Assessment of Public Procurement Performance Indicators by Hungarian Public Procurement Experts
Copyright (c) 2023 Erdei-Derschner Katalin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract
In 2020, the public procurement market was also influenced by the negative impact of the coronavirus epidemic. Compared to 2019, there was a decline in both the number and the value of procedures. Thus measuring the performance of public procurement becomes even more important than ever. As a result, public procurement becomes more transparent, enables the principle of publicity to be served more widely, promotes the value for money principle and ensures more efficient public spending. A transparent organisational indicator framework, which is linked to the strategic goals, can act as a motivational tool for public procurers, providing a monitoring tool that helps all involved organisations and individuals to measure, analyse and improve the quality of their public procurement activities. The aim of the research is to explore the opinion of Hungarian experts on the measurability of the effectiveness, economy and efficiency of public procurement and the applicable indicators.
Keywords:
References
Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA). Online: https://www.federalreserve.gov/ publications/gpra.htm
Ivarsson, Daniel (2014): Principles of Public Procurement: The Basis of Good Performance. Istanbul, 2014. május 27–30. Online: https://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/Event/ECA/public-procurement-forum10-eca/tr-procurement-danielivarsson.pdf
Közbeszerzési Hatóság (2020): „Beszámoló az Országgyűlés számára”. Online: https://kozbeszerzes.hu/data/filer_public/4a/45/4a45649c-cab4-47e5-a3bb-b0a65fc15d92/kozbeszerzesi_hatosag_2020_evi_beszamoloja.pdf
Magina, Paulo (2014): Public Sector Integrity Division – Towards Public Procurement Key Performance Indicators. Online: https://bit.ly/3CjGHLf
Niven, R. Paul (2008): Balanced Scorecard Step by Step for Government and Procurement Agencies. [h. n.]: John Wiley & Sons.
Nunnally, Jum C. (1994): Psychometric Theory. NewYork: McGraw-Hill.
Nyikos, Györgyi – Kondor, Zsuzsanna (2019): The Hungarian Experiences with Handling Irregularities in the Use of EU Funds. The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 12(1). Online: https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2019-0005
Nyikos, Györgyi – Soós, Gábor (2017): Public Procurement Controls in Hungary. Pro Publico Bono – Magyar Közigazgatás, (4), 144–168. Online: http://real.mtak.hu/93114/1/PPB_2017_4-CC2019-Gyorgyi-Nyikos_Gabor-Soos.pdf
Nyikos, Györgyi – Soós, Gábor (2018): The Impact of the Public Procurement Control System on the Hungarian Public Administration. Central European Public Administration Review, 16(2), 133–156. Online: https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2018.2.07
Nyikos, Györgyi – Soha, Bettina – Béres, Attila (2021): Entrepreneurial Resilience and Firm Performance during the COVID-19 Crisis – Evidence from Hungary. Regional Statistics, 11(3), 29–59. Online: https://doi.org/10.15196/RS110307
Rendon, G. Rene (2008): Procurement Process Maturity: Key to Performance Measurement. Journal of Public Procurement, 8(2), 200–214. Online: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-08-02-2008-B003
Rigó, Csaba Balázs (2016): Developments in Public Procurement in Hungary – Opportunities and Challenges. Public Finance Quarterly, (2), 137–153. Online: https://www.penzugyiszemle.hu/upload/pdf/penzugyi_szemle_angol/volume_61_2016_2/rigo_2016_2_a.pdf
Obicci, Peter Adoko (2015): Conflict of Interest on Public Procurement Management in Uganda. Journal of Business Management, 8(1). Online: https://doi.org/10.26524/jms.2015.27
USAID Deliver Project (2013): Procurement Performance Indicator Guide 2013. Online:https://toolkits.knowledgesuccess.org/sites/default/files/procindiguid.pdf
Jogi forrás
2015. évi CXLIII. törvény a közbeszerzésekről
