Rethinking the S Pillar of ESG: Corporate Social Responsibility in a Corporate and EU Context
A vállalati társadalmi felelősségvállalás vállalati és uniós kontextusban
Copyright (c) 2026 Fási Csaba

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract
This study examines the role of corporate social responsibility (CSR) within the ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) framework, with a special focus on the social (“S”) dimension and its regulatory context in the EU. The central question of the research is how the social aspect of the ESG approach can become an integral part of corporate strategy and what regulatory instruments are best suited for encouraging socially responsible operations in the EU. While the environmental dimension has seen more development to date, the social dimension is becoming more prominent, in particular through Directive 2014/95/EU and the CSRD. This study aims to explore the mechanisms through which CSR can be integrated into the day-to-day operations of companies and how these practices affect their market position and social acceptance. The study uses qualitative methods, applying legal and literature analysis, which highlights the importance of employee welfare, community relations and transparent reporting. The results suggest that the inclusion of social considerations in mandatory reporting is not only an ethical but also an economic imperative. Corporate social performance affects credit risk, investor decisions and social trust. The study will allow a deeper understanding of the relationship between CSR and the ESG framework and thus contribute to the promotion of a sustainable and inclusive economy.
Keywords:
References
ALEKSIĆ, Marko – BJEKIĆ, Radmila – RODIĆ, Marijana (2020): Application of Corporate Social Responsibility and Companies’ Environmental Performance. Journal of Engineering Management and Competitiveness, 10(2), 81–89. Online: https://doi.org/10.5937/JEMC2002081A
ALONSO-NUEZ, María-Jesús et al. (2022): Corporate Social Responsibility and Workplace Health Promotion: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. Online: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1011879
ALSAYEGH, Maha F. – ABDUL RAHMAN, Rashidah – HOMAYOUN, Saeid (2020): Corporate Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability Performance Transformation through ESG Disclosure. Sustainability, 12(9). Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093910
BECCHETTI, Leonardo – BOBBIO, Emanuele – PRIZIA, Federico – SEMPLICI, Lorenzo (2022): Going Deeper into the S of ESG: A Relational Approach to the Definition of Social Responsibility. Sustainability, 14(15). Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159668
BOROS, Anita – LENTNER, Csaba – NAGY, Vitéz (2022): A fenntarthatóság új szempontjai: a nem pénzügyi jelentések európai gyakorlatának elemzése [New Aspects of Sustainability: an analysis of non-financial reporting practices in Europe]. Pénzügyi Szemle, 67(2), 186–200. Online: https://doi.org/10.35551/Psz_2022_2_2
BRAVO, Rafael – PINA, José M. – TIRADO, Beatriz (2021): Effects of Internal Brand Knowledge Dissemination on the Employee. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 39(7), 1273–1291. Online: https://doi.org/10.1108/ijbm-12-2020-0608
BURBANO, Vanessa – DELMAS, Magali – COBO, Manuel (2023): The Past and Future of Corporate Sustainability Research. Organization & Environment, 37(2), 133–158. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266231213105
CAHYONO, Suham (2023): A Bibliographic Study for Management Control Systems on Journal of Management Accounting Research. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 25(1), 1–16. Online: https://doi.org/10.34208/jba.v25i1.1798
CALDANA, Adriana – LOURENÇÃO, Marina – KRÜGER, Caroline – PENNABEL, Adriana – SANTOS, Neusa (2021): Development of a Sustainable Brand Identity Model: Fostering the Implementation of SDGs in the Brazilian Power Sector. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 29(9), 3008–3029. Online: https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-06-2021-0363
CHEN, Huiya – JUNG, Wonsik – YOON, Sungjoon (2022): Validating Antecedent Factors Affecting Ethical Purchase Behavior: Comparing the Effect of Customer Citizenship versus Corporate Citizenship. Sustainability, 14(21). Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114486
CHEN, Jingliang – CHEN, Ning C. – YU, Kangkang – HALL, Colin M. (2021): Does Entrepreneurs’ Darwinian Social Identity Contribute to Business Performance via Corporate Social Responsibility in China? The Role of Entrepreneurs’ Well-Being. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. Online: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.781399
CHERKASOVA, Victoria – FEDOROVA, Еlena – STEPNOV, Igor (2023): Market Reaction to Firms’ Investments in CSR Projects. Journal of Economics Finance and Administrative Science, 28(55), 44–59. Online: https://doi.org/10.1108/jefas-08-2021-0150
DÚL, János – PAPP, Tekla – CSITEI, Béla (2025): Hungarian Family Enterprises and Family Farms in the Frame of Corporate Social Responsibility. Juridical Tribune – Review of Comparative and International Law, 15(1), 141–183. Online: https://doi.org/10.62768/TBJ/2025/15/1/08
FANG, Xintong – ZHANG, Xiaodan – HOU, Deshuai (2025): Is the ESG Performance of State-Owned Enterprises Becoming a Pivotal Role? – Based on the Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms. Sustainability, 17(11). Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17115072
FARKAS, Szilveszter (2013): A fenntarthatóság vállalati szintű mutatói, jellemzői. In BESZTERI, Béla (ed.): A felfedező tudomány: a Széchenyi István Egyetem és az MTA VEAB közös konferenciája. Győr, 2013. május 16. Győr: Széchenyi István Egyetem Kautz Gyula Gazdaságtudományi Kar, 60–67. Online: https://kgk-archiv.sze.hu/images/dokumentumok/VEABtanulmanyok/farkas_szilveszter.pdf
FÁSI, Csaba (2023): A fenntarthatóság dimenziói és a hazai felsőoktatási intézmények helyzetének egyes aspektusai a fenntarthatósági rangsorok tükrében [Dimensions of Sustainability and Some Aspects of the Situation of Domestic Higher Education Institutions in the Light of Sustainability Rankings]. Acta Humana – Emberi Jogi Közlemények, 11(3), 117–135. Online: https://doi.org/10.32566/ah.2023.3.6
GAÁL, Adrián – NAGY, Attila Zoltán (2025): Analysis of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises ESG Rating in Hungary. International Journal of Applied Economics, Finance and Accounting, 22(1), 82–93. Online: https://doi.org/10.33094/ijaefa.v22i1.2241
GAMBACORTA, Leonardo – POLIZZI, Salvatore – REGHEZZA, Alessio – SCANNELLA, Enzo (2023): Do Banks Practice What They Preach? Brown Lending and Environmental Disclosure in the Euro Area. ECB Working Paper, No. 2023/2872. Online: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4632041
GUROL, Burcu – LAGASIO, Valentina (2023): Women Board Members’ Impact on ESG Disclosure with Environmental and Social Dimensions: Evidence from the European Banking Sector. Social Responsibility Journal, 19(1), 211–228. Online: https://doi.org/10.1108/srj-08-2020-0308
HERMAWAN, Marko – HANDOYO, Alan (2025): Harmonizing ESG in a Local Context; Integrating Social Dimension and Kekeluargaan Values in the Context of Indonesia Culture. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(2), 2225–2236. Online: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3057
HERRERA, Juan – HERAS-ROSAS DE LAS, Carlos (2020): Corporate Social Responsibility and Human Resource Management: Towards Sustainable Business Organizations. Sustainability, 12(3). Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030841
HU, Jiaen – LÓPEZ-BONILLA, Luis M. – LÓPEZ-BONILLA, Jesús M. (2023): CSR Perceptions and Brand Attitudes in Chinese Luxury Hospitality: The Moderating Effect of Ads vs. Media Reports. Sustainability, 15(9). Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097689
KASRADZE, Mariam – SARAJI, Mahyar – ŠTREIMIKIENĖ, Dalia (2023): Challenges to Corporate Social Responsibility Adoption for Sustainability: A Picture Fuzzy Approach. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 19(5), 1254–1275. Online: https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4740
KATSAMAKAS, Evangelos – SÁNCHEZ-CARTAS, J. Manuel (2023): A Computational Model of the Competitive Effects of ESG. Plos One, 18(7). Online: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284237
LEE, Hyuck – RHEE, Tae-hwan (2023): How Does Corporate ESG Management Affect Consumers’ Brand Choice? Sustainability, 15(8). Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086795
LI, Weihao – HU, Hongbing – HONG, Zekun (2024): Green Finance Policy, ESG Rating, and Cost of Debt – Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 92. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.103051
LIN, Yuya (2024): Research on the Impact of Corporate ESG Performance on Long-Term Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Journal of Modern Business and Economics, 1(2). Online: https://doi.org/10.70767/jmbe.v1i2.230
LIPPAI-MAKRA, Edit – KOVÁCS, Zsuzsanna Ilona – KISS, Gábor Dávid (2022): The Non-Financial Reporting Practices of Hungarian Listed Public Interest Entities Considering the 2014/95/EU Directive. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 23(1), 301–318. Online: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-04-2021-0086
LIU, Dingru – JIN, Shanyue (2023): How Does Corporate ESG Performance Affect Financial Irregularities? Sustainability, 15(13). Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15139999
LIU, Kai – WANG, Jiang – LIU, Liqun – HUANG, Yingjun (2023): Mixed-Ownership Reform of SOEs and ESG Performance: Evidence from China. Economic Analysis and Policy, 80, 1618–1641. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.10.016
LIU, Manzi – LU, Jia – ZHAO, Chen – LUO, Jie – LIU, Qiyao – WANG, Hui – FANG, Shuting – YANG, Yaxin (2024): Antecedents and Consequences of Environmental, Social, and Governance: A Bibliometric Analysis Based on the Web of Science Database. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(1), 984–1001. Online: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2981
LU, Dan – MENG, Tiantian – LAU, Yeng Wai – ONG, Tze San (2025): Mechanisms of Investor Attention in Enhancing ESG Performance: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies. Discover Global Society, 3(1). Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-025-00218-0
MARKOWSKI, Łukasz – KOTLIŃSKI, Kamil – OSTROWSKA, Aleksandra (2023): Sustainable Consumption and Production in the European Union – An Attempt to Assess Changes and Convergence from the Perspective of Central and Eastern European Countries. Sustainability, 15(23). Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316485
MATOS, Pedro (2020): ESG and Responsible Institutional Investing around the World. A Critical Review. Charlottesville, VA: CFA Institute Research Foundation. Online: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3668998
MICHALSKI, Dariusz (2024): Operationalization of ESG-Integrated Strategy Through the Balanced Scorecard in FMCG Companies. Sustainability, 16(21). Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219174
NAEEM, Nasruzzaman – CANKAYA, Serkan – BILDIK, Recep (2022): Does ESG Performance Affect the Financial Performance of Environmentally Sensitive Industries? A Comparison between Emerging and Developed Markets. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22, S128–S140. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.11.014
NEWMAN, Carol – RAND, John – TARP, Finn – TRIFKOVIC, Neda (2020): Corporate Social Responsibility in a Competitive Business Environment. The Journal of Development Studies, 56, 1455–1472. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2019.1694144
NI, Kejin – ZHANG, Rui – TAN, Lei – LAI, Xiaobing (2024): How ESG Enhances Corporate Competitiveness: Mechanisms and Evidence. Finance Research Letters, 69. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106249
OTTENSTEIN, Philipp – ERBEN, Saskia – JOST, Sébastien – WEUSTER, Carl – ZÜLCH, Henning (2021): From Voluntarism to Regulation: Effects of Directive 2014/95/EU on Sustainability Reporting in the EU. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 23(1), 55–98. Online: https://doi.org/10.1108/jaar-03-2021-0075
PARK, Jong Gyu – PARK, Kijung – NOH, Heena – KIM, Yong Geun (2023): Characterization of CSR, ESG, and Corporate Citizenship through a Text Mining-Based Review of Literature. Sustainability, 15(5). Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15053892
PENG, Caizi (2025): The Impact of Goldwind’s ESG Performance on Financial Performance. Scientific Journal of Economics and Management Research, 7(5), 200–208. Online: https://doi.org/10.54691/k1abkq66
PIEŃKOWSKI, Dariusz – SKÝPALOVÁ, Renata (2024): The Unfair Value Shared in Fair Trade Value Chains. Economics and Environment, 89(2). Online: https://doi.org/10.34659/eis.2024.89.2.671
QIAN, Simeng (2024): The Effect of ESG on Enterprise Value under the Dual Carbon Goals: From the Perspectives of Financing Constraints and Green Innovation. International Review of Economics & Finance, 93, 318–331. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.03.010
SANG, Shuairan – YAN, Aiguo – AHMAD, Mahmood (2024): CEO Experience and Enterprise Environment, Social and Governance Performance: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 16(11). Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114403
SHUKLA, Akanksha – GEETIKA – SHUKLA, Nimesh (2021): Corporate Social Responsibility Measures: A Brief Review. Business Perspectives and Research, 10(1), 101–120. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/2278533721992206
SZALAY, Rita ed. (2021): ESG Jelentési Útmutató. Budapest: Budapesti Értéktőzsde. Online: https://www.bet.hu/Kibocsatok/Ajanlasok-kibocsatoknak/bet-esg-/esg-guide
SZENDREY, Orsolya – DOMBI, Mihály (2024): A hazai fenntarthatósági közzététel helyzete és fejlődési lehetőségei [Status and potential for development of domestic sustainability disclosure]. Észak-magyarországi Stratégiai Füzetek, 21(1), 98–114. Online: https://doi.org/10.32976/stratfuz.2024.8
THOMPSON, Cedric (2023): Global Reporting Initiative (GRI): Purpose, Standards, and Importance. Investopedia.com, 17 May 2023. Online: https://www.investopedia.com/global-reporting-initiative-7483127
TOJEIRO-RIVERO, Damián – MORENO, Rosina (2019): Technological Cooperation, R&D Outsourcing, and Innovation Performance at the Firm Level: The Role of the Regional Context. Research Policy, 48(7), 1798–1808. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.006
TÓTH, Tibor (2018): Az európai szociális modell változásai és perspektívái. European Mirror, 21(2), 33–50. Online: https://folyoirat.ludovika.hu/index.php/eumirror/article/view/1178/499
TŐZSÉR, Dávid – LAKNER, Zoltán – SUDIBYO, Novy A. – BOROS, Anita (2024): Disclosure Compliance with Different ESG Reporting Guidelines: The Sustainability Ranking of Selected European and Hungarian Banks in the Socio-Economic Crisis Period. Administrative Sciences, 14(3). Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14030058
United Nations (1992): United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3–14 June 1992. Online: https://www.un.org/en/conferences/environment/rio1992
United Nations (2005): A Legal Framework for the Integration of Environmental, Social and Governance Issues into Institutional Investment. Online: https://www.unepfi.org/industries/investment/a-legal-framework-for-the-integration-of-environmental-social-and-governance-issues-into-institutional-investment/
WANG, Binli (2025): ESG Performance and Corporate Competitive Advantage. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 156(1), 144–150. Online: https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2025.20652
WANG, Runze – ZHU, Wenli (2024): How Does ESG Performance Affect Corporate Financial Performance? Scientific Journal of Economics and Management Research, 6(7), 54–61. Online: https://doi.org/10.54691/a3rjcc12
WANYAN, Ruiyun – ZHAO, Tongpu (2024): The Contradictory Impact of ESG Performance on Corporate Competitiveness: Empirical Evidence from China’s Capital Market. Journal of Environmental Management, 371. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123088
World Economic Forum (2016): The Compact for Responsive and Responsible Leadership: A Roadmap for Sustainable Long-Term Growth and Opportunity. Online: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/Media/AM17/The_Compact_for_Responsive_and_Responsible_Leadership_09.01.2017.pdf
WUT, Tai Ming – XU, Jing – WONG, Shun-Mun H. (2023): Timing and Congruence Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility Practices on Social Media Crises in the Tourism Industry. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 14(2), 154–171. Online: https://doi.org/10.1108/jhtt-02-2022-0043
ZHANG, Dongyang – BAI, Dingchuan – CHEN, Xingyu (2024): Can Crude Oil Futures Market Volatility Motivate Peer Firms in Competing ESG Performance? An Exploration of Shanghai International Energy Exchange. Energy Economics, 129. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107240
ZHANG, Hua – LAI, Jie (2024): Greening through ESG: Do ESG Ratings Improve Corporate Environmental Performance in China? International Review of Economics & Finance, 96. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103726
ZHANG, Yanyun – ZHOU, Qi – XIA, Weibang – RATHER, Luqman J. – LI, Qing (2022): Sonochemical Mordanting as a Green and Effective Approach in Enhancing Cotton Bio Natural Dye Affinity through Soy Surface Modification. Journal of Cleaner Production, 336. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130465
ZHANG, Zhaoting – ZHANG, Lei (2024): Investor Attention and Corporate ESG Performance. Finance Research Letters, 60. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104887
ZHAO, Wu (2024): Research Trend in the Development of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG). Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences, 122(1), 183–194. Online: https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2024.17815
EU related legislation
Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 on sustainability‐related disclosures in the financial services sector
Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2020 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment, and amending Regulation (EU) 2019/2088
Regulation (EU) 2023/956 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023 establishing a carbon border adjustment mechanism
Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups
Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting
Directive (EU) 2024/1760 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on corporate sustainability due diligence and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 and Regulation (EU) 2023/285
Directive (EU) 2025/794 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 April 2025 amending Directives (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards the dates from which Member States are to apply certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements
European Commission (2021a): ‘Fit for 55’: Delivering the EU's 2030 Climate Target on the Way to Climate Neutrality. COM/2021/550. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52021DC0550
European Commission (2021b): The European Pillar of Social Rights Action Plan. COM(2021) 102 final. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52021DC0102
European Union (2017): Communication from the Commission – Guidelines on non-financial reporting (methodology for reporting non-financial information). C/2017/4234. Online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/845ab879-6182-11e7-9dbe-01aa75ed71a1