Transforming Military Command: The Relevance of Coup D’oeil
Copyright (c) 2024 Ferenc Fazekas

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract
The fundamental questions of military leadership remain unchanged during the last millennia: the decisive element of the success is the able military leader. In this work I scrutinize the works of the classical military writers to find out what they considered the good military leader to be, what attributes they considered to make the difference between good and bad general. The military authors of the 18-19. centuries, such as Clausewitz, considered the ability to make quick and sound decision to be this attribute. They identified this attribute, which they called the coup d’oeil, in the context of the relatively small-scale military engagements of their era. In my work I will demonstrate how this classical coup d’oeil can be interpreted in relation to the modern operating environment. The traditional coup d’oeil is coexisting with a digital and a multi-domain coup d’oeil, and I raise attention to the increasing role of these in the future’s continually digitalizing armies.
Keywords:
References
BOLLMANN, Anders Theis – HELTBERG, Therese (2023): The Strategic Corporal, the Tactical General, and the Digital Coup d’oeil – Military Decision-Making and Organizational Competences in Future Military Operations. Scandinavian Military Studies, 6(1), 151–168. Online: https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.190
BOUDRY, Maarten – VLERICK, Michael – EDIS, Taner (2020): The End of Science? On Human Cognitive Limitations and How to Overcome Them. Biology & Philosophy, 35(18), 1–16. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-020-9734-7
CLARK, Bryan – PATT, Dan – SCHRAMM, Harrison (2020): Mosaic Warfare. Washington: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. Online: https://csbaonline.org/uploads/documents/Mosaic_Warfare.pdf
CLAUSEWITZ, Carl von (2013): A háborúról. Budapest: Zrínyi.
CLAUSEWITZ Károly (1917): A háborúról. Budapest: Athaeneum.
ECKHARDT Sándor – OLÁH Tibor (2001): Francia–Magyar Nagyszótár. Budapest: Akadémiai.
GONDA András szerk. (1994): Hadtörténelem tankönyv a katonai főiskolák számára. Budapest: MH Tanintézeti Főnökség.
JOMINI, Antoine-Henri de (1974): A hadművészet meghatározása. In RÁZSÓ Gyula szerk. (1974): A hadművészet középkori és újkori klasszikusai. Budapest: Zrínyi, 566–622.
LAYTON, Peter (2018): Fighting Artificial Intelligence Battles. Canberra: Australian Defence College. Online: https://doi.org/10.51174/JPS.004
MOLINA, Maria D. – SUNDAR, Shyam S. (2022): Does Distrust in Humans Predict Greater Trust in AI? Role of Individual Differences in User Responses to Content Moderation. New Media & Society, 26(6), 3638–3656. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221103534
MONTECUCCOLI, Raimondo (1974): Emlékiratok a háborúról. In RÁZSÓ Gyula szerk. (1974): A hadművészet középkori és újkori klasszikusai. Budapest: Zrínyi, 209–235.
MORRIS, Alan H. (2018): Human Cognitive Limitations. Broad, Consistent, Clinical Application of Physiological Principles Will Require Decision Support. Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 15(1), S53–S56. Online: https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201706-449KV
NATO (2016): Allied Tactical Publication ATP-3.2.2 Command and Control of Land Forces Edition A Version 1. Brussels: NATO Standardization Office.
NATO (2022): Allied Joint Doctrine AJP-01 Edition F Version 1. Brussels: NATO Standardization Office. Online: https://www.cimic-coe.org/resources/external-publications/ajp-01-edf-v1-f.pdf
NATO (2023): Next Generation Command and Control. Online: https://www.act.nato.int/article/next-generation-c2/
ONASZANDROSZ (1963): Sztratégikon. In HAHN István szerk. (1963): A hadművészet ókori klasszikusai. Budapest: Zrínyi, 666–685.
PERJÉS Géza (1986): Clausewitz és a háború praxeológiája. Budapest: Zrínyi.
PERJÉS Géza (2002): Zrínyi Miklós és kora. Budapest: Osiris.
RAPIN, Ami-Jacques (2023): Shrewdness, coup d’œil, and Genius: The Cognitive Attributes of the Consummate General (Greek Antiquity, Byzantine Era, Modern Times). Qeios. Online: https://doi.org/10.32388/F0CNLD
RULE, Jeffrey N. (2013): A Symbiotic Relationship: The OODA Loop, Intuition, and Strategic Thought. Carlisle: U.S. Army War College. Online: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA590672.pdf
SANTANU, Acharjee – UPASHANA, Gogoi (2024): The Limit of Human Intelligence. Heliyon, 10(12), 1–17. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32465
U. S. Army (2003). FM 6-0 Mission Command: Command and Control of Army Forces. Washington: Department of the Army.
VÁRI Rezső – BÁRCZAY Oszkár (1896): Bölcs Leó Taktikája. Hadtörténeti Közlemények, 9. 23–52. Online: http://epa.oszk.hu/00000/00018/00112/pdf/EPA00018_hadtortenelmi_1896.pdf
XENOPHÓN (1986): Emlékeim Szókratészról. Budapest: Európa.
ZRÍNYI Miklós (1986): Vitéz Hadnagy. In KOCSIS Bernát szerk. (1986): Válogatás a magyar hadügy írásaiból. Budapest: Zrínyi, 258–378.