Interpretive Dilemmas of Cyber Espionage in the Context of Cyber Operations
The Technical and Legal Interpretation of Cyber Espionage within the Framework of Cyber Operations, Part 2
Copyright (c) 2026 Kovács Kinga Virág

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract
The study examines the dilemmas of the legal and strategic interpretation of cyber espionage in close connection with the findings of the first part, which revealed conceptual dilemmas through the interpretation of the available set of definitions. The second part of the study approaches the topic through the technical and legal characteristics of cyber espionage, emphasizing that although the activity does not typically cause direct physical damage, it creates systemic risks through breaches of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The study uses qualitative methodology to analyze the difficulties of classifying cyber espionage under international law. The analysis points out that cyber espionage remains below the classic threshold of force, but that unauthorized intrusion into a system and sustained presence can in themselves constitute a violation of sovereignty and continuous interference.
Keywords:
References
CIVULI, Abdulla et al. (2022): Cyber Espionage Consequences as a Growing Threat. Journal of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, 7(13–14), 13–20.
DEVANNY, Joe – MARTIN, Ciaran – STEVENS, Tim (2021): On the Strategic Consequences of Digital Espionage. Journal of Cyber Policy, 6(3), 429–450. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2021.2000628
FARRELL, Henry – NEWMAN, L. Abraham (2019): Weaponized Interdependence: How Global Economic Networks Shape State Coercion. International Security, 44(1), 42–79. Online: https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00351
Fortinet [é. n. a]: Advanced Persistent Threat: The Silent, Long-Term Cyberattack. Online: https://www.fortinet.com/resources/cyberglossary/advanced-persistent-threat
Fortinet [é. n. b]: Living Off The Land (LOTL) Attacks And Techniques. Online: https://www.fortinet.com/resources/cyberglossary/living-off-the-land-lotl
Fortinet [é. n. c]: What Is Access Control? Online: https://www.fortinet.com/resources/cyberglossary/access-control
Fortinet [é. n. d]: What Is the CIA Triad? Online: https://www.fortinet.com/resources/cyberglossary/cia-triad
GEISS, Robin – LAHMANN, Henning (2021): Protecion of Data in Armed Conflict. International Law Studies, 97, 556–572. Online: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2964&context=ils
LIBICKI, Martin C. (2018): Drawing Inferences from Cyber Espionage. In 2018 10th International Conference on Cyber Conflict. Tallinn: NATO CCDCOE Publications, 109–122. Online: https://doi.org/10.23919/CYCON.2018.8405013
MAZARR, J. Michael (2015): Mastering the Gray Zone: Understanding a Changing Era of Conflict. [H. n.]: Strategic Studies Institute – U.S. Army War College. Online: https://press.armywarcollege.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1427&context=monographs
MCCORMACK,Tim (2018): International Humanitarian Law and the Targeting of Data. International Law Studies, 94, 222–240. Online: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1725&context=ils
POMSON, Ori (2023): ‘Objects’? The Legal Status of Computer Data under International Humanitarian Law. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 28(2), 349–387. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krad002
ROSSBACH, Niklas H. (2024): Intelligence and Data Resilience. A small State Perspective on Digitalisation and National Defence Towards the 2030s. Stockholm: Försvarshögskolan. Online: https://doi.org/10.62061/iibr1180
SCHMITT, Michael N. (2017): Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316822524
SHUKLA, Veer Summer (2025): The Weaponization of Data: International Legal Responses to Digital Espionage and State-Sponsored Cyber Warfare. The Yale Review of International Studies, 2025. május 15. Online: https://yris.yira.org/column/the-weaponization-of-data-international-legal-responses-to-digital-espionage-and-state-sponsored-cyber-warfare/
United Nations (1945): Charter of the United Nations and Statute of the International Court of Justice. San Francisco: United Nations.