Characteristics of the European Platform Regulation

Platform Law and User Protection

doi: 10.53116/pgaflr.2022.1.7


This paper presents the European regulation of platforms. In its first part, it reconstructs the process by which the concept of ‘platform’ in information technology and marketing have evolved and become a legal concept. This emerged from the mid-2010s, first in amendments of sectoral rules and later in sui generis platform rules. The second part of the paper argues that these rules can be interpreted as an emerging separate area of law, the ‘European platform law’. One of the most important ultimate justifying principles and purposes of this legal corpus is the protection of users. This is achieved through a number of tools, some of which are legal transplants from other legal areas (such as consumer protection), while others are sui generis legal rules created specifically for platforms, such as the protection of user accounts or the explainability and transparency of algorithms.


internet platforms concept of platform platform as legal concept user protection on platforms Digital Services Act (DSA) Digital Markets Act (DMA) comprehensibility of user contracts transparency and explainability of algorithms complaint mechanism on platforms platform-work platform law

How to Cite

Ződi, Z. (2022). Characteristics of the European Platform Regulation: Platform Law and User Protection. Public Governance, Administration and Finances Law Review, 7(1), 91–108.


Balkin, J. M. (2016). Information Fiduciaries and the First Amendment. UC Davis Law Review, 49(4), 1183–1234. Online:

Balkin, J. M. (2020). The Fiduciary Model of Privacy. Harvard Law Review Forum, 134(11), 11–33. Online:

Cohen, J. (2019). Between Truth and Power. The Legal Constructions of Informational Capitalism. Oxford University Press. Online:

Van Dijck, J., Poell, T. & de Waal, M. (2018). The Platform Society. Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford University Press. Online:

Van Dijck, J., Nieborg, D. & Poell, T. (2019). Reframing Platform Power. Internet Policy Review, 8(2). Online:

Van Dijck, J. (2021). Governing Trust in European Platform Societies: Introduction to the EJC Special Issue. European Journal of Communication, 36(4), 323–333. Online:

Dumbrava, C. (2021). Key Social Media Risks to Democracy: Risks from Surveillance, Personalisation, Disinformation, Moderation and Microtargeting. EPRS. Online:

Gillespie, T. (2010). The Politics of ‘Platforms’. New Media & Society, 12(3), 347–364. Online:

Malgieri, G. & Comand, G. (2017). Why a Right to Legibility of Automated Decision-Making Exists in the General Data Protection Regulation. International Data Privacy Law, 7(4), 243–265. Online:

Riordan, J. (2016). The Liability of Internet Intermediaries. Oxford University Press. Online:

Shapiro, C. & Varian, H. R. (1998). Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Harvard Business School Press.

De Waal, M., Poell, T. & Van Dijck, J. (2016). De platformsamenleving: strijd om publieke waarden in een online wereld. Amsterdam University Press.

Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B. & Floridi, L. (2017). Why a Right to Explanation of Automated Decision-Making Does Not Exist in the General Data Protection Regulation. International Data Privacy Law, 7(2), 76–99. Online:

Wheelwright, S. & Clark, K. B. (1992). Revolutionizing Product Development. Simon and Schuster.

Wong, J. C. (2018, March 18). The Cambridge Analytica Scandal Changed the World – But it Didn’t Change Facebook. The Guardian. Online:

Zhu, F. & Iansiti, M. (2007). Dynamics of Platform Competition: Exploring the Role of Installed Base, Platform Quality and Consumer Expectations. ICIS 2007 Proceedings, 38. Online:


Download data is not yet available.