A Legal Theory of Platform Law
Copyright (c) 2024 Ződi Zsolt
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract
This paper discusses the recently emerging platform law from a jurisprudential point of view. After defining the platform as a general coordination mechanism, it deals with topics such as the rationale for regulation, its main goals, and its general characteristics. According to the study, the main argument for regulation is that the platform, as a coordination mechanism, tends to become unstable without intervention, or to become harmful from the point of view of society. Above all, it tends to abuse the asymmetric power situation that exists between the platform and its users. These conditions must be prevented from occurring, and platform users must be protected in certain situations. The study lists four features that characterise platform law: its ex ante regulatory nature, the predominance of technology regulation and self-regulation, and the extensive use of user protection tools, such as complaint mechanisms, protection of user accounts, and explainability obligations. This toolbox partly resembles the long-established methods of consumer protection, but it also differs from it in certain ways.
Keywords:
References
BIBÓ, István (1986): Az európai társadalomfejlődés értelme [The Meaning of European Social Development]. In Válogatott tanulmányok 3. kötet [Selected Studies, Volume 3]. Budapest: Magvető, 7–122.
BOEHMER, Christiansen (2002): The Precautionary Principle in Germany – Enabling Government. In O’RIORDAN, Timothy – CAMERON, James (eds.): Interpreting the Precautionary Principle. London: Routledge, 31–61. Online: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315070490
BROWNSWORD, Roger – SCOTFORD, Eloise – YEUNG, Karen (2016): Law, Regulation, and Technology: The Field, Frame, and Focal Questions. In BROWNSWORD, Roger – SCOTFORD, Eloise – YEUNG, Karen (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Law, Regulation, and Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–38.
Brownsword, Roger: Law 3.0 Routledge, London, 2021
BROWNSWORD, Roger (2011): Lost in Translation: Legality, Regulatory Margins, and Technological Management. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 26(3), 1321–1366.
BROWNSWORD, Roger (2005): Code, Control, and Choice: Why East is East and West is West. Legal Studies, 25(1), 1–21. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2005.tb00268.x
CAUFFMAN, Caroline – GOANTA Catalina (2021): A New Order: The Digital Services Act and Consumer Protection. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 12(4), 758–774. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2021.8
COHEN, Julie (2017): Between Truth and Power. The Legal Constructions of Informational Capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
DARLEY, John M. – ROBINSON, Paul H. – CARLSMITH, Kevin M. (2001): The Ex Ante Function of the Criminal Law. Law & Society Review, 35(1), 165–190. Online: https://doi.org/10.2307/3185389
EHRLICH, Eugen (2022): Grundlegung des Soziologie des Rechts (5th edition). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
European Commission (2001): European Governance: A White Paper. COM (2001) 428. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/DOC_01_10
European Commission (2002): Communication from the Commission of 5 June 2002, Action Plan “Simplifying and improving the regulatory environment”. COM (2002) 278 final. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/action-plan-for-better-regulation.html
European Commission (2020): Proposal Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European Data Governance (Data Governance Regulation). COM (2020) 767 final. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52020PC0767
European Commission (2022): Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Harmonised Rules on Fair Access to and Use of Data (Data Sharing Legislation). COM (2022) 68 final. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2022%3A68%3AFIN
DUMBRAVA, Costica (2021): Key Social Media Risks to Democracy: Risks from Surveillance, Personalisation, Disinformation, Moderation and Microtargeting. European Parliamentary Research Service. Online: https://doi.org/10.2861/135170
Facebook’s policy on dangerous individuals and organisations https://transparency.fb.com/hu-hu/policies/community-standards/dangerous-individuals-organizations/
FRIED, Barbara H. (2003): Ex Ante/Ex Post. Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 13(1), 123–160. Online: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.390462
GALLE, Brian (2015): In Praise of Ex Ante Regulation. Vanderbilt Law Review, 68(6), 1715– 1759.
GARDBAUM, Stephen (2003): The Horizontal Effect of Constitutional Rights. Michigan Law Review, 102(3), 387–459. Online: https://doi.org/10.2307/3595366
Habermas, Jürgen (1987) [1981]. Theory of Communicative Action, Volume Two: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason (Book). Translated by Thomas A. McCarthy. Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press
HARREMOËS, Poul – GEE, David – MACGARVIN, Malcolm – STIRLING, Andy – KEYS, Jane – WYNNE, Brian – VAZ, Sofia Guedes eds. (2001): Late Lessons from Early Warnings. The Precautionary Principle 1896–2000. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
HILDEBRANDT, Mireille (2018): Primitives of Legal Protection in the Era of Data-Driven Platforms. Online: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3140594
JOH, Elizabeth E. (2016–2017): Policing Police Robots. UCLA Law Review Discourse, 64, 516–543.
KEYNES, John M. (1936): The general theory of employment, interest and money. First Harvest/Harcourt, San Diego – London – New York
KOLSTADT, Charles D. – ULEN, Thomas S. – JOHNSON, Gary V. (1990): Ex Post Liability for Harm vs Ex Ante Safety Regulation: Substitutes guard Complements? The American Economic Review, 80(1), 888–901.
KORNAI, János (1992): The Socialist System: The Political Economy of Communism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
MEFFORD, Aron (1997): Lex Informatica: Foundations of Law on the Internet. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 5(1), 211–238.
MISES, Ludwig von (1944): Bureaucracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
O’RIORDAN, Tim – CAMERON, James eds. (2002): Interpreting the Precautionary Principle. London: Routledge.
PHILLIPSON, Gavin (1999): The Human Rights Act, Horizontal Effect and the Common Law: a Bang or a Whimper. Modern Law Review, 62(6), 824–849. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00240
POLANYI, Karl (2001): The Great Transformation. The Political and Economic Origins of Our Times. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
RAZ, Joseph (1990): Practical Reason and Norms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
REHBINDER, Manfred (1986): Die Begründung der Rechtssoziologie durch Eugen Ehrlich. Berlin: Dunckert & Humblot.
REIDENBERG, Joel R. (1997): Lex Informatica: The Formulation of Information Policy Rules through Technology. Texas Law Review, 76(3), 553–594.
SCHLESINGER, Philip (2022): The Neo-Regulation of Internet Platforms in the United Kingdom. Policy & Internet, 14 (1), 47–62. Online: https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.288
SENDEN, Linda (2005): Soft Law, Self- regulation and Co-regulation in European Law: Where do they Meet? Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, 9(1). Online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=943063
STARK, David – PAIS, Ivana (2020): Algorithmic Management in the Platform Economy. Sociologica, 14(3), 47–72. Online: https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/12221
SUNSTEIN, Cass (2005): Laws of Fear. Beyond the Precautionary Principle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790850
SUSSKIND, Richard (2009): The End of Lawyers? Rethinking the Nature of Legal Services. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
TUSHNET, Mark (2003): The Issue of State Action/Horizontal Effect in Comparative Constitutional Law. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 1(1), 79–98. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/1.1.79
YEUNG, Karen – LODGE, Martin (2019): Introduction. In YEONG, Karen – LODGE, Martin (eds): Algorithmic Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198838494.003.0001
VAN DIJCK, José – NIEBORG, David – POELL, Thomas (2019): Reframing Platform Power. Internet Policy Review, 8(2). Online: https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.2.1414
VICARELLI, Fausto (1984): Keynes: The Instability of Capitalism. [s. l.]: University of Pennsylvania Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.9783/9781512819892
WALKER, Neil (2005): Legal Theory and the European Union European University Institute. EUI Working Papers, Law 2005/16. Online: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.891032
ZŐDI, Zsolt (2022): Algorithmic Explainability and Legal Reasoning. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 10(1), 67–92. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2022.2033945
Legal sources
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/945 of 12 March 2019 on unmanned aircraft systems and third country operators of unmanned aircraft systems
Communication Decency Act of the USA
Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts Directive – Consumer Protection Directive
Council Directive 93/13/EEC (April 5, 1993) on unfair terms in consumer contracts
Directive (EU) 2018/1808 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 November 2018 amending Directive 2010/13/EU on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive) in view of changing market realities
Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC (Copyright Directive)
Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (‘Directive on electronic commerce’)
Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive – old AVMSD)
Network-enforcement law (Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgezetz – NetzDG) of Germany
Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on improving working conditions in platform work COM(2021) 762 final (Platform work proposal). Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2021%3A762%3AFIN
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain union legislative acts
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation – GDPR)
Regulation (EU) 2019/1150 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on promoting fairness and transparency for business users of online intermediation services (Platform-to-Business Regulation – P2B)
Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2022 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector and amending Directives (EU) 2019/1937 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Digital Markets Act – DMA)
Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market For Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act – DSA)
Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948)
