Cybersecurity Policy-Related Developments in Latin America
Copyright (c) 2022 Urbanovics Anna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The copyright to this article is transferred to the University of Public Service Budapest, Hungary (for U.S. government employees: to the extent transferable) effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The author warrants that this contribution is original and that he/she has full power to make this grant. The author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors.
An author may make an article published by University of Public Service available on a personal home page provided the source of the published article is cited and University of Public Service is mentioned as copyright holder
Abstract
Latin American countries begin to develop their national-level cyber policy including their cybersecurity strategy. The paper aims to provide a comparative analysis of the strategy development processes in six Latin American countries including Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Peru. The methodology is based on a mixed approach. For the quantitative analysis, the National Cyber Security Index and UNIDIR Cyber Policy Portal were used, while for the qualitative analysis a document analysis was carried out on the national strategies. Analysing national data based on the NCSI, Chile stands out overall, however, the country is still in the initial phase in terms of digital and essential service protection, personal data protection and cyber crisis management. Brazil’s position is interesting, standing at 3rd place overall, being the most targeted country by cyberattacks in the region. Brazil stands out in terms of cyber threat analysis and military cyber operations. Based on the document analysis, Chile and Argentina have a more holistic cybersecurity strategy, including factors such as cybersecurity education, cybercrime detection, regulatory framework, and the aim to cooperate with international and industrial partners.
Keywords:
How to Cite
References
Barrett, Matthew P.: Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity. Gaithersburg, Maryland, National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce, 2018. Online: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.CSWP.04162018
Bolgov, Radomir: The UN and Cybersecurity Policy of Latin American Countries. 2020 Seventh International Conference on eDemocracy and eGovernment (ICEDEG). 259–263. Online: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG48599.2020.9096798
Brent, Laura: NATO’s Role in Cyberspace. NATO Review, 12 February 2019. Online: https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2019/02/12/natos-role-in-cyberspace/index.html
Buzzio-Garcia, Jorge – Victor Salazar-Vilchez – Jhonatan Moreno-Torres – Omar Leon-Estofanero: Review of Cybersecurity in Latin America during the Covid-19 Pandemic. A brief Overview. 2021 IEEE Fifth Ecuador Technical Chapters Meeting (ETCM). Online: https://doi.org/10.1109/ETCM53643.2021.9590693
CSIRT Americas Platform. s. a. Online: https://cybilportal.org/projects/americas-csirt-network-and-virtual-platform/
Clark, David – Thomas Berson – Herbert S. Lin (eds.): At the Nexus of Cybersecurity and Public Policy. Some Basic Concepts and Issues. Washington, D.C., The National Academies Press, 2014.
Creese, Sadie – William H. Dutton – Patricia Esteve-González: The Social and Cultural Shaping of Cybersecurity Capacity Building: A Comparative Study of Nations and Regions. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 25, no. 5 (2021). 941–955. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-021-01569-6
Contreras, Belisario – Kerry-Ann Barrett: Challenges in Building Regional Capacities in Cybersecurity. A Regional Organizational Reflection. In Eneken Tikk – Mika Kerttunen (eds.): Routledge Handbook of International Cybersecurity. London, Routledge, 2020. 214–217. Online: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351038904-20
Estrategia Nacional de Ciberseguridad de la República Argentina. 2019. Online: https://www.argentina.gob.ar/normativa/323594_res829-01_pdf/archivo
Estratégia Nacional de Segurança Cibernética (E-Ciber). 2020. Online: https://www.gov.br/governodigital/pt-br/estrategias-e-politicas-digitais/estrategia-nacional-de-seguranca-cibernetica
Hurel, Louise Marie: Cybersecurity in Brazil: An Analysis of the National Strategy. Igarapé Institute, 15 April 2021. Online: https://igarape.org.br/en/cybersecurity-in-brazil-an-analysis-of-the-national-strategy/
IMD World Digital Competitiveness Index. s. a. Online: https://www.imd.org/centers/world-competitiveness-center/rankings/world-digital-competitiveness/
International Telecommunications Union (ITU) Ranking. 2021. Online: https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/facts/default.aspx
Izycki, Eduardo: National Cyber Security Strategies in Latin America: Opportunities for Convergence of Interests and Consensus Building. RISTI – Revista Ibérica de Sistemas e Tecnologías de Informacao, E15 (2018). 39–52.
Kosévich, Ekaterina: Estrategias de seguridad cibernética en los países de América Latina [Cybersecurity Strategies in Latin American Countries]. Iberoamerica, no. 1 (2020). 137–159. Online: https://doi.org/10.37656/s20768400-2020-1-07
Luiijf, Eric – Kim Besseling – Patrick de Graaf: Nineteen National Cyber Security Strategies. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 9, no. 1–2 (2013). 3–31. Online: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCIS.2013.051608
Marsh and McLennan Companies: Estado del Riesgo Cibernético en Latinoamérica en tiempos de Covid-19. 2020.
National Cyber Security Index. s. a. Online: https://ncsi.ega.ee/ncsi-index/
National Cybersecurity Policy (NCSP) 2017–2022. 2017. Online: https://www.unodc.org/e4j/data/_university_uni_/chiles_national_cybersecurity_policy_2017-2022.html?lng=en
National Cybersecurity Strategy. 2017. Online: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/399655/ENCS.ENG.final.pdf
National Cybersecurity Strategies Repository. s. a. Online: https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Cybersecurity/Pages/National-Strategies-repository.aspx
Organization of the American States list of members. s. a. Online: https://www.oas.org/en/member_states/default.asp
Política Nacional de Seguridad Digital. 2016. Online: https://colaboracion.dnp.gov.co/CDT/Conpes/Econ%C3%B3micos/3854.pdf
Solar, Carlos: Cybersecurity and Cyber Defence in the Emerging Democracies. Journal of Cyber Policy, 5, no. 3 (2020). 392–412. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2020.1820546
Statista: Average Cost of Data Breaches Worldwide as of 2020, by Country or Region (in million U.S. dollars). 2022a. Online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/463714/cost-data-breach-country/
Statista: Change in Information Technology (IT) Spending in Selected Countries in Latin America in 2021. 2022b. Online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1190544/latin-america-it-spending/
Statista: Countries in Latin America Most Targeted by Cyber Attacks in 2020. 2022c. Online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/818412/latin-american-countries-highest-share-cyber-attacks/
Statista: Latin American Countries with the Largest Number of Web Application Attacks Observed in the Public Sector in June 2019. 2022d. Online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1066172/most-targeted-countries-web-application-attacks-public-sector-latin-america/
Statista: Value of the Cybersecurity Market in Latin America in 2019 and 2025. 2022e. Online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1180184/value-cybersecurity-market-latin-america/
Tikk, Eneken – Mika Kerttunen: Introduction. In Eneken Tikk – Mika Kerttunen (eds): Routledge Handbook of International Cybersecurity. 1–8. London, Routledge, 2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351038904
UNIDIR Cyber Policy Portal. s. a. Online: https://cyberpolicyportal.org/
Zittrain, Jonathan: ‘Netwar’: The Unwelcome Militarization of the Internet Has Arrived. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 73, no. 5 (2017). 300–304. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2017.1362907