The Moral Foundations of Policing
Vocation, Discretionary Decision-Making, and the Protection of Human Dignity
Copyright (c) 2026 Barkóczi Csaba

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Introduction: In modern democratic states, the social legitimacy of policing is a fundamental condition of effective law enforcement. The evaluation of police activity is therefore not solely a legal issue but is inseparably linked to ethical considerations that directly influence public trust and policing effectiveness.
Objectives: This study examines how ethically grounded policing contributes to the effectiveness and social legitimacy of the police. The analysis focuses on the normative identity of the police profession, the ethical dilemmas of discretionary decision-making, and the consistent protection of human dignity.
Method: The study applies a theoretical and normative approach. Its methodological basis consists of a systematic review of relevant national and international literature and a normative analysis of the Police Code of Ethics, with particular attention to its role as an internal guide complementing legal regulation in discretionary decision-making.
Results: The findings demonstrate that policing effectiveness and legitimacy depend significantly on the ethical quality of police decision-making. The legitimate exercise of discretion is ensured not by limiting discretion itself, but by grounding it in ethical principles such as proportionality, fairness, the duty to give reasons, and respect for human dignity. The application of procedural justice principles strengthens public trust and citizens’ willingness to cooperate. The study proposes a conceptual model of ethically grounded policing, identifying key conditions through which legitimacy and effectiveness are mutually reinforced.
Conclusions: The study concludes that ethical commitment does not constrain policing effectiveness but reinforces it by enhancing legitimacy and public trust. Ethics is therefore not a supplementary element but a fundamental precondition of modern, democratic policing.
Keywords:
How to Cite
References
BEETHAM, David (1991): The Legitimation of Power. Basingstoke: Macmillan. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21599-7
BODA Mihály (2018): A hivatás és a katonai hivatás története és elemei. Hadtudomány, 28(3–4), 135–155. Online: https://doi.org/10.17047/HADTUD.2018.28.3-4.135
BODA Mihály (2025): A terrorelhárítás etikája: hivatás, halálos erőszak alkalmazása és információszerzés. In RÉMAI Dániel – TALLER János (szerk.): Terrorizmus. Budapest: Ludovika, 563–593. Online: https://doi.org/10.36250/01259_29
Council of Europe (2001): The European Code of Police Ethics. Recommendation Rec(2001)10 Adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on 19 September 2001 and Explanatory Memorandum. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing. Online: https://rm.coe.int/the-european-code-of-police-ethics-pdf/1680b003e0
FINSZTER Géza (2018): A rendészettan. Budapest: Dialóg Campus.
JACKSON, Jonathan et al. (2012): Why do People Comply with the Law? Legitimacy and the Influence of Legal Institutions. British Journal of Criminology, 52(6), 1051–1071. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azs032
KANT, Immanuel (1993) [1785]: Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.
KISS Tibor (2020): A rendőri attitűdök szerepe a rendőrség működésében. In BARABÁS A. Tünde (szerk.): Alkalmazott kriminológia. Budapest: Dialóg Campus, 563–586. Online: https://www.scribd.com/document/489355216/AlkalmazottKriminologia
KLEINIG, John (1996): The Ethics of Policing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139172851
LIPSKY, Michael (1980): Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/9781610447713
MAZEROLLE, Lorraine et al. (2013): Shaping Citizens’ Perceptions of Police Legitimacy: A Randomized Field Trial of Procedural Justice. Criminology, 51(1), 33–63. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00289.x
SKOGAN, Wesley G. (2006): Police and Community in Chicago: A Tale of Three Cities. New York: Oxford University Press.
SUNSHINE, Jason – TYLER, Tom R. (2003): The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing. Law & Society Review, 37(3), 513–547. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5893.3703002
TURAY Alfréd (2000): Az ember és az erkölcs. Alapvető etika Aquinói Tamás nyomán. Szeged: Agapé.
TYLER, Tom R. (1990): Why People Obey the Law. New Haven – London: Yale University Press. Online: https://archive.org/details/whypeopleobeylaw0000tyle
TYLER, Tom R. (2006): Restorative Justice and Procedural Justice: Dealing with Rule Breaking. Journal of Social Issues, 62(2), 307–326. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00452.x
VÁRI Vince (2021): A rendőrségbe vetett bizalom és a rendőrség hatékonysága közötti kapcsolat. Belügyi Szemle, 69(6ksz.), 55–72. Online: https://doi.org/10.38146/BSZ.SPEC.2021.6.4
Jogi források
- 1994. évi XXXIV. törvény a Rendőrségről (Rtv.)
Országos Rendőr-főkapitányság (2015): A Rendőri Hivatás Etikai Kódexe. Budapest: Országos Rendőr-főkapitányság