The Ohrid Framework Agreement and International Law: Twenty Years of Development
Copyright (c) 2023 Donev Nikola
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Balkans can be described as a laboratory of modernity, especially when it comes to the form of multicultural life in the communities. The modern nation states that formed from the dissolution of Yugoslavia in the 1990s were faced on the one hand with a “need” to establish a state for the majority dominant ethnic group, and on the other hand to reconcile the multicultural reality of their societies and accommodate for the rights of minorities. This paper will focus on the constitutional and legal implications that followed the signing of the Ohrid Framework Agreement (OFA). It will also give an overview of the contents of the OFA and subsequent legislation juxtaposing it to international standards prescribed by documents such as the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Persons Belonging to National or Ethnic, Religious and Linguistic Minorities and the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities of the Council of Europe. In the context of this legal analysis, the paper will examine the developing political environment through analysing certain dynamics in the political system focusing on parliament and political parties. It will also follow the discourse and popular support of the agreement and its effects on the internal and external stability of North Macedonia.
Hogyan kell idézni
Akademik (2018): На референдумот од 91 година од 1.495.807 граѓани со право на глас излегле 1.132.981 граѓанин, од кои над 95% гласале „За“ [In the referendum of 1991, out of 1,495,807 citizens with the right to vote, 1,132,981 citizens came out, of which over 95% voted “Yes”]. Akademik, 01 October 2018. Online: https://akademik.mk/na-referendumot-od-91-godina-od-1-495-807-gragani-so-pravo-na-glas-izlegle-1-132-981-graganin-od-koi-nad-95-glasale-za/
Bieber, Florian (2008): Power-Sharing and Implementation of the Ohrid Framework Agreement. In Dehnert, Stefan – Sulejmani, Rizvan (eds.): Power Sharing and the Implementation of the Ohrid Framework Agreement. Skopje: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung – Office Macedonia. 7–40.
Blazevska, Katerina (2021): Фрчкоски: Охридскиот договор е успешен, но уште „неразбран“ [Frchkoski: The Ohrid agreement is successful, but still “misunderstood”]. DW, 14 August 2021.
Daskalovski, Zhidas (2002). Language and Identity: The Ohrid Framework Agreement and Liberal Notions of Citizenship and Nationality in Macedonia. JEMIE – Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, (1), 1–31. Online: https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/6216
Dimitrov, Nikola (1999): The Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities. Historical Background and Theoretical Implication. Skopje: Matica Makedonska.
Lijphart, Arend (1977): Democracy in Plural Societies. A Comparative Exploration. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Linz, Juan J. – Stepan, Alfred C. (1996): Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Southern Europe, South America and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lyon, Aisling (2011): Municipal Decentralisation: Between the Integration and Accommodation of Ethnic Difference in the Republic of Macedonia. In Risteska, Marija –Daskalovski, Zhidas (eds.): One Decade after the Ohrid Framework Agreement: Lessons (to be) Learned from the Macedonian Experience. Skopje: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung – Office Macedonia. 87–115.
Manor, James (1999): The Political Economy of Democratic Decentralization. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. Online: https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-4470-6
Marolov, Dejan (2013): Understanding the Ohrid Framework Agreement. In Ramet, Sabrina P. – Listhaug, Ola – Simkus, Albert (eds.): Civic and Uncivic Values in Macedonia. Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan. 134–154. Online: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137302823_8
NDI (2020): Public Opinion Research in North Macedonia. Online: https://www.ndi.org/publications/ndipoll-public-opinion-research-north-macedonia-june-2020
Pichler, Robert (2009): Historiography and the Politics of Education in the Republic of Macedonia (1991–2008). In Dimou, Augusta (ed.): “Transition” and the Politics of History Education in Southeastern Europe. Göttingen: V&R unipress. 217–251.
Todorov, Petar (2020): “Us” against “Them”: Historical Education that Enables Division. In “Us” against “Them” Symbolic Divisions in North Macedonia. Skopje: Centre for the Research of Nationalism and Culture. 69–91.
Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia of 1991. Online: https://www.sobranie.mk/ustav-na-rm.nspx
Council of Europe (2022): Fifth Opinion on North Macedonia. Advisory Committee on the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (ACFC). Online: https://www.coe.int/en/web/minorities/-/north-macedonia-publication-of-the-5th-advisory-committee-opinion
Ohrid Framework Agreement (2001). Online: https://www.osce.org/skopje/100622
Устав на Социјалистичка Република Македонија од 1974 [Constitution of the Socialist Republic of Macedonia of 1974]. Online: https://www.marxists.org/makedonski/istorija/makedonija/ustavsrm1974/index.htm
Venice Commission (2019): European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission), North Macedonia. Opinion on the Law on the Use of Languages, CDL-AD (2019)033, adopted at its 121st Plenary Session, 6–7 December 2019. Online: https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-AD(2019)033-e