A reziliencia a biztonság kontextusában
Copyright (c) 2025 Annamária Szöllősi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Absztrakt
A 21. századi biztonságpolitika egyik központi kérdése a reziliencia szerepe a napjaink biztonsági környezetét meghatározó tényezők között. A tanulmány azt vizsgálja, hogy a reziliencia milyen megoldást kínálhat a jelenkori biztonsági kihívások kezelésére. Ennek érdekében az EU–NATO biztonsági tengely mentén áttekinti Európa aktuális biztonsági környezetét alakító és befolyásoló releváns tényezőket, valamint kísérletet tesz a reziliencia elhelyezésére a globális biztonsági rendszer geopolitikai kihívásainak összefüggésrendszerében. A reziliencia és a biztonság közötti kapcsolat feltárásával a tanulmány rávilágít e szemlélet stratégiai jelentőségére, és amellett érvel, hogy alapvető szerepet játszhat a fenntartható biztonság megteremtésében.
Kulcsszavak:
Hivatkozások
- 1035/2012. (II. 21.) Korm. határozat Magyarország Nemzeti Biztonsági Stratégiájáról. Online: https://njt.hu/jogszabaly/2012-1035-30-22
ALCARO, Riccardo – BARGUÉS, Pol (2024): Relational Power Europe. Conflict Management and the Future of EU Foreign and Security Policy. JOINT Research Papers, 26. Online: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003559467
ANDERSSON, Jan Joel – CRAMER, Clara Sophie (2023): EUISS Yearbook of European Security 2023. European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Online: https://www.iss.europa.eu/publications/books/yearbook-european-security-2023
ARADAU, Claudia (2017): The Promise of Security. Resilience, Surprise and Epistemic Politics. In CHANDLER, David – COAFFEE, Jon (szerk.): The Routledge Handbook of International Resilience. London: Routledge, 79–91.
BARGUÉS, Pol (2022): The EU Strategic Compass: A Blueprint for a European Defensive and Securitisation Policy. JOINT Brief, 16, 1–7. Online: https://www.jointproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/joint_b_16.pdf
BODA József szerk. (2019): Rendészettudományi szaklexikon. Budapest: Ludovika.
BODA Mihály (2022): A hibrid háború etikája: az igazságos hibrid háború elmélete. In M. SZABÓ Miklós (szerk.): A hadtudomány aktuális kérdései napjainkban I. Budapest: Ludovika, 95–108.
BODA Mihály (2023): Hibrid háború: konfliktusforma a harmonikus béke és a direkt háború között – A hibrid háború katonafilozófiai értelmezése. In GŐCZE István – PADÁNYI József (szerk.): Lehelyezett kő. Budapest: Ludovika, 21–28. Online: https://bit.ly/3HQJyAX
BODA Mihály (2024): A proxyháború filozófiai és etikai megközelítésben. Honvédségi Szemle – Hungarian Defence Review, 151(6), 27–39. Online: https://doi.org/10.35926/HSZ.2023.6.3
BOLT, Neville et al. (2023): Understanding Strategic Communications: NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence Terminology Working Group Publication No. 3. Riga: NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence. Online: https://stratcomcoe.org/pdfjs/?file=/publications/download/Terminology-Report-No3-DIGITAL.pdf?zoom=page-fit
BOURBEAU, Philippe (2013): Resiliencism: Premises and Promises in Securitisation Research. Resilience, 1(1), 3–17. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2013.765738
BRETHOUS, Marie – KOVALČÍKOVÁ, Naďa (2023): Next Level Partnership: Bolstering EU-NATO Cooperation to Counter Hybrid Threats in the Western Balkans. European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep48494
BUNDE, Tobias – EISENTRAUT, Sophie – SCHÜTTE, Leonard szerk. (2025): Munich Security Report 2025: Multipolarization. Online: https://doi.org/10.47342/ezuc8623
CANNON, Shaun (2024): The Alliance’s Transition to Multi-Domain Operations. An AIRCOM Perspective. The Journal of the JAPCC, 37, 15–26. Online: https://www.japcc.org/wp-content/uploads/JAPCC_J37_screen.pdf#page=15.00
Carnegie Endowment [@CarnegieEndowment] (2024): How can the U.S. and China Reach a Realistic Coexistence? YouTube, 2024. október 17. Online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQ7U-rSVGOU
CLAUSEWITZ, Carl (1917): A háborúról. Budapest: Athenaeum.
COAFFEE, Jon – CHANDLER, David (2017): Conclusion. International Resilience and the Uncertain Future. In CHANDLER, David – COAFFEE, Jon (szerk.): The Routledge Handbook of International Resilience. London: Routledge, 385–392.
DORN, Florian – POTRAFKE, Niklas – SCHLEPPER, Marcel (2024): European Defence Spending in 2024 and Beyond: How to Provide Security in an Economically Challenging Environment. Online: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/289556/1/1884156363.pdf
EKMAN, Alice (2024): Introduction: The Politics of Contestation. In EKMAN, Alice – EVERTS, Steven (szerk.): Contestation. The New Dynamic Driving Global Politics. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2–5. Online: https://doi.org/10.2815/13410
European Commission (2020): 2020 Strategic Foresight Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Online: https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/497a17be-3824-4135-bf2b-1072d74272b3_en?filename=strategic_foresight_report_2020_1.pdf
European Commission (2023): Strategic foresight report 2023. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Online: https://doi.org/10.2792/32296
European Commission (2025): Read-out of the meeting between the President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen, and the US Special Envoy for Ukraine and Russia, General Keith Kellogg. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/read_25_539
European External Action Service (2016): Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe. A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy’. European Union. Online: https://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/top_stories/pdf/eugs_review_web.pdf
European External Action Service (2024): Annual Progress Report on the Implementation of the Strategic Compass for Security and Defence. European Union. Online: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/2024/StrategicCompass_2ndYear_Report_0.pdf
European Union (2022): A Strategic Compass for Security and Defence. Online: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/strategic_compass_en3_web.pdf
FARKAS Ádám (2022): A védelem és biztonság-szavatolás szabályozásának alapkérdései Magyarországon. Budapest: Magyar Katonai Jogi és Hadijogi Társaság.
FARKAS Ádám – RESPERGER István (2020): Az úgynevezett „hibrid hadviselés” kihívásainak kezelése és a nemzetközi jog mai korlátai. In FARKAS Ádám – VÉGH Károly (szerk.): Új típusú hadviselés a 21. század második évtizedében és azon túl. Intézményi és jogi kihívások. Budapest: Zrínyi, 132–149. Online: http://bit.ly/3ZXQUbZ
FAZEKAS Ferenc (2022): A multitér (multi-domain) műveletek kialakulása és szükségessége. Hadtudomány, 32(2), 59–73. Online: https://doi.org/10.17047/HADTUD.2022.32.2.59
FEJÉRDY Gergely – SIKLÓSI Péter – VASS Ágnes (2025): A „sokkoltak klubja” – mit üzen a párizsi informális találkozó? Magyar Külügyi Intézet. Online: https://bit.ly/4nx2sgy
FIOTT, Daniel – LINDSTROM, Gustav (2022): Strategic Compass: New Bearings for EU Security and Defence? Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Online: https://doi.org/10.2815/40834
FJÄDER, Christian (2014): The Nation-State, National Security and Resilience in the Age of Globalisation. Resilience, 2(2), 114–129. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2014.914771
GIOE, David V. – MIRONA, Marina – OZAWA, Marc (2024): Reassessing NATO’s Deterrence and Defence Posture in the Baltics: Rebalancing Strategic Priorities to Counter Russian Hybrid Aggression. Defense & Security Analysis, 41(1), 145–165. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2024.2424935
HÁBER Péter (2022): A hibrid hadviselés elméletének tömör összefoglalása a hazai szakirodalom alapján. Felderítő Szemle, 21(4), 72–94. Online: https://hhk.uni-nke.hu/document/hhk-uni-nke-hu/2022_4_Felder%C3%ADt%C5%91%20Szemle.pdf
HENIG, David – KNIGHT, Daniel M. (2023): Polycrisis: Prompts for an emerging worldview. Anthropology Today, 39(2), 3–6. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.12793
IYENGAR, Rishi (2025): Europe’s Top Leaders Meet in Paris to Stay Relevant. Foreign Policy, 2025. február 28. Online: https://foreignpolicy.com/2025/02/18/europe-emergency-meeting-paris-munich-vance-russia-saudi/
JOSEPH, Jonathan – JUNCOS, Ana E. (2024): Conceptual Politics and Resilience-At-Work In the European Union. Review of International Studies, 50(2), 373–392. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210523000463
JUNCOS, Ana E. – JOSEPH, Jonathan (2020): Resilient Peace: Exploring the Theory and Practice of Resilience in Peacebuilding Interventions. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 14(3), 289–302. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2020.1745445
KAIM, Markus – KEMPIN, Ronja (2022): Compass or Wind Chime? An Analysis of the Draft “Strategic Compass” of the EU. SWP Comment, 3, 1–8. Online: https://doi.org/10.18449/2022C03
KEENAN, Jesse M. et al. (2024): The Role of Science in Resilience Planning for Military-Civilian Domains in the U.S. and NATO. Defence Studies, 24(4), 493–524. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2024.2365218
LETZING, John (2025): Can Europe Fundamentally Reshape Its Economies to Focus On Defence? World Economic Forum. Online: https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/02/can-europe-fundamentally-reshape-its-economies-to-focus-on-defence/
MAKARYCHEV, Andrey – DIEZ, Thomas (2023): Introduction: Political Logics and Academic Rationalities of Securitisation and International Crises. Central European Journal of International and Security Studies (CEJISS), 17(2), 4–20. Online: https://doi.org/10.51870/PEOW5184
MEIJER, Bart (2025): EU ready to move fast on easing spending rules for defence. Reuters. Online: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/eu-ready-move-fast-easing-spending-rules-defence-2025-02-18/
Munich Security Conference [@MunSecConf] (2025): Main Stage I: Defiance and Diplomacy: Prospects for Ukraine’s Future. YouTube, 2025. február 15. Online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpFD-4yu230&t=2192s
NATO (2014): Wales Summit Declaration. Online: https://www.nato.int/cps/cn/natohq/official_texts_112964.htm
NATO (2022): NATO 2022 Strategic Concept. Online: https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2022/6/pdf/290622-strategic-concept.pdf
NATO (2023a): Chair of the NATO Military Committee calls for more “Kriegstüchtigkeit” and resilience at the Berlin Security Conference. Online: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_220962.htm
NATO (2023b): Joint Declaration on EU-NATO Cooperation. Online: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_210549.htm
NATO (2023c): The Secretary General’s Annual Report 2023. Online: https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2024/3/pdf/sgar23-en.pdf#page=40.99
NATO (2024): Resilience, Civil Preparedness and Article 3. Online: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_132722.htm
NITOIU, Christian - SIMIONOV, Loredana (2022): A New Business as Usual? The Impact of the ‘Resilience Turn’ on the EU’s Foreign Policy and Approach Towards the Eastern Neighbourhood. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 31(4), 1073–1085. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2021.2023484
NOVÁK-VARRÓ Virág (2021): Az „ellenálló képesség”, mint a békeépítés eszköze. Hadtudomány, 31(3), 32–43. Online: https://doi.org/10.17047/HADTUD.2021.31.3.32
PERSON, Robert – KULALIC, Isak – MAYLE, John (2024): Back to the Future: The Persistent Problems of Hybrid War. International Affairs, 100(4), 1749–1761. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiae131
PORKOLÁB Imre (2024): A Geraszimov-doktrína folytatása: Az orosz–ukrán háború tapasztalatai a stratégia tükrében. Honvédségi Szemle – Hungarian Defence Review, 152(5), 18–27. Online: https://doi.org/10.35926/HSZ.2024.5.1
PORTER, Catherine – HIGGINS, Andrew (2025): Meeting Again in Paris, European Leaders Try to Recalibrate After Trump Sides With Russia. The New York Times, 2025. február 19. Online: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/19/world/europe/europe-trump-russia-ukraine.html
POTAPPEL, Maurits (2024): How Ukraine’s Just War Challenges Just Peace Theory. Journal of Religion, Culture & Democracy, March, 1–18. Online: https://doi.org/10.54669/001c.94254
PRAKS, Henrik (2024): Russia’s Hybrid Threat Tactics Against the Baltic Sea Region: From Disinformation to Sabotage. Hybrid CoE Working Paper, 32, 1–27. Online: https://www.hybridcoe.fi/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/20240530-Hybrid-CoE-Working-Paper-32-Russias-hybrid-threat-tactics-WEB.pdf
PROCHÁZKA, Josef et al. (2023): One Threat – Multiple Responses: Countering Hybrid Threats in V4 Countries. Defense & Strategy / Obrana a strategie, 23(1), 49–73. Online: https://doi.org/10.3849/1802-7199.23.2023.01.049-073
PUGA, Jimena (2021): Post-Cold War Securitization in the European Union. Global Affairs and Strategic Studies. Online: https://www.unav.edu/web/global-affairs/seguridad-de-la-ue
RESPERGER István (2018): A válságkezelés és a hibrid hadviselés. Budapest: Dialóg Campus. Online: https://bit.ly/3Ges2pA
SHAMIM, Sarah (2025): Trump’s Ukraine Policy Shift: How Are European Leaders Planning to Respond? Al Jazeera, 2025. február 18. Online: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/2/18/trumps-ukraine-policy-shift-how-are-european-leaders-planning-to-respond
SCHLIESSER, Christine (2023): Just War and Just Peace. Seen & Unseen, 2023. március 16. Online: https://www.seenandunseen.com/just-war-and-just-peace
STEPHAN, Maria J. (2016): What Happens When You Replace a Just War With a Just Peace. Foreign Policy, 2016. május 18. Online: https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/05/18/pope-francis-just-peace-catholic-vatican-africa-isis/
SWAINE, Michael D. (2024): How to Stop the United States and China from Sliding into War. War on the Rocks, 2024. november 25. Online: https://warontherocks.com/2024/11/how-to-stop-the-united-states-and-china-from-sliding-into-war/
SZENES Zoltán (2022): Felkészülés a háborúra? A NATO új stratégiai koncepciójának értékelése. KKI Elemzések, 41, 1–16. Online: https://doi.org/10.47683/KKIElemzesek.KE-2022.41
TOCCI, Nathalie (2020): Resilience and the Role of the European Union in the World. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(2), 176–194. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2019.1640342
TONRA, Ben (2020): Resilience and the EU's Global Strategy: The Potential Promise of Justice. GLOBUS Research Paper, 4, 1–15. Online: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3541741
TOOZE, Adam (2022): Welcome to the World of the Polycrisis. Financial Times. Online: https://www.ft.com/content/498398e7-11b1-494b-9cd3-6d669dc3de33
VERHOFSTADT, Guy – DEVESA, Domènec Ruiz (2025): Trump Is Just What Europe’s Defense Needs. Politico, 2025. február 19. Online: https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-europe-us-eu-common-security-defense-policy-nato-command-attack-disruptive/
World Bank Group [é. n.]: Military expenditure (% of GDP) – United States. Online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/MS.MIL.XPND.GD.ZS?locations=US
World Economic Forum (2023): The Global Risks Report 2023. Online: https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-risks-report-2023/