Exploring the Connections Between the Dynamics of Peer Bullying and the Process of the Emergence of Genocidal Regimes
Copyright (c) 2026 Molnár Jenő István

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Introduction: Peer bullying has long been a central focus of educational sciences, psychology, and criminology; however, it is rarely examined within broader social and historical contexts. This study is based on the assumption that aggressive behavioral patterns among young people are not isolated phenomena but rather reflections of wider social communication and power dynamics.
Aims: The author’s aim is to explore the structural and dynamic similarities between the processes of peer bullying and the mechanisms underlying the emergence of genocidal regimes, with particular attention to normalization processes, actor roles, and the role of societal indifference.
Methodology: The study is based on a qualitative methodology, employing a literature-based analysis and thematic review. Through a comparative examination of selected theoretical models, the analysis focuses on processual characteristics, the stabilization of social roles, and recurring communication patterns.
Results: The analysis demonstrates that bullying and genocidal processes share several structural similarities, including the dehumanization of victims, the passive role of bystanders, the gradual legitimization of aggression, and institutional or community-level silence. These factors appear as decisive elements in both phenomena.
Conclusion: The study concludes that reducing violence among young people is not solely a pedagogical or disciplinary issue but a matter of broader societal responsibility. Communication patterns amplified by the digital environment further underscore the need for society-wide efforts to promote more conscious, tolerant, solidaristic, and morally consistent forms of communication. The primary contribution of this study lies in drawing attention - among the first in the field - to the parallels between peer bullying and genocidal processes, thereby expanding the interpretative framework of bullying research.
Keywords:
How to Cite
References
Á. K. (2021): A lányok voltak Gábor leghangosabb gúnyolói, a zaklatók nem kérnek bocsánatot az elhunyt vajai diák édesanyjától. NLC, 2021. szeptember 10. Online: https://nlc.hu/csalad/20210910/tisza-gabor-ongyilkossag-iskolai-zaklatas-reszletek/
ALLANSON, Patricia Bolton – LESTER, Robin Rawlings – NOTAR, Charles E. (2015): A History of Bullying. International Journal of Education and Social Science, 2(12), 31–36. Online: https://www.coursehero.com/file/59675101/5pdf/
ALLPORT, Gordon (1954): The Nature of Prejudice. Boston: Addison–Wesley. Online: https://ia601500.us.archive.org/17/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.188638/2015.188638.The-Nature-Of-Prejudice.pdf
ANTONIADOU, Nafsika – KOKKINOS, Constantinos M. (2015): Cyber and School Bullying: Same or Different Phenomena? Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 25B, 363–372. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.09.013
ASHLEY, A. Anderson et al. (2018): Toxic Talk: How Online Incivility Can Undermine Perceptions of Media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, (30)1, 156–168. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw022
BAUM, Steven K. (2008): The Psychology of Genocide. Perpetrators, Bystanders, and Rescuers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819278
BELKOVICS Judit (2025): Egy iskolapszichológus gondolatai az iskolai zaklatásról. Katedra, 32(9–10), 127–132. Online: https://katedra.sk/folyoirat/xxxii_09-10_17/
BUDA Mariann (2015): Az iskolai zaklatás – a kutatások tükrében. Debrecen: Debreceni Egyetemi Kiadó. Online: https://bit.ly/3QYmrcD
COLOROSO, Barbara (2020): Bullying: zaklatók, áldozatok, szemlélők. Óvodától középiskoláig: hogyan szakíthatjuk meg az erőszak körforgását... Budapest: Harmat.
FERGUSON, Christopher J. (2021): Does the Internet Make the World Worse? Depression, Aggression and Polarization in the Social Media Age. Bulletin of Science Technology&Society, 41(4). Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/02704676211064567
GARIMELLA, Venkata Rama Kiran – WEBER, Ingmar (2017): A Long-Term Analysis of Polarization on Twitter. Eleventh International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, (11)1, 528–531. Online: https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14918
Iskoláskorú Gyermekek Egészségmagatartása (HBSC-jelentés) (2022). Online: https://doi.org/10.56037/978-963-646-075-4
Kékvillogó (2021): „Meglett a fiam, de sajnos már túl késő” – megtalálták annak a 16 éves fiúnak a holttestét, aki 2 napja tűnt el otthonról, mert társai cikizték az iskolában. Online: https://kekvillogo.hu/21591-2/
LUKOVSZKI Emese (2019): Cyber-bullying jelenség a kiskamasz korban. Gradus, (6)2, 172–182. Online: https://gradus.kefo.hu/archive/2019-2/2019_2_ART_007_Lukovszki.pdf
NMHH (2024): Cyberbullying-érintettség a gyermekek körében. Online: https://nmhh.hu/kiadvany/1/Mediapiaci_Jelentes_2025/79/Cyberbullyingerintettseg_a_gyermekek_koreben?utm_source=chatgpt.com
OLWEUS, Dan (1993): Bullying at School What we Know and what we can do. Oxford: Blackwell.
OLWEUS, Dan (1999): Iskolai zaklatás. Educatio, 8(4), 717–739. Online: https://epa.oszk.hu/01500/01551/00087/pdf/EPA01551_educatio_1999_4_717-739.pdf
ORIGO (2021): Fiatal lányok kergethették öngyilkosságba a vajai gimnazistát. Online: https://www.origo.hu/itthon/2021/09/fiatal-lanyok-kergethettet-a-hallalba-a-vajai-gimnazistat
TIGO, Silvia et al. (2013): Theoretical proposals in bullying research: a review. Anales de Psicología, (29)2, 413–425. Online: https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.2.148251
POUWELS Loes J. – LANSU, Tessa A. M. – CILLESSEN, Antonius H. N. (2015): Participant Roles of Bullying in Adolescence: Status Characteristics, Social Behavior, and Assignment Criteria. Aggressive Behavior, (42), 239–253. Online: https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21614
SALMIVALLI, Christina (2010): Bullying and the Peer Group: A Review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, (15)2, 112–120. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007
SALMIVALLI, Christina et al. (1996): Bullying as a Group Process: Participant Roles and their Relations to Social Status within the Group. Aggressive Behavior, 22(1), 1–15. Online: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:1<1::AID-AB1>3.0.CO;2-T
STANTON, Gregory H. (1996): The Ten Stages of Genocide. Online: https://www.genocidewatch.com/tenstages
STELLA, Massimo – FERRARAB, Emilio – DE DOMENICO, Manlio (2018): Bots Increase Exposure to Negative and Inflammatory Content in Online Social Systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, (115)49, 12435–12440. Online: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1803470115
THORNBERG, Robert (2011): She’s Weird! – The Social Construction of Bullying in School: A Review of Qualitative Research. Children & Society, (25)4, Special Issue: Bullying: The Moral and Social Orders at Play, 258–267. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2011.00374.x
UNICEF–Medián (2022): Középiskolások tapasztalatai az iskolai zaklatásról. Közvélemény-kutatás. Online: https://unicef.hu/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/median_unicef_2022_iskolai_zaklatas_jelentes.pdf
WALTHER, Joseph B. (2022): Social Media and Online Hate. Current Opinion in Psychology, (45). Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.12.010
WÓJCIK, Małgorzata et al. (2022): Downward Spiral of Bullying: Victimization Timeline from Former Victims’ Perspective. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(13–14). Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260521990835