Government Cybersurveillance and AI: A New Equation

doi: 10.53116/pgaflr.7108


There is a tension between state oversight and state intrusion into our personal lives. The analytical powers of artificial intelligence/machine learning and the pervasive data collection of the Internet of Things, the Smart City and all those personal devices we use together permit revelations as to our lives as never seen before. We must consider the impact of this on the relations between citizen and government in this new, ubiquitous world of government cybersurveillance and revelation.


surveillance cybersurveillance artificial intelligence algorithms

How to Cite

Losavio, M. (2024). Government Cybersurveillance and AI: A New Equation. Public Governance, Administration and Finances Law Review, 9(1), 5–20.


Axon Enterprise, Inc. (2019). First Report of the Axon AI & Policing Technology Ethics Board. Online:

Bensinger, K. & Chang, A. (2013, April 20). Boston Bombings: Social Media Spirals out of Control. Los Angeles Times. Online:

Berryhill, J., Heang, K. K., Clogher, R. & McBride, K. (2019). Hello, World: Artificial Intelligence and Its Use in the Public Sector. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, (36). Online:

Campbell, D. (2001, October 17). US Buys Up All Satellite War Images. Manchester Guardian.

CBS News (2013, April 24). Social Media and the Search for the Boston Bombing Suspects. CBS News. Online:

Connors, B. & Zauderer, A. (2013, January 2). Police Use Facebook to ID Waterford Robbery Suspects. NBC Connecticut. Online:

Davidson, R. (2019, August 8). Automated Threat Detection and the Future of Policing. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. Online:

Deeks, A. S. (2018). Predicting Enemies. Virginia Law Review, 104(8), 1529–1592. Online:

Dutton, T. (2018, December 6). Building an AI World: Report on National and Regional Strategies. CIFAR. Online:

Dyer, J. (2013, April 27). Social Media and the Boston Bombings. BBC Radio. Online:

Gianni, R., Lehtinen, S. & Nieminen, M. (2022). Governance of Responsible AI: From Ethical Guidelines to Cooperative Policies. Frontiers in Computer Science, 4. Online:

International Association of Chiefs of Police. (2011). Survey of Law Enforcement’s Use of Social Media Tools.

Losavio, J. D. & Losavio, M. M. (2014). Prosecution and Social Media. In C. D. Marcum & G. E. Higgins (Eds.), Social Networking as a Criminal Enterprise (pp. 197–220). Taylor & Francis. Online:

Losavio, M., Elmaghraby, A. & Losavio, A. (2018). Ubiquitous Networks, Ubiquitous Sensors: Issues of Security, Reliability and Privacy in the Internet of Things. In N. Boudriga, M. S. Alouini, S. Rekhis, E. Sabir & S. Pollin (Eds.), Ubiquitous Networking. UNet 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), 11277. Springer. Online:

Misuraca, G. & Van Noordt, C. (2020). AI Watch. Artificial Intelligence in Public Services. Publications Office of the European Union. Online:

Mitrou, L. (2018). Data Protection, Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Services: Is the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) ‘Artificial Intelligence-Proof’? Online:

Perry, W. L., McInnis, B., Price, C. C., Smith, S. & Hollywood, J. S. (2013). Predictive Policing. The Role of Crime Forecasting in Law Enforcement Operations. RAND Corporation. Online:

Saravia, E. (2022). Prompt Engineering Guide. GitHub. Online:

Stuart, R. D. (2013, February 5). Social Media: Establishing Criteria for Law Enforcement Use. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. Online:

Wallach, W. & Marchant, G. E. (2018). An Agile Ethical/Legal Model for the International and National Governance of AI and Robotics. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. Online:

Winfield, A. F. & Jirotka, M. (2018). Ethical Governance Is Essential in Building Trust in Robotics and Artificial Intelligence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2133). Online:


Download data is not yet available.