Participatory Budgeting as a Governance Innovation: Theoretical Approaches and Institutional Embedding in Hungary

  • Anett Horváth
doi: 10.32566/AH.2026.1.1

Abstract

This study examines participatory budgeting as a form of governance innovation, with particular attention to its theoretical underpinnings and institutional role within local government systems. The paper argues that, in the fiscally constrained environments of Central and Eastern Europe, participatory budgeting should be understood not primarily as a redistributive tool, but as a mechanism for strengthening governance capacity. Drawing on the perspectives of deliberative democracy, institutional theory, and public sector innovation, the study demonstrates how participatory budgeting contributes to enhancing transparency, legitimacy, and administrative learning.

Keywords:

participatory budgeting deliberative democracy governance innovation local governments institutionalization

References

- 2011. évi CLXXXIX. törvény a helyi önkormányzatokról

ARGYRIS, Chris – SCHÖN, Donald A. (1978): Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. [H. n.]: Addison-Wesley.

BAIOCCHI, Gianpaolo (2001): Participation, Activism, and Politics. The Porto Alegre Experiment and Deliberative Democratic Theory. Politics & Society, 29(1), 43–72. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329201029001003

DRYZEK, John S. (2000): Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford University Press. Online: https://archive.org/details/deliberativedemo0000dryz

FUNG, Archon (2006): Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance. Public Administration Review, 66(S1), 66–75. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x

GANUZA, Ernesto – BAIOCCHI, Gianpaolo (2012): The Power of Ambiguity. How Participatory Budgeting Travels the Globe. Journal of Public Deliberation, 8(2). Online: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.142

GRINDLE, Merilee S. (2004): Good Enough Governance. Poverty Reduction and Reform in Developing Countries. Governance, 17(4), 525–548. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00256.x

HABERMAS, Jürgen (1996): Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. Online: https://teddykw2.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/jc3bcrgen-habermas-between-facts-and-norms.pdf

PETERS, B. Guy (2015): Advanced Introduction to Public Policy. [H. n.]: Edward Elgar Publishing.

PETERS, B. Guy – PIERRE, Jon (2016): Governance, Institutions and Administrative Reform. In ANSELL, Christopher – TORFING, Jacob (szerk.): Handbook on Theories of Governance. [H. n.]: Edward Elgar, 209–223.

POLLITT, Christopher – BOUCKAERT, Geert (2017): Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Online: https://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/40090/1/102.Christopher%20Pollitt.pdf

SINTOMER, Yves – HERZBERG, Carsten – RÖCKE, Anja (2008): Participatory Budgeting in Europe. Potentials and Challenges. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1), 164–178. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00777.x

SMITH, Graham (2009): Democratic Innovations. Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. Cambridge University Press.

STOKER, Gerry (2006): Public Value Management. A New Narrative for Networked Governance? The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41–57. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074005282583

VARGA, Zs. András – PATYI, András – SCHANDA, Balázs szerk. (2015): The Basic (Fundamental) Law of Hungary: A Commentary of the New Hungarian Constitution. Dublin: Clarus Press. Online: https://publikacio.ppke.hu/id/eprint/3489

WAMPLER, Brian (2012): Participatory Budgeting. Core Principles and Key Impacts. Journal of Public Deliberation, 8(2). Online: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.138

YIN, Robert K. (2014): Case Study Research. Design and Methods. SAGE Publications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.