object(Publication)#689 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(29) { ["id"]=> int(7467) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2024-05-30" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2024-06-04 07:57:51" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(9362) ["sectionId"]=> int(76) ["seq"]=> int(1) ["submissionId"]=> int(7343) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2024) ["issueId"]=> int(588) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(49) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(1) "5" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(20) "10.32559/et.2023.3.1" ["abstract"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["prefix"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["subtitle"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["title"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(10) "Praesidens" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["hu_HU"]=> string(19) "Kecsmár Krisztián" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(Author)#724 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(14) { ["id"]=> int(9362) ["email"]=> string(30) "krisztian.kecsmar@ec.europa.eu" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7467) ["seq"]=> int(1) ["userGroupId"]=> int(201) ["country"]=> string(2) "BE" ["orcid"]=> string(0) "" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["biography"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(8) "Kecsmár" ["hu_HU"]=> string(8) "Kecsmár" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(10) "Krisztián" ["hu_HU"]=> string(10) "Krisztián" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(0) { } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#737 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(34179) ["id"]=> int(5891) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(7467) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }

object(Publication)#189 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(29) { ["id"]=> int(7342) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2024-05-30" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2024-05-30 15:15:22" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(9173) ["sectionId"]=> int(26) ["seq"]=> int(1) ["submissionId"]=> int(7218) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(4271) "BAUME, Marie De la (2015): The Parliament is Bored. Politico, 21 May 2015. Online: https://www.politico.eu/article/parliament-bored-better-regulation BEESLEY, Hugh (1963): Direct Elections to the European Parliament. In Limits and Problems of European Integration. Dordrecht: Springer, 80–98. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9276-7_7 BOROŃSKA-HRYNIEWIECKA, Karolina (2017): From Early Warning Sytsem to a ‘Green Card’ for National Parliaments. Hindering or Accelerating EU Lawmaking? In JANČIĆ, Davor (ed.): National Parliaments after the Lisbon Treaty and the Euro Crisis: Resilience or Resignation? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 247–262. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198791621.003.0013 Conference on the Future of Europe (2022): Conference on the Future of Europe – Report on the Final Outcome. May 2022. Online: https://wayback.archive-it.org/12090/20230417172132/https://futureu.europa.eu/en Contribution of the XLIX COSAC Dublin, 23–25 June 2013. Online: https://www.ft.dk/samling/20121/almdel/EUU/bilag/496/1268316.pdf DELORS, Jacques (1992): Le nouveau concert Européen. Paris: Odile Jacob. European Parliament (2020a): European Parliament Resolution of 9 June 2022 on Parliament’s Right of Initiative [2020/2132(INI)]. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0242_EN.html European Parliament (2020b): European Parliament Resolution of 26 November 2020 on Stocktaking of European Elections [2020/2088(INI)]. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0327_EN.html European Parliament (2020c): Motion for a European Parliament Legislative Resolution on the Reform of the Electoral Law of the European Union [2020/2220(INL)]. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2022-0083_EN.html European Parliament (2022a): Controlling Subsidiarity in Today’s EU: the Role of the European Parliament and the National Parliaments. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2022/732058/IPOL_STU(2022)732058_EN.pdf European Parliament (2022b): Draft European Parliament Legislative Resolution on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Statute and Funding of European Political Parties and European Political Foundations (recast) [COM(2021)0734 – C9‑0432/2021 – 2021/0375(COD)]. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2022-0223_EN.html Franco–German Working Group on EU Institutional Reform (2023): Sailing on High Seas: Reforming and Enlarging the EU for the 21st Century. Paris–Berlin – 18 September 2023. Online: https://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/20230919_group_of_twelve_report_updated14.12.2023_cle88fb88.pdf KALAS, Vivien (2022): Alkustratégiák az európai Tanácsban. Európai Tükör, 25(1–2), 53–69. Online: https://doi.org/10.32559/et.2022.1-2.3 Middelaar, Luuk van (2014): The Passage to Europe: How a Continent Became a Union. New Haven, CT – London: Yale University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt32bkp4 NAVRACSICS, Tibor (2020): A csúcsjelölti rendszer rövid élete és furcsa halála. Európai Tükör, 23(1), 7–28. Online: https://doi.org/10.32559/et.2020.1.1 Protocol (No 2) to the Treaty on the European Union on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality. SAROTTE, Mary Elise (2010): Eurozone Crisis as Historical Legacy. Council on Foreign Relations, 24 September 2010. Online: https://www.cfr.org/report/eurozone-crisis-historical-legacy#:~:text=In%20the%20interest%20of%20success%2C%20Mitterrand%20acceded%20to,compromise%20on%20timing.%20Kohl%20agreed%20to%20Mitterrand%27s%20bargain Statista (2024): Gross Domestic Product of the United Kingdom from 1948 to 2023. Online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/281744/gdp-of-the-united-kingdom/#:~:text=As%20of%202021%2C%20the%20UK%20had%20the%20sixth,largest%20economy%2C%20is%20of%20a%20very%20similar%20size TOCQUEVILLE, Alexis de (2007): De la démocratie en Amérique. Souvenirs, L’ancien régime et la révoution. Paris: Robert Laffont. WEILER, J. H. H. – HALTERN, Ulrich R. – MAYER, Franz C. (1995): European Democracy and Its Critique. West European Politics, 18(3), 4–39. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389508425089" ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2024) ["issueId"]=> int(588) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(49) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(4) "7-22" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(20) "10.32559/et.2023.3.2" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(1832) "

The history of the institutionalised cooperation in Europe now looks back to more than seven decades. What differentiates this cooperation from other international organisations is the common heritage and destiny the European countries share and the community they have found in a high level of integration. However, since the very beginning of this cooperation, there have been debates about the best method and way to express common European positions. Part of this debate is the question of the democratic legitimacy of the Union institutions. As it is set out in Article 2 of the Treaty of the European Union, democracy is not only a fundamental value of the Member States, but also an expectation towards the European Union. Even though the institutional setting of the European democracy has gone a long way in the past seven decades, the question of democratic legitimacy is still being one of the key subjects and future challenges within the framework of the currently ongoing discussions on the future of Europe. There is no shortage of reform proposals, nevertheless, the main debate has been rather one-sided as it envisions only one avenue to decrease the so-called “democratic deficit” and strengthen the European policy space. What is the function of democracy in the context of the European integration and how can it represent a European position or serve as a check over the Union institutions? What institutions could be able to create a bridge between the peoples of the Member States and the European institutions? This paper seeks to outline the different responses to these questions. To this end, it outlines the theoretical background and institutional evolution of democratic legitimacy in the European integration while seeks to evaluate the current proposals and envision the alternative ones.

" } ["subtitle"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(67) "Chances and Challenges of Achieving Democratic Legitimacy in Europe" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(46) "The Different Angles of the European Democracy" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["hu_HU"]=> string(16) "Sándor Lénárd" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(Author)#123 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(9173) ["email"]=> string(20) "sandor.lenard@mcc.hu" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7342) ["seq"]=> int(1) ["userGroupId"]=> int(201) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(0) "" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(28) "a:1:{s:5:"hu_HU";s:3:"mcc";}" } ["biography"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(7) "Sándor" ["hu_HU"]=> string(7) "Sándor" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(8) "Lénárd" ["hu_HU"]=> string(8) "Lénárd" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(8) { [0]=> string(22) "democratic legitimacy," [1]=> string(12) "subsidiarity" [2]=> string(49) "national institutions in the European cooperation" [3]=> string(18) "democratic deficit" [4]=> string(16) "European Council" [5]=> string(22) "parliamentary scrutiny" [6]=> string(21) "yellow card procedure" [7]=> string(20) "green card procedure" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#759 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(34102) ["id"]=> int(5883) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(7342) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }

object(Publication)#191 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(28) { ["id"]=> int(7340) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2024-05-30" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2024-05-30 15:15:23" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(9171) ["sectionId"]=> int(26) ["seq"]=> int(2) ["submissionId"]=> int(7216) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(14656) "AVBELJ, Matej (2008): Questioning EU Constitutionalism. German Law Journal, (9)1, 1–26. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200006283 AZOULAI, Loïc – DEHOUSSE, Renaud (2012): The European Court of Justice and the Legal Dynamics of Integration. In Erik JONES et al. (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 350–364. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199546282.013.0025 BARRETT, Gavin (2016): The Early Warning System for the Principle of Subsidiarity: Constitutional Theory and Empirical Reality. European Law Review, 41(3), 433–436. BESSELINK, Leonard F. M. (2010): National and Constitutional Identity before and after Lisbon. Utrecht Law Review, 6(3), 36–49. Online: https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.139 BOGDANDY, Armin von (2010): The Constitutional Approach to EU Law – From Taming Intergovernmental Relationships to Framing Political Process. In BOGDANDY, Armin von – BAST, Jürgen (eds.): Principles of European Constitutional Law. Oxford–München: Hart – C. H. Beck, 1–7. BURGESS, Michael (2006): Comparative Federalism, Theory and Practice. New York –London: Routledge. CALLIESS, Christian – VAN DER SCHYFF, Gerhard (2019): Constitutional Identity in a Europe of Multilevel Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108616256 CLOOTS, Elke (2016): National Identity, Constitutional Identity, and Sovereignty in the EU. Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, 45(2), 82–98. Online: https://doi.org/10.5553/NJLP/.000049 Conseil contitutionnel (2006): Les Cahiers du Conseil constitutionnel. Cahier n. 21. Online: https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/sites/default/files/as/root/bank_mm/commentaires/cahier21/ccc_540dc.pdf Conseil contitutionnel (2008): Les Cahiers de Conseil constitutionnel. Cahier n. 25. Online: https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/sites/default/files/as/root/bank_mm/decisions/2008564dc/ccc_564dc.pdf CORNILS, Matthias (2017a): BVerfGE 37, 271 – Solange I. Von den Grenzen des Anwendungsvorranges des Europarechts: Der unabdingbare Grundrechtsstandard des Grundgesetzes. In MENZEL, Jörg – MÜLLER-TERPITZ, Ralf (eds.): Verfassungsrechtsprechung. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 252–263. CORNILS, Matthias (2017b): BVerfGE 123, 267 – Lissabon. Mitgliedstaatlichkeit vorbehalten: Europa am Endpunkt der Integration? In MENZEL, Jörg – MÜLLER-TERPITZ, Ralf (eds.): Verfassungsrechtsprechung. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 852–863. CRAIG, Paul (2004): Competence: Clarity, Conferral, Containment and Consideration. European Law Review, 29(3), 323–344. CRAIG, Paul (2008): The Treaty of Lisbon, Process, Architecture and Substance. European Law Review, 33(2), 137–166. DE BÚRCA, Graienne (1993): The Principle of Proportionality and Its Application in EC Law. Yearbook of European Law, 13(1), 105–150. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/13.1.105 DE WITTE, Bruno (2021): Direct Effect, Primacy, and the Nature of the Legal Order. In CRAIG, Paul – DE BÚRCA, Graienne (eds.): The Evolution of EU Law. 3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 187–227. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192846556.003.0007 DUBOUT, Édouard (2010): »Les règles ou principes inhérents à l'identité constitutionnelle de la france«: une supraconstitutionnalité? Revue française de droit constitutionnel, 83(3), 451–482. Online: https://doi.org/10.3917/rfdc.083.0451 ELAZAR, Daniel Judah (1991): Exploring Federalism. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press. ESTELLA, Antonio (2003): The EU Principle of Subsidiarity and its Critique. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199242429.001.0001 FABBRINI, Federico – POLLICINO, Oreste (2019): Constitutional Identity in Italy: Institutional Disagreements at a Time of Political Change. In CALLIESS, Christian – VAN DER SCHYFF, Gerhard: Constitutional Identity in a Europe of Multilevel Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 201–221. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108616256.010 GRABENWARTER, Christoph (2010): National Constitutional Law Relating to the European Union. In BOGDANDY, Armin von – BAST, Jürgen (eds.): Principles of European Constitutional Law. Oxford–München: Hart – C. H. Beck, 83–130. GRIMM, Dieter (2009): Defending Sovereign Statehood against Transforming the European Union into a State. European Constitutional Law Review, 5(3), 353–373. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019609003538 GUERRINI, Marc (2015): L’identité constitutionnelle du point de vue français. In PEYROUX-SISSOKO, Marie-Odile – KRUZSLICZ, Peter: Constitutions nationales et valeurs européennes. Szeged: Centre Universitaire Francophone, 157–176. JANČIĆ, Davor (2015): The Game of Cards: National Parliaments in the EU and the Future of the Early Warning Mechanism and the Political Dialogue. Common Market Law Review, 52(4), 939–975. Online: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2015075 JOSSO, Selma (2008): Le caractère social de la République, principe inhérent à l’identité constitutionnelle de la France? Civitas Europa, (21), 191–233. Online: https://doi.org/10.3406/civit.2008.1276 ; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/civit.2008.1276 JUHÁSZ-TÓTH, Angéla (2011): Az európai uniós tagállamok nemzeti parlamentjei a Lisszaboni Szerződés hatályba lépése után. Európai Jog, 11(1), 43–47. KECSMÁR, Krisztián (2022): Les états membres sont-ils des sujets de droit privilégiés ou mal aimés en droit de L’union. In Annuaire de droit de l’Union européenne. Panthéon-Assas, 51–74. Online: https://doi.org/10.3917/epas.bluma.2023.01.0051 KELEMEN, Daniel R. (2007): Built to Last? The Durability of EU federalism. In MEUNIER, Sophie – MCNAMARA, Kathleen (eds.): The State of the European Union Volume 8: Making History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 51–66. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199218677.003.0003 KIRÁLY, Andrea (2005): The Role of National Parliaments in European Issues: How the New Member States Scrutinize Their Governments? Jogelméleti Szemle, 6(1). LENAERTS, Koen (1990): Constitutionalism and the Many Faces of Federalism. American Journal of Comparative Law, 38(2), 205–263. Online: https://doi.org/10.2307/840100 LEVADE, Anne (2009): Le Conseil constitutionnel et l'Union européenne. Cahiers du conseil constitutionnel, hors série – colloque du cinquantenaire, 3 novembre 2009. Online: https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/nouveaux-cahiers-du-conseil-constitutionnel/le-conseil-constitutionnel-et-l-union-europeenne MILLET, François-Xavier (2012): National Constitutional Identity as a Safeguard of Federalism in Europe. In AZOULAI, Loïc – BOUCON, Lena – MILLET, François-Xavier (eds.): Deconstructing EU Federalism through Competences. EUI Working Paper LAW 06. San Domenico di Fiesole: European University Institute Badia Fiesolana, 53–64. MILLET, François-Xavier (2013): L'Union européenne et l'identité constitutionnelle des États membres. L.G.D.J. MILLET, François-Xavier (2019): Constitutional Identity in France. In CALLIESS, Christian – VAN DER SCHYFF, Gerhard (eds.): Constitutional Identity in a Europe of Multilevel Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 134–152. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108616256.007 MINNERATH, Roland (2008): The Fundamental Principles of Social Doctrine. The Issue of their Interpretation. In ARCHER, Margaret S. – DONATI, Pierpaolo (eds.): Pursuing the Common Good: How Solidarity and Subsidiarity can Work Together? Vatican City: The Pontificial Academy of Social Sciences, 45–56. MITRANY, David (1966): A Working Peace System. Chicago: Quadrangle Books. ORBÁN, Endre (2021): The EU-Member State Relationship as a Principal-Agent Problem. Perspectives on Federalism, 13(1), 61–90. ORBÁN, Endre (2022): Constitutional Identity in the Jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, 63(2), 142–173. Online: https://doi.org/10.1556/2052.2022.00374 PACZOLAY, Péter (2006): Szuverenitás és szubszidiaritás az Európai Unió és annak tagállamai között. In FRIVALDSZKY, János (ed.): Szubszidiaritás és szolidaritás az Európai Unióban. Budapest: OCIPE Magyarország –Faludi Ferenc Akadémia, 59–72. PÁLNÉ KOVÁCS, Ilona (2006): A helyi-területi önkormányzati rendszerek. In TÓTH, Judit – LEGÉNY, Krisztián (eds.): Összehasonlító alkotmányjog. Budapest: CompLex, 281–327. PERNICE, Ingolf (1999): Multilevel Constitutionalism and the Treaty of Amsterdam: European Constitution-Making Revisited? Common Market Law Review, 36(4), 703–750. Online: https://doi.org/10.54648/233680 PERNICE, Ingolf (2009): The Treaty of Lisbon: Multilevel Constitutionalism in Action. The Columbia Journal of European Law, 15(3), 349–407. PERNICE, Ingolf (2013): The Autonomy of the EU Legal Order – Fifty Years after Van Gend. In TIZZANO, Antonio – KOKOTT, Juliane – PRECHAL, Sacha (eds.): Court of Justice of the European Union: 50th Anniversary of the Judgment in Van Gend en Loos, 1963–2013. Luxembourg: Office des publication de l’Union européenne, 55–80. PIVODA, Marek (2023): Constitutional Courts Asking Questions: A Deliberative Potential of Preliminary Reference Mechanism. In Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge Universtiy Press, 1–20. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/cel.2023.15 POLZIN, Monika (2016): Constitutional Identity, Unconstitutional Amendments and the Idea of Constitutent Power: The Development of the Doctrine of Constitutional Identity in German Contitutional Law. I-CON, 14(2), 411–438. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mow035 REESTMAN, Jan-Herman (2009): The Franco-German Constitutional Divide: Reflections on National and Constitutional Identity. European Constitutional Law Review, 5(3), 374–390. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019609003745 RIKER, William H. (1964): Federalism, Origin, Operation, Significance. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. ROSENFELD, Michel (2010): The Identity of the Constitutional Subject. Selfhood, Citizenship, Culture and Community. London – New York: Routledge. Online: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203868980 RÖß, Simon (2019): The Conflict between European Law and National Constitutional Law Using the Example of the European Arrest Warrant. European Public Law, 25(1), 25-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/EURO2019003 SAJÓ, András – UITZ, Renáta (2017): The Constitution of Freedom. An Introduction to Legal Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198732174.001.0001 SCHÜTZE, Robert (2009): From Dual to Cooperative Federalism. New York: Oxford University Press. SCHÜTZE, Robert (2018): European Union Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. SOMSSICH, Réka (2018): Az alkotmányos identitás a francia és a belga alkotmánybírósági gyakorlatban. Alkotmánybírósági Szemle, 9(2), 9–19. SORONDO, Macello Sanchez (2008): Solidarity and Subsidiarity as Parts of Justice and Agape/Charity. In ARCHER, Margaret S. – DONATI, Pierpaolo (eds.): Pursuing the Common Good: How Solidarity and Subsidiarity can Work Together? Vatican City: The Pontificial Academy of Social Sciences, 57–74. SPIEKER, Luke Dimitrios (2020): Framing and Managing Constitutional Identity Conflicts: How to Stabilize the Modus Vivendi between the Court of Justice and National Constitutional Courts. Common Market Law Review, 57(2), 361–398. Online: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2020031 STERCK, Julien (2018): Sameness and Selfhood: The Efficiency of Constitutional Identities in EU Law. European Law Journal, 24(4–5), 281–296. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12275 SULYOK, Márton – KISS, Lilla Nóra (2019): In Unchartered Waters? The Place and Position of EU Law and the Charter of Fundamental Rights in the Jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court of Hungary. Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law, 7(1), 395–417. Online: https://doi.org/10.5553/HYIEL/266627012019007001022 SULYOK, Tamás – ORBÁN, Endre (2017): Az európai alkotmányos tér és az alkotmányos párbeszéd forgatókönyve. In CHRONOWSKI, Nóra et al. (eds.): A szabadságszerető embernek. Liber Amicorum István Kukorelli. Budapest: Gondolat, 116–125. TAMÁS, Csaba Gergely (2010): Új lehetőségek a nemzeti parlamentek előtt? A szubszidiaritás elvének uniós és hazai szabályozásáról. Európai Tükör, 15(7–8), 7–23. The European Convention (2002): CONV 375/1/02 REV 1. Online: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/CV-375-2002-REV-1/en/pdf TOTH, Akos G. (1994): Is Subsidiarity Justiciable? European Law Review, 19(3), 268–285. TROPER, Michel (2010): Behind the Constitution? The Principle of Constitutional Identity in France. In SAJÓ, András – UITZ, Renáta (eds.): Constitutional Topography. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing,187–202. VAN DER SCHYFF, Gerhard (2019): Member States of the European Union, Constitutions, and Identity. A Comparative Perspective. In CALLIESS, Christian – VAN DER SCHYFF, Gerhard (eds): Constitutional Identity in a Europe of Multilevel Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 305–347. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108616256.015 VÁRNAY, Ernő (2022): The Hungarian Sword of Constitutional Identity. Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, 63(2), 79–106. Online: https://doi.org/10.1556/2052.2022.00380 VAUCHEZ, Antoine (2020): When Scholarship Matters: Theory-Building and Theory Effects in the EU Polity Context. iCourts Working Paper No. 200, IMAGINE Paper No. 7. Online: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3647175 VINCZE, Attila – CHRONOWSKI, Nóra (2018): Magyar alkotmányosság az európai integrációban. Budapest: HVG-ORAC. VOIGT, Stefan (2012): A Constitution like Any Other? Comparing the European Constitution with Nation State Constitutions. In EGER, Thomas – SCHÄEFER, Hans-Bernd (eds.): Research Handbook on the Economics of European Union Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Online: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781005279.00007 VOßKUHLE, Andreas (2010): Multilevel Cooperation of the European Constitutional Courts Der Europäische Verfassungsgerichtsverbund. European Constitutional Law Review, 6(2), 175–198. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019610200020 WALKER, Neil (2002): The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism. EUI Working Paper LAW 1. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00383 WEILER, Joseph H. H. (2000): Federalism and Constitutionalism: Europe’s Sonderweg. Online: https://jeanmonnetprogram.org/archive/papers/00/001001.html" ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2024) ["issueId"]=> int(588) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(49) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(5) "23-42" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(20) "10.32559/et.2023.3.3" ["abstract"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(1312) "

The introduction of the subsidiarity principle by the Maastricht Treaty was intended to strike a balance between the Member States and the supranational level in terms of non-exclusive competences. However, the principle of subsidiarity in the current EU structure is Janus-faced: although it was theoretically included in the founding treaty to protect the lower levels, its modus operandi is actually aimed at demonstrating the supranational level’s capacity to act. Perhaps this is why the enshrinement of the subsidiarity principle in the Treaty has not lived up to expectations, and the relevant Treaty provisions have largely remained dead letters. At the same time, the need represented by the principle of subsidiarity, namely the protection of the autonomy of the Member States, remained present in European integration, which finally emerged in the concept of constitutional identity, linked to the redefined identity clause after the Lisbon Treaty. In this sense, the identity clause in Article 4(2) TEU has become the legal device or standard that is able to transfer the constitutional needs of the Member States to the level of EU law and provide the possibility for their recognition at EU level. For this to work, a cooperative approach by national constitutional courts seems essential.

" ["hu_HU"]=> string(1312) "

The introduction of the subsidiarity principle by the Maastricht Treaty was intended to strike a balance between the Member States and the supranational level in terms of non-exclusive competences. However, the principle of subsidiarity in the current EU structure is Janus-faced: although it was theoretically included in the founding treaty to protect the lower levels, its modus operandi is actually aimed at demonstrating the supranational level’s capacity to act. Perhaps this is why the enshrinement of the subsidiarity principle in the Treaty has not lived up to expectations, and the relevant Treaty provisions have largely remained dead letters. At the same time, the need represented by the principle of subsidiarity, namely the protection of the autonomy of the Member States, remained present in European integration, which finally emerged in the concept of constitutional identity, linked to the redefined identity clause after the Lisbon Treaty. In this sense, the identity clause in Article 4(2) TEU has become the legal device or standard that is able to transfer the constitutional needs of the Member States to the level of EU law and provide the possibility for their recognition at EU level. For this to work, a cooperative approach by national constitutional courts seems essential.

" } ["title"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(99) "The Concept of Constitutional Identity as a Substantive Expression of the Principle of Subsidiarity" ["hu_HU"]=> string(99) "The Concept of Constitutional Identity as a Substantive Expression of the Principle of Subsidiarity" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["hu_HU"]=> string(12) "Orbán Endre" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "hu_HU" ["authors"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(Author)#754 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(9171) ["email"]=> string(22) "orban.endre@uni-nke.hu" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7340) ["seq"]=> int(2) ["userGroupId"]=> int(201) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5714-8565" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["biography"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(6) "Orbán" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(5) "Endre" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "hu_HU" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(5) { [0]=> string(14) "European Union" [1]=> string(22) "subsidiarity principle" [2]=> string(23) "constitutional identity" [3]=> string(19) "preliminary rulings" [4]=> string(20) "constitutional court" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#738 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(34103) ["id"]=> int(5884) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(7340) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }

object(Publication)#735 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(29) { ["id"]=> int(7474) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2024-05-30" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2024-05-30 15:15:22" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(9370) ["sectionId"]=> int(26) ["seq"]=> int(3) ["submissionId"]=> int(7350) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(9534) "BÓKA, János – GOMBOS, Katalin – SZEGEDI, László (2019): Az Európai Unió intézményrendszere. Budapest: Dialóg Campus. CAROZZA, Paolo G. (1997): Subsidiarity as a Structural Principle of International Human Rights Law. American Journal of International Law, 97(1), 38–79. Online: https://doi.org/10.2307/3087103 DAVIES, Garreth (2006): Subsidiarity: The Wrong Idea, in the Wrong Place, at the Wrong Time. Common Market Law Review, 43(1), 63–84. Online: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2005083 DIENES-OEHM, Egon – ERDŐS, István – KIRÁLY, Miklós – MARTONYI, János – SOMSSICH, Réka – SZABADOS, Tamás (2014): Az Európai Unió gazdasági joga I.: A belső piac és a közös kereskedelempolitika [Economic Law of the European Union I.: The Internal Market and the Common Commercial Policy). Budapest: ELTE Eötvös. KENDE, Tamás – SZŰCS, Tamás – JENEY, Petra eds. (2018): Európai közjog és politika. Budapest: Wolters Kluwer. NOVITZKY, Péter [s. a.]: A szubszidiaritás fogalma. Online: http://web.axelero.hu/kesz/jel/06_01/novitzky.html OCKENFELS, Wolfgang (1994): Katolícká sociální nauka. Praha: Zvon. SCHILLING, Theodor (1995): Subsidiarity as a Rule and a Principle, or: Taking Subsidiarity Seriously. Jean Monet Working Papers 10. Online: https://jeanmonnetprogram.org/archive/papers/95/9510ind.html SZŐKE-KIS, Bernadett (2020): A szubszidiaritás elvének jelentése és megjelenése az európai integrációs, valamint a magyar tagállami jogalkotásban. Külügyi Műhely, 2(2), 25–37. Online: https://doi.org/10.36817/km.2020.2.2 TINDEMANS, Leo (1976): European Union. Report by Mr. Leo Tindemans, Prime Minister of Belgium, to the European Council. Bulletin of the European Communities, Supplement 1/76. TÓTFALUSI, István (2008): Idegenszó-tár. Budapest: Tinta. VARGA, Orsolya (2016): A szubszidiaritás elve. Civilek.hu, 2 August 2016. Online: https://www.civilek.hu/tudastar/a-szubszidiaritas-elve/ WEATHERILL, Stephen (2005): Better Competence Monitoring. European Law Review, 30(1), 23–41. ZLINSZKY, János (2009): Emberi jogok és keresztény etika. Iustum Aequum Salutare, 5(2), 127–132. Legal sources Act XXXVI of 2012 on the National Assembly Annual Report 2021 on the Application of the Principles of Subsidiarity and Proportionality and on Relations with National Parliaments. COM(2022) 366 final. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52022DC0366 Commission of the European Communities (1992): Bulletin of the European Communities. Brussels. Online: http://aei.pitt.edu/65264/1/BUL370.pdf Committee of the Regions (2021): Subsidiarity Annual Report 2020. Online: https://portal.cor.europa.eu/subsidiarity/Publications/Documents/Subsidiarity%20Annual%20Report%202020/COR-2021-00231-14-01-NB-TRA-HU.pdf Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. EU Regulatory Fitness. COM(2012) 746 final. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex:52012DC0746 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. The principles of subsidiarity and proportionality: Strengthening their role in the EU’s policymaking. COM(2018) 703 final. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52018DC0703 Conclusions of the Presidency 11–12 December 1992, SN 456/1/92 REV 1. Online. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/20492/1992_december_-_edinburgh__eng_.pdf Conference on the Future of Europe – Report on the outcome. 2022. Online: https://doi.org/10.2860/233468 Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union Council of the European Union (2021): Better Regulation Guidelines. SWD(2021) 305 final. Online: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-14004-2021-INIT/en/pdf European Commission (2012): Proposal for a Council Regulation on the Exercise of the Right to Take Collective Action within the Context of the Freedom of Establishment and the Freedom to Provide Services COM(2012) 130 final. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2012:0130:FIN:EN:PDF European Commission (2013a): Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the National Parliaments on the Review of the Proposal for a Council Regulation on the Establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office with Regard to the Principle of Subsidiarity, in Accordance with Protocol No 2. COM(2013) 851 final. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52013DC0851 European Commission (2013b): Proposal for a Council Regulation on the Establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office COM(2013) 534 final. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2013:0534:FIN:en:PDF European Commission (2015): Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Better Regulation for Better Results – An EU agenda. COM(2015) 215 final. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52015DC0215 European Commission (2016): Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the National Parliaments on the proposal for a Directive amending the Posting of Workers Directive, with regard to the principle of subsidiarity, in accordance with Protocol No 2. COM(2016) 505 final. European Commission (2017a): Commission Staff Working Document. Better Regulation Guidelines. SWD(2017) 350 final. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/swd/2017/0350/COM_SWD(2017)0350_EN.pdf European Commission (2017b): Press release IP/17/4621: The Future of Europe: President Juncker Creates Task Force on ‘Doing Less, More Efficiently’. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_17_4621 European Commission (2018a): Press release IP/18/341: Future of Europe: President Juncker Appoints Members to Task Force on Subsidiarity and Proportionality. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_18_341 European Commission (2018b): Report on the Task force on Subsidiarity, Proportionality and ‘Doing Less, More Efficiently’. Online: https://commission.europa.eu/document/8530a17b-e2b8-4cd4-a68d-597767cfbad7_en European Commission (2019): Annual Report 2018 on the Application of the Principles of Subsidiarity and Proportionality and on Relations with National Parliaments. COM(2019) 333 final. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52019DC0333 European Commission (2020): Annual Report 2019 on the Application of the Principles of Subsidiarity and Proportionality and on Relations with National Parliaments. COM(2020) 272 final. Online: https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2020-06/com-2020-272-en.pdf Interinstitutional agreement of 25 October 1993 between the Parliament, the Council and the Commission on Procedures for Implementing the Principle of Subsidiarity [OJ C 329, 6.12.1993] 135 Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on Better Law-Making [OJ L 123, 12.5.2016] 1–14 Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-making [OJ C 321, 31.12.2003] 1–5 Joint Declaration on the Conference on the Future of Europe. Online: https://futureu.europa.eu/uploads/decidim/attachment/file/6/EN_-_JOINT_DECLARATION_ON_THE_CONFERENCE_ON_THE_FUTURE_OF_EUROPE.pdf Letter from President Barroso to Martin Schulz, President of the European Parliament, Brussels, 12 September 2012. Parliamentary Decision No. 10/2014 (24.II.) on Certain Provisions of the Rules of Procedure Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 96/71/EC of The European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services. COM(2016) 128 final. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2016%3A128%3AFIN Single European Act Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe 2004. Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed at Lisbon, 13 December 2007. Treaty on European Union, signed at Maastricht on 7 February 1992. Treaty on the European Union Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union White Paper on the Future of Europe. COM(2017)2025 final. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/news/white_paper.html?locale=en Judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union Case C-128/17, Poland v. Parliament and Council, EU:C:2019:194 Case C-233/94, Federal Republic of Germany v. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, ECLI:EU:C:1997:231 Case C-482/17, Czech Republic v. European Parliament and Council, EU:C:2019:1035 Case C-547/14, Philip Morris Brands SARL and Others v. Secretary of State for Health, ECLI:EU:C:2016:325 Case C-84/94, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v. Council of the European Union, ECLI:EU:C:1996:431 Case T-429/05, Artegodan v. Commission, EU:T:2010:60 Joined Cases C-643/15 and C-647/15, Slovakia and Hungary v. Council, EU:C:2017:631" ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2024) ["issueId"]=> int(588) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(49) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(5) "43-63" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(20) "10.32559/et.2023.3.4" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(1350) "

The principle of subsidiarity, which also appeared in antiquity, was refined and perfected by the Catholic Church. The essence of the principle of subsidiarity is to ensure that decision-making takes place as close as possible to the individuals, thus avoiding unnecessary centralisation and encouraging effective decentralisation. The rationale behind this principle is the recognition that higher levels of government do not always have an adequate level of insight or understanding of local realities, and that decision-making should therefore be taken at the lowest possible level of authority to achieve the best quality of governance.
The principle of subsidiarity is a fundamental principle of the European Union’s decision-making system. A return to subsidiarity can play an important role in the constitutional disputes that have been revived in recent years between national constitutional courts and the Court of Justice of the European Union. This paper analyses the evolution of the subsidiarity principle in EU decision-making and the institutions and procedures that are supposed to guarantee its application. By examining the political and legal enforceability of the principle of subsidiarity, the paper draws conclusions on the present state of the enforcement of the principle and makes some proposals for the future.

" } ["subtitle"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(91) "– The Origin and Practice of the Subsidiarity Principle in European Union Decision-Making" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(46) "Pope Leo XIII’s Legacy in European Union Law" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["hu_HU"]=> string(12) "Simon Tamás" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(Author)#755 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(11) { ["id"]=> int(9370) ["email"]=> string(22) "simontamas97@gmail.com" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7474) ["seq"]=> int(3) ["userGroupId"]=> int(201) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(5) "Simon" ["hu_HU"]=> string(5) "Simon" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Tamás" ["hu_HU"]=> string(6) "Tamás" } ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["hu_HU"]=> string(40) "a:1:{s:5:"hu_HU";s:14:"Baker McKenzie";}" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(5) { [0]=> string(12) "subsidiarity" [1]=> string(12) "European law" [2]=> string(14) "European Union" [3]=> string(22) "common European values" [4]=> string(15) "decision-making" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#769 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(34104) ["id"]=> int(5885) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(7474) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }

object(Publication)#758 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(29) { ["id"]=> int(7475) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2024-05-30" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2024-05-30 15:15:22" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(9371) ["sectionId"]=> int(26) ["seq"]=> int(4) ["submissionId"]=> int(7351) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(5501) "BUSSIÈRE¸Éric – DUJARDIN, Vincent – DUMOULIN, Michel – LUDLOW, Piers – BROUWER, Jan Willem – TILL, Pierre (2014): The European Commission 1973–86 – History and Memories of an Institution. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. BUTLER, Graham – WESSEL, Ramses A. (2021): Happy Birthday ERTA! 50 Years of the Implied External Powers Doctrine in EU Law. European Law Blog, 31 March 2021. Online: https://europeanlawblog.eu/2021/03/31/happy-birthday-erta-50-years-of-the-implied-external-powers-doctrine-in-eu-law/ Competence of the ILO to Regulate Incidentally the Personal Work of the Employer. PCIJ Publications 1926, Series B. Conseil des CE (1970): Mémoire en défense présenté par le Conseil. Online: https://archives.eui.eu/en/fonds/663526?item=CEUE_SEJU-06-0258 CRAIG, Paul (2014): Pringle and the Nature of Legal Reasoning. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 21(1), 205–220. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X1402100111 Effect of Awards of Compensation made by the UN Administrative Tribunal, Advisory Opinion, [1954] ICJ Rep, 56–59. European Union (2001): Laeken Declaration of 15 December 2001 on the future of the European Union. Online: https://www.cvce.eu/content/publication/2002/9/26/a76801d5-4bf0-4483-9000-e6df94b07a55/publishable_en.pdf European Commission (1970): Mémoire en replique dans l’affaire 22/70 JUR/3432/7O, Historical Archives of the European Union CEUE_SEJU-0258 26-32. Online: https://archives.eui.eu/en/fonds/663526?item=CEUE_SEJU-06-0258 FRITZ, Vera (2020): Activism On and Off the Bench: Pierre Pescatore and the Law of Integration. Common Market Law Review, 57(2), 475–502. Online: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2020034 GADKOWSKI, Andrzej (2016): The Doctrine of Implied Powers of International Organizations in the Case Law of International Tribunals. Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review, 6, 45–59. Online: https://doi.org/10.14746/ppuam.2016.6.03 GOVAERE, Inge (2022): Implied Powers of the EU, Limits to Political Expediency and Internationally Inspired Pragmatism: Commission v Council (ERTA). In BUTLER, Graham –WESSEL, Ramses A. (eds.): External Relations Law – The Cases in Context. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 9–20. Online: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509939725.ch-001 GWILLIAM, Ken M. (1980): Realism and the Common Transport Policy of the EEC. In POLAK, Jacob B. – VAN DER KAMP, Jan B. (szerk.): Changes in the Field of Transport Studies. Essays on the Progress of Theory in Relation to Policy Making. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 38–59. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9306-8_4 HODUN, Milosz (2015): Doctrine of Implied Powers as a Judicial Tool to Build Federal Polities. PhD-disszertáció. Reykjavík University School of Law. Online: https://opinvisindi.is/bitstream/handle/20.500.11815/2479/Doctrine%20of%20implied%20powers%20as%20a%20judicial....pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y KAJTÁR, Gábor (2010): A kettős pillérszerkezet megerősített kontúrjai a Lisszaboni Szerződés hatálybalépése után. Európai Jog, 10(4), 3–14. KNAPP, László (2019): A beleértett külső hatáskörök doktrínájának kodifikálása és az EU–Szingapúr szabadkereskedelmi megállapodás. Jog Állam Politika, 11(1), 79–100. LEOPOLD, Patricia M. (1977): External Relations Power of EEC in Theory and in Practice. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 26(1), 54–80. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/26.1.54 LOCK, Tobias (2022): Refining and Expanding Implied Powers of the Union: Kramer. In BUTLER, Graham – WESSEL, Ramses A. (eds.): External Relations Law – The Cases in Context. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 77–88. Online: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509939725.ch-007 MCNAUGHTON, Anne (2017): Acts of Creation – The ERTA Decision as a Foundation Stone of the EU Legal System. In NICOLA, Fernanda – DAVIES, Bill (eds.): EU Law Stories – Contextual and Critical Histories of European Jurisprudence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 134–154. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316340479.008 NOËL, Emile (1975): The External Relations of the EEC and Its Internal Problems. Government and Opposition, 10(2), 159–166. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.1975.tb00634.x PETTI, Alessandro (2021a): ERTA and Us: Shifting Constitutional Equilibria on the Visions of Europe. European Papers, 6(1), 567–577. PETTI, Alessandro (2021b): The Court of Justice in the Archives Project Analysis of the ERTA case (22/70). Academy of European Law Working Paper 2021/8. Online: https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/71556 RASMUSSEN, Morten (2012): Establishing a Constitutional Practice of European Law: The History of the Legal Service of the European Executive, 1952–65. Contemporary European History, 21(3), 375–397. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960777312000252 RASMUSSEN, Morten (2014): Revolutionizing European Law: A History of the Van Gend en Loos Judgment. International Journal of Counstitutional Law, 12(1), 136–163. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mou006 Reparation for injuries suffered in the service of the Nations, Advisory Opinion, [1949] ICJ Rep 174, ICGJ 232 (ICJ 1949), 11th April 1949. SCHERMERS, Henry G. – BLOKKER, Niels M. (2018): International Institutional Law. Sixth edition. Leiden–Boston: Brill Nijhoff. Online: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004381650 SINCLAIR, Guy F. (2017): To Reform the World – International Organizations and the Making of Modern States. Oxford: Oxford University Press." ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2024) ["issueId"]=> int(588) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(49) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(5) "65-82" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(20) "10.32559/et.2023.3.5" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(1225) "

EU external relations law is not very much at the centre of the Hungarian EU legal discourse, so the matter of implied external competences may seem almost mystical. However, it is not mysterious at all, its development is rather evidence of the presence of pragmatism in the development of EU law, as the implied external powers were even used to extend competences in the period of the EEC. The aim the paper is to show how this pragmatism has been manifested from time to time in the development of the implied external competences. To do so, the paper also draws on Sinclair’s theory, who sees the phenomenon of the expansion of powers in the law of international organisations as a coherent process in some cases. Accordingly, the article describes case C-22/70. Commission v. Council (ERTA), including the main arguments made in the case, and the relevant circumstances as well. This is followed by the explanation of the expansion of the implied powers to highlight the appearance of its different aspects involved. Finally, the paper points out a “dialogue” that has been developed between the Member States and the Court of Justice during the process of the Constitutional Treaty and the Lisbon reforms.

" } ["subtitle"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(76) "The Case of Implied Powers in External Relations – A History of Pragmatism" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(102) "The Case of Implied External Powers – The History of Pragmatism in the EU’s External Relations Law" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["hu_HU"]=> string(12) "Budai Péter" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(Author)#765 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(11) { ["id"]=> int(9371) ["email"]=> string(27) "peter.budai101100@gmail.com" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7475) ["seq"]=> int(4) ["userGroupId"]=> int(201) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(5) "Budai" ["hu_HU"]=> string(5) "Budai" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Péter" ["hu_HU"]=> string(6) "Péter" } ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["hu_HU"]=> string(29) "a:1:{s:5:"hu_HU";s:4:"ELTE";}" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(5) { [0]=> string(18) "European Union law" [1]=> string(25) "EU external relations law" [2]=> string(23) "implied external powers" [3]=> string(4) "ERTA" [4]=> string(18) "development of law" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#777 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(34105) ["id"]=> int(5886) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(7475) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }

object(Publication)#763 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(29) { ["id"]=> int(7326) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2024-05-30" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2024-05-30 15:15:23" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(9152) ["sectionId"]=> int(26) ["seq"]=> int(5) ["submissionId"]=> int(7202) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(15015) "ANSES (2024): Review of the Agency’s Work on Glyphosate. 24 March 2024. Online: https://www.anses.fr/en/content/review-agency’s-work-glyphosate CENTNER, Terence J. (2021): Pesticide Registration Fails to Protect Human Health: Damages from Exposure to Glyphosate-Based Herbicides. Journal of Environmental Law and Litigation, 36(1), 69–128. Online: https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/handle/1794/26258 CHRONOWSKI, Nóra – VINCZE, Attila (2018): Magyar alkotmányosság az európai integrációban. Budapest: HVG-ORAC. CLAUSING, Peter (2019): Glyphosate: The European Controversy – A Review of Civil Society Struggles and Regulatory Failures. Business and Human Rights Journal, 4(2), 351–356. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2019.5 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2324 of 12 December 2017. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32017R2324 DILBECK, Morgan (2021): Monsanto: Creator of Cancer Liability? DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal, 18(1), 105–126. Online: https://via.library.depaul.edu/bclj/vol18/iss1/2 DONATI, Alessandra (2023): The Glyphosate Saga in Luxembourg: The Annulment by the Judiciary of the Legislative Ban of Glyphosate-Based Products – A Breach of European Union Law? European Journal of Risk Regulation, 14(4), 816–822. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2023.63 European Commission (2014): Communication from the Commission on the European Citizens' Initiative “Water and sanitation are a human right! Water is a public good, not a commodity!”. COM(2014) 177 final. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52014DC0177 European Commission (2015a): Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. Report on the Application of Regulation (EU) No. 211/2011 on the Citizens’ Initiative. COM(2015) 0145 final. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52015DC0145 European Commission (2015b): Communication from the Commission on the European Citizens’ Initiative “Stop Vivisection”. COM(2015) 3773 final. European Commission (2017a): Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the European Citizens’ Initiative “Ban Glyphosate and Protect People and the Environment from Toxic Pesticides”. C(2017) 8414 final. Online: https://food.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2017-12/pesticides_glyphosate_eci_final.pdf European Commission (2017b): Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and the Council on the Quality of Water Intended for Human Consumption (Recast). COM(2017) 753 final. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=COM:2017:753:FIN European Commission (2017c): Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Citizens’ Initiative. COM(2017) 482 final. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:115dfc53-985a-11e7-b92d-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format=PDF European Commission (2018): Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Minimum Requirements for Water Reuse. COM(2018) 337 final. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52018PC0337 European Commission (2020a): Report From the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council On the Experience Gained by Member States on the Implementation of National Targets Established in their National Action Plans and on Progress in the Implementation of Directive 2009/128/EC on the Sustainable Use of Pesticides COM(2020) 204 final. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2020:204:FIN European Commission (2020b): Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions A Farm to Fork Strategy for a Fair, Healthy and Environmentally-friendly Food System. COM(2020) 381 final. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52020DC0381 European Commission (2021): Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the European Citizens' Initiative 'Minority SafePack – One Million Signatures for Diversity in Europe’. C(2021) 171 final. European Commission (2023): Renewal of the Approval of Glyphosate: Questions and Answers*. 16 November 2023. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/hu/QANDA_23_5793?fbclid=IwAR3tTjcTzpMBxjTAWGXk44KEIFzzCp00WNUt3HWK_yEDcsC3I-nLCys6ASU European Parliament (2015): European Parliament Resolution of 28 October 2015 on the European Citizens’ Initiative. 2014/2257(INI). Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52015IP0382 European Commission (2018): Commission Staff Working Document: Impact Assessment: Accompanying the Document: Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Minimum Requirements for Water Reuse. SWD(2018) 249 final/2. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/HU/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52018SC0249(01) European Commission: Earlier Assessment of Glyphosate. Online: https://food.ec.europa.eu/plants/pesticides/approval-active-substances/renewal-approval/glyphosate/earlier-assessment_en FINARDI, Corrado (2020): The Austrian Ban of Glyphoate and the Precautionary Principle Paradox: “The More You Wreck It, the More You Strengthen It”. European Food and Feed Law Review (EFFL), 15(5), 473–476. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26998540 GHERGHINA, Sergiu – GROH, Adriana (2016): A Poor Sales Pitch? The European Citizens’ Initiative and Attitudes toward the EU in Germany and the UK. European Politics and Society, 17(3), 373–387. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2016.1166875 GRAEFE, J. Julius (2019): Glyphosate’s Fate: Comparing Strategies for the Precautionary Cancellation of Glyphosate Registrations in the United States and the European Union. Connecticut Journal of International Law, 35(2), 248–271. Greenpeace European Unit (2023): EU Must Withdraw Licence for Toxic Glyphosate Considering Flawed EU Approval System for Pesticides. 14 November 2023. Online: https://www.greenpeace.org/eu-unit/issues/nature-food/46824/eu-must-withdraw-licence-for-toxic-glyphosate-considering-flawed-eu-approval-system-for-pesticides/ GREENWOOD, Justin (2018): The European Citizens’ Initiative: Bringing the EU Closer to Its Citizens? Comparative European Politics, 17(6), 940–956. Online: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-018-0138-x HALÁSZ, Iván – JAKAB, András (2019): V. A szuverenitás fogalma az alkotmányjogban. In GÁRDOS-Orosz, Fruzsina – HALÁSZ, Iván (eds.): Bevezetés az alkotmányjogba. Budapest: Dialóg Campus, 81–92. Health and Environment Alliance (2017a): ECHA Opinion on Glyphosate Expected on Wednesday. 14 March 2017. Online: https://www.env-health.org/echa-opinion-on-glyphosate-expected-on-wednesday/ Health and Environment Alliance (2017b): European Citizens’ Initiative to #StopGlyphosate. 8 February 2017. Online: https://www.env-health.org/european-citizens-initiative-to-stopglyphosate/ Health and Environment Alliance (2017c): Glyphosate: future generations to pay the price of reauthorisation of health-harming herbicide. 27 November 2017. Online: https://www.env-health.org/glyphosate-future-generations-to-pay-the-price-of-reauthorisation-of-health-harming-herbicide/ Health and Environment Alliance (2017d): Join our #StopGlyphosate Action Day! 4 May 2017. Online: https://www.env-health.org/join-our-stopglyphosate-action-day/ Health And Environment Alliance (2017e): More than One Million Europeans Stand Up against Glyphosate. 15 June 2017. Online: https://www.env-health.org/more-than-one-million-europeans-stand-up-against-glyphosate/ Health and Environment Alliance (2018): Organisers of #StopGlyphosate Citizens’ Initiative Call on EU Parliament to Amend Proposed General Food Law Revision. 27 September 2018. Online: https://www.env-health.org/organisers-of-stopglyphosate-citizens-initiative-call-on-eu-parliament-to-amend-proposed-general-food-law-revision-2/ Health and Environment Alliance (2023): Press Note: Glyphosate: Failed Member States’ Vote Shows It is Impossible to Ignore Science – European Commission Called to Drop its Proposal. Online: https://www.env-health.org/glyphosate-failed-member-states-vote-shows-it-is-impossible-to-ignore-science-european-commission-called-to-drop-its-proposal/ KAISER, Tamás (2019): IX. A közpolitikai változások és az implementáció tervezése. In KAISER, Tamás (ed.): A modern kormányzás koncepcionális és közpolitikai keretei: Hazai és nemzetközi dimenziók. Budapest: Dialóg Campus, 157–279. KARATZIA, Anastasia (2018): Revisiting the Registration of European Citizens’ Initiatives: The Evolution of the Legal Admissibility Test. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 20(1), 147–178. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/cel.2018.9 LEONELLI, Giulia Claudia (2018): The Glyphosate Saga and the Fading Democratic Legitimacy of European Union Risk Regulation. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 25(5), 582–606. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X18796981 LEONELLI, Giulia Claudia (2022): The Glyphosate Saga Continues: ‘Dissenting’ Member States and the European Way Forward. Transnational Environmental Law, 12(1), 200–224. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102522000188 LONGO, Erik (2019): The European Citizens’ Initiative: Too Much Democracy for EU Polity? German Law Journal, 20(2), 181–200. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2019.12 MILITARU, Ioana Nely (2017): European Citizens’ Initiative. Juridical Tribune, 7(2), 89–97. Online: https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/juridtrib7&i=590 MORARU, Andrei (2016): European Union Democratic Governance: A Case Study of the European Citizens’ Initiative. Europolity: Continuity and Change in European Governance, 10(2), 137–168. PASKALEV, Vesco (2020): The Clash of Scientific Assessors: What the Conflict over Glyphosate Carcinogenicity Tells Us about the Relationship between Law and Science. European Journal of Risk Regulation (EJRR), 11(3), 520–538. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2020.59 Pesticide Action Network (2023): No Qualified Majority for Glyphosate Renewal: EU Commission Will Now Decide. 16 November 2023. Online: https://www.pan-europe.info/press-releases/2023/11/no-qualified-majority-glyphosate-renewal-eu-commission-will-now-decide PETRARU, Roxana Alina (2011): Considerations regarding the Regulation on the Citizens’ Initiative. Jurnalul de Studii Juridice, 6(1–2), 69–74. Online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1959348 PETRESCU, Oana-Măriuca (2014a): European Citizens’ Initiative: A Useful Instrument for Society and for Citizens? Revista Chilena de Derecho, 41(3), 993–1016. Online: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34372014000300009 PETRESCU, Oana-Măriuca (2014b): Strengthening the Idea of „by Citizens, for Citizens” in the Context of the European Citizens’ Initiative – Brief Analysis of Initiatives. Romanian Journal of European Affairs, 14(2), 5–28. Online: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/strengthening-idea-citizens-context-european/docview/1538255004/se-2 Regulation (EU) 2019/1381 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on the transparency and sustainability of the EU risk assessment in the food chain and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1829/2003, (EC) No 1831/2003, (EC) No 2065/2003, (EC) No 1935/2004, (EC) No 1331/2008, (EC) No 1107/2009, (EU) 2015/2283 and Directive 2001/18/EC (Text with EEA relevance.). Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/1381/oj ROBINSON, Claire et al. (2020): Achieving a High Level of Protection from Pesticides in Europe: Problems with the Current Risk Assessment Procedure and Solutions. European Journal of Risk Regulation (EJRR), 11(3), 450–480. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2020.18 SMYTH, Caer (2017): What Counts as Expertise: The Case of Glyphosate and Jasanoff’s Three-Body Problem. Environmental Law Review, 19(3), 168–182. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461452917724137 SZEGEDI, László (2022): EU Expert Bodies in Light of the Glyphosate Saga and the Dieselgate Scandal. Cross-Sectoral Lessons to Be Learned in the Era of Emerging Risk Factors and Constant Crisis Management? Európai Tükör, 25(3–4), 93–116. Online: https://doi.org/10.32559/et.2022.3-4.5 SZEGEDI, László – TELEKI, Bálint (2020): A glifozát környezetre és emberi egészégre gyakorolt hatásaival kapcsoalatos jogi kérdések. Publicationes Universitatis Miskolcinensis. Sectio Juridica et Politica, 38(2), 246–265. Online: https://doi.org/10.32978/sjp.2020.035 SZELIGOWSKA, Dorota –, MINCHEVA, Elitsa (2012): The European Citizens’ Initiative – Empowering European Citizens Within the Institutional Triangle: A Political and Legal Analysis. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 13(3), 270–284. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/15705854.2012.702572 TÁRNOK, Balázs (2017): European Minorities Win a Battle in Luxembourg – The Judgment of the General Court in the Case Minority SafePack European Citizens’ Initiative. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 16(1), 79–94. Online: https://doi.org/10.5553/HYIEL/266627012017005001015 TÁRNOK, Balázs (2019): A minority safepack európai polgári kezdeményezés és a magyarországi aláírásgyűjtés tapasztalatai. Létünk – Társadalmi, tudományos, kulturális, folyóirat, 49(2), 131–148. TÁRNOK Balázs (2020): Az európai polgári kezdeményezés működési nehézségei és az európai polgári kezdeményezésről szóló rendelet felülvizsgálata. Iustum Aequum Salutare, 16(2), 147-178. TÁRNOK, Balázs (2021): Tízéves az európai polgári kezdeményezés – mivé vált az Unió részvételi demokráciájának új eszköze? Európai Tükör, 24(4), 37–53. Online: https://doi.org/10.32559/et.2021.4.3 TOMLINSON, Taylor (2020): Glyphosate: Weeding Our Way to the Truth of Roundup’s Carcinogenicity. Drake Journal of Agricultural Law, 25(1), 145–166. VAN DEN BRINK, Ton (2020): Danger! Glyphosate May Expose Weaknesses in Institutional Systems: EU Legislation and Comitology in the Face of a Controversial Reauthorisation. European Journal of Risk Regulation (EJRR), 11(3), 436–449. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2020.2 VATAMAN, Dan (2013): Participation and Influence of European Citizens in Decision-Making Process at the EU Level. International Conference Education and Creativity for a Knowledge-Based Society, 7, 267–271. Online: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2420969 VOGIATZIS, Nikos (2019): The Commission’s ‘Communication’ on a Successful European Citizens’ Initiative before the Court of Justice: ECJ (Grand Chamber) 19 December 2019, Case C-418/18 P, Puppinck and Others v European Commission. European Constitutional Law Review, 16(4), 691–712. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019620000292" ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2024) ["issueId"]=> int(588) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(49) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(6) "83-103" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(20) "10.32559/et.2023.3.6" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(1502) "

The EU re-authorisation of glyphosate, the active substance used in plant protection products, has once again highlighted the issues and problems associated with the active substance in 2023. The main source of tension is that the active substance was classified as a potential carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer in 2015, but the EU’s competent agencies have not identified any reasons for banning the active substance. Despite calls from civil society for removing glyphosate from the internal market, the European Commission has refused to ban the substance from the internal market. The aim of this paper is to present in more detail the European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI) to ban glyphosate and the Commission’s response to the initiative. The European Citizens’ Initiative is a legal instrument that gives EU citizens the opportunity to express their will on a specific issue or policy question. Thus, through the citizens’ initiative, it is possible to channel the demands of EU citizens into the legislative process. An analysis of the measures taken in response to the initiative, that aimed to ban glyphosate shows that an ECI can not only have a direct impact, but can also have an indirect trigger effect in terms of getting the Commission to pay attention to an important issue. The result of this indirect trigger effect may be that, after a longer period of time, the Commission finally initiates legislation on the subject of a particular ECI.

" } ["subtitle"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(47) "The Example of the Initiative to Ban Glyphosate" ["hu_HU"]=> string(47) "The Example of the Initiative to Ban Glyphosate" } ["title"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(86) "The Potential Indirect Impact of the European Citizens’ Initiative on EU Legislation" ["hu_HU"]=> string(86) "The Potential Indirect Impact of the European Citizens’ Initiative on EU Legislation" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["hu_HU"]=> string(13) "Csibor Ferenc" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "hu_HU" ["authors"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(Author)#773 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(9152) ["email"]=> string(28) "csibor.ferenc.1999@gmail.com" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7326) ["seq"]=> int(5) ["userGroupId"]=> int(201) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7919-0485" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(107) "a:1:{s:5:"hu_HU";s:81:"Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem Államtudományi és Nemzetközi Tanulmányok Kar";}" } ["biography"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(6) "Csibor" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(6) "Ferenc" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "hu_HU" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(5) { [0]=> string(10) "glyphosate" [1]=> string(37) "European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI)" [2]=> string(11) "legislation" [3]=> string(10) "pesticides" [4]=> string(8) "advocacy" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#780 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(34106) ["id"]=> int(5887) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(7326) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }

object(Publication)#113 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(29) { ["id"]=> int(7471) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2024-05-30" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2024-05-30 15:15:22" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(9367) ["sectionId"]=> int(29) ["seq"]=> int(1) ["submissionId"]=> int(7347) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(9206) "Auswärtiges Amt (2023): Sailing on High Seas – Reforming and Enlarging the EU for the 21st Century. 18 September 2023. Online: https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/blob/2617206/4d0e0010ffcd8c0079e21329bbbb3332/230919-rfaa-deu-fra-bericht-data.pdf Auswärtiges Amt (2023): Gemeinsame Mitteilung der Außenministerien zum Start der Freundesgruppe für Qualifizierte Mehrheits­entscheidungen in der Außen- und Sicherheits­politik der Europäischen Union. 4 May 2023. Online: https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/de/newsroom/-/2595302 BÓLYA, Boglárka (2021a): Zöld utat kapott az Európa jövőjéről szóló konferencia. Mandiner.hu 11 March 2021. Online: https://mandiner.hu/velemeny/2021/03/zold-utat-kapott-az-europa-jovojerol-szolo-konferencia BÓLYA, Boglárka (2021b): Hallassuk a hangunkat, mondjuk el, hogy milyen Európában szeretnénk élni. Mandiner.hu 31 December 2021. Online: https://mandiner.hu/belfold/2021/12/vendegszerzo Der Bundesadler [s. a.]: Koalitionsvertrag zwischen SPD, Bündnis 90/Die Grünen und FDP. Online: https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/aktuelles/koalitionsvertrag-2021-1990800 Conference on the Future of Europe (2022). Report on the Final Outcome. Online: https://doi.org/10 2860/637445 Council of the European Union – European Parliament – European Commission (2021): Joint Declaration on the Conference on the Future of Europe. Engaging with Citizens for Democracy. Online: https://wayback.archive-it.org/12090/20230310164426/https://futureu.europa.eu/uploads/decidim/attachment/file/6/EN_-_JOINT_DECLARATION_ON_THE_CONFERENCE_ON_THE_FUTURE_OF_EUROPE.pdf Council of the European Union (2020): Conference on the Future of Europe: Council Position. Online: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/44679/st09102-en20.pdf European Commission (2017a): White Paper on the Future of Europe. Reflections and Scenarios for the EU27 by 2025. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/HU/TXT/?uri=COM:2017:2025:FIN European Commission (2017b): Reflection Paper on the Deepening of the Economic and Monetary Union. Online: https://commission.europa.eu/publications/reflection-paper-deepening-economic-and-monetary-union_hu European Commission (2017c): Reflection Paper on the Future of EU Finances. Online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/5f9c0e27-6519-11e7-b2f2-01aa75ed71a1 European Commission (2022): Conference on the Future of Europe – Report on the Final Outcome. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/FS_22_2942 European Commission (2023): Standard Eurobarometer 98 – Winter 2022–2023. Online: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2872 European Council (2001): Laeken Declaration on the Future of the European Union. 15 December 2001. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/pdf/lae2_en.pdf European Parliament (2017a): European Parliament Resolution of 16 February 2017 on Improving the Functioning of the European Union Building on the Potential of the Lisbon Treaty. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0049_HU.html European Parliament (2017b): European Parliament Resolution of 16 February 2017 on Possible Evolutions of and Adjustments to the Current Institutional Set-up of the European Union. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0048_HU.html European Parliament (2017c): European Parliament Resolution of 16 February 2017 on Budgetary Capacity for the Euro Area. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0050_HU.html European Parliament (2017d): European Parliament Resolution of 16 February 2017 on Budgetary Capacity for the Euro Area. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0050_HU.html European Parliament (2018a): Press Release – Macron Defends the Idea of European Sovereignty. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20180411IPR01517/macron-defends-the-idea-of-european-sovereignty European Parliament (2018b): Press release – Ideal of Creating a Better Future Still Inspires the EU, Says Irish Taoiseach. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20180112IPR91628/ideal-of-creating-a-better-future-still-inspires-the-eu-says-irish-taoiseach European Parliament (2018c): Press Release – Merkel: Nationalism and Egoism must Never have a Chance again in Europe. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20181106IPR18316/merkel-nationalism-and-egoism-must-never-have-a-chance-again-in-europe European Parliament (2018d): Press Release – We cannot Expect More from Europe without Giving More to it, says Portuguese PM. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/hu/press-room/20180309IPR99429/we-cannot-expect-more-from-europe-without-giving-more-to-it-says-portuguese-pm European Parliament (2020a): European Parliament Resolution of 15 January 2020 on the European Parliament’s Position on the Conference on the Future of Europe. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0010_HU.html European Parliament (2022a): European Parliament Resolution of 4 May 2022 on the Follow-up to the Conclusions of the Conference on the Future of Europe. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0141_HU.html European Parliament (2022b): European Parliament Resolution of 9 June 2022 on the Call for a Convention for the Revision of the Treaties. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0244_HU.html European Parliament (2022c): Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RULES-9-2022-07-11-TOC_EN.html European Parliament (2022d): Verbatim Report of Proceedings. 9 June 2022. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-9-2022-06-09-ITM-003_HU.html European Parliament (2023): Verbatim Report of Proceedings. 9 May 2023. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-9-2023-05-09-ITM-007_DE.html European Parliament Committee on Constitutional Affairs (2023): Report on Proposals of the European Parliament for the Amendment of the Treaties. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0337_EN.html European Parliamentary Research Service (2018): Briefing – Future of Europe Debates II. Parliament Hosts Heads of State or Government. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2018/628288/EPRS_BRI(2018)628288_EN.pdf JUNCKER, Jean-Claude (2016): Az Unió helyzete 2016: Építsünk egy jobb Európát – amely védelmet nyújt, eszközöket ad polgárai kezébe és garantálja a biztonságot. 14 September, 2016. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/hu/SPEECH_16_3043 Kantar Public (2022): Contributions per Member State on the Multilingual Digital Platform of the Conference on the Future of Europe. Online: https://wayback.archive-it.org/12090/20230417081912/https://futureu.europa.eu/rails/active_storage/blobs/eyJfcmFpbHMiOnsibWVzc2FnZSI6IkJBaHBBNGNBQVE9PSIsImV4cCI6bnVsbCwicHVyIjoiYmxvYl9pZCJ9fQ==--8e7163573de15aeb202baf8250b8b2c344a27f9b/Report%20Kantar%20COFE%20Member%20States_February_Final_21032022.pdf KENGYEL, Ákos (2017): Az Európai Unió jövője – célok, identitás és kommunikáció. Közgazdasági Szemle, 64(6), 661–665. Online: https://doi.org/10.18414/KSZ.2016.6.661 Koalitionsvertrag 2021 – 2025 zwischen der Sozialdemokratischen Partei Deutschlands (SPD) MACRON, Emmanuel (2019): Pour une Renaissance européenne. 4 March 2019. Online: https://www.elysee.fr/emmanuel-macron/2019/03/04/pour-une-renaissance-europeenne Ministry of Justice (2022): „Éljen a magyar szabadság, éljen a haza!” Magyar javaslatok az Európai Unió jövőjéről. 12 May 2022. Online: https://cdn.kormany.hu//uploads/sheets//a/ad/ade/adecd43bce23652f4f2baecaa8e6b88.pdf Multilingual Digital Platform of the Conference on the Future of Europe – Archive [s. n.]. Online: https://wayback.archive-it.org/12090/20230418091815/https:/futureu.europa.eu/ ORBÁN, Viktor (2022): Előadás a „Harminc éve szabadon” című konferencián. 19 June 2021. Online: https://2015-2022.miniszterelnok.hu/orban-viktor-eloadasa-a-harminc-eve-szabadon-cimu-konferencian/ Parliamentary Resolution 32/2022 (19.VII.) on the Hungarian position to be taken on the future of the European Union Treaty on European Union Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union VON DER LEYEN, Ursula (2019a): Opening Statement in the European Parliament Plenary Session by Ursula von der Leyen, Candidate for President of the European Commission. 16 July 2019. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_19_4230 VON DER LEYEN, Ursula (2019b): A Union that Strives for More – My Agenda for Europe. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/resources/library/media/20190716RES57231/20190716RES57231.pdf VON DER LEYEN, Ursula (2022): 2022 State of the Union Address by President von der Leyen. 14 September 2022. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_22_5493 VON DER LEYEN, Ursula (2023): 2023 State of the Union Address by President von der Leyen. 13 September 2023. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_23_4426 " ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2024) ["issueId"]=> int(588) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(49) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(7) "105-128" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(20) "10.32559/et.2023.3.7" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(654) "

The Conference on the Future of Europe, launched by the European Union in 2021, aimed to engage citizens in a dialogue and serve as a key platform for EU institutions to discuss the future direction of the European Union. Hungary actively participated in the process, and the objective of our study is to shed light on the contributions of Hungarian citizens and the conclusions drawn from them. The study also explores the post-Conference landscape, tracing the evolution of the proposals arising directly or indirectly from the debates on the future of Europe, with a reflection to their possible implications on the revision of the EU Treaties.

" } ["subtitle"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(66) "The Hungarian Experience of the Conference on the Future of Europe" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(21) "The Future has Begun?" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["hu_HU"]=> string(42) "Bólya Boglárka, Balogh Zsuzsanna Zsófia" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(2) { [0]=> object(Author)#733 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(11) { ["id"]=> int(9367) ["email"]=> string(24) "boglarka.bolya@im.gov.hu" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7471) ["seq"]=> int(1) ["userGroupId"]=> int(201) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Bólya" ["hu_HU"]=> string(6) "Bólya" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(9) "Boglárka" ["hu_HU"]=> string(9) "Boglárka" } ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["hu_HU"]=> string(53) "a:1:{s:5:"hu_HU";s:27:"Igazságügyi Minisztérium";}" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } [1]=> object(Author)#730 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(9570) ["email"]=> string(22) "orban.endre@uni-nke.hu" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7471) ["seq"]=> int(1) ["userGroupId"]=> int(201) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(0) "" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["biography"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Balogh" ["hu_HU"]=> string(6) "Balogh" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(17) "Zsuzsanna Zsófia" ["hu_HU"]=> string(17) "Zsuzsanna Zsófia" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(5) { [0]=> string(34) "Conference on the Future of Europe" [1]=> string(9) "EU reform" [2]=> string(15) "Treaty revision" [3]=> string(19) "European Parliament" [4]=> string(10) "federalism" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#753 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(34107) ["id"]=> int(5888) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(7471) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }

object(Publication)#120 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(27) { ["id"]=> int(7468) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2024-05-30" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2024-05-30 15:15:22" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(9363) ["sectionId"]=> int(29) ["seq"]=> int(2) ["submissionId"]=> int(7344) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2024) ["issueId"]=> int(588) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(49) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(7) "129-133" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(20) "10.32559/et.2023.3.8" ["abstract"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(8) "

-

" ["hu_HU"]=> string(8) "

-

" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(65) "European Integration at a Crossroads – Which Direction to Take?" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["hu_HU"]=> string(16) "Gottfried Péter" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(Author)#734 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(11) { ["id"]=> int(9363) ["email"]=> string(25) "peter.gottfried@gmail.com" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7468) ["seq"]=> int(2) ["userGroupId"]=> int(201) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(9) "Gottfried" ["hu_HU"]=> string(9) "Gottfried" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Péter" ["hu_HU"]=> string(6) "Péter" } ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["hu_HU"]=> string(54) "a:1:{s:5:"hu_HU";s:28:"MNB Monetáris Tanács tagja";}" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(0) { } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#761 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(34108) ["id"]=> int(5889) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(7468) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }

object(Publication)#729 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(28) { ["id"]=> int(7469) ["accessStatus"]=> int(0) ["datePublished"]=> string(10) "2024-05-30" ["lastModified"]=> string(19) "2024-05-30 15:15:22" ["primaryContactId"]=> int(9364) ["sectionId"]=> int(29) ["seq"]=> int(3) ["submissionId"]=> int(7345) ["status"]=> int(3) ["version"]=> int(1) ["categoryIds"]=> array(0) { } ["citationsRaw"]=> string(2884) "Allocution de Monsieur Jean Monnet au National Press Club, Washington, le 30 Avril 1952 (1952). Online: http://aei.pitt.edu/14364/1/S4.pdf ANCEAU, Eric [s. a.]: De Gaulle and Europe. Digital Encyclopedia of European History, [s. a.]. Online: https://ehne.fr/en/encyclopedia/themes/political-europe/arbiters-and-arbitration-in-europe-beginning-modern-times/de-gaulle-and-europe Antwerp Summit (2022): Antwerp Declaration, June 2022. Online: https://www.vlaamsbelang.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Antwerp-Declaration.pdf European Commission (2021): Jean Monnet: The Unifying Force behind the Birth of the European Union. Online: https://european-union.europa.eu/system/files/2021-06/eu-pioneers-jean-monnet_en.pdf GÁL, Kinga (2020): The EP’s Minority Intergroup has been Reestablished. Online: https://galkinga.hu/en/the-eps-minority-intergroup-has-been-re-established/ Government of Hungary (2021): Orbán Viktor előadása a „Harminc éve szabadon” című konferencián. Budapest, 19. June 2021. Online: https://kormany.hu/beszedek-interjuk/miniszterelnok/orban-viktor-eloadasa-a-harminc-eve-szabadon-cimu-konferencian HÉRAUD, Guy (1963): L’Europe des ethnies. Paris: Presses d’Europe. HÉRAUD, Guy (1968): Fédéralisme at groupes ethniques. R.E.F., (97), 18. HÉRAUD, Guy (1969): La revolution federaliste. Paris: Presses d’Europe. KOLLER, Boglárka (2021): Politikai unió vagy nemzetek Európája? A millió dolláros kérdés margójára. Európai Tükör, 24(3), 5–32. Online: https://doi.org/10.32559/et.2021.3.1 LAFONT, Robert (1967): La revolution regionaliste. Paris: Gallimard. MARTONYI, János (2021a): Bevezető. In Nemzet és Európa. Emlékirat helyett. Budapest: Ludovika, 17–49. MARTONYI, János (2021b): A Schuman-deklaráció akkor és most. In Nemzet és Európa. Emlékirat helyett. Budapest: Ludovika, 189–200. MEINECKE, Friedrich (1908): Weltbürgertum und Nationalstaat. Studien zur Genesis des deutschen Nationalstaates. München: Oldenbourg. MORAVCSIK, Andrew (1998): De Gaulle and European Integration: Historical Revision and Social Science Theory. Center for European Studies, Working Paper Series 8.5. Harvard University. Online: https://aei.pitt.edu/39396/ Parliament (2022): Az Európai Unió jövőjével kapcsolatosan képviselendő magyar álláspontról. Online: https://www.parlament.hu/irom42/00364/00364.pdf PAUSCH, Markus (2019): Ein Europa der Nationen und Vaterlaender? Mögliche Konsequenzen und offene Fragen. Österreischische Gesellschaft für Europa, Wien, Policy Brief 07/2019. Online: https://www.oegfe.at/policy-briefs/europa-nationen/ SZENT-IVÁNYI, István (2021): Nemzetek Európája és a magyar érdek. 168 Óra, 33(15), 44–46. TEASDALE, Anthony (2016): The Fouchet Plan: De Gaulle Intergovernmental Design for Europe. LEQS Paper. No. 117/2016. Online: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2857167" ["copyrightYear"]=> int(2024) ["issueId"]=> int(588) ["licenseUrl"]=> string(49) "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0" ["pages"]=> string(7) "135-147" ["pub-id::doi"]=> string(20) "10.32559/et.2023.3.9" ["abstract"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(8) "

-

" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(45) "Europe of Nations – Illusions and Realities" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["hu_HU"]=> string(21) "Szent-Iványi István" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(Author)#768 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(11) { ["id"]=> int(9364) ["email"]=> string(19) "hunemblju@gmail.com" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7469) ["seq"]=> int(3) ["userGroupId"]=> int(201) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(13) "Szent-Iványi" ["hu_HU"]=> string(13) "Szent-Iványi" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(7) "István" ["hu_HU"]=> string(7) "István" } ["affiliation"]=> array(1) { ["hu_HU"]=> string(51) "a:1:{s:5:"hu_HU";s:25:"KODOLÁNYI JÁNOS EGYETEM";}" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(0) { } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#770 (7) { ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(34109) ["id"]=> int(5890) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(7469) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }