Press Publishers' Right in Hungary
Brief Empirical Report After the Implementation
Copyright (c) 2024 Harkai Istvan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Access to information, consumption of media products and mass media have changed radically in the age of digital technologies. News gathering and aggregation platform services and social media sites have become indispensable, making news produced by press publishers available to the public in a collected, sorted and categorised form. The construction of the right of press publishers in the CDSM Directive raises a number of questions, and doubts have only been exacerbated by the Member States’ transposition. Experience to date does not yet provide scope for a precise analysis and interpretation of the impact of Article 15. Nor is it known yet in what exact framework does the new related rights be exercised in the Member States. Transposition and subsequent events do not provide answers to the most pressing questions. These include whether competition law instruments can be more effective against the dominant platform giants, which seem reluctant to reach agreements with publishers. Does it violate the principle of contractual freedom to force industry platforms to enter into Article 15 license agreements, when experience so far clearly shows that platforms would rather stop indexing content if they had to pay a fee for the content exploitation. While the intention to promote a free and diverse press, quality journalism, access to information for citizens, public debate and the development of a democratic society is more than welcome, experience so far paints a much more nuanced picture. In order to alley the doubts, this paper attempts to look into the details of the Hungarian implementation of press publishers’ right, and to outline what do the Hungarian press industry representatives think about the new neighbouring right.
Keywords:
How to Cite
References
Danbury, R. (2022). The EU’s Press Publisher’s Right is Too Broad. What Can Be Done about It? European Intellectual Property Review, 44(1), 20–26. Online: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/26722
Furgał, U. (2021). The EU Press Publishers’ Right: Where Do Member States Stand? Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 16(8), 887–893. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpab105
Furgał, U. (2023). The Emperor Has No Clothes: How the Press Publishers’ Right Implementation Exposes Its Shortcomings. GRUR International, 72(7), 650–664. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikad025
Harkai, I. (2020a). Új üzleti modellek az audiovizuális művek nyilvánossághoz közvetítésében I. rész [New Business Models for the Distribution of Audiovisual Works to the Public – Part 1]. Iparjogvédelmi és Szerzői Jogi Szemle, 15(2), 7–38.
Harkai, I. (2020b). Új üzleti modellek az audiovizuális művek nyilvánossághoz közvetítésében II. rész [New Business Models for the Distribution of Audiovisual Works to the Public – Part 2]. Iparjogvédelmi és Szerzői Jogi Szemle, 15(3), 7–35.
Harkai, I. (2021). Érvek a sajtókiadványok kiadóinak uniós védelme mellett és ellen [Arguments for and against EU Protection for Press Publishers]. Európai Jog, 21(6), 17–21.
Harkai, I. & Cross, J. (2023). Comparative Analysis of the New EU Press Publishers’ Right. Revista Anales de la Facultad de Derecho, 39, 9–28. Online: https://doi.org/10.25145/j.anfade.2022.39.01
Harkai, I. (2024a). Sajtókiadók a digitális platformgazdaságban [Press Publishers in the Digital Platform Economy]. Forum Acta Juridica et Politica, 14(2), 95–106. Online: http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/id/eprint/85275
Harkai, I. (2024b). Hol a helye az online sajtónak a digitális platformgazdaságban [Where Does the Online Press Fit in the Digital Platform Economy]? In A. Badó (Ed.), Emlékkönyv Dr. Heka László egyetemi docens 65. születésnapjára (pp. 44–51). Szegedi Tudományegyetem Állam- és Jogtudományi Kar Összehasonlító Jogi és Jogelméleti Intézet.
Höppner, T. (2018). EU Copyright Reform: The Case for a Publisher’s Right. Intellectual Property Quarterly, (1), 1–21.
Knapstad, T. (2021). Fighting the Tech Giants – News Edition: Competition Law’s (Un)Suitability to Safeguard the Press Publishers’ Right and the Quest for a Regulatory Approach. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 16(12), 1319–1332. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpab144
Lampecco, N. (2021). EU Competition Law to the Rescue of Press Publishers’ Ancillary Rights. EU Law Live, Weekend Edition, (55), 8–14.
Martial-Braz, N. (2020). The Related Right of News Publishers – Or Biased Negotiations. RIDA – Revue International Du Droit D’Auteur, 264, 163–179.
Mezei, P. & Harkai, I. (2024). A platformgazdaság szerzői jogi kihívásai [Copyright Challenges of the Platform Economy]. ORAC.
Moscon, V. (2019). Neighbouring Rights: In Search of a Dogmatic Foundation. The Press Publishers’ Case. In T. Pihlajarinne, J. Vesala & O. Honkkila (Eds.), Online Distribution of Content in the EU (pp. 40–61). Edward Elgar.
Papadopoulou, M.-D. & Moustaka, E.-M. (2020). Copyright and the Press Publishers Right on the Internet: Evolution and Perspectives. In T.-E. Synodinou, P. Jougleux, C. Markou & T. Prastitou (Eds.), EU Internet Law in the Digital Era (pp. 99–136). Springer. Online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25579-4_5
Peguera, M. (2022). Spanish Transposition of Arts. 15 and 17 of the DSM Directive: Overview of Selected Issues. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 17(5), 450–456. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpac034
Peukert, A. (2016). An EU Related Right for Press Publishers Concerning Digital Uses. A Legal Analysis. Goethe Universität Frankfurt am Main, Faculty of Law, No. 22. Online: https://d-nb.info/1127639323/34
Pihlajarinne, T. & Vesala, J. (2018). Proposed Right of Press Publishers: A Workable Solution? Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 13(3), 220–228. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpx194
Poell, T., Nieborg, D. & van Dijck, J. (2019). Platformisation. Internet Policy Review, 8(4), 1–13. Online: https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1425
Rendas, T. (2022). Does Size Matter? The Press Publishers’ Right and the Implementation of the ‘Very Short Extracts’ Limitation. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 17(6), 473–474. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpac040
Rosati, E. (2016). Neighbouring Rights for Publishers: Are National and (Possible) EU Initiatives Lawful? International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 47(5), 569–594.
Rosati, E. (2021). Copyright in the Digital Single Market. Article-by-Article Commentary to the Provisions of Directive 2019/790. Oxford University Press.
Stamatoudi, I. & Torremans, R. Eds. (2021). EU Copyright Law. A Commentary (2nd ed.). Edward Elgar.
Senftleben, M., Kerk, M., Buiten, M. & Heine, K. (2017). New Rights or New Business Models? An Inquiry into the Future of Publishing in the Digital Era. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 48(5), 538–561.
Sganga, C. & Contardi, M. (2022). The New Italian Press Publishers’ Right: Creative, Fairness-Oriented… and Invalid? Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 17(5), 421–428. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpac028
Szalay, K. & Polyák, G. (2019). Sajtókiadók szomszédos joga: a tagállami átültetés kérdőjelei [Neighbouring Rights of Press Publishers: Issues Relating to Transposition]. Pro Futuro, 9(2), 9–25. Online: https://doi.org/10.26521/Profuturo/2019/2/5436
Szilágyi, P. (2023). A versenyjog és a digitális piacok monopóliumai. Alkalmas-e a versenyjog a digitális piacok versenyszempontú megregulázására [Competition Law and Monopolies in Digital Markets. Is Competition Law Suitable for Regulating Digital Markets?] In Medias Res, 12(1), 35–52. Online: https://doi.org/10.59851/imr.12.1.3
Vučković, R. M. (2021). The Effectiveness of the Press Publishers’ Related Right. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 52(8), 1050–1068.
Westkamp, G. (2013). The New German Publisher’s Right – A Violation of European Law? A Comment. Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 3(3), 241–250. Online: https://doi.org/10.4337/qmjip.2013.03.04
The research was supported by the Digital Society Competence Centre of the Humanities and Social Sciences Cluster of the Centre of Excellence for Interdisciplinary Research, Development and Innovation of the University of Szeged. The author is a member of the Legal, Political Aspects of the Digital Public Sphere research group.