Latvia’s Ambiguous Attitude towards the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities: Is Diversity a Threat?
Copyright (c) 2024 Kascian Kiryl
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
On 22 February 2024, the Advisory Committee on the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities published a critical opinion on Latvia within the framework of the fourth monitoring cycle. This text is centred on government comments as an important element of the standardised FCNM monitoring mechanisms provided by the Latvian Government during the four monitoring circles. This study identifies and assesses the key arguments and techniques employed by Latvia in this sectoral dialogue framework. It shows that the Latvian authorities view diversity as a threat to social cohesion, and their endeavours, inter alia, in the minority education domain, combine references to Latvia’s traumatic historical experience, constitutional identity, and the margin of state discretion that camouflage the absence of political will to advance minority rights. Among other negative factors, this signals a dangerous path that could likely be followed by other states that are parties to this Convention.
Keywords:
How to Cite
References
Auers, D. (2013). Latvia. In S. Berglund, J. Ekman, K. Deegan-Krause & T. Knutsen (Eds.), The Handbook of Political Change in Eastern Europe (pp. 85–123). Edward Elgar.
Council of Europe (s. a.). Latvia, Country-specific Monitoring of the Implementation of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities. Online: https://www.coe.int/en/web/minorities/latvia
Di Federico, G. & Martinico, G. (2023). Official Languages, National Identities and the Protection of Minorities: A Complex Legal Puzzle. Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) 7 September 2022, Case C-391/20, Boriss Cilevičs et al., ECLI:EU:C:2022:638. European Constitutional Law Review, 19(2), 346–370. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/S157401962300010X
Dimitrovs, A. (2019, May 2). A Dangerous Precedent for Minority Rights: the Latvian Constitutional Court’s Ruling on Minority Schools. VerfassungsBlog. Online: https://doi.org/10.17176/20190517-144117-0
Dimitrovs, A. (2020, June 23). Riga and Venice on a Collision Course: On the Controversial New Constitutional Court Decisions on Minority Languages in Latvia. VerfassungsBlog. Online: https://doi.org/10.17176/20200624-003808-0
Fourth Opinion (2024, February 22). Fourth Opinion on Latvia: Advisory Committee on the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities. ACFC/OP/IV(2023)1. Online: https://rm.coe.int/4th-op-latvia-en/1680ae98f6
Ganty, S. & Kochenov, D. V. (2022, July 22). Citizenship Imposition Is the New Non-Discrimination Standard: ECtHR Blames the Victims in Savickis. VerfassungsBlog. Online: https://doi.org/10.17176/20220722-113542-0
Ganty, S. & Kochenov, D. V. (2023, November 23). Hijacking Human Rights to Enable Punishment by Association: Valiullina, Džibuti and Outlawing Minority Schooling in Latvia. Strasbourg Observers. Online: https://shorturl.at/hEP12
Government comments (2011, March 30). Comments of the Government of Latvia on the First Opinion of the Advisory Committee on the implementation of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities by Latvia. Online: https://rm.coe.int/1st-com-latvia-en/090000168008c94c
Government comments (2014, January 3). Comments of the Government of Latvia on the Second Opinion of the Advisory Committee on the implementation of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities by Latvia. Online: https://rm.coe.int/2nd-com-latvia-en/090000168008f51e
Government comments (2018, September 21). Comments of the Government of Latvia on the Third Opinion of the Advisory Committee on the implementation of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities by Latvia. Online: https://rm.coe.int/3rd-com-latvia-en/16808d91a6
Government comments (2024, February 19). Comments of the Government of Latvia on the Fourth Opinion of the Advisory Committee on the implementation of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities by Latvia. Online: https://rm.coe.int/4th-com-latvia-en/1680ae98f5
Kascian, K. (2019, October 3). Judicial Path to Nowhere? Challenging the Minority Education Reform before Latvia’s Constitutional Court. VerfassungsBlog. Online: https://doi.org/10.17176/20191003-232709-0
Kascian, K. (2023). Evolution of Lithuania’s Approach towards Writing of Personal Names in the Official Documents: On the Verge of Liberalisation? Public Governance, Administration and Finances Law Review, 8(2), 73–86. Online: https://doi.org/10.53116/pgaflr.6746
Kolstø, P. & Tsilevich, B. (1997). Patterns of Nation Building and Political Integration in a Bifurcated Postcommunist State: Ethnic Aspects of Parliamentary Elections in Latvia. East European Politics and Societies, 11(2), 366–391. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325497011002008
Krivcova, E. (2023, July 28). Language litigation in the field of higher education in the Constitutional Court of Latvia and the EU Court of Justice. ICELDS. Online: https://shorturl.at/bsA17
Muižnieks, N. (2011). Latvian–Russian Memory Battles at the European Court of Human Rights. In N. Muižnieks (Ed.), The Geopolitics of History in Latvian–Russian Relations (pp. 219–238). Academic Press of the University of Latvia.
Morris, H. M. (2005). The Non-Citizens of the EU. In D. J. Smith (Ed.), The Baltic States and Their Region. New Europe or Old? Vol. 3. On the Boundary of Two Worlds: Identity, Freedom, and Moral Imagination in the Baltics (pp. 251–273). Rodopi.
National Statistical System of Latvia (s. a.). Population by ethnicity at the beginning of year 1935–2023. Online: https://shorturl.at/nDEI5
Nugraha, I. Y. (2023). Protection of Constitutional Identity as a Legitimate Aim for Differential Treatment: ECtHR 9 June 2022, No. 49270/11, Savickis and Others v. Latvia. European Constitutional Law Review, 19(1), 141–162. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019622000463
Office of Citizenship and Migration Affairs (2024, January 24). Latvijas iedzīvotāju sadalījums pēc nacionālā sastāva un valstiskās piederības (Datums = 01.01.2024) [Distribution of Latvia’s population according to ethnic composition and nationality (Date = 01.01.2024)]. Online: https://www.pmlp.gov.lv/lv/media/11043/download
Phillips, A. (2002, September 1). FCNM: From Analysis to Action – Protecting minorities in Europe. Minority Rights Group. Online: https://shorturl.at/wCGQ3
Purs, A. (2012). Baltic Facades. Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania Since 1945. Reaktion Books.
Salnītis, V. & Skujenieks, M. (1937). Ceturtā tautas skaitīšana Latvijā 1935. gadā. IV: Tautība [Fourth Population Census in Latvia in 1935. IV: Nationality]. State Statistical Office. Online: https://shorturl.at/ahjHK
Smooha, S. (2002). The Model of Ethnic Democracy: Israel as a Jewish and Democratic State. Nations and Nationalism, 8(4), 475–503. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8219.00062
TVP Wilno (2022, January 18). V. Čmilytė-Nielsen o oryginalnej pisowni nazwisk: jest to kwestia godności ludzkiej [V. Čmilytė-Nielsen on the Original Writing of Names: It Is a Question of Human Dignity]. Online: https://tinyurl.com/4a4pxfhy
Ziemele, I. (2020). A Non-Recognition Policy with Regards to the Occupation of Latvia. In A. Sprūds, V. Ščerbinskis & K. Bukovskis (Eds.), The Centenary of Latvia’s Foreign Affairs. Global Thought and Latvia (pp. 100–116). Latvian Institute of International Affairs.
The author dedicates this article to the memory of Aleksandr Kuzmin aka Aleksandrs Kuzmins (1984–2021), lawyer, politician and minority rights activist from Latvia.