A Dialogue Between Innovation and Regulation: The Interaction Between Experimental Regulatory Instruments and Corporate Compliance

  • Firniksz Judit
doi: 10.32575/ppb.2024.3.5

Abstract

Over the past decade, in digital markets there has been a notable increase in the use of experimental regulatory instruments which facilitate innovation by offering a provisional exemption from the prevailing regulations, within a structured environment of monitored risks and supervision while at the same time they provide avenues for regulatory learning through discourse and enhance the understanding of emerging technologies for both external and internal regulators. Commencing with an examination of the compliance aspects of digital companies, the paper proceeds to distinguish between the external and internal dimensions of corporate compliance. Within this interpretative framework, it outlines the conceptual and theoretical background of experimental regulatory instruments, taking into account developments within the EU’s Better Regulation agenda as well. Subsequently, the paper illustrates the learning process based on regulatory dialogue and demonstrates the possibilities for interaction between change and uncertainty management mechanisms in external and internal regulatory dimensions. Furthermore, it highlights the potential of internal corporate sandboxes through the example of addressing the issue of shadow AI generated by large language models.

Keywords:

digital compliance digital markets experimentary regulatory instruments regulatory testbeds living labs regulatory sandboxes

References

+ Key Digital Transformation Statistics (2024). Online: https://explodingtopics.com/blog/digital-transformation-stats#dt-market-stats, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/global-size-of-digital-transformation-market-forecasted-to-reach-usd-3-739-06-billion-by-2030--with-23-6-cagr-growth-polaris-market-research-301685062.html#:~:text=According%20to%20the%20research%20study,USD%203%2C739.06%20Billion%20By%202030.

ABBAS, Roba – MICHAEL, Katina (2022): Socio-Technical Theory: A review. In PAPAGIANNIDIS, Savvas (szerk.): TheoryHub Book. open.ncl.ac.uk, 124–142.

APPAYA, Mandepanda Sharmista – GRADSTEIN, Helen Luskin – HAJI KANZ, Mahjabeen (2020): Global Experiences from Regulatory Sandboxes (English). World Bank Group Fintech Note, No. 8/2020. Online: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/912001605241080935/Global-Experiences-from-Regulatory-Sandboxes

A Tanács következtetései a szabályozói tesztkörnyezetekről és a kísérleti záradékokról mint a digitális kor gyökeres változtatást igénylő kihívásainak kezelését szolgáló innovációbarát, időtálló és reziliens szabályozási keret eszközeiről (2020/C 447/01) (2020). Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/HU/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52020XG1223(01)

ATTREY, Angela – LESHER, Molly – LOMAX, Christopher (2020): The Role of Sandboxes in Promoting Flexibility and Innovation in the Digital Age. OECD Going Digital Toolkit Policy Note, No. 2. Online: https://goingdigital.oecd.org/ toolkitnotes/the-role-of-sandboxes-in-promoting-flexibility-and-innovation-in-the-digital-age.pdf

BARAN, Grzegorz (2020): Social Innovation Living Labs as Platforms to Co-design Social Innovations. Journal of Intercultural Management, 12(1), 36–57. Online: https://doi.org/10.2478/joim-2019-0031

BAUKNECHT, Dierk et al (2021): How to Design and Evaluate a Regulatory Experiment? A Guide for Public Administrations. Online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350707383_How_to_design_and_evaluate_a_Regul atory_Experiment_A_Guide_for_Public_Administrations

BAUKNECHT, Dierk – KUBECZKO, Klaus (2024): Regulatory Experiments and Real-World Labs: A Fruitful Combination for Sustainability. GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 33(1), 44 –50. Online: https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.33.S1.7

BENNETT MOSES, Lyria (2011): Agents of Change: How the Law ʻCopesʼ with Technological Change. Griffith Law Review, 20(4), 763–794. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2011.10854720

BERTSCHEK, Irene et al. (2023): Lernende Regulatorik als Innovationstreiber Anregungen zur Ausgestaltung des Reallabore-Gesetzes. National Academy of Science and Engineering Publications. Online: https://en.acatech.de/publication/driving-innovation-with-regulatory-learning/

CIRIOLO, Emanuele et al. (2016): Behavioural Insights Applied to Policy Application to Specific Policy Issues and Collaboration at EU Level. Workshop report. European Commission Joint Research Centre. Online: https://doi.org/10.2760/267723

COLES, Cameron (2024): Shadow AI: How Employees Are Leading the Charge in AI Adoption and Putting Company Data at Risk. Cyberhaven, 2024. május 21. Online: https://www.cyberhaven.com/blog/shadow-ai-how-employees-are-leading-the-charge-in-ai-adoption-and-putting-company-data-at-risk

Digital Transformation: How to Scope and Execute Strategy (2024). Online: https://www.gartner.com/en/information-technology/topics/digital-transformation

DIJCK, Gijs Van – GESTEL, Rob Van (2011): Better Regulation Through Experimental Legislation. European Public Law, 17(3), 539–553. Online: https://doi.org/10.54648/EURO2011037

DÖMÖTÖRFY Borbála Tünde (2024): A hídembereké a jövő? jogaszvilag.hu, 2024. március 5. Online: https://jogaszvilag.hu/a-jovo-jogasza/a-hidembereke-a-jovo/

European Commission (2023): Commission Staff Working Document on Regulatory Learning in the EU. Guidance on Regulatory Sandboxes Testbeds, and Living Labs in the EU, With a Focus Section on Energy. SWD(2023) 277 final. Online: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-12199-2023-INIT/en/pdf

EC Better Regulation Toolbox (2021). Version of 3 November 2021. Online: https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-making-process/planning-and-proposing-law/better-regulation/better-regulation-guidelines-and-toolbox_en

ELMAWAZINI, Khaled et al. (2022): Do Regulatory Policies Matter to Corporate Innovation? International Review of Financial Analysis, 84, article number: 102398. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102398

EU Cybersecurity Certification (2024). Online: https://www.enisa.europa.eu/topics/certification/eu-cybersecurity-certification-faq

EU Digital Identity: 4 Projects Launched to Test EUDI Wallet (2023). Online: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/eu-digital-identity-4-projects-launched-test-eudi-wallet

European Blockchain Sandbox (2024). Online: ttps://ec.europa.eu/digital-building-blocks/sites/display/EBSI/Sandbox+Project

FIRNIKSZ Judit (2023): Pillanatkép a digitális piacok szabályozásáról. Budapest: Wolters Kluwer.

FØLSTAD, Asbjørn (2008): Living Labs for Innovation and Development of Information and Communication Technology: A Literature Review. The Electronic Journal for Virtual Organizations and Networks, 2008(10), 99–129. Online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259255452_Living_Labs_for_Innovation_and_Development_of_Information_and_Communication_Technology_A_Literature_Review

GUBLER, Zachary J. (2015): Making Experimental Rules Work. Administrative Law Review, 67(3), 551–593. Online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24799524

HOLLÓ Richárd (2023): A magyar energiajogi szabályozásba bevezetett regulatory sandbox klauzulák. A szabályozási tesztkörnyezetek értékelése és azok potenciálja. Közigazgatástudomány, 3(1), 171–185. Online: https://doi.org/10.54200/kt.v3i1.55

IANSITI, Marco – LAKHANI, Karim R. (2020): Competing in the Age of AI: Strategy and Leadership When Algorithms and Networks Run the World. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.

Innovation Principle. (2022). Online: https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/document/download/294b40e0-ad5a-448e-9612-ea87b5b9e48e_en?filename=ec_rtd_factsheet-innovation-principle.pdf

KÁDÁR Krisztián (2012): A közigazgatás stratégiai tervezésének és fejlesztésének módszertana. Budapest: Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem. Online: https://tudasportal.uni-nke.hu/xmlui/handle/20.500.12944/100048

KERT, Kaia – VEBROVA, Michaela – SCHADE, Sven (2022): Regulatory Learning in Experimentation Spaces. European Commission, JRC130458. Online: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC130458

KOOP, Christel – LODGE, Martin (2017): What Is Regulation? An Interdisciplinary Concept Analysis. Regulation & Governance, 11(1), 95–108. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12094

KSH Digitális Gazdaság 2020 (2020). Központi Statisztikai Hivatal. Online: https://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xftp/idoszaki/ikt/2020/02/index.html#ahazaivllalkozsokktharmadavanjelenonline

LEIMULLER, Gertraud – WASSERBACHER-SCHWARZER, Silvia (2020): Regulatory Sandboxes. Analytical Paper for BusinessEurope. Vienna. Online: https://www.businesseurope.eu/sites/buseur/files/media/other_docs/regulatory_sandboxes_-_winnovation_analytical_paper_may_2020.pdf

LIE, Rico – VAN PAASSEN, Annemarie – WITTEVEEN, Loes (2023): Living Labs and Innovation Platforms: A Literature Review. Worldfish Program Report 2023. Online: https://worldfishcenter.org/publication/living-labs-and-innovation-platforms-literature-review

LYYTINEN, Kalle – YOO, Youngjin – BOLAND, Richard J (2015): Digital Product Innovation Within Four Classes of Innovation Networks. Information Systems Journal, 26(1), 47–75. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12093

Making Space for Innovation: The Handbook for Regulatory Sandboxes (2019). Berlin: Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy. Online: https://www.congreso.es/docu/docum/ddocum/dosieres/sleg/legislatura_14/spl_5/pdfs/20.pdf

NAGY Zoltán (2023): Modern technológiák és jogi szabályozásukkal kapcsolatos elméleti kérdések. In NAGY Zoltán (szerk.): Az összehasonlító jog eszközével a gyűlölet ellen. Az online gyűlöletbeszéd, zaklatás és megfélemlítés nemzetközi szabályozása. Budapest: Mádl Ferenc Összehasonlító Jogi Intézet, 21–32. Online: https://doi.org/10.47079/2023.nz.gyuloletbeszed.10_1

New European Innovation Agenda on the Move (2024). Report on the State of Play of the New European Innovation Agenda. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. Online: https://doi.org/10.2777/097305

Oslo Manual. Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, 4th Edition, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities (2018). OECD Publishing. Online: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en

OGUS, Anthony I. (2004): Regulation: Legal form and Economic Theory. Oxford: Hart.

ORBACH, Barak (2016): What Is Regulation? Yale Journal on Regulation, 2016. július 25. Online: https://www.yalejreg.com/bulletin/what-is-regulation/

ORBACH, Barak – BOETTCHER, Shanen – ZAN, Ofir (2023): AI Adaptation: A Primer for Corporate Directors. Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 23–32, November 30, 2023. Online: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4662300

PACCES, Alessio M. – van den BERGH, Roger J. (2011): An Introduction to the Law and Economics of Regulation. RILE Working Paper Series No. 2011/03. Online: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1914417

PASMORE, Willam A. (1988): Designing Effective Organizations: The Sociotechnical Systems Perspective. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

RANCHORDAS, Sofia (2013): The Whys and Woes of Experimental Legislation. Theory and Practice of Legislation, 1(3), 415–440. Online: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2604506

RANCHORDAS, Sofia – VINCI, Valeria (2024): Regulatory Sandboxes and Innovation-friendly Regulation: Between Collaboration and Capture. Italian Journal of Public Law, 16(1), 107–139. Online: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4696442

Regulatory Experimentation: Moving Ahead on the Agile Regulatory Governance Agenda (2024). OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, No. 47. Online: https://doi.org/10.1787/f193910c-en

Regulatory Sandboxes in Artificial Intelligence (2023). OECD Digital Economy Papers, 13 July 2023. Online: https://www.oecd.org/publications/regulatory-sandboxes-in-artificial-intelligence-8f80a0e6-en.htm

SÁNTHA György (2013): A pilot mint tervezés-módszertani eszköz, avagy tervezési „kép a képben”. In GELENCSÉR Balázs Szabolcs (szerk.): Modellkísérletek a közigazgatás fejlesztésében. Az ún. „pilot projektek” határai elméletben és gyakorlatban. Budapest: Pázmány Press. Online: https://jak.ppke.hu/uploads/articles/227518/file/modellkiserletek_kotet.%20_0515pdf.FINAL.pdf

STRIHÓ Krisztina – SZEGEDI László (2023): A digitális egységes piac kezdeti lépései – egységes uniós szabályozás eltérő tagállami végrehajtás. Magyar Közigazgatás, 11(4), 127–147. Online: https://doi.org/10.32575/ppb.2023.4.7

ŠTEFANEK, Štefan. (2022): Regulatory Sandboxes and Experimentation Clauses: an Attempt to Make the (Croatian) Legal System More Entrepreneurial. Conference Paper. EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series (ECLIC). 6. 213–235. Online: https://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/22416

Top 100 Digital Transformation Statistics & Trends To Help You Navigate it in 2024 (2024). Online: https://quixy.com/blog/top-digital-transformation-statistics-trends/

TÓTH András (2016): Technológia és versenyjog. In TÓTH András (szerk.): Technológia jog. Új globális technológiák jogi kihívásai. Budapest: Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem Állam- és Jogtudományi Kar, 141–161. Online: http://www.kre.hu/ajk/images/doc/Uj_technologia_jog_kotet.pdf

TRUBY, Jon et al. (2022): A Sandbox Approach to Regulating High-Risk Artificial Intelligence Applications. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 13(2), 270–294. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2021.52

A New European Innovation Agenda (2022). A Bizottság közleménye az Európai Parlamentnek, a Tanácsnak, az Európai Gazdasági és Szociális Bizottságnak és a Régiók Bizottságának – (COM(2022) 332 final). Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52022DC0332

World Bank Key Data from Regulatory Sandboxes across the Globe (2020). Online: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/fintech/brief/key-data-from-regulatory-sandboxes-across-the-globe

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.