Public Perception of the Hungarian Local Government Reform

Results of an Empirical Study

doi: 10.53116/pgaflr.2022.2.3

Abstract

Following a change of government in 2010, the Hungarian local government system underwent a period of significant transformation. The question of how it is viewed and the effects it may have are currently being debated. The centralising effort of the government had already become clear beyond a shadow of a doubt before the adoption of the Cardinal Act or the Fundamental Law (2011) itself. This was followed by the steps of the local government reform, which transferred many local government powers to the state. Municipalities lost influence over local public education institutions, municipal hospitals and many other areas. In this situation, where there was a significant loss of influence by local elites, it became an interesting question to what extent this changed society’s relationship with local government. Our comprehensive research has conducted a number of quantitative and qualitative studies to answer this question. Between 2016 and 2018, our research group had the opportunity to conduct four empirical studies to assess knowledge, attitudes and opinions related to local government. This paper presents and interprets the results of this research, and an important area of public attitudes towards local government, in particular with regard to the division of responsibilities between the state and municipalities.

Keywords:

local government empirical studies reform centralising efforts

How to Cite

Badó, A., & Feleky, . G. Public Perception of the Hungarian Local Government Reform: Results of an Empirical Study. Public Governance, Administration and Finances Law Review, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.53116/pgaflr.2022.2.3

References

Aaberge, R. & Langorgen, A. (2006). Measuring the Benefits from Public Services: The Effects of Local Government Spending on the Distribution of Income in Norway. Review of Income and Wealth, 52(1), 61–83. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2006.00176.x

Agranoff, R. (2014). Local Governments in Multilevel Systems: Emergent Public Administration Challenges. American Review of Public Administration, 44(4_suppl), 47–62. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074013497629

Almond, G. (1950). The American People and Foreign Policy. Harcourt, Brace and Co.

Aristotle (1932). Politics. Translated by H. Rackham. Loeb Classical Library 264. Harvard University Press.

Badó, A., Feleky, G. & Lőrinczi, J. (2016). Reprezentativitás a magyar ülnökrendszerben. Egy empirikus vizsgálat alapkérdése I. MTA Law Working Papers, 3(16), 1–18. Online: https://bit.ly/3VSLRFK

Badó, A., Feleky, G., Lőrinczi, J. & Patyi, Zs. (2017a). Összehasonlító motivációs vizsgálat a szegedi joghallgatók körében. MTA Law Working Papers, 4(11), 1–41. Online: https://bit.ly/3FNSIdX

Badó, A., Feleky, G. & Lőrinczi, J. (2017b). Laikus és professzionális bírák viszonya a kevert bíróságban – Egy empirikus vizsgálat eredményei a magyar ülönkrendszerről. Állam- és Jogtudomány, 58(1), 3–28.

Badó, A., Lőrinczi, J. & Patyi, Zs. (2018). A joghallgatók helyi önkormányzatokkal kapcsolatos jogtudat vizsgálatának táblázatos eredményei. Comparative Law Working Papers, 2(3), 1‒40. Online: https://bit.ly/3VR2Zf0

Badó, A., Feleky, G. & Lőrinczi, J. (2019). Empirical Research in Hungary about Lay and Professional Judge Relations in Mixed Tribunals: Fair or Self-Distancing Aristocratism. HSOA Journal of Forensic, Legal & Investigative Sciences, 5(28), 1–12. Online: http://doi.org/10.24966/FLIS-733X/100028

Bjørnå, H. & Jenssen, S. (2006). Prefectoral Systems and Central–Local Government Relations in Scandinavia. Scandinavian Political Studies, 29(4), 308–332. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2006.00154.x

Bordogna, L. & Neri, S. (2014). Austerity Policies, Social Dialogue and Public Services in Italian Local Government. European Review of Labour and Research, 20(3), 357–371. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258914535548

Brackertz, N. (2013). Political Actor or Policy Instrument? Governance Challenges in Australian Local Government. Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance, 12, 3–19. Online: https://doi.org/10.5130/cjlg.v12i0.3261

Bulmer, E. (2015). Local Democracy. International IDEA.

Callanan, M. (2011). Review of International Local Government Efficiency Reforms. Local Government Research Series, Report no. 1. Institute of Public Administration (IPA). Online: https://bit.ly/3PlFNTz

Chan, J. L. (2019). New Development: China Renews Reform of Central–Local Fiscal Relations and Provides for Basic National Public Services. Public Money & Management, 39(1), 64–69. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1537707

Chen, Z., Li, D. & Wang, J. (2010). Citizens’ Attitudes Toward Local Government Public Services. Public Performance & Management Review, 34(2), 221–235. Online: http://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576340204

Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., Garcia-Sanchez, I. M. & Prado-Lorenzo, J. M. (2013). Effect of Modes of Public Services Delivery on the Efficiency of Local Governments: A Two-stage Approach. Utilities Policy, 26(C), 23–35. Online: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2013.04.005

Dawkins, R. (2021). Private Contracting and Citizen Attitudes Toward Local Government. Urban Affairs Review, 57(5), 1286–1311. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087420918660

Devereux, P. J. & Weisbrod, B. A. (2006). Does “Satisfaction” with Local Public Services Affect Complaints (Voice) and Geographic Mobility (Exit)? Public Finance Review, 34(2), 123–147. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142105282963

Dollery, B., Crase, L. & Byrnes, J. (2006). Local Government Failure: Why Does Australian Local Government Experience Permanent Financial Austerity? Australian Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 339–353. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10361140600848952

Falleth, E. & Hovik, S. (2009). Local Government and Nature Conservation in Norway: Decentralisation as a Strategy in Environmental Policy. Local Environment, 14(3), 221–231. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13549830802692849

Forray, R. K. & Kozma, T. (2013). Menekülés az iskolától. Educatio, 22(1), 23‒34.

Gawłowski, R. & Paweł, M. (2019). Innovation in Public Service Delivery in Terms of Shared Services Centres in Local Governments: A Case Study of the City of Toruń (Poland). Zarządzanie Publiczne, 50(4), 39–53.

Giannoccaro, R., Costantino, N., Ludovico, A. & Pietroforte, R. (2008). Measuring Citizen Satisfaction with Aspects of Public Services from a Local Authority and Determining Their Importance: A Case Study. Public Organization Review, 8(1), 1–15. Online: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-007-0044-1

Gerschenkron, A. (1984). A gazdasági elmaradottság történelmi távlatból. Translated by Halmos K., Hegedűs J. & Kertesi G. Gondolat.

Haque, A. (2012). Theoretical Perspective of Local Government – Literature Review. Research Institute of Behavioural Psychology. Online: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/45868/

Hardell, S., Johansson Sevä, I. & Öun, I. (2020). Welfare Service Privatization and Opinions about Service Quality: The Role of Political Ideology Among Local Politicians and the Public. Social Policy & Administration, 54(1), 45–59. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12509

James, O. (2011). Managing Citizens’ Expectations of Public Service Performance: Evidence from Observation and Experimentation in Local Government. Public Administration, 89(4), 1419–1435. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01962.x

Kadirbeyoğlu, Z. & Sümer, B. (2012). The Neoliberal Transformation of Local Government in Turkey and the Contracting Out of Municipal Services: Implications for Public Accountability. Mediterranean Politics, 17(3), 340–357. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2012.725301

Kákai, L. (2013). Önkormányzat és lakosság viszonya, avagy bizalom vagy bizalmatlanság. In Csefkó Ferenc (Ed.), Közigazgatás és az emberek (pp. 153–170). A Jövő Közigazgatásáért Alapítvány.

Kákai, L. (2019). Útkereső önkormányzatok. Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem.

Keivani, R., Parsa, A. & McGreal, S. (2001). Globalisation, Institutional Structures and Real Estate Markets in Central European Cities. Urban Studies, 38(13), 2457–2476. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120094614

Kudo, H. (2015). Bridging the Gap between Reform Practices and Literatures: New Public Service Delivery of Japanese Local Governments. International Public Management Review, 16(1), 147–164.

Michels, R. (2001). Political Parties. Kitchener, Batoche Books.

Milán-García, J., Rueda-López, N. & De Pablo-Valenciano, J. (2021). Local Government Efficiency: Reviewing Determinants and Setting New Trends. International Transactions in Operational Research, 29(5), 2871–2898. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.13032

Mina, S. & Surugiu, I. (2013). Different Ways of Analysing the Effects of Public-Private Partnership in Organizing Public Services. Constanta Maritime University Annals, 14(20), 247–250.

Murphy, P., Greenhalgh, K. & Jones, M. (2011). Comprehensive Performance Assessment and Public Services Improvement in England? A Case Study of the Benefits Administration Service in Local Government. Local Government Studies, 37(6), 579–599. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2011.623160

Narbón-Perpiná, I. & De Witte, K. (2018). Local Governments’ Efficiency: A Systematic Literature Review. International Transactions in Operational Research, 25(2), 431–468. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12364

Nurse, A. (2015). Bridging the Gap? The Role of Regional Governance in Delivering Effective Local Public Services: Evidence from England. Planning Practice & Research, 30(1), 69–82. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2015.1008802

Powell, M., Gillett, A. & Doherty, B. (2019). Sustainability in Social Enterprise: Hybrid Organizing in Public Services. Public Management Review, 21(2), 159–186. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1438504

Plato (1997). Republic. Translated by G. M. A. Grube, rev. C. D. C. Reeve. In J. M. Cooper (Ed.), Plato. Complete Works (pp. 971–1223). Hackett Publishing Co.

Reddick, C. G., Perlman, B. J. & Demir, T. (2022). Citizen Satisfaction with Public Service Delivery: A Test of Alternative Theories. Canadian Public Administration, 65(2), 352–371. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12464

Reid, M. (2012). Managing Central-Local Government Relationships: The Case of New Zealand. Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance, (11), 3–32. Online: https://doi.org/10.5130/cjlg.v0i0.3055

Sellers, J. M. & Lidström, A. (2007). Decentralization, Local Government, and the Welfare State. Governance, 20(4), 609–632. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00374.x

Suditu, B., Nae, M., Negut, S. & Gheorghilaş, A. (2014). Responsibilities and Limits of Local Government Actions against Users of Public Services of Planning and Sustainable Territorial Development in Romania. Amfiteatru Economic Journal, 16(35), 154–170. Online: https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/168819

Szüdi, J. (s. a.). Az önkormányzati vagyon állami használatba vétele. drszudi.hu. Online: https://bit.ly/3BsCAf5

Tamás, V. (2014). Politikai élet a helyi önkormányzatokban. MTA TK PTI. Online: https://bit.ly/3Wd6hbY

Tarditi, V. (2020). Policy Framing and Party Competition: The Italian Political Debate on Local Public Services since the Economic Crisis. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 13(1), 633–664.

Tocqueville, A. (2000). Democracy in America. Translated by G. Lawrence. Harper Perennial Modern Classics.

Vincent-Jones, P. (2002). Values and Purpose in Government: Central-local Relations in Regulatory Perspective. Journal of Law and Society, 29(1), 27–29. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6478.00210

Watt, P. A. (2006). Principles and Theories of Local Government. Blackwell.

Wilson, D. (2003). Unravelling Control Freakery: Redefining Central-Local Government Relations. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 5(3), 317–346. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.0010

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.