For Whom the Bell Tolls – Osman Kavala

  • Siska Katialin
doi: 10.32566/ah.2022.3.7

Abstract

On April 25, 2022, Istanbul’s 13th High Criminal Court sentenced Osman Kavala, a philanthropist and Turkish human rights defender to life imprisonment for attempting to overthrow the government. The charges were related to the events that took place in Gezi Park between May and September 2013 (Article 312 of the Criminal Code) and to his participation in the coup attempt on July 15, 2016 (Article 309 of the Criminal Code). The charges were espionage and an attempt to overthrow the government and the constitutional order, as well as participation in a coup attempt against the government of President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. On December 10, 2019, the European Court of Human Rights found that Turkey used the detention for political purposes, violated Kavala’s rights, including his right to liberty, and acted in bad faith. The Kavala judgment, like all judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, are legally binding, but the Turkish authorities ignored the judgment of the Strasbourg court. In response, The Council of Europe Committee of Ministers’ voted on February 2, 2022 to begin infringement proceedings against Turkey for non-compliance with the judgment of the European Court of Justice, which is an important step to support the protection of human rights in Turkey and to comply with international human rights frameworks.

Keywords:

The Republic of Turkey European Convention on Human Rights European Court of Human Rights Constitutional Court of Turkey Turkish criminal procedure non-governmental organizations

How to Cite

Siska, K. (2023). For Whom the Bell Tolls – Osman Kavala. Acta Humana – Human Rights Publication, 10(3), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.32566/ah.2022.3.7

References

Amnesty International (2019): Milena Buyum: Turkey: Constitutional Court Ruling on Osman Kavala “Rubs Salt into the Wound of Injustice” (2019. május 22.) Online: https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/press-release/2019/05/turkey-constitutional-court-ruling-on-osman-kavala-rubs-saltinto-the-wound-of-injustice/

Azizlerli Emre (2013): Gezi Park: Turkey’s New Opposition Movement. BBC News, 2013. augusztus 26. Online: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-23795857

Council of Europe (2019): Commissioner Mijatovič Intervenes Before the European Court of Human Rights in the Case of Mehmet Osman Kavala v. Turkey (2019. október 1.) Online: https://bit.ly/3QVPrNx

Court Arrests Turkish Activist Osman Kavala over Failed Coup Attempt. Hürriyet Daily News, 2017. november 26. Online: https://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/court-arrests-turkish-activist-osmankavala-over-failed-coup-attempt-121694

Dinsmore, Darren (2022): European Court Upholds Osman Kavala’s Claim of Arbitrary Detention. Mojust, 2022. április 30. Online: https://mojust.org/turkeys-campaign-against-civil-societydenounced-at-strasbourg/

European Union External Action (2022): Turkey: Speech by High Representative/Vice-President Josep Borrell at the EP Debate on the Case of Osman Kavala (2022. május 4.). Online: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/turkey-speech-high-representativevice-president-josep-borrell-ep-debatecase-osman-kavala_en

General Assembly of Constitutional Court to Review Kavala’s Application on December 29. Bianet.org, 2020. október 24. Online: https://bianet.org/cocuk/law/236500-general-assembly-ofconstitutional-court-to-review-kavala-s-application-on-december-29

Gumrukcu, Tuvan – Jonathan Spicer (2021): Turkey’s Erdogan Quits European Treaty on Violence Against Women. Reuters, 2021. március 20. Online: https://reut.rs/3Wj4IJd

Gürcan, Efe Can – Efe Peker (2015): A Class Analytic Approach to the Gezi Park Events: Challenging the ‘Middle Class’ Myth. Capital & Class, 39(2), 321–343. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816815584015

Human Rights Watch (2020): Turkey: Prominent Civic Leader Rearrested After Acquittal (2020. február 20.). Online: https://www.ecoi.net/en/document/2025173.html

Human Rights Watch (2022a): Turkey: Council of Europe Votes for Infringement Process. Sanction Sought for Ankara’s Refusal to Release Rights Defender Osman Kavala (2022. február 2.). Online: https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/02/02/turkey-council-europe-votes-infringement-process

Human Rights Watch (2022b): The Life Sentence for Rights Defender Osman Kavala. Kavala, 7 Co‑Defendants Convicted, Outrageous Miscarriage of Justice (2022. április 26.). Online: https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/04/26/turkey-life-sentence-rights-defender-osman-kavala

Human Rights Watch (2022c): Landmark Judgement Against Turkey for Ignoring European Ruling. European Court of Human Rights Rules on its Order to Free the Rights Defender Osman Kavala (2022. július 22.). Online: https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/07/12/landmark-judgment-against-turkeyignoring-european-ruling

International Commission of Jurists (2020): The Gezi Park Case. A Trial Monitoring Report. Geneva, ICJ. Online: https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Turkey-GeziParkTrial-TrialObservation-Publications-Reports-2020-ENG.pdf

Legal Report on Indictment: Turkey v. Osman Kavala and Others. Pen Norway, 2020. szeptember 10. Online: https://norskpen.no/nyheter/legal-report-on-indictment-turkey-v-osman-kavalaand-others/

McBride, Jeremy (2018): Human Rights and Criminal Procedure. The Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights. Strasbourg, Council of Europe.

Osman Kavala Put in Pretrial Detention after 2 Weeks under Custody. Turkey Purge, 2017. november 1. Online: https://turkeypurge.com/breaking-osman-kavala-put-pretrial-detention-12-weeks-custody

Stockholm Center for Freedom (2022): Conviction of Rights Activists Proves Turkish Courts Operate under Erdoğan’s Instructions (2022. április 27.). Online: https://stockholmcf.org/conviction-ofrights-activists-proves-turkish-courts-operate-under-erdogans-instructions-hrw

Turkey Detains Osman Kavala, Prominent Right Activist at Airport. Deutsche Welle, 2017. október 19. Online: https://www.dw.com/en/turkey-detains-osman-kavala-prominent-rights-activist-atairport/a-41041125

Turkey Ends State of Emergency after Two Years. BBC News, 2018. július 18. Online: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-44881328

Turkey Protests: Istanbul Erupts as Gezi Park Cleared. BBC News, 2013. június 16. Online: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-22924886

Turkey’s President Finds a New Enemy: “The Famous Hungarian Jew”. The Economist, 2018. december 15. Online: https://www.economist.com/europe/2018/12/15/turkeys-president-finds-a-newenemy-the-famous-hungarian-jew

Turkey Ramps Up Gulen Crackdown with Nearly 700 Arrests. Reuters Istanbul, 2020. február 18. Online: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-turkey-security-gulen-idUSKBN20C0ES

Taştan, Coşkun (2013): The Gezi Park Protests in Turkey: A Qualitative Field Research. Insight Turkey, 15(3), 27–38. Online: https://www.insightturkey.com/commentaries/the-gezi-park-protestsin-turkey-a-qualitative-field-research

Yilmaz Mehmet: A török politikai rendszer átalakulása 2002 és 2018 között. Doktori értekezés. Budapest, Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem Nemzetközi Kapcsolatok Multidiszciplináris Doktori Iskola. Online: http://phd.lib.uni-corvinus.hu/1061/1/Yilmaz_Mehmet_dhu.pdf

Zihnioğlu, Özge (2019): The Legacy of the Gezi Protests in Turkey. Carnegie Europe, 2019. október 24. Online: https://carnegieeurope.eu/2019/10/24/legacy-of-gezi-protests-in-turkey-pub-80142

Jogforrások

évi XXXI. törvény az emberi jogok és az alapvető szabadságok védelméről szóló, Rómában, 1950. november 4-én kelt Egyezmény és az ahhoz tartozó nyolc kiegészítő jegyzőkönyv kihirdetéséről

Emberi Jogok Európai Egyezménye. Online: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_hun.pdf

The Constitution of the Republic of Turkey. Online: https://www.anayasa.gen.tr/1982Constitution-1995-1.pdf

Decree Law No. 685. Decree Law on Establishment of the Inquiry Commission on the State of Emergency Measures. Online: https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDLREF(2017)014-e

Penal Code of Turkey. Online: https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDLREF(2016)011-e

Turkish Code of Criminal Procedure. Online: https://sherloc.unodc.org/cld/uploads/res/document/tur/2005/turkish_criminal_procedure_code_html/2014_Criminal_Procedure_Code.pdf

Jogesetek

Akgün v. Turkey, 19699/18. 2019. április 2-i ítélet.

Alparslan Altan v. Turkey, 12778/17. 2019. április 16-i ítélet. Online: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#%7B%22itemid%22:%5B%22001-192804%22%5D%7D

Assanidze v. Georgia, 71503/01. 2004. április 8-i ítélet. Online: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22002-4416%22]}

Brogan and Others v. The United Kingdom11209/84, 1234/84,11266/84,11386/85, 1988. november 29-i ítélet. Online: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#%7B%22itemid%22:[%22001-57450%22]%7D

Buzadji v. Moldova, 23755/07, 2016. július 5-i ítélet. Online: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#%7B%22fulltext%22[%22Buzadji%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-164928%22]%7D

Case of Kavala v. Turkey. 28749/18 2019. december 10-i ítélet. Online: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#%7B%22itemid%22:[%22001-199515%22]%7D

Creangă v. Romania, 29226/03, 2012. február 23-i ítélet. Online: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/fd9acb/pdf/

Eriksen v. Norway, 17391/90, 1990. augusztus 29., 66. §. Online: https://kuria-birosag.hu/hu/ejeb/eriksen-norvegia-elleni-ugye-1739190

Fox, Campbell és Hartley v. The United Kingdom, 13599/88, 1990. augusztus 30-i ítélet. Online: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-57771%22]}

G.B. v. Switzerland, 27426/95, 2000. november 30-i ítélet. Online: https://www.stradalex.com/en/sl_src_publ_jur_int/document/echr_27426-95_001-5060

Idalov v. Russia 5823/03. 2012. május 12-i ítélet. Online: https://www.hr-dp.org/contents/619

Ilgar Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 15172/13, 2014. május 22-i ítélet. Online: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#%7B%22itemid%22:[%22002-9462%22]%7D

Ilnseher v. Germany 10211/12, 2018. február 4. Online: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22002-12240%22]}

James, Wells and Lee v. Egyesült Királyság, 25119/ 09. 2012. szeptember 18-i ítélet. Online: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22002-6440%22]}

Jėčius v. Lithuania, European Court of Human Rights 34578/97, 2000. július 31-i ítélet. Online: https://www.stradalex.com/nl/sl_src_publ_jur_int/document/echr_34578-97_001-4056

Kandjov v. Bulgária, 68294/01, 2008. november 6-i ítélet. Online: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22002-1836%22]}

Labita v. Italiy, 26772/95, 2000. április 6-i ítélet. Online: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22002-6867%22]}

Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary, 18030/11., 2016. november 8-i ítélet. Online: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#%7B%22itemid%22[%22001-115547%22]%7D

Mammadli v. Azerbajian, 47145/14. 2018. április 19-i ítélet. Online: https://laweuro.com/?p=8088

Mehmet Hasan Altan v. Turkey, 13237/17, 2018. március 20-i ítélet. Online: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#%7B%22itemid%22:[%22001-181862%22]%7D

Merabisvili v. Georgia 72508/13. sz. 2017. november 28-i ítélet. Online: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#%7B%22itemid%22:%5B%22001-178753%22%5D%7D

Mergen v. Turkey, 44062/09. 2016. május 31-i ítélet. Online: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-163680%22]}

Murray v. The United Kingdom, 18731/91, 1994. október 28-i ítélet. Online: https://www.refworld.org/cases,COECOMMHR,402a22c44.html

Rasul Jafarov v. Azerbaian, 69981/14., 2016. március 17-i ítélet. Online: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-161416%22]}

Smatana v. Czech Republic, 18642/04, 2007. szeptember 27-i ítélet. Online: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#%7B%22display%22[2],%22tabview%22:[%22related%22],%22languageisocode%22:[%22RUM%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-82430%22]%7D

Tchankotadze v. Georgia, 15256/05, 2016. június 21-i ítélet. Online: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-163799%22]}

Włoch v. Poland, 27785/95, 2011. május 10-i ítélet. Online: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-104722%22]}

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.