Transferring Digital Artworks on Online Market Platforms
Abstract
By writing this paper, the authors intended to answer questions raised by the transfer of digital artworks in the online space. At the beginning of the study, the basic expressions, including NFT digital artwork, will be explained. Then, it will be examined how these new forms of artwork can be treated by civil law. Although NFTs change hands daily, their legal nature, i.e. if they shall be deemed as things in the civil law sense, is unclear. If NFTs are treated as things, they can be a subject of ownership, and the provisions on the transfer of ownership rights shall be applied, which raises several further questions. According to another approach, NFTs embody the right to dispose, while there are other opinions as to which NFTs, following the model of bank account money, shall be deemed as claims facilitating the application of the provisions of the law of obligations. After reviewing the different approaches to the legal nature of NFTs, features of online auctions of NFT artworks will be introduced. Then, it will be examined if the platforms enabling online auctions fall under the scope of the recently adopted Digital Market Act and if so, which rules of the Act are applicable for them.
Keywords:
How to Cite
References
Bacsó, R. (2016). Virtuális valuta mint a modern kori pénzpiaci szabályozás kihívása [Virtual Currency as a Challenge of the Modern Financial Market Regulation]. Polgári Szemle, 12(1–3), 244–251. Online: https://shorturl.at/nuCF3
Cifrino, C. (2014). Virtual Property, Virtual Rights: Why Contract Law, Not Property Law, Must be the Governing Paradigm in the Law of Virtual Worlds. Boston College Law Review, 55(1), 235–264. Online: https://shorturl.at/amqY1
De Filippi, P. & Wright, A. (2019). Blockchain and the Law. The Rule of Code. Harvard University Press.
European Central Bank (2015). Virtual Currency Schemes – A Further Analysis. Online: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/virtualcurrencyschemesen.pdf
Frye, B. L. (April 19, 2021). NFTs & the Death of Art. Online: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3829399
Garbers-von Boehm, K., Haag, H. & Gruber, K. (2022). Intellectual Property Rights and Distributed Ledger Technology with a focus on art NFTs and tokenized physical artwork. Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs Directorate-General for Internal Policies. Online: https://shorturl.at/hjySU
Juhász, Á. (2021). Intelligent Contracts – A New Generation of Contractual Agreements? European Integration Studies, 16(1), 41–53. Online: https://ojs.uni-miskolc.hu/index.php/eis/article/view/963
Juhász, Á. (2023). Hagyományos magánjogi megoldások – 21. századi kihívások [Conventional Private Law Solutions – 21st Century Challenges]. In Karlovitz, János Tibor (Ed.), What Will Our Future Be Like? (pp. 222–234). Sozial und Wirtschafts Forschungsgruppe.
Kőhidi, Á. (2022). A virtuális valóság pszeudoreáliáinak polgári jogi vizsgálata [Civil Law Analysis of Virtual Reality Pseudorealia]. In Medias Res, 11(2), 55–66. Online: https://inmediasresfolyoirat.hu/imr/article/view/251
Kulakova, O. S. (2022). Digital Art in the Light of NFT: Market Role and Legal Uncertainty. Digital Law Review, 3(2), 36–50. Online: https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2022-3-2-36-50
Radin, J. M. (1982). Property and Personhood. Stanford Law Review, 34(5), 957–1015. Online: https://doi.org/10.2307/1228541
Rohr, J. & Wright, A. (2019). Blockchain-Based Token Sales, Initial Coin Offerings, and the Democratization of Public Capital Market. Hastings Law Journal, 70(2), 463–524. Online: https://shorturl.at/bcv12
Szilágyi, F. (2022a). Kié a digitális adat? Az allokatív adatjog létjogosultsága a magánjogi (dologi jogi) megközelítés margóján. I. rész [Who Owns the Digital Data? The Justification of Allocative Data Law in the Context of the Private Law (in Rem) Approach. Part I]. Polgári Jog, 7(9–10). Online: https://doi.org/10.55413/193.A2200501.POJ
Szilágyi, F. (2022b). Kié a digitális adat? Az allokatív adatjog létjogosultsága a magánjogi (dologi jogi) megközelítés margóján. II. rész [Who Owns the Digital Data? The Justification of Allocative Data Law in the Context of the Private Law (in Rem) Approach. Part II]. Polgári Jog, 7(11–12). Online: https://doi.org/10.55413/193.A2200602.POJ
Sztermen, O. L. (2022). A digitális műalkotások megjelenési kérdései I. terminológiai problémák [Appearance and Legal Terminology of Digital Artworks: Part One: Thoughts on Terminology]. Miskolci Jogtudó, 6(3), 70–83. Online: https://shorturl.at/beoyP
Wang, G., Gunasekaran, A., Ngai, E. W. T & Papadopoulos, T. (2016). Big Data Analytics in Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Certain Investigations for Research and Applications. International Journal of Production Economics, 176(June), 98–110. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.03.014
Woebbeking, M. K. (2019). The Impact of Smart Contracts on Traditional Concepts of Contracts Law. JIPITEC – Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law, 10(1), 106–113. Online: https://shorturl.at/btGJM
