Applying the Logic of Regionalisation in Minority Studies
Copyright (c) 2023 Korpics Fanni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Absztrakt
This paper aims to highlight why the logic of regionalisation can be applied in minority studies. Overall, the introduction of a regionalised structure benefits minority groups in a country, simply because through decentralisation their voices can be better heard. Two components constitute regionalisation: the strengthening of regional identities within the population, and the political will of the central state to enhance effectivity in public administration. Regionalisation is a concept based on the rediscovery of the necessity of territorial management which is slowly returning to public administration structures all over Europe, but especially in Spain, Italy and France. These three countries are represented in this paper as examples of countries where the status of minorities can be examined through the analysis of the regionalisation process introduced there.
Kulcsszavak:
Hogyan kell idézni
Hivatkozások
A. Gergely, András (1997): Kisebbség, etnikum, regionalizmus. Budapest: MTA Politikai Tudományok Intézete.
Anderson, Benedict (1983): Imagined Communities. London: Verso.
Brunner, Georg – Küpper, Herbert (2003): European Options of Autonomy: A Typology of Autonomy Models, of Minority Self-Governance. In Gál, Kinga (ed.): Minority Governance in Europe. Budapest: Open Society Institute. 11–36.
Capotorti, Francesco (1979): Study on the Rights of Persons belonging to Ethnic, Linguistic or Religious Minorities. UN Doc E/CN.4/Sub.2./348./Rev.1. 1979.
Conversi, Daniele (2002): The Smooth Transition: Spain’s 1978 Constitution and the Nationalities Question. National Identities, 4(3), 223–244. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/1460894022000026105
Daftary, Farimah (2008): Experimenting with Territorial Administrative Autonomy in Corsica: Exception or Pilot Region? International Journal on Minority Group Rights, 15(2–3), 273–312. Online: https://doi.org/10.1163/157181108X332631
Győri Szabó, Róbert (2006): Kisebbség, autonómia, regionalizmus. Budapest: Osiris.
Horváth, Gyula (2001): Decentralizáció és regionalizmus Európában. Pécs: Pécsi Tudományegyetem Közgazdaságtudományi Kara, Regionális Politika és Gazdaságtan Doktori Iskola.
Horváth, M. Tamás (2004): Bevezetés: Rendszer, politika, területi közigazgatás. In Horváth, M. Tamás (ed.): A Regionális politika közigazgatási feltételei. Variációk az uniós csatlakozás küszöbén. Budapest: Magyar Közigazgatási Intézet. 1–9.
Hueglin, Thomas O. (1986): Regionalism in Western Europe. Conceptual Problems of a New Political Perspective. Comparative Politics, 18(4), 439–458. Online: https://doi.org/10.2307/421693
Józsa, Zoltán (2006): Önkormányzati szervezet, funkció, modernizáció. Budapest–Pécs: Dialóg Campus. 166–170.
Keating, Michael (1988): Does Regional Government Work? The Experience of Italy, France and Spain. Governance, 1(2), 184–204. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.1988.tb00258.x
Keating, Michael (1998): The New Regionalism in Western Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Kymlicka, Will – Straehle, Christine (2001): Cosmopolitanism, Nation-States, and Minority Nationalism. In Kymlicka, Will (ed.): Politics in the Vernacular. Nationalism, Multiculturalism, and Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 221–241. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199240981.003.0012
Sipos, Katalin (1993): A regionalizmus történeti és jogi aspektusai (Spanyolország, Olaszország, Franciaország). Budapest: MTA Állam és Jogtudományi Intézet.
Vizi, Balázs (2011): Valle d’Aosta tartomány és az alkotmányos reform Olaszországban. Kisebbségkutatás, 20(3), 361–377.
Wagstaff, Peter ed. (1999): Regionalism in the European Union. Exeter–Portland: Intellect.