Some Aspects of Fiscal and Monetary Tools of the Environmental Sustainability – Through the Case of Hungary

doi: 10.53116/pgaflr.2022.1.5

Abstract

On the one hand, economic sustainability depends on an environmentally friendly and energy-saving economy, though it rather means the continuous functioning of businesses and the national economy, which is expressed in the balance of accounting, foreign trade and budget balances.

On the regulatory side, monetary policy, alongside fiscal policy, serves ensuring economic sustainability, as the main objective of central banks is to ensure price stability and maintain financial equilibrium to underpin continued economic activity. However, in our energy crisis-ridden world, there is an increasing emphasis on energy-efficient, environmentally friendly management. The focus of our study is on the environmental sustainability context of Hungarian fiscal and central bank tools, with a particular focus on the legislative and programmatic elements of the green economy development of the Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Hungarian National Bank, hereinafter: MNB).

Keywords:

green economy green investments financial regulation Hungary

How to Cite

Lentner, C., & Zsarnóczai, S. J. (2022). Some Aspects of Fiscal and Monetary Tools of the Environmental Sustainability – Through the Case of Hungary. Public Governance, Administration and Finances Law Review, 7(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.53116/pgaflr.2022.1.5

References

Arvaniti, M. & Habla, W. (2021). The Political Economy of Negotiating International Carbon Markets. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 110. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2021.102521

Bank of America (2021, September 15). Countdown to 2050. Online: https://bit.ly/3CKYPhL

Békés, M., Havas, A., Jánoskuti, L., Soma, T., Engel, H. & Hanzlik, V. (2022, May 31). Carbon-Neutral Hungary. McKinsey Sustainability. Online: https://mck.co/3TjW2ll

Budziszewska, M. & Glod, Z. (2021). These Are the Very Small Things That Lead Us to That Goal: Youth Climate Strike Organizers Talk about Activism Empowering and Taxing Experiences. Sustainability, 13(19). Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/su131911119

Daly, H. E. & Cobb, J. B. Jr. (1989). For the Common Good. Redirecting the Economy toward Community, the Environment, and a Sustainable Future. Beacon Press.

Daly, H. E. (1999). Uneconomic Growth: In Theory, in Fact, in History, and in Relation to Globalization. Saint John’s University.

EKTP (Resource and Competence Map Platform) EKTP.gov.hu

Fritz, M., Koch, M., Johansson, H., Emilsson, K., Hildingsson, R. & Khan, J. (2021). Habitus and Climate Change: Exploring Support and Resistance to Sustainable Welfare and Social–Ecological Transformations in Sweden. British Journal of Sociology, 72(4), 874–890. Online: http://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12887

Glauber, J. & Laborde, D. (2022, February 24). How Will Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine Affect Global Food Security? IFPRI Blog. Online: www.ifpri.org/blog/how-will-russias-invasion-ukraine-affect-global-food-security

Grover, A. & Singh, R. B. (2020). Urban Health and Wellbeing. Indian Case Studies. Springer. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6671-0

Hantoko, D., Li, X., Pariatamby, A., Yoshikawa, K., Horttanainen, M. & Yan, M. (2021). Challenges and Practices on Waste Management and Disposal during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Environmental Management, 286. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112140

Hirvilammi, T. & Koch, M. (2020). Sustainable Welfare beyond Growth. Sustainability, 12(5). Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051824

Jain, D., Bhatnagar, S. & Sachdeva, K. (2022). Impact of Degrading Air Quality on Mode Choice and Emissions – Study of Ten Global Cities. World Development Sustainability, 1. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2022.100002

Kis, N., Jobbágy, Z., Mészáros, B., Téglási, A. & Hutkai, Zs. (2019). Biztonság és bizalom a kormányzatban. In T. Kaiser (Ed.), Jó Állam Jelentés 2019 (pp. 12–38). Ludovika Egyetemi Kiadó. Online: https://bit.ly/3M70Vvj

Kolozsi, P. P., Ladányi, S. & Straubinger, A. (2022). Measuring the Climate Risk Exposure of Financial Assets: Methodological Challenges and Central Bank Practices. Financial and Economic Review 21(1), 113–140. Online: https://doi.org/10.33893/FER.21.1.113

Kutasi, G. (2022). How Does Economics Approach Nature? Cognitive Sustainability, 1(2). Online: https://doi.org/10.55343/cogsust.21

Matolcsy, Gy. (2015). Egyensúly és növekedés. Konszolidáció és stabilizáció Magyarországon 2010–2014. Kairos.

Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L. & Randers, J. (1992). Beyond the Limits. Chelsea Green Publishing.

MNB (2016). Növekedési hitelprogram. A Magyar Nemzeti Bank hitelösztönző eszközeinek tapasztalatai 2013–2015. Prospectus.

MNB (2020, December). A hazai megújulóenergia-termelés finanszírozása. Online: https://bit.ly/3SDGKra

MNB (2021a). Fenntarthatóság és jegybanki politika – zöld szempontok az MNB monetáris politikai eszköztárában. Prospectus Kft. Online: https://bit.ly/3SHrjyb

MNB (2021b). Zöldpénzügyi jelentés. Helyzetkép a magyar pénzügyi rendszer környezeti fenntarthatóságáról. Online: https://bit.ly/3CCQpbO

MNB (2021c). Zöld vállalati és önkormányzati tőkekövetelmény-kedvezmény. Online: https://bit.ly/3V55tq3

MNB (2022, May). A Fenntartható egyensúly és felzárkózás 144 pontja. Online: https://bit.ly/3T4198R

NÉS (2018). Nemzeti Éghajlatváltozási Stratégia. A 2018–2030 közötti időszakra vonatkozó, 2050-ig tartó időszakra is kitekintést nyújtó második Nemzeti Éghajlatváltozási Stratégia. Innovációs és Technológiai Minisztérium.

NCE (2015). New Climate Economy. Catalyzing International Cooperation for Growth and Climate Action. Global Commission on the new Climate Economy.

OECD (2022). OECD Environmental Outlook to 2050: The Consequences of Inaction – Key Facts and Figures. Online: https://bit.ly/3ykLie2

Opschoor, H. (2000). The Ecological Footprint: Measuring Rod or Metaphor? Ecological Economics, 32(3), 363–365. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00155-X

Opschoor, J., Lohman, A. F. & Vos, H. B. (1994). Managing the Environment. The Role of Economic Instruments. OECD.

Otto, A. & Gugushvili, D. (2020). Eco-Social Divides in Europe: Public Attitudes towards Welfare and Climate Change Policies. Sustainability, 12(1). Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010404

Paris Agreement (2015, December). Online: https://bit.ly/3R2ImdS

Paulik, É. & Tapaszti, A. (2022, March 24). Tovább a zöld úton: jelentősen emelkedett az MNB zöldkötvény-portfóliójának pozitív környezeti hatása. Világgazdaság. Online: https://bit.ly/3EoEq30

Pigou, A. C. (1920). The Economics of Welfare. McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Ritchie, H. (2022). CO₂ Emissions Dataset: Our Sources and Methods. How Do We Construct Our Global Data on CO₂ Emissions? Our World in Data. Online: https://ourworldindata.org/co2-dataset-sources

Ritchie, H., Roser, M. & Rosado, P. (2017). CO₂ and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Our World in Data. Online: https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-other-greenhouse-gas-emissions

Shan, S., Genç, S. Y., Kamran, H. W. & Dinca, G. (2021). Role of Green Technology Innovation and Renewable Energy in Carbon Neutrality: A Sustainable Investigation from Turkey. Journal of Environmental Management, 294. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113004

Szlávik, J. Ed. (2011): Környezetgazdálkodás. Vol. 2. Pannon Egyetem, Környezetmérnöki Intézet. Online: https://bit.ly/3CBy5A0

Schumacher, E. F. (1973). A kicsi szép: A közgazdaságtan tanulmánya, mintha az emberek számítanának. Szőke and Briggs.

Zivot, E. & Andrews, D. W. K. (2002). Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil-Price Shock, and the Unit-Root Hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 20(1), 25–44. Online: https://doi.org/10.1198/073500102753410372

Zöldy, M., Csete, M., Kolozsy, P. P., Bordás, P. & Török, Á. (2022). Cognitive Sustainability.

Cognitive Sustainability 1(1). Online: https://doi.org/10.55343/CogSust.7

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.