Populism in Time of Crisis
The Brazilian Case of Bolsonaro
Copyright (c) 2022 Borges Aguiar Giovanna Maria
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The copyright to this article is transferred to the University of Public Service Budapest, Hungary (for U.S. government employees: to the extent transferable) effective if and when the article is accepted for publication. The copyright transfer covers the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, microform, electronic form (offline, online) or any other reproductions of similar nature.
The author warrants that this contribution is original and that he/she has full power to make this grant. The author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors.
An author may make an article published by University of Public Service available on a personal home page provided the source of the published article is cited and University of Public Service is mentioned as copyright holder
Abstract
A new wave of Populism has been on the ascent around the world. In Brazil, the situation is not different, and the populist rhetoric strongly seized the most recent presidential election in 2018. The aim of this paper is to explore the reasons for President Jair Bolsonaro’s (considered a populist politician) victory. The potential motivations for this triumph are discussed in this paper, with the finding that a multidimensional crisis gripped the country in the years prior to the election, leading people to sympathise with those who were in opposition to the dominant party, which culminated in a heavily divisive presidential campaign. The nation was engulfed by an economic depression that coincided with a political crisis, which had legal, social, and even cultural repercussions, with polarisation and corruption playing key roles. The paper also explores the multifaceted phenomenon of populism, and why Bolsonaro is considered to be a populist; the latter mainly related to his appealing speeches, in which he tried to show himself as a politician of the people who governs for them, in opposition to the villainous establishment.
Keywords:
How to Cite
References
Alessi, Gil, ‘Angela Alonso: O Brasil é um país muito conservador, que não muda fácil, nem rápido e nem sem reação’. El País, 06 February 2019. Online: https://brasil.elpais.com/brasil/2019/02/01/politica/1549050356_520619.html
Almeida, Matheus and Fernando Henrique da Silva Horita, ‘Análise Crítica da Operação Lava Jato: Ativismo Judicial, Midiatização e Jurisdição De Exceção’. Revista Jurídica Luso Brasileira 3, no 6 (2017), 1631–1658.
Almeida, Ronaldo, ‘Bolsonaro presidente: conservadorismo, evangelismo e a crise brasileira’. Novos Estudos CEBRAP 38, no 1 (2019), 185–213.
Araújo, Thiago, ‘Bolsonaro defende que a PM mate mais no Brasil’. Exame Brazil, 05 October 2015. Online: https://exame.abril.com.br/brasil/bolsonaro-defende-que-a-pm-mate-mais-no-brasil/
Carvalho, Laura, Valsa brasileira: Do boom ao caos econômico. São Paulo: Todavia SA, 2018.
De la Torre, Carlos, Populist Seduction in Latin America: The Ecuadorian Experience. Ohio University Press, 2000.
Dolzan, Marcio, ‘Facada mudou rumos da campanha de Jair Bolsonaro’. Estadão, 28 October 2018. Online: https://politica.estadao.com.br/noticias/eleicoes,facada-impulsionou-candidatura-de-bolsonaro,70002570437
Ferreira, Ricardo Ribeiro, ‘Desinformação em Processos Eleitorais: Um Estudo de Caso da Eleição Brasileira de 2018’. Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal, 22 October 2019. Online: https://estudogeral.sib.uc.pt/bitstream/10316/93397/1/RicardoFerreira_versaofinal.pdf
Fhoutine, Marie, ‘13 de junho, o dia que não terminou’. Carta Capital, 16 September 2013. Online: www.cartacapital.com.br/politica/13-de-junho-o-dia-que-nao-terminou-6634/
Folha de São Paulo, ‘Maioria da população é a favor dos protestos, mostra Datafolha’. Folha.Uol, 14 June 2013. Online: www.folha.uol.com.br/cotidiano/2013/06/1294919-maioria-da-populacao-e-a-favor-dos-protestos-mostra-datafolha.shtml
Garcez, Francisco Thiago Cavalcante, Laura Hêmilly Campos Martins, Ítalo Moura Guilherme and Kevin Samuel Alves Batista, ‘O Avançar da Agenda Conservadora e o Fascismo Latente no Brasil’. Revista UNIABEU 12, no 30 (2019), 161–174.
Gidron, Noam and Bart Bonikowski, ‘Varieties of Populism: Literature Review and Research Agenda’. Weatherhead Working Paper Series, no 13-0004 (2013), 38. Online: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2459387
Hawkins, Kirk A, Venezuela’s Chavismo and Populism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511730245
Hawkins, Kirk A and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, ‘The Ideational Approach to Populism’. Latin American Research Review 52, no 4 (2017), 513–528. Online: https://doi.org/10.25222/larr.85
Hawkins, Kirk A and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, ‘Introduction: The ideational approach’, in The Ideational Approach to Populism: Concept, Theory, and Method, ed. by Kirk A Hawkins, Ryan Carlin, Levente Littvay and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser. New York: Routledge, 2019. Online: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315196923
Hunter, Wendy and Timothy J Power, ‘Bolsonaro and Brazil’s Illiberal Backlash’. Journal of Democracy 30, no 1 (2019), 68–82. Online: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0005
Inglehart, Ronald F, ‘Modernization, Existential Security and Cultural Change: Reshaping Human Motivations and Society’, in Advances in Culture and Psychology, ed. by Michele J Gelfand, Chi-yue Chiu and Ying-yi Hong. Oxford University Press, 2016. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190879228.003.0001
Inglehart, Ronald F and Pippa Norris, ‘Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash’. HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP16-026, August 2016. Online: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2818659
Jornal da Record, ‘Bolsonaro chama ditadura militar brasileira de “intervenção democrática”,’ 31 March 2015. Online: https://noticias.r7.com/brasil/bolsonaro-chama-ditadura-militar-brasileira-de-intervencao-democratica-31032015
Kurlantzick, Joshua, Democracy in Retreat. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2013.
Laclau, Ernesto, On Populist Reason. London: Verso, 2005.
Moffitt, Benjamin and Simon Tormey, ‘Rethinking Populism: Politics, Mediatisation and Political Style’. Political Studies 62, no 2 (2014), 381–397. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12032
Maghin, Hélène and Eva Renon, ‘Latin America’s Golden Era’, in The Political Economy of Latin America: Reflections on Neoliberalism and Development after the Commodity Boom, ed. by Peter Kingstone. New York: Routledge, 2018. Online: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315682877-5
Marques, Luciana, ‘Michel Temer fica, mas sem apoio político nem popular’. Radio France Internationale, 18 May 2017. Online: www.rfi.fr/br/brasil/20170518-temer-fica-mas-sem-apoio-politico-nem-popular
Mont’Alverne, Camila, Isabele Mitozo and Henrique Barbosa, ‘WhatsApp e eleições: quais as características das informações disseminadas’. Le Monde Diplomatique Brasil, 07 May 2019. Online: https://diplomatique.org.br/whatsapp-e-eleicoes-informacoes-disseminadas/
Mudde, Cas, ‘The Populist Zeitgeist’. Government and Opposition 39, no 4 (2004), 541–562. Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
Panizza, Francisco (ed.), Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. London: Verso, 2005.
Passari, Evgenia, ‘The Great Recession and the Rise of Populism’. Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy 55, no 1 (2020), 17–21. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-020-0863-7
Tamaki, Eduardo Ryo and Mario Fuks, ‘Populism in Brazil’s 2018 General Elections: An Analysis of Bolsonaro’s Campaign Speeches’. Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política, no 109 (2020), 103–127. Online: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-103127/109
The World Bank, World Development Indicators, ‘GDP growth (annual %) – Brazil’ [Data file]. September, 2020. Online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?locations=BR
Weyland, Kurt, ‘Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics’. Comparative Politics 34, no 1 (2001), 1–22. Online: https://doi.org/10.2307/422412
Young, Angelo, ‘Most Dangerous Cities in the World’. 24/7 Wall St., 23 July 2019. Online: https://247wallst.com/special-report/2019/07/23/most-dangerous-cities-in-the-world/