Coronavirus Test of the European Union’s Policy on the Rule of Law

doi: 10.53116/pgaflr.2021.1.3

Abstract

The issue of the rule of law has been on the European Union’s (EU) agenda since the beginning of the 2010s. The legal history of the EU shows that the EU’s approach to the topic of the rule of law underwent significant changes. Initially, the Member States called for guarantees of fundamental rights in EU institutions. This trend began to change in the late 1990s and early 2000s, when the possibility of European rule of law control over Member States and the predecessor of the current Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) were introduced by the Treaty of Amsterdam. However, the idea that the EU institutions can constantly monitor the Member States in the name of the rule of law has only emerged and started dominating the European political agenda since the early 2010s. Over the last decade, the EU institutions have continuously expanded their toolkit for monitoring Member States in this regard.
Following calls from some Member States and the European Parliament, in 2014 the Commission set up the new EU framework to strengthen the rule of law. In the same year, the European Council introduced an annual rule of law dialogue. In 2016, the European Parliament proposed the establishment of an annual rule of law report that monitors all Member States. At first, the European Commission was reluctant to accept this idea, but finally it introduced an annual rule of law report in 2020. However, the EU’s policy on the rule of law suffers from fundamental shortcomings, which were especially visible during the first wave of the coronavirus crisis in the spring of 2020. In the pandemic situation, it has become even more apparent that the EU’s policy on the rule of law raises a significant issue of EU institutions exceeding their competences and stands on a questionable legal basis.
Criticisms formulated against Hungary during the pandemic have revealed that the EU institutions do not provide sufficient guarantees for an objective examination of the situation of the rule of law in the Member States. The situation brought about by the coronavirus has also raised a number of questions regarding the lawful functioning of EU institutions, which shows the need for a rule of law mechanism capable of verifying that the EU institutions themselves also properly respect the rule of law.

Keywords:

European policy on the rule of law conferral of competences legality of the functioning of European institutions during the coronavirus pandemic Covid-19

How to Cite

Gát, B. (2021). Coronavirus Test of the European Union’s Policy on the Rule of Law. Public Governance, Administration and Finances Law Review, 6(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.53116/pgaflr.2021.1.3

References

Bayer, L. (2020, April 1). 13 countries “deeply concerned” over rule of law. Politico. Online: https://www.politico.eu/article/viktor-orban-hungary-13-countries-deeply-concerned-over-rule-of-law/

Council of Europe (2011). Report on the rule of law adopted by the Venice Commission at its 86th Plenary Session. Online: https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2011)003rev-f

Council of the European Union (2014a). Press release nr. 16936/14, 3362nd Council meeting, General Affairs. Brussels, 16 December 2014. Online: http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-16936-2014-INIT/en

Council of the European Union (2014b). Opinion of the Legal Service, Communication from the Commission on a new EU Framework to strengthen the Rule of Law – compatibility with the Treaties. Online: http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-10296-2014-INIT/en

Déclaration sur l’identité europenne (Copenhague, 14 décembre 1973). Online: https://www.cvce.eu/obj/declaration_sur_l_identite_europeenne_copenhague_14_decembre_1973-fr-02798dc9-9c69-4b7d-b2c9-f03a8db7da32.html

de Combles de Nayves, P. (2020, March 22). Ne rajoutons pas l’arbitraire à la catastrophe sanitaire. Dalloz. Online: https://www.dalloz-actualite.fr/node/ne-rajoutons-pas-l-arbitraire-catastrophe-sanitaire#.YXvBaJ5BzIU

European Commission (2014). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. A new EU Framework to strengthen the Rule of Law. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:caa88841-aa1e-11e3-86f9-01aa75ed71a1.0023.02/DOC_1&format=DOC

European Commission (2017). Follow up to the European Parliament resolution with recommendations to the Commission on the establishment of an EU Mechanism on Democracy, the Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights, adopted by the Commission on 17 January 2017. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/spdoc.do?i=27630&j=0&l=en

European Commission (2019). Communication from the European Commission of 17 July 2019. Strengthening the rule of law within the Union. A blueprint for action. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2019/EN/COM-2019-343-F1-EN-MAIN-PART-1.PDF

European Parliament (1992). The Maastricht Treaty. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/hu/in-the-past/the-parliament-and-the-treaties/maastricht-treaty

European Parliament (1997). Treaty of Amsterdam. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/hu/in-the-past/the-parliament-and-the-treaties/treaty-of-amsterdam

European Parliament (2013). Resolution of 3 July 2013 on the situation of fundamental rights: standards and practices in Hungary (pursuant to the European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2012). Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0315_HU.html?redirect

European Parliament (2016). Resolution of 25 October 2016 with recommendations to the Commission on establishing an EU mechanism on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P8-TA-2016-0409+0+DOC+XML+V0//HU

European Parliament (2020a). Agenda of the European Parliament plenary session of 14 May 2020. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/OJQ-9-2020-05-14_HU.html

European Parliament (2020b). Resolution of 17 April 2020 on coordinated EU action to combat the COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0054_HU.html

Ferraro, F. & Carmona, J. (2015). Les droits fondamentaux dans l’Union européenne. Le rôle de la Charteaprès le traité de Lisbonne. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2015/554168/EPRS_IDA%282015%29554168_FR.pdf

Gát, Á. B. (2019). Küzdelem az Európai színtéren – a Magyarországgal szembeni „jogállamiság”-kritika feltáratlan összefüggései. Közép- és Kelet-európai Történelem és Társadalom Kutatásért Alapítvány.

Hassenteufel, P. (2011). Sociologie politique: l’action publique. Armand Colin. Online: https://doi.org/10.3917/arco.hasse.2011.01

Juncker, J.-C. (2014, July 15). A new start for Europe. Opening statement in the European Parliament plenary session. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/hu/SPEECH_14_567

Letter from the German, Dutch, Finnish and Danish Foreign Ministers to the President of the European Commission, 6 March 2013. Online: https://www.eerstekamer.nl/eu/documenteu/_brief_nederland_duitsland/f=/vji8oh6slx9o.pdf

Magyar Nemzet (2020, May 12). Jött a válasz Brüsszelből: Varga Judit nem kap szót az Ep-ben. Hírtv. Online: https://hirtv.hu/hirtvkulfold/jott-a-valasz-brusszelbol-varga-judit-nem-kap-szot-az-ep-ben-2501170

Mandiner (2020, March 23). Cseh EP-képviselő tiltakozik a magyar veszélyhelyzetet meghosszabbító törvényjavaslat ellen. Online: https://mandiner.hu/cikk/20200323_cseh_ep_kepviselo_tiltakozik_a_magyar_veszelyhelyzetet_meghosszabbito_torellen

Mathieu, B. (2017). Le droit contre la démocratie ? LGDJ.

Szájer, J. (2020, April 6). Rule of law and the functioning of the European Parliament under the coronavirus pandemic – how to restore the lawful operation. Fidesz-eu. Online: https://fidesz-eu.hu/en/rule-of-law-and-the-functioning-of-the-european-parliament-under-the-coronavirus-pandemic-how-to-restore-the-lawful-operation/

Téglási, A. (2014). Az emberi jogok védelmének nemzetközi rendszere. In Zs. Bende & I. Halász (Eds.), Összehasonlító alkotmányjog. Fejezetek az alkotmány, az állam, az államszervezet és az alapvető jogok témaköréből. NKE Közigazgatás-tudományi Kar.

Varga, A. Zs. (2019). From Ideal to Idol? The Concept of the Rule of Law. Dialóg Campus. Online: https://nkerepo.uni-nke.hu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/12507/web_PDF_From_Ideal_to_Idol.pdf;jsessionid=EDB476C4E8617752010B6B1EDD215CC2?sequence=1

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.