Public Intelligence in Public Diplomacy

U.S. Strategic Intelligence Sharing in the New Age of Great Power Competition

doi: 10.32561/nsz.2025.2.1

Abstract

This paper examines the evolution of intelligence sharing as a tool of public diplomacy through analysis of two recent cases: the U.S. intelligence disclosures preceding Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine and the 2023 Chinese surveillance balloon incident. Drawing on declassified documents and contemporary reporting, the article demonstrates how intelligence sharing has transformed from a purely operational tool into a sophisticated instrument of public diplomacy. The paper reveals distinct approaches to intelligence disclosure: systematic pre-emptive sharing in Ukraine versus rapid crisis response during the balloon incident. Both cases, however, demonstrate the U.S. Intelligence Community’s growing sophistication in balancing operational security with strategic communication needs. Through comparative analysis, the article identifies key patterns in how intelligence sharing can shape international narratives, build coalition support, and counter adversary messaging while maintaining credibility and protecting sources. This evolution in intelligence sharing practices, formalised in U.S. Intelligence Community Directive 405, represents a significant development in how intelligence services engage with both foreign governments and public audiences in an era of digital information warfare and great power competition.

Keywords:

intelligence sharing public diplomacy intelligence diplomacy strategic communication narrative control

References

BERG, Raffi (2024): Ex-Israeli agents reveal how Hezbollah pager attacks were carried out. BBC, 23 December 2024. Online: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwy3l02wxqdo

BEST, R. A. (2011): Intelligence Information: Need-to-Know vs. Need-to-Share. Congressional Research Service Report. Online: https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R41848.html

BORGER, Julian (2021): Colin Powell’s UN speech: A decisive moment in undermining US credibility. The Guardian, 18 October 2021. Online: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/oct/18/colin-powell-un-security-council-iraq

BRATTVOLL, Joakim (2024): Intelligence Disclosure as a Strategic Messaging Tool. NATO Review, 16 December 2024. Online: https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2024/12/16/intelligence-disclosure-as-a-strategic-messaging-tool/index.html

DYLAN, Huw – MAGUIRE, Thomas J. (2022): Secret Intelligence and Public Diplomacy in the Ukraine War. Survival, 64(4), 33–74. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2022.2103257

GIOE, David V. (2025): How America’s Allies Boost U.S. Intelligence. Foreign Affairs, 13 February 2025. Online: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/how-americas-allies-boost-us-intelligence

HARRIS, Shane – SONNE, Paul (2021): Russia Planning Massive Military Offensive against Ukraine Involving 175,000 Troops, U.S. Intelligence Warns. The Washington Post, 4 December 2021. Online: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/russia-ukraine-invasion/2021/12/03/98a3760e-546b-11ec-8769-2f4ecdf7a2ad_story.html

HASTEDT, Glenn (2013): The Politics of Intelligence and the Politicization of Intelligence: The American Experience. Intelligence and National Security, 28(1), 5–31. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2012.749062

Hungary Today (2022): Ukraine Crisis: Hungarian Foreign Ministry Will Not Evacuate Employees. Hungary Today, 24 January 2022. Online: https://hungarytoday.hu/ukraine-crisis-evacuation-nato-hungary-russia-orban-biden-putin/

Intelligence Community (2013): ICD Directive 403. Office of the Director of National Intelligence, 13 March 2013. Online: https://www.dni.gov/index.php/what-we-do/ic-related-menus/ic-related-links/intelligence-community-directives

Intelligence Community (2025): ICD Directive 405. Office of the Director of National Intelligence, 14 January 2025. https://www.dni.gov/index.php/what-we-do/ic-related-menus/ic-related-links/intelligence-community-directives

LEONARDSON, J. E. (2020): Review of Active Measures: The Secret History of Disinformation and Political Warfare. Studies in Intelligence, 64(1).

MARINHO, Jorge – VENTURA, Júlio – RIBEIRO, Lourenço (2024): Strategic Intelligence and Intelligence Diplomacy in the Sphere of Foreign Policy – Diplomat magazine, 2 June 2024. Online: https://diplomatmagazine.eu/2024/06/02/strategic-intelligence-and-intelligence-diplomacy-in-the-sphere-of-foreign-policy/

NEUBERGER, Anne (2025): Spy vs. AI. Foreign Affairs, 15 January 2025. Online: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-ai

NG, Lynnette H. X. – CARLEY, Kathleen M. (2023): Deflating the Chinese Balloon: Types of Twitter Bots in US-China Balloon Incident. EPJ Data Science, 12(1), Article 1. Online: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00440-3

ODNI (2021): Chinese Space Activities Will Increasingly Challenge US Interests Through 2030. April 2021. Online: https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/reports-publications/reports-publications-2022/3645-chinese-space-activities-will-increasingly-challenge-u-s-interests-through-2030

ODNI (2022): Annual Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community. February 2022. Online: https://www.odni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/ATA-2022-Unclassified-Report.pdf

PINKUS, Jonathan (2014): Intelligence and Public Diplomacy: The Changing Tide. Journal of Strategic Security, 7(1), 33–46. Online: https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.7.1.3

RIEHLE, Kevin P. (2024): Ignorance, Indifference, or Incompetence: Why are Russian Covert Actions so Easily Unmasked? Intelligence and National Security, 39(5), 864–878. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2023.2300165

SHAPIRO, Jeremy (2024): Letter from Washington: All-Knowing America and US Intelligence Diplomacy. ECFR, 18 April. Online: https://ecfr.eu/article/letter-from-washington-all-knowing-america-and-us-intelligence-diplomacy/

TAYLOR, Chris (2023): ‘Doing Good Deeds Quietly’: The Rise of Intelligence Diplomacy as a Potent Tool of Statecraft. Australian Strategy Policy Institute Strategic Insights. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep53516

THOMAS, Matthew (2022): Major Russian Invasion of Ukraine Imminent. Baltic Security Foundation, 21 January 2022. Online: https://balticsecurity.eu/major_russian_invasion_of_ukraine_imminent

VALLE DE FRUTOS, S. (2024): La opinión pública internacional en el contexto de la geopolítica de la globalización desinformativa. Análisis desde la teoría de la complejidad y de la baja racionalidad. Relaciones Internacionales, (56), 75–93. Online: https://doi.org/10.15366/relacionesinternacionales2024.56.004

WONG, Frankie H. C. – MULUPI, Dinfin (2024): Up in the Air: A Strategic Narrative Contest in the U.S.–China Balloon Incident 2023. International Communication Gazette, 0(0). Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/17480485241290361

ZHANG, Baoyu – CHEN, Tao – LI, Qiang – ZHANG, Weishan – WANG, Fei-Yue (2024): Spy Balloon or Sputnik Moment: A Comparative Analysis of Public Opinion in China and the United States. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 11(3), 3729–3740. Online: https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2023.3333954

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.