Europeanisation of Public Policy in Hungary

doi: 10.32559/et.2021.2.4

Abstract

Empirical research about the European Union’s impact on domestic public policy has been largely missing both from public discourse and academic research. By presenting the results of three new databases, the aim of this study is to investigate the impact of the EU on the Hungarian public policy between 2004 and 2018. The three aspects covered in this article are the Europeanisation of law-making in the Hungarian Parliament, the implementation of country-specific recommendations issued by the European Commission, and the similarities and differences between different governments in terms of handling infringement procedures. Our results show that the interaction between the Hungarian Government (and in general, V4 governments) and the EU is much less conflictual at the policy level than what some high-profile political conflicts might suggest.

Keywords:

European integration Europeanisation public policy European Semester Euroscepticism

References

Alcidi, Cincia – Daniel Gros: How to strengthen the European Semester? CEPS Research Report, (2017), 15. 1–29. Online: https://www.ceps.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/RR2017_15_CAandDG_EuropeanSemester.pdf

Bíró-Nagy András: Integráció Európába. Közép-európai képviselők az Európai Parlamentben. Budapest, Gondolat – MTA TK PTI. 2018.

Boda Zsolt – Sebők Miklós (szerk.): A magyar közpolitikai napirend – Elméleti alapok, empirikus eredmények. Budapest, MTA TK PTI, 2018.

Börzel, Tanja A. – Antoaneta Dimitrova – Frank Schimmelfennig: European Union Enlargement and Integration Capacity: Concepts, Findings, and Policy Implications. Journal of European Public Policy, 24. (2017), 2. 157–176. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1265576

Börzel, Tanja A. – Frank Schimmelfennig: Coming together or drifting apart? The EU’s political integration capacity in Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 24. (2017), 2. 278–296. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1265574

Brouard, Sylvain – Olivier Costa – Thomas König (szerk.): The Europeanization of Domestic Legislatures. The Empirical Implications of the Delors’ Myth in Nine Countries. New York, Springer, 2012.

Cirtautas, Arista M. – Frank Schimmelfennig: Europeanisation Before and After Accession: Conditionality, Legacies and Compliance. Europe-Asia Studies, 62. (2010), 3. 421–441. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/09668131003647812

Costello, Tim: Six Years On: Assessing the Impact of Country Specific Recommendations. Dublin, Institute of International and European Affairs, 2017.

Európai Bizottság: Az európai szemeszter céljai (é. n.). Online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/economic-and-fiscal-policy-coordination/eu-economic-governance-monitoring-prevention-correction/european-semester/framework/european-semester-why-and-how_hu

Európai Bizottság: Kötelezettségszegési eljárás (é. n.). Online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-making-process/applying-eu-law/infringement-procedure_hu

Ladrech, Robert: Europeanization of Domestic Politics and Institutions: The Case of France. Journal of Common Market Studies, 32.

(1994), 1. 69–88. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1994.tb00485.x

Radaelli, Claudio: The Europeanization of Public Policy. In Kevin Featherstone – Claudio Radaelli (szerk.): The Politics of Europeanization. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2003. 27–56. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199252092.003.0002

Schlipphak, Bernd – Oliver Treib: Playing the Blame Game on Brussels: The Domestic Political Effects of EU Interventions against Democratic Backsliding. Journal of European Public Policy, 24. (2017), 3. 352–365. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1229359

Verdun, Amy – Jonathan Zeitlin: Introduction: the European Semester as a new architecture of EU socioeconomic governance in theory and practice. Journal of European Public Policy, 25. (2018), 2. 137–148. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1363807

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.