Principles for the Europeanisation of Public Administration

In Search of the European Procedural Administrative Principles

doi: 10.53116/pgaflr.6850

Abstract

Administrative regimes are no longer isolated phenomena: they are constantly confronted with international influences, which shape the internal structure and system of the states. The cooperation between the European Union and the Member States’ administration is today a kind of convergence in principles. This is what the EU expects from the candidate countries and in the neighbourhood policy. The main question of the study is whether the content of the principles used by the EU is cognisable and consistent. The study covers two policy instruments: the SIGMA project, which is a joint EU–OECD collaboration, and the comparative legal activities of the ReNEUAL. These instruments testify two completely different attitudes: one does not explain the principle but holds it accountable, the other seeks the means to understand its content and the reasons for the differences in interpretations. Both programs have undergone internal development, but while SIGMA has moved away from its administrative procedural roots, ReNEUAL has confirmed it. The paper is another argument in favour of the need for administrative research using the tools of comparative law.

Keywords:

EU OECD SIGMA ReNEUAL principles accountability

How to Cite

Gerencsér, B. S. (2023). Principles for the Europeanisation of Public Administration: In Search of the European Procedural Administrative Principles. Public Governance, Administration and Finances Law Review, 8(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.53116/pgaflr.6850

References

Balázs, I. (2020a). Európai közigazgatási térség [European Administrative Area]. In A. Jakab, M. Könczöl, A. Menyhárd & G. Sulyok (Eds.): Internetes Jogtudományi Enciklopédia [Internet Encyclopedia of Law]. Online: http://ijoten.hu/szocikk/europai-kozigazgatasi-terseg

Balázs, I. (2020b). Az Európai Közigazgatási Tér és az európai közigazgatási jog [The European Administrative Area and European Administration Law]. In A. Lapsánszky (Ed.), Közigazgatási jog. Szakigazgatásaink elmélete és működése [Administrative Law. Theory and Functioning of Our Specialised Administrations]. Wolters Kluwer. 70–90.

Boros, A. (2018). Európai közigazgatási eljárásjog – megjegyzések a Parlament rendelettervezetének margójára [European Law of Administrative Procedures – Notes on the Draft Regulation of Parliament]. Jogtudományi Közlöny, 4, 202–209.

Della Cananea, G. (2017). The ‘Common Core’ of Administrative Laws in Europe: A Research Agenda. In The Common Core of European Administrative Law. Working Papers Series, 1/2017.

Della Cananea, G. & Bussani, M. (2019). The ‘Common Core’ of Administrative Laws in Europe: A Framework for Analysis. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 26(2), 217–250. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X19827817

Della Cananea, G. & Caranta, R. (2020). Tort Liability of Public Authorities in European Laws. Oxford University Press.

Della Cananea, G. & Andenas, M. (2021). Judicial Review of Administration in Europe. Oxford University Press.

Conticelli, M. & Perroud, T. (2021). Procedural Requirements for Administrative Limits to Property Rights. Oxford University Press.

European Commission (2018). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A credible enlargement perspective for and enhanced EU engagement with the Western Balkans. COM(2018) 65 final. Online: https://bit.ly/3JADrPh

Grabbe, H. (2003). Europeanisation Goes East: Power and Uncertainty in the EU Accession Process. In K. Featherstone & C. M. Radaelli (Eds.), The Politics of Europeanisation. Oxford University Press. 319–320. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199252092.003.0013

Heidbreder, E. G. (2011). Structuring the European Administrative Space: Policy Instruments of Multi-level Administration. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(5), 709–727. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.586800

Józsa, Z. (2003). Az európai közigazgatási tér összefüggéseiről [On the Context of the European Administrative Area]. Magyar Közigazgatás, 53(12), 723–735.

Láncos, P. L. & Gerencsér, B. Sz. (2015). Az európai közigazgatási jog [European Administration Law]. In B. Sz. Gerencsér (Ed.), Összehasonlító és Európai Uniós Közigazgatási Jog [Comparative and EU Administration Law]. Pázmány Press.

Polt, P. (2019). A költségvetés büntetőjogi védelmének egyes elméleti és gyakorlati kérdései. Hazai gyakorlat és uniós mechanizmusok [Certain Theoretical and Practical Issues of the Criminal Protection of the Budget. Domestic Practices and Union Mechanisms]. Dialóg Campus.

ReNEUAL (2014). Model Rules on EU Administrative Procedure. Version for online publication. Online: https://bit.ly/45ZODyd

ReNEUAL (2017). Model Rules on EU Administrative Procedure. Updated Version 2015 for publication in print by Oxford University Press. Online: https://bit.ly/3Ntsl0J

Rose-Ackerman, S., Lindseth, P. L. & Emerson, B. (2019). Introduction. In S. Rose-Ackerman, P. Lindseth & B. Emerson (Eds.), Comparative Administrative Law. Edward Elgar.

Schindler, B. (2017). Der Kodifikationsentwurf für ein EU-Verwaltungsverfahrensrecht aus schweizerischer Perspektive [ReNEUAL Model Rules on EU Administrative Procedure – A Swiss Perspective]. Die Verwaltung, 50(1), 51–76. Online: https://doi.org/10.3790/verw.50.1.51

Sántha, Gy. (2021). A menedzselt állam. A menedzsmentciklusok és az öntökéletesítő folyamatok jelentősége a közigazgatás-fejlesztésben [The Managed State. The Significance of Management Cycles and Self-Perfecting Processes in the Development of Public Administration]. Doctoral thesis, PPKE JÁK.

SIGMA (1999). European Principles for Public Administration. SIGMA Papers, No. 27. CCNM/SIGMA/PUMA(99)44/REV1. Online: https://www.sigmaweb.org/publicationsdocuments/36972467.pdf

SIGMA–OECD (2017). The Principles of Public Administration. Online: https://www.sigmaweb.org/publications/Principles-of-Public-Administration-2017-edition-ENG.pdf

SIGMA–OECD (2019). Methodological Framework for the Principles of Public Administration. Online: https://bit.ly/3Jd2DuP

SIGMA–OECD (2021). Monitoring Report of Serbia. Online: https://www.sigmaweb.org/publications/Monitoring-Report-2021-Serbia.pdf

Tamás, A. (2010). A közigazgatási jog elmélete [The Theory of Administration Law]. Szent István Társulat.

Torma, A. (2011). Az Európai Közigazgatási Térségről – magyar szemmel [On the European Administrative Area – From a Hungarian Perspective]. Miskolci Jogi Szemle, 6, 196–210.

Varga, Zs. A. (2017). A közigazgatás és a közigazgatási jog alkotmányos alapjai (The constitutional basis of public administration and administration law), Dialog Campus, 2017. 91.

Varga, Zs. A. (2020). Magyarország szuverenitása [Hungary’s Sovereignty]. In L. Csink, B. Schanda & Zs. A. Varga (Eds.), A magyar közjog alapintézményei [The Basic Institutions of Hungarian Public Law]. Pázmány Press.

Waldo, D. (2006). The Administrative State: A Study of the Political Theory of American Public Administration. Routledge.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.