Evaluation of the Dose Distribution of Gamma Radiation by a Discrete Measuring Point Method Using Drones
Copyright (c) 2022 Molnár András
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract
The primary objective of the development was to create a more compact, easily portable, and deployable system, but one which, in contrast with the previous ones, is more sensitive. Despite background radiation (typically 0.01 μSv/h in the testing areas), a difference of +0.009 μSv/h has reliably been detected in the experiments made so far. In this present development, this value was successfully reduced to +0.005 – +0.007 μS/h. The improvement in sensitivity was achieved primarily by increasing the measurement time per point, which was realised using special flight control software. This sensitivity increase either allows higher scanning altitude (approximately +1–2 m) or, in case of an identical flight device at an identical altitude, a larger survey area with one take-off. In our experiments, we used a natural uranium mineral (Autunite) with activity far below that of artificially produced isotopes. In this series of experiments, we also covered the identification of several sources, which models the possibility of mapping active sources scattered around the site of a possible accident. The main advantage of the system developed and introduced by us over the survey procedures used in practice is that it is easy to mobilise, a large area can be surveyed at low cost without putting an operator at risk in the field. The purpose of the system is to detect the presence of the source and to localise it to such an extent that the localisation can subsequently be easily specified by manual or other ground procedures. Since we do not strive for centimeter positioning accuracy, standard GPS localisation is sufficient for measurements. During the measurements, the geographical coordinates are interpreted in the WGS’84 system. The circles of latitude and longitude coordinates are also shown in this system in the figures presented.
Keywords:
How to Cite
References
1. Molnár A., „Gammadózis teljesítmény-eloszlási térkép készítése kis méretű drón alkalmazásával,” Haditechnika, 53. évf. 2. sz. pp. 8–13. 2019. Online: https://doi.org/10.23713/HT.53.2.02
2. A. Molnár, D. Stojcsics, Zs. Domozi, I. Lovas, „Gamma Radiation Distribution Map Creation Using a Small-Sized Drone,” in IEEE 18th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Informatics (CINTI 2018) Budapest, 2018. pp. 161–166. Online: https://doi.org/10.1109/CINTI.2018.8928202
3. A. Parshin, V. Morozov, N. Snegirev, E. Valkova, F. Shikalenko, „Advantages of Gamma-Radiometric and Spectrometric Low-Altitude Geophysical Surveys by Unmanned Aerial Systems with Small Scintillation Detectors,” Applied Sciences, Vol. 11, No. 5. p. 2247. 2021. Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052247
4. S. Mochizuki, et al., „First Demonstration of Aerial Gamma-Ray Imaging Using Drone for Prompt Radiation Survey in Fukushima,” Journal of Instrumentation, Vol. 12, No. 11. p. P11014. 2017. Online: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/12/11/P11014
5. J. Aleotti, et al., „Detection of Nuclear Sources by UAV Teleoperation Using a Visuo-Haptic Augmented Reality Interface,” Sensors (Switzerland), Vol. 17, No. 10. p. 2234. 2017. Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/s17102234
6. T. Hinterhofer, M. Pfennigbauer, S. Schraml, M. Hofstätter, „UAV Based Multi-Sensor System With Real- Time Data Processing and Downlink for Survey of Nuclear Disaster Locations for First-Responder Support," in Proceedings of the AUVSI XPONENTIAL, Dallas, TX, USA, 8–11 May 2017. Online: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2304353
7. J. Zelenák, J. Csurgai, L. Halász, J. Solymosi, Á. Vincze, „A légi sugárfelderítés képességei alkalmazhatóságának vizsgálata elveszett vagy ellopott sugárforrások felkutatása, illetve szennyezett terepszakaszok felderítése során,” Hadmérnök, 4. évf. 1. sz. pp. 46–62. 2009.
8. Pintér I., A járműfedélzeti sugárszintmérés elvei és gyakorlati megvalósításuk harctevékenység, illetve nukleáris baleset-elhárítás során. PhD-értekezés, Zrínyi Miklós Nemzetvédelmi Egyetem, 2002.
9. D. T. Connor et al., „Radiological Comparison of a FDNPP Waste Storage Site during and after Construction,” Environmental Pollution, Vol. 243, pp. 582–590. 2018. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.08.099
10. O. Šálek, M. Matolín, L. Gryc, „Mapping of Radiation Anomalies Using UAV Mini-Airborne Gamma-Ray Spectrometry,” Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, Vol. 182, pp. 101–107. 2018. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.11.033
11. P. Martin et al., „Radiological Identification of Near-Surface Mineralogical Deposits Using Low-Altitude Unmanned Aerial Vehicle,” Remote Sensing, Vol. 12, No. 21. p. 3562. 2020. Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12213562
12. LND, Inc. Oceanside, New York, USA, Gamma detector product datasheet. Online: https://www.lndinc.com/products/geiger-mueller-tubes/7808/
13. Sync, BecqMoni2011 is an amateur freeware Japanese MCA software. Online: https://ln.sync.com/dl/cbafeba20/87sjrujv-%C2%ADr9tziicq-%C2%ADpz9ncmsy-%C2%ADnphcjsk5/view/default/1092926230010
14. V. Fedorovsky, et al., Aerospace Geological Map of the North-Eastern Part of zones Chernorud & Tomota. Irkutsk, Russia, Geological Institute of RAS & Institute of Earth’s Crust, 2013.
15. A. V. Parshin, A. E. Budyak, V. N. Babyak, „Interpretation of Integrated Aerial Geophysical Surveys by Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Mining: A Case of Additional Flank Exploration,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 459, No. 5 p. 052079. 2020. Online: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/459/5/052079
16. A. V. Parshin, et al., „Complex UAS-Geophysical Surveys at the First Stages of Geological Prospecting: Case in the Western Sayan (Russia),” In Proceedings of the First EAGE Workshop on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, Toulouse, France, 2–4 December 2019. pp. 1–5. Online: https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201903321