective Social Service Delivery: The Nigerian Experience. International Journal of Public Administration and Management Research (IJPAMR), 2(5), 12–22. Boyne, G. A., Gould-Williams, J. S., Law, J. & Walker. R. M. (2004). Problems of Rational Planning in Public Organisations. Administration and Society, 36(3), 328–350. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399704265294 Bovaird, T. & Loeffler, E. (2012). From Engagement to Co-production: The Contribution of Users and Communities to Outcomes and Public Value. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(4), 1119–1138. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9309-6 Bozeman, B. & Straussman, J. (1990). Public Management Strategies. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Bryson, J. M. (2010). The Future of Public and Non-profit Strategic Planning in the United States. Public Administration Review, 70 (12), S255–S267. Bryson, J. M. (2011). Strategic Planning for Public and Non-profit Organisations (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C. & Bryson, J. K. (2009). Understanding Strategic Planning and the Formulation and Implementation of Strategic Plans as a Way of Knowing: The Contributions of Actor-Network Theory. International Public Management Journal, 12(2), 172–207. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490902873473 Bryson, J. & Edwards, L. H. (2017). Strategic Planning in the Public Sector. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia, Business and Management. Oxford University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.128 Bryson, J. M., Edwards, L. H. & Van Slyke, D. M. (2017). Getting Strategic about Strategic Planning Research. Public Management Review, 20(3), 317–339. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1285111 Bryson, J. M. & George, B. (2020). Strategic Management in Public Administration. In B. Guy Peters & I. Thynne, (Eds.), The Oxford Encyclopaedia of Public Administration. Oxford University Press. Centre for Democracy and Development (CDD) (2017). Report on The Democratic Transition in The Gambia: The Burden of Leadership and Consolidation. Abuja: CDD. Conyers, D. (2007). Decentralisation and Service Delivery: Lessons from Sub-Saharan Africa. IDS (Institute of Development Studies) Bulletin, 38(1), 18–32. Online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2007.tb00334.x ECA (2003). Public Sector Management Reforms in Africa Report. Addis Ababa: Economic Commission for Africa (ECA). Frederickson, D. G. & Frederickson, H. G. (2007). Measuring the Performance of the Hollow State. Georgetown University Press. George, B. & Desmidt, S. (2014). A State of Research on Strategic Management in the Public Sector: An Analysis of the Empirical Evidence. In P. Joyce & A. Drumaux, Strategic Management in Public Organisations: European Practices and Perspectives (pp. 151–172). Routledge. George, B., Desmidt, S., Cools, E. & Prinzie, A. (2017). Cognitive Styles, User Acceptance and Commitment to Strategic Plans in Public Organisations: An Empirical Analysis. Public Management Review, 20(3), 340–359. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1285112 Gil-García, J. R. & Pardo, T. A. (2005). E-Government Success Factors: Mapping Practical Tools to Theoretical Foundations. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 187–216. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.02.001 Heeks, R. (2006). Understanding and Measuring e-Government: International Benchmarking Studies. Paper prepared for UNDESA workshop, E-Participation and E-Government: Understanding the Present and Creating the Future, Budapest, Hungary, 27–28 July 2006. Hendrick, R. (2003). Strategic Planning Environment, Process, and Performance in Public Agencies: A Comparative Study of Departments in Milwaukee. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13, 491–519. Heymann, P. B. (1987). The Politics of Public Management. Yale University Press. Höglund, L., Caicedo, M. H., Mårtensson, M. & Svärdsten, F. (2018): Strategic Management in the Public Sector How Tools Enable and Constrain Strategy Making. International Public Management Journal, 21(5), 822–849. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2018.1427161 Hughes, O. E. (2003). Public Management and Administration (3rd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. Hytönen, J. & Ahlqvist, T. (2019). Emerging Vacuums of Strategic Planning: An Exploration of Reforms in Finnish Spatial Planning. European Planning Studies, 27(7), 1350–1368. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1580248 Ijewereme, O. B. (2018). Strategic Planning and Performance in Federal Civil Service of Nigeria (2004–2015) (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Jaw, S. M. & Isbell, T. (2019). Gambians with Clear Message to Government: Focus on Service Delivery. Accra, Ghana: Afrobarometer. Dispatch No. 322. Online: https://www.afrobarometer.org/publication/ad322-gambians-clear-message-government-focus-service-delivery/ Joyce, P. (2000). Strategy in the Public Sector: A Guide to Effective Change Management. John Wiley and Sons. Joyce, P. (2015). Strategic Management in the Public Sector. Routledge. Kabeyi, M. J. B. (2019). Organisational Strategic Planning, Implementation and Evaluation with Analysis of Challenges and Benefits. International Journal of Applied Research and Studies, 5(6), 27–32. Online: http://dx.doi.org/10.22271/allresearch.2019.v5.i6a.5870 Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (5430). OECD (2017). Getting Infrastructure Right: A framework for better governance. OECD Publishing. Online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264272453-en Kemp, E. J., Jr., Funk, R. J. & Eadie, D. C. (1993). Change in Chewable Bites: Applying Strategic Management at EEOC. Public Administration Review, 53(2), 129–134. Kireeva, E. (2018). Concept of Good Governance in Jurisprudence: The Russian Experience and Practice. Public Governance, Administration and Finances Law Review, 3(1), 34–45. Online: https://doi.org/10.53116/pgaflr.2018.1.4 Leskaj, E. (2017). The Challenges Faced by the Strategic Management of Public Organizations. Administratie si Management Public, (29), 151–161. Lynn, L. Jr. (1987). Managing Public Policy. Little, Brown and Company. Lynn, L. Jr. (1996). Public Management as Art, Science and Profession. Chatham House. Michalak, M. (2017). Challenges of Good Governance in the European Union. Public Governance, Administration and Finances Law Review, 2(2), 67–70. Online: https://doi.org/10.53116/pgaflr.2017.2.5 Mintzberg, H. (1990). The Design School: Reconsidering the Basic Premises of Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 11(3), 171–195. Online: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250110302 Mintzberg, H. (1991). Learning 1, Planning 0: Reply to Igor Ansoff. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 463–466. Mnjama, M. D. & Koech, P. (2019). Factors Affecting Implementation of Strategic Plans at Wellcome Trust Research Programme. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 6(2), 892–913. Monahan, K. E. (2001). Balanced Measures for Strategic Planning: A Public Sector Handbook. Management Concepts. Morachiello, E., Nicolau, D. & Hegbor, C. K. (2015). Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) Assessment 2014, The Gambia. The Gambia: European Union Report. Nutt, P. C. & Backoff, R. W. (1993). Organisational Publicness and Its Implications for Strategic Management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3, 209–231. Okumus, F. (2003). A Framework to Implement Strategies in Organisations. Management Decision, 41(9), 871–882. Online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251740310499555 Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., Vidal, I. & Kinder, T. (2014). A Sustainable Business Model for Public Service Organisations? Public Management Review, 16(2), 165–172. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.872435 Pasha, O. Q., Poister. T. H. & Edwards, L. H. (2015). Mutual Relationships of Strategic Stances and Formulation Methods, and Their Impacts on Performance in Public Local Transit Agencies. Administration and Society, 50(6), 884–910. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399715587524 Patyi, A. (2016). Good Governance and Good Public Administration. Public Governance, Administration and Finances Law Review, 1(1), 6–29. Online: https://doi.org/10.53116/pgaflr.2016.1.1 Pettigrew, A., Ferlie, E. & McKee, L. (1992). Shaping Strategic Change. London: SAGE. Pettigrew, A. M., Thomas, H. & Whittington, R. Eds. (2006). Handbook of Strategy and Management. SAGE. Pollitt, C. & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford University Press. Poister, T. H. (2010). The Future of Strategic Planning in the Public Sector: Linking Strategic Management and Performance. Public Administration Review, 70(S1), S246–S254. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.2010.70.issue-s1 Poister, T. H., Pitts, D. & Edwards, L. H. (2010). Strategic Management Research in the Public Sector: Synthesis, Assessment, and Future Directions. American Review of Public Administration, 40(4), 522–545. Poister, T. H. & Streib, G. (1999). Strategic Management in the Public Sector: Concepts, Models and Processes. Public Productivity and Management Review, 22(3), 310–311. Poister, T. H. & Streib, G. D. (2005). Elements of Strategic Planning and Management in Municipal Government: Status after Two Decades. Public Administration Review, 65(1), 45–56. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00429.x Porter, M. (2004). Competitive Strategy (Export Ed.). Free Press. Pressman, J. L. & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland: Or Why It’s Amazing that Federal Programs Work at All. University of California Press. Ring, P. S. (2000). The Environment and Strategic Planning. In J. Rabin, G. J. Miller, & W. B. Hildreth (Eds.), Handbook of Strategic Management (2nd ed.) (pp. 89-122). Marcel Dekker. Ring, P. S. & Perry, J. L. (1985). Strategic Management in Public and Private Organisations: Implications of Distinctive Contexts and Constraints. The Academy of Management Review, 10(2), 276–286. Online: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.2307/257969 Rose, R. (2005). Learning from Comparative Public Policy. Routledge. Shapek, R. A. & Richardson, W. C. (1989). Strategic Capability. In J. Rabin, G. J. Miller & W. B. Hildreth (Eds.), Handbook of Strategic Management (pp. 219–240). Marcel Dekker. Streib, G. &. Poister, T. H. (1990). Strategic Planning in U. S. Cities: Patterns of Use, Perceptions of Effectiveness, and an Assessment of Strategic Capacity. American Review of Public Administration, 20(1), 29–44. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/027507409002000103 Sulaiman, S. (2021). Governments’ Measures to Govern the Coronavirus Crisis and the Lessons Learned. Public Governance, Administration and Finances Law Review, 5(2), 17–31. Online: https://doi.org/10.53116/pgaflr.2020.2.2 Tamimi, S. A. A., Khalil, S., & Abdullah, H. H. (2018). Application of Strategic Management Practices in Public Sector: Cases from Some Middle East Countries. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 5(9), 36–51. Online: https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.59.5159 United Nations Development (2015). Governance for Sustainable Development. United Nations Publications. Online: https://www.undp.org/publications/discussion-paper-governance-sustainable-development Vinzant, D. H. & Vinzant, J. C. (1996). Strategy and Organisational Capacity: Finding a Fit. Public Productivity & Management Review, 20, 139–157. Wessels, J. S. (2023). Local Government: A Social Ontology of Care. Public Governance, Administration and Finances Law Review, 8(2), 41–72. Online: https://doi.org/10.53116/pgaflr.7061 Wheeland, C. M. (2004). Empowering the Vision: Community-Wide Strategic Planning in Rock Hill, South Carolina. University Press of America. The World Bank (2010a). The Gambia: Improving Civil Service Performance, Volume I: Main Analysis. Africa Region, Banjul: World Bank. Report No. 51655-GM. Online: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/952501468282550211/pdf/516550v10P10221rmReportFeb3100FINAL.pdf The World Bank (2010b). The Gambia: Improving Civil Service Performance: Public Service Pensions Policy Reform Note, Volume II. Report No. 51655-GM. Online: https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/822261468282550497/Public-service-pensions-policy-reform-note The World Bank (2017). Governance and the Law. The World Bank." ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2024) ["issueId"]=> int(599) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(43) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(7) "59–78" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(20) "10.53116/pgaflr.7519" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(2046) "

Scholars have long established the connections between strategic plans and service delivery and how lack of dedicated plans to clinically bypass the attendant complexities and intricacies tends to undermine the efficacy of the implementation process. Most research on the crucial antidote against bad governance, which is often attributed to arbitrary policy making, dearth of accountable leadership and uninformed decisions have been conducted in the developed climes where public service delivery are comparatively better served. Research about strategic plans in Africa, where most public institutions grope in the dark for lack of strategic torchlights to navigate the bumpy road to delivering public goods at a challenging time when citizens are becoming more demanding of governance dividends, is commensurably low. The paper, therefore, analysed the challenges to strategic plans implementation in achieving the objectives of public service organisations (PSOs) in The Gambia. Cross-sectional data about institutional challenges to adopted strategic plans were collected from relevant authorities and key informants, and descriptively analysed. The study revealed a range of challenges confronting implementation of strategic plans by PSOs in the country, namely, poor public service emoluments resulting in low staff morale and systemic corruption (RII = 3.90), political interference (RII = 3.88), inadequate facilities (RII = 3.86), lack of top management commitment (RII = 3.81), lack of political will (RII = 3.81), inadequate strategic management professionals and expertise (RII = 3.67), and insufficient budgetary allocations (RII = 3.66). Added to this, negative employee behaviour and attitude, negative and unfavourable internal and external environmental changes and conditions, and corruption and mismanagement of funds among others were the challenges that confronted PSOs during strategic plans implementation. The research validates strategic plan as a good governance tool for public service delivery in The Gambia.

" } ["additionalMetadatafield"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(101) "

The authors are especially thankful to the participants of this study and anonymous reviewers.

" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(30) "Sawaneh Banna, Olaiya Taiwo A." } ["prefix"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(3) "The" } ["subtitle"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(98) "Analysis of the Challenges to Strategic Plans Implementation in Public Organisations in The Gambia" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(57) "Bumpy Road to Good Governance and Public Service Delivery" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(2) { [0]=> object(Author)#890 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(9588) ["email"]=> string(19) "bsawaneh@utg.edu.gm" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(false) ["publicationId"]=> int(7643) ["seq"]=> int(4) ["userGroupId"]=> int(286) ["country"]=> string(2) "GM" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2614-389X" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(24) "University of The Gambia" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(263) "

Associate Professor of Public Administration, Department of Management Sciences, School of Business & Public Administration (SBPA), University of The Gambia (UTG) and Senior Researcher at the Center for Policy, Research and Strategic Studies (CepRass).

" } ["familyName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(7) "Sawaneh" } ["givenName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(5) "Banna" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } [1]=> object(Author)#883 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(9589) ["email"]=> string(22) "olaiyata@oauife.edu.ng" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7643) ["seq"]=> int(4) ["userGroupId"]=> int(286) ["country"]=> string(2) "GM" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2701-8596" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(24) "University of The Gambia" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(186) "

Full Professor, Department of Public Administration, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria. Visiting Professor, University of the Gambia, Serekunda, The Gambia.

" } ["familyName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Olaiya" } ["givenName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(8) "Taiwo A." } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(5) { [0]=> string(10) "challenges" [1]=> string(15) "strategic plans" [2]=> string(14) "implementation" [3]=> string(49) "public service organisations and service delivery" [4]=> string(10) "The Gambia" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#860 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(37090) ["id"]=> int(6127) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(7643) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }

object(Publication)#73 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(30) { ["id"]=> int(7757) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2024-12-17" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2024-12-17 22:36:19" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(9776) ["sectionId"]=> int(31) ["seq"]=> int(5) ["submissionId"]=> int(7633) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(6451) "Danbury, R. (2022). The EU’s Press Publisher’s Right is Too Broad. What Can Be Done about It? European Intellectual Property Review, 44(1), 20–26. Online: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/26722 Furgał, U. (2021). The EU Press Publishers’ Right: Where Do Member States Stand? Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 16(8), 887–893. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpab105 Furgał, U. (2023). The Emperor Has No Clothes: How the Press Publishers’ Right Implementation Exposes Its Shortcomings. GRUR International, 72(7), 650–664. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikad025 Harkai, I. (2020a). Új üzleti modellek az audiovizuális művek nyilvánossághoz közvetítésében I. rész [New Business Models for the Distribution of Audiovisual Works to the Public – Part 1]. Iparjogvédelmi és Szerzői Jogi Szemle, 15(2), 7–38. Harkai, I. (2020b). Új üzleti modellek az audiovizuális művek nyilvánossághoz közvetítésében II. rész [New Business Models for the Distribution of Audiovisual Works to the Public – Part 2]. Iparjogvédelmi és Szerzői Jogi Szemle, 15(3), 7–35. Harkai, I. (2021). Érvek a sajtókiadványok kiadóinak uniós védelme mellett és ellen [Arguments for and against EU Protection for Press Publishers]. Európai Jog, 21(6), 17–21. Harkai, I. & Cross, J. (2023). Comparative Analysis of the New EU Press Publishers’ Right. Revista Anales de la Facultad de Derecho, 39, 9–28. Online: https://doi.org/10.25145/j.anfade.2022.39.01 Harkai, I. (2024a). Sajtókiadók a digitális platformgazdaságban [Press Publishers in the Digital Platform Economy]. Forum Acta Juridica et Politica, 14(2), 95–106. Online: http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/id/eprint/85275 Harkai, I. (2024b). Hol a helye az online sajtónak a digitális platformgazdaságban [Where Does the Online Press Fit in the Digital Platform Economy]? In A. Badó (Ed.), Emlékkönyv Dr. Heka László egyetemi docens 65. születésnapjára (pp. 44–51). Szegedi Tudományegyetem Állam- és Jogtudományi Kar Összehasonlító Jogi és Jogelméleti Intézet. Höppner, T. (2018). EU Copyright Reform: The Case for a Publisher’s Right. Intellectual Property Quarterly, (1), 1–21. Knapstad, T. (2021). Fighting the Tech Giants – News Edition: Competition Law’s (Un)Suitability to Safeguard the Press Publishers’ Right and the Quest for a Regulatory Approach. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 16(12), 1319–1332. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpab144 Lampecco, N. (2021). EU Competition Law to the Rescue of Press Publishers’ Ancillary Rights. EU Law Live, Weekend Edition, (55), 8–14. Martial-Braz, N. (2020). The Related Right of News Publishers – Or Biased Negotiations. RIDA – Revue International Du Droit D’Auteur, 264, 163–179. Mezei, P. & Harkai, I. (2024). A platformgazdaság szerzői jogi kihívásai [Copyright Challenges of the Platform Economy]. ORAC. Moscon, V. (2019). Neighbouring Rights: In Search of a Dogmatic Foundation. The Press Publishers’ Case. In T. Pihlajarinne, J. Vesala & O. Honkkila (Eds.), Online Distribution of Content in the EU (pp. 40–61). Edward Elgar. Papadopoulou, M.-D. & Moustaka, E.-M. (2020). Copyright and the Press Publishers Right on the Internet: Evolution and Perspectives. In T.-E. Synodinou, P. Jougleux, C. Markou & T. Prastitou (Eds.), EU Internet Law in the Digital Era (pp. 99–136). Springer. Online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25579-4_5 Peguera, M. (2022). Spanish Transposition of Arts. 15 and 17 of the DSM Directive: Overview of Selected Issues. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 17(5), 450–456. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpac034 Peukert, A. (2016). An EU Related Right for Press Publishers Concerning Digital Uses. A Legal Analysis. Goethe Universität Frankfurt am Main, Faculty of Law, No. 22. Online: https://d-nb.info/1127639323/34 Pihlajarinne, T. & Vesala, J. (2018). Proposed Right of Press Publishers: A Workable Solution? Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 13(3), 220–228. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpx194 Poell, T., Nieborg, D. & van Dijck, J. (2019). Platformisation. Internet Policy Review, 8(4), 1–13. Online: https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1425 Rendas, T. (2022). Does Size Matter? The Press Publishers’ Right and the Implementation of the ‘Very Short Extracts’ Limitation. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 17(6), 473–474. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpac040 Rosati, E. (2016). Neighbouring Rights for Publishers: Are National and (Possible) EU Initiatives Lawful? International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 47(5), 569–594. Rosati, E. (2021). Copyright in the Digital Single Market. Article-by-Article Commentary to the Provisions of Directive 2019/790. Oxford University Press. Stamatoudi, I. & Torremans, R. Eds. (2021). EU Copyright Law. A Commentary (2nd ed.). Edward Elgar. Senftleben, M., Kerk, M., Buiten, M. & Heine, K. (2017). New Rights or New Business Models? An Inquiry into the Future of Publishing in the Digital Era. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 48(5), 538–561. Sganga, C. & Contardi, M. (2022). The New Italian Press Publishers’ Right: Creative, Fairness-Oriented… and Invalid? Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 17(5), 421–428. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpac028 Szalay, K. & Polyák, G. (2019). Sajtókiadók szomszédos joga: a tagállami átültetés kérdőjelei [Neighbouring Rights of Press Publishers: Issues Relating to Transposition]. Pro Futuro, 9(2), 9–25. Online: https://doi.org/10.26521/Profuturo/2019/2/5436 Szilágyi, P. (2023). A versenyjog és a digitális piacok monopóliumai. Alkalmas-e a versenyjog a digitális piacok versenyszempontú megregulázására [Competition Law and Monopolies in Digital Markets. Is Competition Law Suitable for Regulating Digital Markets?] In Medias Res, 12(1), 35–52. Online: https://doi.org/10.59851/imr.12.1.3 Vučković, R. M. (2021). The Effectiveness of the Press Publishers’ Related Right. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 52(8), 1050–1068. Westkamp, G. (2013). The New German Publisher’s Right – A Violation of European Law? A Comment. Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 3(3), 241–250. Online: https://doi.org/10.4337/qmjip.2013.03.04 " ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2024) ["issueId"]=> int(599) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(43) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(7) "79–91" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(20) "10.53116/pgaflr.7633" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(1764) "

Access to information, consumption of media products and mass media have changed radically in the age of digital technologies. News gathering and aggregation platform services and social media sites have become indispensable, making news produced by press publishers available to the public in a collected, sorted and categorised form. The construction of the right of press publishers in the CDSM Directive raises a number of questions, and doubts have only been exacerbated by the Member States’ transposition. Experience to date does not yet provide scope for a precise analysis and interpretation of the impact of Article 15. Nor is it known yet in what exact framework does the new related rights be exercised in the Member States. Transposition and subsequent events do not provide answers to the most pressing questions. These include whether competition law instruments can be more effective against the dominant platform giants, which seem reluctant to reach agreements with publishers. Does it violate the principle of contractual freedom to force industry platforms to enter into Article 15 license agreements, when experience so far clearly shows that platforms would rather stop indexing content if they had to pay a fee for the content exploitation. While the intention to promote a free and diverse press, quality journalism, access to information for citizens, public debate and the development of a democratic society is more than welcome, experience so far paints a much more nuanced picture. In order to alley the doubts, this paper attempts to look into the details of the Hungarian implementation of press publishers’ right, and to outline what do the Hungarian press industry representatives think about the new neighbouring right.

" } ["additionalMetadatafield"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(345) "

The research was supported by the Digital Society Competence Centre of the Humanities and Social Sciences Cluster of the Centre of Excellence for Interdisciplinary Research, Development and Innovation of the University of Szeged. The author is a member of the Legal, Political Aspects of the Digital Public Sphere research group.

" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(13) "Harkai Istvan" } ["subtitle"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(48) " Brief Empirical Report After the Implementation" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(34) "Press Publishers' Right in Hungary" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(Author)#857 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(9776) ["email"]=> string(25) "harkai.istvan89@gmail.com" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7757) ["seq"]=> int(5) ["userGroupId"]=> int(286) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1584-4196" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(20) "University of Szeged" ["hu_HU"]=> string(84) "a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:58:"University of Szeged Faculty of Law and Political Sciences";}" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(152) "

Assistant Professor, Institute for Comparative Law and Legal Theory, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary

" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Harkai" ["hu_HU"]=> string(6) "Harkai" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Istvan" ["hu_HU"]=> string(6) "Istvan" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(5) { [0]=> string(16) "press publishers" [1]=> string(38) "ancillary right for press publications" [2]=> string(14) "CDSM Directive" [3]=> string(16) "platform economy" [4]=> string(21) "news aggregator sites" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#896 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(37091) ["id"]=> int(6128) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(7757) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }

object(Publication)#886 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(29) { ["id"]=> int(7845) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2024-12-17" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2024-12-17 22:36:18" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(9915) ["sectionId"]=> int(31) ["seq"]=> int(6) ["submissionId"]=> int(7721) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(16226) "Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2017). Barrier Identification and Mitigation Tool. Online: https://tinyurl.com/4tfee6mm Andorno, R. (2021). Why Does Scientific Misconduct Occur? Integrity. Online: https://h2020integrity.eu/why-does-scientific-misconduct-occur/ Arksey, H. & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 8(1), 19–32. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616 Asghari, M. H., Moloudizargari, M. & Abdollahi, M. (2017). Misconduct in Research and Publication: a Dilemma That Is Taking Place. Iranian Biomedical Journal, 21(4), 203–204. Baghramian, M. & Caprioglio Panizza, S. (2022). Scepticism and the Value of Distrust. Inquiry, 1–28. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2022.2135821 Barde, F., Peiffer-Smadja, N. & de La Blanchardière, A. (2020). Fraude scientifique: une menace majeure pour la recherche médicale [Scientific Misconduct: A Major Threat for Medical Research]. La Revue de Médecine Interne, 41(5), 330–334. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revmed.2020.02.004 BEYOND (s. a.). It’s the Orchard, Not the Apples. Online: https://beyondbadapples.eu/ Boetto, E., Golinelli, D., Carullo, G. & Fantini, M. P. (2021). Frauds in Scientific Research and How to Possibly Overcome Them. Journal of Medical Ethics, 47(12). Online: https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106639 Bonetta, L. (2006). The Aftermath of Scientific Fraud. Cell, 124(5), 873–875. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.032 Boyle, P. (2022, May 4). Why Do So Many Americans Distrust Science? AAMC. Online: https://www.aamc.org/news/why-do-so-many-americans-distrust-science Bruton, S. V., Brown, M. A., Sacco, D. F. & Didlake, R. (2019). Testing an Active Intervention to Deter Researchers’ Use of Questionable Research Practices. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 4(24). Online: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073- 019-0085-3 Chalmers, I. (1990). Underreporting Research Is Scientific Misconduct. JAMA, 263(10), 1405–1408. Online: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1990.03440100121018 Couzin, J. (2006). Scientific Misconduct. Truth and Consequences. Science, 313(5791), 1222–1226. Online: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.313.5791.1222 Dooley, J. J. & Kerch, H. M. (2000). Evolving Research Misconduct Policies and Their Significance for Physical Scientists. Science and Engineering Ethics, 6(1), 109–121. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-000-0029-8 Dougherty, M. V. (2019). The Pernicious Effects of Compression Plagiarism on Scholarly Argumentation. Argumentation, 33(3), 391–412. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-019-09481-3 Eckstein, M. A. (2003). Combating Academic Fraud: Towards a Culture of Integrity. UNESCO IIEP. Online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000133038 Elliott, S. (2016). Bad Science: Cause and Consequence. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 105(4), 1358–1361. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2016.01.002 Elsayed, D. E. M. (2020). Fraud and Misconduct in Publishing Medical Research. Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences, 15(2), 131–141. Online: https://doi.org/10.18502/sjms.v15i2.6693 Enago Academy (2016). The Effect of Scientific Misconduct on a Researcher’s Career. Online: https://tinyurl.com/4dyuh2fe European Commission (2016). Define the Global and Financial Impact of Research Misconduct (DEFORM). Online: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/710246 Evans, T. R., Pownall, M., Collins, E., Henderson, E. L., Pickering, J. S., O’Mahony, A., Zaneva, M., Jaquiery, M. & Dumbalska, T. (2022). A Network of Change: United Action on Research Integrity. BMC Research Notes, 15, 1–7. Online: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06026-y Fetterman, A. K. & Sassenberg, K. (2015). The Reputational Consequences of Failed Replications and Wrongness Admission among Scientists. PLoS ONE, 10(12). Online: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143723 Fong, E. A. & Wilhite, A. W. (2021). The Impact of False Investigators on Grant Funding. Research Policy, 50(10). Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104366 Fong, E. A., Wilhite, A. W., Hickman, C. & Lee, Y. (2020). The Legal Consequences of Research Misconduct: False Investigators and Grant Proposals. Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics, 48(2), 331–339. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110520935347 Frias-Navarro, D., Pascual-Soler, M., Perezgonzalez, J., Monterde-i-Bort, H. & Pascual-Llobell, J. (2021). Spanish Scientists’ Opinion about Science and Researcher Behavior. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 24. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2020.59 Garfield, E. (1987). What Do We Know about Fraud and Other Forms of Intellectual Dishonesty in Science? Part 2: Why Does Fraud Happen and What are Its Effects? Current Contents Clinical Medicine, 15(15), 3–10. Online: http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/v10p093y1987.pdf Glenna, L. & Bruce, A. (2021). Suborning Science for Profit: Monsanto, Glyphosate, and Private Science Research Misconduct. Research Policy, 50(7). Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104290 Gopalakrishna, G., Ter Riet, G., Vink, G., Stoop, I., Wicherts, J. M. & Bouter, L. M. (2022). Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices, Research Misconduct and Their Potential Explanatory Factors: A Survey Among Academic Researchers in The Netherlands. PLoS ONE, 17(2). Online: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263023 Golden, J., Mazzotta, C. M. & Zittel-Barr, K. (2023). Systemic Obstacles to Addressing Research Misconduct in Higher Education: A Case Study. Journal of Academic Ethics, 21, 71–82. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09438-w Grant, D. B., Kovács, Gy. & Spens, K. (2018). Questionable Research Practices in Academia: Antecedents and Consequences. European Business Review, 30(2), 101–127. Online: https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-12-2016-0155 Grant, M. J. & Booth, A. (2009). A Typology of Reviews: An Analysis of 14 Review Types and Associated Methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x Grech, V. (2019). Write a Scientific Paper (WASP): Academic Hoax and Fraud. Early Human Development, 129, 87–89. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2018.12.005 Greenhalgh, T. & Peacock, R. (2005). Effectiveness and Efficiency of Search Methods in Systematic Reviews of Complex Evidence: Audit of Primary Sources. British Medical Journal, 331, 1064–1065. Online: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68 Grimes, D. R., Bauch, C. T. & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2018). Modelling Science Trustworthiness under Publish or Perish Pressure. Royal Society Open Science, 5(1). Online: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171511 Guraya, S. Y., Norman, R. I., Khoshhal, K. I., Guraya, S. S. & Forgione, A. (2016). Publish or Perish Mantra in the Medical Field: A Systematic Review of the Reasons, Consequences and Remedies. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 32(6), 1562–1567. Online: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.326.10490 Habib, A. S. & Gan, T. J. (2013). Scientific Fraud: Impact of Fujii’s Data on Our Current Knowledge and Practice for the Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 116(3), 520–522. Online: https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e31827ab7d8 Hagberg, J. M. (2020). The Unfortunately Long Life of Some Retracted Biomedical Research Publications. Journal of Applied Physiology, 128(5), 1381–1391. Online: https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00003.2020 Holbeach, N., Freckelton, I. & Mol, B. W. (2022). Journal Editors and Publishers' Legal Obligations with Respect to Medical Research Misconduct. Research Ethics, 19(2), 107–120. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161221147440 Holtfreter, K., Reisig, M. D., Pratt, T. C. & Mays, R. D. (2020). The Perceived Causes of Research Misconduct Among Faculty Members in the Natural, Social, and Applied Sciences. Studies in Higher Education, 45(11), 2162–2174. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1593352 Horbach, S. P. J. M., Breit, E., Halffman, W., Mamelund, S.-E. (2020). On the Willingness to Report and the Consequences of Reporting Research Misconduct: The Role of Power Relations. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(3), 1595–1623. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00202-8 Hussinger, K. & Pellens, M. (2019). Guilt by Association: How Scientific Misconduct Harms Prior Collaborators. Research Policy, 48(2), 516–530. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.012 Khadilkar, S. S. (2018). The Plague of Plagiarism: Prevention and Cure!!! The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 68(6), 425–431. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-018-1182-9 Kim, J. & Park, K. (2013). Ethical Modernization: Research Misconduct and Research Ethics Reforms in Korea Following the Hwang Affair. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(2), 355–380. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9341-8 Kim, M., Kim, J. & Bak, H.-J. (2018). Between Fraud and Hope: Stem Cell Research in Korea after the Hwang Affair. East Asian Science Technology and Society – An International Journal, 12(2), 143–164. Online: https://doi.org/10.1215/18752160-4201055 Krishna, A. & Peter, S. M. (2018). Questionable Research Practices in Student Final Theses – Prevalence, Attitudes, and the Role of the Supervisor’s Perceived Attitudes. PLoS ONE, 13(8). Online: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203470 Leiserowitz, A. A., Maibach, E. W., Roser-Renouf, C., Smith, N. & Dawson, E. (2013). Climategate, Public Opinion, and the Loss of Trust. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(6), 818–837. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212458272 Li, W., Gurrin, L. C. & Mol, B. W. (2022). Violation of Research Integrity Principles Occurs More Often Than We Think. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 44(2), 207–209. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.11.022 Loscalzo, J. (2012). Irreproducible Experimental Results Causes, (Mis)interpretations, and Consequences. Circulation, 125(10), 1211–1214. Online: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.098244 Memon, S. A., Makovi, K. & AlShebli, B. (2023). Characterizing the Effect of Retractions on Scientific Careers. arXiv. Online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.06710 Michalek, A. M., Hutson, A. D., Wicher, C. P. & Trump, D. L. (2010). The Costs and Underappreciated Consequences of Research Misconduct: A Case Study. Plos Medicine, 7(8). Online: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000318 Moore, R. A., Derry, S. & McQuay, H. J. (2010). Fraud or Flawed: Adverse Impact of Fabricated or Poor Quality Research. Anaesthesia, 65(4), 327–330. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06295.x Morreim, E. H. (2021). Corporations, High-Stakes Biomedical Research, and Research Misconduct: Yes They Can (and Sometimes Do). Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 8(1). Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsab014 U.S. National Science Foundation (s. a.). Research Misconduct. Online: https://oig.nsf.gov/investigations/research-misconduct Department of Health (2018). Implementation Guide and Toolkit for National Clinical Guidelines. Online: https://tinyurl.com/cdbp4ymm Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., Stewart, L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V. A., Whiting, P. & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Update Guideline for Reporting Systematic Review. PLoS Medicine, 18(3). Online: https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PMED.1003583 Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D. & Soares, C. B. (2015). Guidance for Conducting Systematic Scoping Reviews. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 141–146. Online: https://doi.org/10.1097/xeb.0000000000000050 Pickett, J. T. & Roche, S. P. (2018). Questionable, Objectionable or Criminal? Public Opinion on Data Fraud and Selective Reporting in Science. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(1), 151–171. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9886-2 Pizzolato, D., Abdi, S. & Dierickx, K. (2020). Collecting and Characterizing Existing and Freely Accessible Research Integrity Educational Resources. Accountability in Research, 27(4), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1736571 Raj, A. T., Patil, S., Sarode, S. & Salameh, Z. (2018). P-Hacking: A Wake-Up Call for the Scientific Community. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24, 1813–1814. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9984-1 Rodrigues, R. & Rituerto, M. D. (2022). Socio-Economic Impact Assessments for New and Emerging Technologies. Journal of Responsible Technology, 9. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2021.100019 Rodrigues, R. & Pizzolato, D. (2024). Insights on the Socio-Economic Impacts of Research Misconduct. Zenodo. [Preprint.] Online: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11348059 Rowbotham, M. C. (2008). The Impact of Selective Publication on Clinical Research in Pain. Pain, 140(3), 401–404. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2008.10.026 Roy, S. & Edwards, M. A. (2023). NSF Fellows’ Perceptions About Incentives, Research Misconduct, and Scientific Integrity in STEM Academia. Scientific Reports, 13. Online: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32445-3 Ščepanović, R., Labib, K., Buljan, I., Tijdink, J., & Marušić, A. (2021). Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27(1), 4. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00281-1 Shen, W., Liu, Y., Wan, G., Shi, J. & Liu, W. (2024). Performance Evaluation Considering Academic Misconduct of China’s Higher Education Institutions. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 91. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2023.101752 Science Europe (2015a). Briefing Paper on Research Integrity: What it Means, Why it Is Important and How we Might Protect it. Online: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5060051 Science Europe (2015b). Seven Reasons to Care About Integrity in Research. Online: https://tinyurl.com/463kj9zs Stavale, R., Ferreira, G. I., Galvão, J. A. M., Zicker, F., Novaes, M. R. C. G., Oliveira, C. M. D. & Guilhem, D. (2019). Research Misconduct in Health and Life Sciences Research: A Systematic Review of Retracted Literature from Brazilian Institutions. PLoS ONE, 14(4). Online: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214272 Sterken, E. (2006). The Impact of Scientific Misconduct on Child Health. Public Health Nutrition, 92(2), 273–276. Online: https://doi.org/10.1079/PHN2006951 Stern, A. M., Casadevall, A., Steen, R. G. & Fang, F. C. (2014). Financial Costs and Personal Consequences of Research Misconduct Resulting in Retracted Publications. eLife, 3. Online: https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.02956 Troughton, L. & Obasi, A. (2022). An Exploration of Practices Affecting Research Integrity in Global Health Partnerships. BMJ Global Health, 7(8). Online: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009092 UN Environment Programme (2019). Part B: Policies, Goals, Objectives and Environmental Governance: An Assessment of their Effectiveness, Chapter 10. Online: https://tinyurl.com/3e6khpvd Ware, J. J. & Munafo, M. R. (2015). Significance Chasing in Research Practice: Causes, Consequences and Possible Solutions. Addiction, 110(1), 4–8. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12673 Wellcome (2021). Research Misconduct – Grant Funding. Online: https://wellcome.org/grant-funding/guidance/research-misconduct White, C. (2015). Author of Retracted BMJ Paper is Ordered to Pay $C1.6m to Canadian Broadcaster. British Medical Journal, 351. Online: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h6211 Wible, J. R. (2023). The Economics of Scientific Misconduct. Fraud, Replication Failure, and Research Ethics in Empirical Inquiry. Routledge. Yang, J., Yang, L., Quan, H. & Zeng, Y. (2021). Implementation Barriers: A TASKS Framework. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 25(3–4), 1–14. Online: https://doi.org/10.3233/JID-210011 " ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2024) ["issueId"]=> int(599) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(43) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(8) "93–122" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(20) "10.53116/pgaflr.7721" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(873) "

Research misconduct (RM) and questionable research practices (QRPs) have a considerable impact on researchers, economy and society. Using a socio-economic impact assessment methodology, this article identifies and assesses their impacts. The objective is to help support the measures developed to promote research ethics and research integrity principles through shared responsibility (individual and institutional) and improve education and training. The article presents recommendations for policy and future research as part of a cohesive framework that takes socio-economic impacts into account.  This qualitative study advances and updates current knowledge on the impacts of RM, enriching existing research by introducing new insights, especially regarding socio-economic dimensions, affected stakeholders, and the relevance and significance of these impacts.

" } ["additionalMetadatafield"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(1053) "

The BEYOND Horizon Europe project – Beyond Bad Apples: Towards a Behavioural and Evidence-Based Approach to Promote Research Ethics and Research Integrity in Europe (2023–2025) is funded by the European Union, Grant agreement ID: 101094714. Trilateral Research is supported by UKRI Grant 10062742. This article and its contents reflect only the views of the authors and does not intend to reflect those of the European Commission or the UKRI. The European Commission or the UKRI is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains. The authors would like to thank David Barnard-Wills and Ian Slesinger of Trilateral Research (reviews), the impact identification consultation participants (Sandra Bendiscioli, Martin Canter, Hugh Desmond, Kris Dierickx, Anja Gilis, Panagiotis Kavouras, Teodora Konach, Ana Marusic, Rita Santos, and Susanne van den Hooff), the validation workshop participants (Caroline Gans Combe, Anja Gilis, Panagiotis Kavouras, Dorota Lepianka and Susanne van den Hooff) and anonymous reviewers.

" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(34) "Rodrigues Rowena, Pizzolato Daniel" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(61) "Insights on the Socio-Economic Impacts of Research Misconduct" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(2) { [0]=> object(Author)#899 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(9915) ["email"]=> string(39) "Rowena.Rodrigues@trilateralresearch.com" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7845) ["seq"]=> int(6) ["userGroupId"]=> int(286) ["country"]=> string(2) "GB" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4506-238X" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(19) "Trilateral Research" ["hu_HU"]=> string(19) "Trilateral Research" } ["biography"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(87) "

Head of Innovation & Research Services, Trilateral Research Ltd., London, UK

" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(9) "Rodrigues" ["hu_HU"]=> string(9) "Rodrigues" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Rowena" ["hu_HU"]=> string(6) "Rowena" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } [1]=> object(Author)#887 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(9916) ["email"]=> string(21) "pizzolato@eurecnet.eu" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7845) ["seq"]=> int(6) ["userGroupId"]=> int(286) ["country"]=> string(2) "DE" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3954-5924" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(5) "EUREC" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(59) "

Postdoctoral Researcher, EUREC Office, Bonn, Germany

" } ["familyName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(9) "Pizzolato" } ["givenName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Daniel" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(6) { [0]=> string(7) "impacts" [1]=> string(17) "impact assessment" [2]=> string(31) "questionable research practices" [3]=> string(18) "research integrity" [4]=> string(19) "research misconduct" [5]=> string(21) "socio-economic impact" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#888 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(37093) ["id"]=> int(6154) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(7845) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }

object(Publication)#892 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(29) { ["id"]=> int(7850) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2024-12-17" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2024-12-18 15:26:52" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(9921) ["sectionId"]=> int(31) ["seq"]=> int(7) ["submissionId"]=> int(7726) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(7727) "Acharya, K. K. & Scott, J. (2022). A Study of the Capabilities and Limitations of Local Governments in Providing Community Services in Nepal. Public Administration and Policy, 25(1), 64–77. Online: https://doi.org/10.1108/PAP-01-2022-0006 Acharya, K. K. (2021). Federalism Practice in Nepal: Does it Move in the Expected Course? Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 15(1), 20–34. Online: https://doi.org/10.3126/dsaj.v15i01.41923 Acharya, K. K. & Zafarullah, H. (2020). Institutionalizing Federalism in Nepal: Operationalizing Obstacles, Procrastinated Progress. Public Administration and Policy: An Asia-Pacific Journal, 23(2), 125–139. Online: https://doi.org/10.1108/PAP-03-2020-0013 Altunbaş, Y. & Thornton, J. (2012). Fiscal Decentralization and Governance. Public Finance Review, 40(1), 66–85. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142111424276 Arachi, G. & Zanardi, A. (2004). Designing Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations: Some Insights from the Recent Italian Reform. Fiscal Studies, 25(3), 325–365. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2004.tb00542.x Bahl, R. (2000). Intergovernmental Transfers in Developing and Transition Countries: Principles and Practice. The World Bank. Bahl, R. W. & Linn, J. (1994). Fiscal Decentralization and Intergovernmental Transfers in Less Developed Countries. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 24(1), 1–20. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3330701 Balla, S. J. & Gormley, W. T. (2017). Bureaucracy and Democracy: Accountability and Performance (4th ed.). CQ Press. Bhatta, G. (2011). Fiscal Decentralization and Fiduciary Risks: A Case Study of Local Governance in Nepal. Asian Development Bank. Bhusal, T. (2022a). Understanding Local Government Coordination: An Assessment of District Coordination Committees in Nepal. State and Local Government Review, 54(1), 68–81. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X221087909 Bhusal, T. (2022b). Nepal’s Intergovernmental Collaboration during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Conference Proceeding presented at the Hans Seidel Stiftung (HSS) Conference on Federalism in Crisis Times. New Delhi: Central University of Haryana. Bhusal, T. & Acharya, K. K. (2024). Five Years of Local Democracy in Federal Nepal (2017–2022). Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 11(2). Online: https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.389 Bhusal, T. & Breen, M. G. (2024). A Study of the First Five-Year Tenure (2017–2022) of Provincial Governments in Nepal. Asian Politics and Policy, 16(4), 524–547. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.12767 Boex, J. & Kelly, R. (2013). Fiscal Federalism and Intergovernmental Financial Relations. In R. Allen, R. Hemming & B. H. Potter (Eds.), The International Handbook of Public Financial Management (pp. 259–280). Palgrave Macmillan. Online: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137315304_13 Boadway, R. & Shah, A. (2007). Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers: Principles and Practice. Public Sector Governance and Accountability. World Bank. Choudhry, S. & Perrin, B. (2007). The Legal Architecture of Intergovernmental Transfers: A Comparative Examination. In R. Boadway & A. Shah (Eds.), Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers: Principles and Practice (pp. 259–292). World Bank. Devkota, K. L. (2009). A Brief Overview of Minimum Conditions and Performance Measures (MCPMs) of Local Bodies of Nepal. Kathmandu: LGCDP/Ministry of Local Development Nepal. Devkota, K. L. (2020). Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers in a Federal Nepal. International Centre for Public Policy Working Paper, 20-17. Online: https://icepp.gsu.edu/files/2020/11/paper2017a.pdf Dhakal, M.H. (2024). Empirical Review on Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfer in Nepal. Global Scientific and Academic Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 3(8), 41–50. Dhungana, R. K. & Acharya, K. K. (2021). Local Government’s Tax Practices from a Cooperative Federalism Perspective. Nepal Public Policy Review, 1(1), 157–178. Online: https://doi.org/10.3126/nppr.v1i1.43440 Funk, K. D. & Owen, E. (2020). Consequences of an Anti-Corruption Experiment for Local Government Performance in Brazil. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 39(2), 444–468. Online: https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22200 Gordin, J. P. (2006). Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations 'Argentine Styles',. Journal of Public Policy, 26(3), 255–277. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X06000535 Government of Nepal (2017). Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfer Act, 2017. Nepal Law Commission. Government of Nepal (2019a). Nepal: Capacity Needs Assessment for the Transition to Federalism. UNDP Nepal. Government of Nepal (2019b). Financial Procedures and Fiscal Accountability Act 2019. Nepal Law Commission. Government of Nepal (2022). Economic Survey of FY 2022/2023. Ministry of Finance. Gyawali, B. K. (2022, July 14). One-Third of Total Arrears Reveal Financial Irregularities. República. Online: https://tinyurl.com/hy9jskj6 Halligan, J. (2020). Reforming Public Management and Governance: Impact and Lessons from Anglophone Countries. Edward Elgar. Henderson, J. V. & Kuncoro, A. (2011). Corruption and Local Democratization in Indonesia: The Role of Islamic Parties. Journal of Development Economics, 94(2), 164–180. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.01.007 Hou, Y. (2011). Establishing a New Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfer System in China: The State of the Field, 1994–2010. China Review, 11(22), 213–243. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23462350 Lawton, A. & Macaulay, M. (2014). Localism in Practice: Investigating Citizen Participation and Good Governance in Local Government Standards of Conduct. Public Administration Review, 74(1), 75–83. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12161 Overseas Development Institut (2018). Uganda Budget Transparency and Accountability Strategy. Overseas Development Institute. Pandeya, G. P., Horie, M. & Wescott, C. G. (2016). Further Dissecting the Role of Citizen Participation in Strengthening Accountability of Local Governments in Nepal. International Public Management Review, 17(2), 89–117. Online: https://ipmr.net/index.php/ipmr/article/view/278 Pratchett, L. (2004). Local Autonomy, Local Democracy, and the ‘New Localism’. Political Studies, 52(2), 358–375. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00484.x Rahman, A., Kabir, M. & Razzaque, M. A. (2007). Bangladesh: Civic Participation in Subnational Budgeting. In A. Shah (Ed.), Participatory Budgeting (pp. 1–30). World Bank. Shah, A. Ed. (2006). Local Governance in Developing Countries. Public Sector Governance and Accountability. World Bank. Shah, R. K. (2016). Fiscal Federalism Model in Nepal: An Analytical Study. Tribhuvan University Journal, 30(2), 123–138. Online: https://doi.org/10.3126/tuj.v30i2.25559 Shanmugam, K. & Shanmugam, K. R. (2022). Equalisation Transfers Based on Spending Needs and Fiscal Capacity of State Governments in India. Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 16(2), 139–165. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/09738010221074595 Shrestha, R. (2019). Governance and Institutional Risks and Challenges in Nepal. Asian Development Bank. Online: https://dx.doi.org/10.22617/TCS190551 Smoke, P. (2016). Looking Beyond Conventional Intergovernmental Fiscal Frameworks: Principles, Realities, and Neglected Issues. ADBI Working Paper 606. Asian Development Bank Institute. Waheduzzaman, W., Van Gramberg, B. & Ferrer, J. (2017). Bureaucratic Readiness in Managing Local Level Participatory Governance: A Developing Country Context. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 76(2), 309–330. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12256 World Bank (1997). Helping Countries Combat Corruption. The Role of the World Bank. The World Bank. " ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2024) ["issueId"]=> int(599) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(43) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(9) "123–151" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(20) "10.53116/pgaflr.7726" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(1007) "

The Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfer (IGFT) is a crucial tool for local governments (LGs) to bridge fiscal disparities by providing the necessary funds to fulfil their functional responsibilities. In the context of federal Nepal, IGFT has been classified into four types: fiscal equalisation, conditional, special and matching grants. This research is an attempt to examine the effectiveness of these transfer types in enhancing the local governments’ accountability in Nepal. Through a combination of quantitative and qualitative data types, this study collected primary and secondary data from seven purposively selected municipalities. Our analysis finds that IGFT serves as a powerful tool for advancing accountability among local governments in Nepal. However, the current trend of centralisation within federal government agencies, limited bureaucratic capabilities at both federal and local levels and inadequate political commitment to IGFT have hindered accountability at the local level.

" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(40) "Acharya Keshav Kumar, Bhusal Thaneshwar " } ["subtitle"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(58) "Does It Lead to Greater Accountability at the Local Level?" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(42) "Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfer in Nepal" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(2) { [0]=> object(Author)#898 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(9921) ["email"]=> string(24) "keshavkacharya@gmail.com" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7850) ["seq"]=> int(7) ["userGroupId"]=> int(286) ["country"]=> string(2) "NP" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3295-0003" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(20) "Kathmandu University" ["hu_HU"]=> string(46) "a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:20:"Kathmandu University";}" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(86) "

Visiting Faculty of Kathmandu University School of Management, Kathmandu, Nepal

" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(7) "Acharya" ["hu_HU"]=> string(7) "Acharya" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(12) "Keshav Kumar" ["hu_HU"]=> string(12) "Keshav Kumar" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } [1]=> object(Author)#893 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(9922) ["email"]=> string(33) "thaneshwar.bhusal@canberra.edu.au" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7850) ["seq"]=> int(7) ["userGroupId"]=> int(286) ["country"]=> string(2) "AU" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4738-5337" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(22) "University of Canberra" } ["biography"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(117) "

Honorary Research Fellow, Faculty of Business, Government and Law, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia

" } ["familyName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Bhusal" } ["givenName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(11) "Thaneshwar " } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(4) { [0]=> string(17) "fiscal federalism" [1]=> string(33) "Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfer" [2]=> string(20) "local accountability" [3]=> string(5) "Nepal" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#901 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(37129) ["id"]=> int(6173) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(7850) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }