Visegrad Countries and Migration. Does the Nation State Have a Superstate?

Absztrakt

Several serious circumstances have prompted the writing of this essay: since 2008 the crisis has remained, albeit with varying degrees of intensity, the situation in international security as well as debt and institutional crises are worsening not only in the eurozone. Probably the organized migration wave continues to move across the permeable borders of the Schengen area, showing how the European Union is fragile and helpless. German Chancellor Angela Merkel said there was no upper limit for the number of people who would be admitted to escape political persecution in their country. Germany leaves the Dublin system inconsistently, inconsistent with European cohesion, and ceases to distinguish between an immigrant and a refugee. Migration divides EU Member States into patriarchal and patrimonial and distrust between communities is increasing. Scissors are being opened between the "old" and "new" EU countries. In addition, in some regions of Europe (France, Belgium, Germany, Sweden, the United Kingdom) there are closed communities in which the majority law is not valid. Our current socio-political and economic existence is based on a traditional understanding of security. The second decade of the 21st century, however, represents a political and military conservative mirror that reflects the image of prosperity and security from a different angle than it did in previous years. The dramatic development has resulted in the huge migration of the peoples of the African and Asian continent and the division of the European Union, above all, in view of the permanent mechanism of redistribution of asylum seekers.