Governing the Perceptual Infrastructure

Public Administration in the Age of Algorithmic Perception

doi: 10.53116/pgaflr.8853

Abstract

Artificial intelligence systems increasingly shape not only what information citizens access but the interpretive frameworks through which they perceive public affairs, posing a governance challenge that public administration scholarship has yet to theorise. Through conceptual and normative analysis, the paper develops the construct of perceptual infrastructure – the cognitive and informational substrate of democratic deliberation – drawing on information theory, public administration and regulatory-governance scholarship, and tests it against the EU regulatory architecture. The analysis shows that the algorithmic construction of perceptual frameworks constitutes a distinct governance domain that the EU AI Act and the Digital Services Act do not reach, owing primarily to a regulatory omission rather than an implementation deficit: existing provisions take systems, use cases and identifiable harms as their object, not the cumulative, longitudinal construction of perception. An accountability framework is proposed – incorporating aggregate transparency, perceptual sovereignty as a citizen right, proportional responsibility and meta-perceptual literacy – with concrete implications for administrative accountability, regulatory capacity and democratic resilience.

Keywords:

AI governance algorithmic accountability democratic governance public administration perceptual infrastructure EU AI Act

References

Alibašić, H. (2019). Brexit by Toby Haynes: Moral and Ethical Irrelevance and Naïve Expectations. Public Integrity, 21(5), 537–542. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2019.1626796

Alibašić, H. (2024). The Post-Factual Polity. Ethical, Governance, Administrative, and Policy Crises in the Disinformation Era. Information Age Publishing. Online: https://doi.org/10.1108/979-8-88730-661-2

Alibašić, H. & Rose, J. (2019). Fake News in Context: Truth and Untruths. Public Integrity, 21(5), 463–468. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2019.1622359

Bakshy, E., Messing, S. & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to Ideologically Diverse News and Opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132. Online: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160

Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. University of Chicago Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226924601.001.0001

Diakopoulos, N. (2015). Algorithmic Accountability: Journalistic Investigation of Computational Power Structures. Digital Journalism, 3(3), 398–415. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.976411

Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/019925043x.001.0001

Dubois, E. & Blank, G. (2018). The Echo Chamber Is Overstated: The Moderating Effect of Political Interest and Diverse Media. Information, Communication & Society, 21(5), 729–745. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656

European Parliament & Council of the European Union (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union, L, 2024/1689, 12.7.2024. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/eng

European Parliament & Council of the European Union (2022). Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a single market for digital services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act). Official Journal of the European Union, L 277, 1–102. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32022R2065

Floridi, L. (2011). The Philosophy of Information. Oxford University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199232383.001.0001

Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet. Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions that Shape Social Media. Yale University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300235029

Guess, A. M., Malhotra, N., Pan, J., Barberá, P., Allcott, H., Brown, T., Crespo-Tenorio, A., Dimmery, D., Freelon, D., Gentzkow, M., González-Bailón, S., Kennedy, E., Kim, Y. M., Lazer, D., Moehler, D., Nyhan, B., Rivera, C. V., Settle, J., Thomas, D. R., Thorson, E. A., Wang, X., Wojcieszak, M., Tucker, J. A. & Van Bavel, J. J. (2023). How Do Social Media Feed Algorithms Affect Attitudes and Behavior in an Election Campaign? Science, 381(6656), 398–404. Online: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abp9364

Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (W. Rehg, Trans.). MIT Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001

Hosseinmardi, H., Ghasemian, A., Clauset, A., Mobius, M., Rothschild, D. M. & Watts, D. J. (2021). Examining the Consumption of Radical Content on YouTube. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(32). Online: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2101967118

Landemore, H. (2013). Democratic Reason. Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many. Princeton University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691155654.001.0001

Levy, R. (2021). Social Media, News Consumption, and Polarization: Evidence from a Field Experiment. American Economic Review, 111(3), 831–870. Online: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20191777

Shannon, C. E. (1948). A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379–423. Online: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x

Statista (2024). Number of Daily Active Facebook Users Worldwide [Data set]. Online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/346167/facebook-global-dau/

Yadav, S. (2025). The European Union A.I. Act 2024: Understanding the Context and Exploring its Future (ORF Occasional Paper No. 486). Observer Research Foundation.

Yeung, K. (2018). Algorithmic Regulation: A Critical Interrogation. Regulation & Governance, 12(4), 505–523. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12158

Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.