The Potential and Limitations of the Treatment of Caste Discrimination in International Human Rights Law
Copyright (c) 2023 Wankhede Asang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This paper critically evaluates all the developments that lead to the making of caste discrimination an issue in international human rights law (IHRL) – both as racial discrimination and as an issue of the minority rights regime. It explores the reasons why such developments and the politics of it have proven to be insufficient in cause and totality in addressing the rampant abuses of the human rights of Dalits. While focusing on the obvious limitations of the minority rights regime in including Dalits as a minority, it weighs the limitations and the potential of the existing IHRL corpus in addressing caste discrimination. The paper will first outline the genealogy of caste discrimination in IHRL, which will provide a descriptive account of all the developments. I identify the treatment of caste in terms of a “violating norm” and as a “violation sub-category”. Then the paper seeks to engage with the theory on the limitations and critiques of IHRL, to argue that there are theoretical and legal-doctrinal fault lines in the conception of caste discrimination as a sub-set of descent-based racial discrimination both normatively and interpretatively. To support this argument the paper explores reasons for the failure of IHRL in critical legal thought – which outline the triumph of cultural and social pressures in the society over the language of IHRL. Following this, a novel attempt is made to develop the concept of “cultures of oppression” as a central theme in imagining a “Dalit critique of IHRL” which in my opinion is not only a normative contribution to the critical discourses in reimagining IHRL which is more responsive to the problems of Dalits, but also provides a new outlook for human rights movements to combat caste discrimination.
Hogyan kell idézni
Ambedkar, Babasaheb (2014a): Annihilation of Caste. In Moon, Vasant (ed.): Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Writings and Speeches. Vol. 1. New Delhi: Dr. Ambedkar Foundation. 23–96.
Ambedkar, Babasaheb (2014b): Ranade, Gandhi and Jinnah. In Moon, Vasant (ed.): Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Writings and Speeches. Vol. 1. New Delhi: Dr. Ambedkar Foundation. 205–240.
Ambedkar, Babasaheb (2014c): The Hindu Social Order: Its Essential Principles. In Moon, Vasant (ed.): Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Writings and Speeches. Vol. 3. New Delhi: Dr. Ambedkar Foundation. 95–115.
Ambedkar, Babasaheb (2014d): Hindus and Want of Public Conscience. In Moon, Vasant (ed.): Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Writings and Speeches. Vol. 5. New Delhi: Dr. Ambedkar Foundation. 89–93.
Ambedkar, Babasaheb R. (2014e): Why Lawlessness is Lawful? In Moon, Vasant (ed.): Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Writings and Speeches. Vol. 5. New Delhi: Dr. Ambedkar Foundation. 62–74.
Ando, Nisuke (2008): General Comments/Recommendations. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/e1730
Babar, Aniruddha V. (2016): International Human Rights Law and the Menace of Atrocities on Dalit Communities in India. Contemporary Voice of Dalit, 8(2), 111–123. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/2455328X16631051
Baxi, Upendra (2008): The Future of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195690439.001.0001
Bob, Clifford (2007): “Dalit Rights Are Human Rights”: Caste Discrimination, International Activism, and the Construction of a New Human Rights Issue. Human Rights Quarterly, 29(1), 167–193. Online: https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2007.0001
Çalı, Başak (2013): The Legitimacy of International Interpretive Authorities for Human Rights Treaties: An Indirect-Instrumentalist Defence. In Føllesdal, Andreas – Ulfstein, Geir – Schaffer, Johan K. (eds.): The Legitimacy of International Human Rights Regimes. Legal, Political and Philosophical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139540827.006
Dror, Yehezkel (1959): Law and Social Change. Tulane Law Review, 33(4), 787–802.
Eisenman, William J. (2003): Eliminating Discriminatory Traditions against Dalits: The Local Need for International Capacity-Building of the Indian Criminal Justice System. Emory International Law Review, 17, 133–171.
Galanter, Marc (1969): Untouchability and the Law. Economic and Political Weekly, 4(1–2), 131–171.
Galanter, Marc (1993): Law and Society in Modern India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Herdegen, Matthias (2020): Interpretation in International Law. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/e723
Hoffmann, Stefan-Ludwig (2010): Introduction: Genealogies of Human Rights. In Hoffmann, Stefan-Ludwig (ed.): Human Rights in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1–28. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921667.001
IDSN (2022): Compilation of UN References to Caste Discrimination. Online: https://idsn.org/un-2/compilation-of-un-references-to-caste-discrimination/
Jaffrelot, Christophe (2005): Dr. Ambedkar and Untouchability: Fighting the Indian Caste System. New York: Columbia University Press. 34–35.
Keane, David (2007): Caste-based Discrimination in International Human Rights Law. Aldershot: Ashgate. Online: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315570945
Keane, David – Waughray, Annapurna (2017): CERD and Caste-based Discrimination. In Keane, David – Waughray, Annapurna (eds.): Fifty Years of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. A Living Instrument. Manchester: Manchester University Press. 121–149. Online: https://doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9781784993047.001.0001
Lennox, Corinne (s. a.): Dalits and Norm Entrepreneurship on Caste-Based Discrimination. Online: http://idsn.org/wp-content/uploads/user_folder/pdf/New_files/Other_documents/IDSN_summary_paper_Dalit_international_mobilisation_-_Corinne_Lennox.pdf
Mechlem, Kerstin (2009): Treaty Bodies and the Interpretation of Human Rights. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 42, 905–947.
Mégret, Frédéric (2012): Where Does the Critique of International Human Rights Stand? An Exploration in 18
Vignettes. Beneyto, José María – Kennedy, David (eds.): New Approaches to International Law. The European and the American Experiences. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press. 3–40. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-879-8
Narula, Smita (2008): Equal by Law, Unequal by Caste: The Untouchable Condition in Critical Race Perspective. Wisconsin International Law Journal, 26(2), 255–344.
O’Connell, Paul (2018): Human Rights: Contesting the Displacement Thesis. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 69(1), 19–35. Online: https://doi.org/10.53386/nilq.v69i1.76
Orakhelashvili, Alexander (2008): The Interpretation of Acts and Rules in Public International Law. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199546220.001.0001
Rosenberg, Gerald (2008): Constrains, Conditions, and the Courts. In The Hollow Hope. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 72–106.
Thorat, Sukhadeo (2002): Hindu Social Order and Human Rights of Dalits. Online: https://www.combatlaw.org/information.php?article-id=109&issue-id=4
Thorat, Sukhadeo – Umakant eds. (2004): Caste Race and Discrimination. Discourses in International Context. Jaipur – New Delhi: Rawat. Waughray, Annapurna (2009): India and the Paradox of Caste Discrimination. European Yearbook of Minority Issues, 8(1), 413–452. Online: https://doi.org/10.1163/22116117-90001679
Waughray, Annapurna (2010): Caste Discrimination and Minority Rights: The Case of India’s Dalits. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 17, 327–353. Online: https://doi.org/10.1163/157181110X495926
Waughray, Annapurna (2016): Capturing Caste in Law. The Legal Regulation of Caste Discrimination. London: Routledge. Online: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315750934
UNCEDAW (2010): General Recommendation 28. In The Core Obligations of States Parties under Article 2 of the CEDAW. UN Doc. CEDAW/C/GC/28, 4.
UNCEDAW (2014): Concluding Observation – India. CEDAW/C/IND/CO/4-5.
UNCERD (1996a): State party’s report. CERD/C/299/Add.3.
UNCERD (1996b): State party’s report. UN Doc CERD/C/149/Add.11.
UNCERD (1996c): Concluding observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. CERD/C/304/Add.13.
UNCERD (2000): General Recommendation 27. UN Doc. A/55/18.
UNCERD (2002a): Thematic Discussion on Discrimination based on Descent. CERD/C/SR.1531.
UNCERD (2002b): General Recommendation 29 on Article 1, Paragraph 1, of the Convention (Descent). UN Doc HRI/GEN/1/Rev.1 GR 12 (ICERD).
UNCESCR (2008): Concluding Observations – India. UN Doc E/C.12/IND/CO/5.
UNCHR (2007): Report of the former Special Rapporteur on the right to food Jean Ziegler. UN Doc A/HRC/4/30.
UNCHR (2009): Report of the Independent Expert on minority issues: Recommendations of the Forum on Minority Issues. UN Doc. A/HRC/10/11/Add.1.
UNCHR (2012): Follow up report of the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, Christof Heyns on his mission to India. UN Doc A/HRC/29/37/Add.3.
UNCHR (2015): Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to food. UN Doc. A/HRC/31/51.
UNCHR (2016): Report of the Special Rapporteur on Minority Issues: Minorities and discrimination based on caste and analogous systems of inherited status. A/HRC/31/56.
UNCRC (2014): Concluding Observations – India. UN Doc. CRC/C/IND/CO/3-4.
UNHRC (1997): Concluding Observations – India. UN Doc. CCPR/C/79/Add.81.
UNHRC (2009): Draft Principles and Guidelines for the Effective Elimination of Discrimination Based on Work and Descent. A/HRC/11/CRP.3. UNHRC, CCPR/C/78/D/829/1998.
UN Sub-Commission (2000): Discrimination based on work and descent Sub-Commission on Human Rights resolution 2000/4. UN Doc E/CN.4/SUB.2/RES/2000/4.
UN Sub-Commission (2003): Asbjorn Eide and Yozo Yokota, expanded working paper. UN Doc. E/.