The Ideological Forerunners of Soft Power Thinking and Influence
The Origins of the Analytical Concept of Soft Power Thinking Based on the Power of Attraction of Assumed Universal Values
Copyright (c) 2022 Pál Melinda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Soft power is a pulling force, an influence based on attraction, cooperation, and induction of a voluntary desire for identification. The origin of American soft power is a non-feudal and non-dynastic society based on human rights and individual freedom, which the American people consider a jewel of their classical liberal value system, as enshrined in their constitution. The theoretical basis of this value system originates from the broad consensus of social values conceived in the spirit of the Enlightenment. This paper outlines the historical development of the value system and ideology that to this day dominate Western Civilization, which began during the 17th century and flourished in the course of the Enlightenment of the 18th century. Furthermore, this paper outlines the American exceptionalism/sense of mission that originates from the establishment of the first American colonies in the 17th century. As the origins of the soft power analytical concept rose from what some consider to be the universally-held value system of the United States, this study examines the ideals and thinkers of the Enlightenment who have grounded this value system ‘primarily’ or exclusively from an ideological distance, most significantly the works and roles of Locke, Hobbes, and Kant. In the chapter on American exceptionalism and sense of mission, this study highlights the works and influence of the personalities who, by simplifying, were the forerunners and main advocates of non-military policies and liberal internationalism. The concluding chapters of the study outline the nature of U.S. foreign policy during its transition from a bipolar to a unilateral position of power from the perspective of the elaboration of the analytical concept of soft power developed in 2004. The paper emphasizes the rise of neo conservatism, the ideological trend that provided the theoretical basis that underpinned the Iraqi intervention, which was not supported by global international organizations, and which was thus, as a counter-trend, a direct indicator of the elaboration of Nye’s analytical concept of soft power, a theory intended as a guide for realpolitik-oriented politicians. In this context, the concept of Nye has also become an ever-present element of the current and ongoing peace policies.
Keywords:
References
Bacevich, Andrew: The New American Militarism. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005.
Baldwin, David A.: Power and International Relations. In Walter Carlsnaes – Thomas Risse – Beth A. Simmons (szerk.): Handbook of International Relations. London, Sage, 2013. 273–297. Online: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446247587.n11
Bakó Tibor: A soft power szerepe az Egyesült Államok kulturális hegemóniájának építésében. Köz-Gazdaság, 6. (2012), 4. 111–125.
Baranyi Tamás Péter: Az enyhülés meghatározása a hidegháború historiográfiájában. Világtörténet, 9. (2019), 3. 331–356.
Békés Csaba: Hidegháború–enyhülés új megközelítésben. Külügyi Szemle, 13. (2014), 4. 3–18.
Békés, Csaba – Malcolm Byrne – János M. Rainer (szerk.): The 1956 Hungarian Revolution. A History in Documents. Budapest – New York, CEU Press, 2002.
Berman, Morris: Dark Ages America: The Final Phase of Empire. London – New York, W. W. Norton & Co., 2006.
Brunner, Otto – Werner Conze – Reinhart Koselleck (szerk.): A demokrácia. Budapest, Jószöveg Műhely Kiadó, 1999.
Bush, George W.: President Bush Delivers Graduation Speech at West Point. [online], The White House President George W. Bush, 2002. június 1. Forrás: georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov [2021. 09. 29.].
Charles II: Art & Power. [online], Royal Collection Trust, (é. n.). Forrás: rct.uk [2021. 09. 29.]
Chace, James – Nicholas X. Rizopoulos: Grand Stategy. Toward a New Concert of Nations: An American Perspective. World Policy Journal, 16. (1999), 3. 2–10. Online: https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/olj/wpj/wp_99chj05.html
Cull, Nicholas: The Cold War and the United States Information Agency. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2008. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817151
Csizmazia Gábor: Az Egyesült Államok kül- és biztonságpolitikája Kelet-Közép-Európában 2009–2019 között. Doktori értekezés. Budapest, NKE Hadtudományi Doktori Iskola, 2020.
Ehrman, John: The Rise of Neoconservatism. Intellectuals and Foreign Affairs. New Haven – London, Yale University Press, 1995.
Eisenhower, Dwight D.: Farewell Address. [online], National Archives, 1961. január 17. Forrás: https://archives.gov [2021. 09. 29.]
Fukuyama, Francis: Amerika válaszúton. Demokrácia, hatalom és a neokonzervatív örökség. Budapest, Századvég Kiadó, 2006.
Gallarotti, Giulio M.: Cosmopolitan Power in International Relations. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760839
Hobbes, Thomas: Leviatán vagy Az egyházi és világi állam formája és hatalma. Ford. Vámosi Pál. Budapest, Kossuth Könyvkiadó, [1651] 1999.
Hobbes, Thomas: Of Man, Being the First Part of Leviathan. Chapter XIII. Of the Natural Condition of Mankind as Concerning Their Felicity and Misery. [online], The Harvard Classics 1909–1914, (é. n.). Forrás: https://bartlyby.com [2021. 09. 29.]
Hobbes, Thomas: Leviathan: Or the Matter, Forme & Power of a Common-Wealth Ecclesiasticall and Civill. (Rethinking the Western Tradition). New Haven – London, Yale University Press, [1651] 2010.
Infranca, Antonio: Kant Örök béke című írásának paradoxonjai. Magyar Filozófiai Szemle, (1998), 1–3. Online: http://epa.oszk.hu/00100/00186/00001/98_infranca.htm
Kant, Immanuel: A gyakorlati ész kritikája. Ford. Papp Zoltán. Budapest, Osiris Kiadó – Gond-Cura Alapítvány, [1788] 2004.
Kant, Immanuel: Az örök béke. Ford. Babits Mihály, Bukarest, Kriterion, [1795] 1971.
Kant, Immanuel: Egy világpolgár gondolatai az emberiség egyetemes történetéről. [online], Országos Széchenyi Könyvtár Európa Könyvtár, 1922. Forrás: mek.oszk.hu [2021. 09. 29.]
Kennedy, John F.: The City Upon a Hill Speech. Address to Massachusetts State Legislature. 9 January 1961. [online], : John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum, 1961. Forrás: https://jfklibrary.org [2021. 09. 29.]
Kiss J. László: Biztonságelméletek. In Gazdag Ferenc – Tálas Péter (szerk.): Biztonsági tanulmányok – Biztonságpolitika. Budapest, Zrínyi Miklós Nemzetvédelmi Egyetem, 2011. 53–89.
Lincoln, Abraham: “A House Divided”: Speech at Springfield, Illinois [1855] in Roy P. Basler (szerk.): The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln. 8 Volumes, New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers University Press, 1953. 2. 461.
Lincoln, Abraham: Annual Message to Congress. [online], Abraham Lincoln Online, Speeches & Writings 1862. december 1. Forrás: https://abrahamlincolnonline.org
Locke, John: The Second Treatise on Civil Government. [online], Norton, 1689. Forrás: https://wwnorton.com [2021. 09. 29.]
Magyarics Tamás: Az amerikai külpolitikai önkép. MKI-tanulmányok, 4. (2010), 1. 1–13. Online: https://www.grotius.hu/doc/pub/TNFWIL/2010_63_magyarics_tamas_az_amerikai_kulpolitikai_onkep.pdf
Magyarics Tamás: Állandóság és változás az Egyesült Államok külpolitikai identitásában és eszköztárában. MKI-tanulmányok, (2012), 3. 1–24. Online: https://kki.hu/assets/upload/Tanulmanyok_2012_03_ellandeseg_ees_veltozes_az_.pdf
Manent, Pierre: Histoire intellectuelle du liberalisme. Dixleboons. Paris, Calmann-Lévy, 1987.
Manent, Pierre: A liberális gondolat története. Ford. Babarczy Eszter. Pécs, Tanulmány Kiadó, 1994.
Nordholt, Jan Willem Schulte: Woodrow Wilson: A Life for World Peace. Ford. Herbert H. Roven. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1991.
Nye, Joseph S.: Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York, Basic Books, 1990.
Nye, Joseph S.: Soft Power. The Means to Success in the World Politics. New York, Public Affairs, 2004.
Nye, Joseph S.: Get Smart: Combining Hard and Soft Power. Foreign Affairs, 88. (2009), 4. 160–163.
Obama, Barack: University of Massachusetts at Boston Commencement Address. [online], Obama Speeches, 2006. június 2. Forrás: https://obamaspeeches.com [2021. 09. 29.]
Rácz Gábor: A demokratikus béke elmélete. Nemzet és Biztonság, 11. (2018), 3. 127–133. Online: https://folyoirat.ludovika.hu/index.php/neb/article/view/3575/2859
Reagan, Ronald: Farewell Address to the Nation. [online], Ronald Reagan Presidental Library& Museum, 1989.január 11. Forrás: https://reaganlibrary.gov [2021. 09. 29.]
Rice, Condoleezza: Campaign 2000: Promoting the National Interest. [online], Foreign Affairs, 2000. január. Forrás: https://foreignaffairs.com [2021. 09. 29.]
Riedel, Bruce: What We Won. America’s Secret War in Afghanistan, 1979–89. Washington D.C., Brookings Institute, 2014.
Ruffini, Pierre-Bruno: Science et diplomatie. Une nouvelle dimension des relations internationales. Paris, Édition du Cygne, 2015.
Russett, Bruce: Liberalism. In Tim Dunne – Milja Kurki – Steve Smith (szerk.): International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013.
Russett, Bruce – John R. Oneal: Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York, W. W. Norton & Company, 2001.
Tully, James: The Kantian Idea of Europe. In Tully, James: Public Philosophy in a New Key. New York, Cambridge University Press, 2008. 15–42. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790744.003
Villepin, Dominique de: Mémoire de Paix pour Temps de Guerre. Paris, Grasset, 2016.
Wilson, Woodrow: Democracy and Efficiency. [online], The Atlantic Monthly, 1901. március. Forrás: https://theatlantic.com [2021. 09. 29.]
Wilson, Woodrow: Second Annual Message. [online], The American Presidency Project, 1914. december 8. Forrás: https://presidency.ucsb.edu [2021. 09. 29.]
Wilson, Woodrow: Address to the Senate. [online], History Central, 1917. január 22. Forrás: https://historycentral.com [2021. 09. 29.]