Comparative Overview of International Regulatory Attempts Regarding Artificial Intelligence – Through the Lens of Human Rights
Copyright (c) 2023 Hárs András
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract
The race to regulate artificial intelligence on the international level started in the last couple of years, when several international organizations have begun drawing up their own regulatory attempts. Among the most rapid regulators are the European Union, the OECD, the UNESCO and the Council of Europe. If there is one common aspect in the draft proposals and recommendations set forth by these organizations is an emphasis on human rights. However, human rights are not a homogenous mass, and the human rights understanding as well as the methods, means and goals of these organizations differ greatly. Therefore, the questions are raised whether there can be cooperation or competition on the international level and whether having multiple actors serves or hinders the international community.
Keywords:
References
Ad Hoc Committee on Artificial Intelligence (CAHAI) (2021): Extract from CM(2019)131. Online: https://rm.coe.int/cahai-2021-09rev-elements/1680a6d90d
Arisztotelész (1969): Politika. Budapest: Gondolat.
Asaro, Peter (2019): A Review of Private Sector AI Principles: A Report Prepared for UNIDIR. Unpublished report prepared for UN.
Aust, Anthony (2010): Handbook of International Law. második kiadás. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Center for Security and Emerging Technology (2022): Artificial Intelligence White Paper. Online: https://cset.georgetown.edu/publication/artificial-intelligence-white-paper-2022/
Committee of Experts on Internet Intermediaries (MSI-NET) (2017): Algorithms and Human Rights. Study on the Human Rights Dimensions of Automated Data Processing Techniques (in Partricular Algorithms) and Possible Regulatory Implications. Online: https://rm.coe.int/algorithms-and-human-rights-study-on-the-human-rightsdimension-of-aut/1680796d10
Dawes, James (2020): Speculative Human Rights: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of the Human. Human Rights Quarterly, 42(3), 573–593. Online: https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2020.0033
Donahoe, Eileen – MacDuffee Metzger, Megan (2019): Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Journal of Democracy, 30(2), 115–126. Online: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0029
Fjeld, Jessica et al. (2020): Principled Artificial Intelligence: Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-based Approaches to Principles for AI. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research, 2020. január 15. Online: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3518482
Floridi, Luciano et al. (2018): AI4People – An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
Franke, Ulrike (2019): Harnessing Artificial Intelligence. European Council on Foreign Relations, 2019. június 25. Online: https://ecfr.eu/publication/harnessing_artificial_intelligence/
Fukuda-Parr, Sakiko – Gibbons, Elizabeth (2021): Emerging Consensus on ‘Ethical AI’: Human Rights Critique of Stakeholder Guidelines. Global Policy, 12(6), 32–44. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12965
Klabbers, Jan (2002): An Introduction to International Institutional Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165051
McKay, Conor – Pollack, Ethan – Fitzpayne, Alastair (2019): Automation and a Changing Economy. Part II: Policies for Shared Prosperity. Aspen: The Aspen Institute. Online: https://www.aspeninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Automation-and-a-Changing-Economy_Policies-for-Shared-Prosperity_April-2019.pdf
OECD (2019): Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence. Online: https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449
OECD (2021): National Policy Toolkit. Online: https://goingdigital.oecd.org/data/notes/No14_ToolkitNote_AIStrategies.pdf
Opderbeck, David W. (2021): Artificial Intelligence, Rights and the Virtues. Washburn Law Journal, 60(3), 445–474. Online: https://contentdm.washburnlaw.edu/digital/collection/wlj/id/7379/rec/66
Risse, Mathias (2019): Human Rights and Artificial Intelligence: An Urgently Needed Agenda. Human Rights Quarterly, 41(1), 1–16. Online: https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2019.0000
Roberts, Huw et al. (2021): The Chinese Approach to Artificial Intelligence: An Analysis of Policy, Ethics, and Regulation. AI & Society, 36(1), 59–77. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00992-2
Sample, Ian (2018): Joseph Stiglitz on Artificial Intelligence: ‘We’re Going Towards a More Divided Society’. The Guardian, 2018. szeptember 8. Online: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/sep/08/joseph-stiglitz-on-artificial-intelligence-were-going-towards-amore-divided-society
Shaw, Malcolm N. (2002): Nemzetközi jog. Ford. Dunay Pál et al. Budapest: Osiris. The White House (2022): Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights. Online: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Blueprint-for-an-AI-Bill-of-Rights.pdf
UNESCO (2021): Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380455
Urgent Action Needed Over Artificial Intelligence Risks to Human Rights. UN News, 2021. szeptember 15. Online: https://news.un.org/en/story/2021/09/1099972
Jogi források
Javaslat az Európai Parlament és a Tanács rendelete a mesterséges intelligenciára vonatkozó harmonizált szabályok (a mesterséges intelligenciáról szóló jogszabály) megállapításáról és egyes uniós jogalkotási aktusok módosításáról. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/HU/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0206
Constitution of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation, UNTC No. 52. Online: https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%204/volume-4-I-52-English.pdf
Convention on the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (with Supplementary Protocols Nos. 1 and 2). UNTC No. 12736. Online: https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%20888/volume-888-I-12736-English.pdf
European Parliament Resolution of 20 October 2020 on Intellectual Property Rights for the Development of Artificial Intelligence Technologies, 2020/2015. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0277_EN.html
European Parliament Resolution of 20 October 2020 with Recommendations to the Commission on a Civil Liability Regime for Artificial Intelligence, 2020/2014. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0276_EN.html
European Parliament Resolution of 20 October 2020 with Recommendations to the Commission on a Framework of Ethical Aspects of Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Related Technologies, 2020/2012. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0275_EN.html
Executive Order 13960. Promoting the Use of Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in the Federal Government. Online: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/12/08/2020-27065/promoting-the-use-of-trustworthy-artificial-intelligence-in-the-federal-government