A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE THEORY OF DATA PROTECTION PROVIDED BY HUNGARIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN COMPARISON WITH GIOVANNI BUTTARELLI'S „PRIVACY 2030”
Observations on Buttarelli’s Privacy 2030 in the Context Of Data Protection in Hungary
Copyright (c) 2024 Páll Imre Borisz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Absztrakt
European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) Giovanni Buttarelli’s posthumous manifesto, „Privacy 2030: A New Vision for Europe”, places data protection in a global context. In his view, a digital underclass has emerged with members who have no access to the necessary informations to understand the logic of the algorithmic decisions affecting them and their privacy. Competition and data protection authorities within the EU cooperate and share their informations about their investigations. While data maximisation is clearly unsustainable from an environmental perspective, within the EU, data minimisation is a core principle of data protection law. Personal data should serve the public interest of state and society rather than private companies based mostly in the US and China.
In case of its proper enforcement, GDPR may be an effective tool of transparent data processing in the EU, and can serve as a model for the rest of the world. Enforcement is duty of the member states’ authorities. Therefore, Buttarelli’s views and Hungarian data protection’s legal tools are worth a comparative analysis.
Kulcsszavak:
Hivatkozások
BALKIN, Jack M. (2016): Information Fiduciaries and the First Amendment. University of California Davis Law Review, 49(4), 1185–1234.
BALKIN, Jack M. (2020): The Fiduciary Model of Privacy. Harvard Law Review Forum, 134(11), 11–33. Online: https://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/134-Harv.-L.-Rev.-F.-11.pdf
BUTTARELLI, Giovanni (2019): Privacy 2030: A New Vision for Europe. Online: https://iapp.org/media/pdf/resource_center/giovanni_manifesto.pdf
DPC (2023): Data Protection Commission announces conclusion of two inquiries into Meta Ireland. 4 January 2023. Online: https://www.dataprotection.ie/en/news-media/data-protection-commission-announces-conclusion-two-inquiries-meta-ireland
EDPB opinion 39/2021 (December 14, 2021). Online: https://edpb.europa.eu/system/files/2022-01/edpb_opinion_202139_article_582g_gdpr_en.pdf
FARRELL, Maria (2019): Afterword: A Cage Went in Search of A Bird. In BUTTARELLI, Giovanni: Privacy 2030: A New Vision for Europe. [s. l.]: IAPP, 35–36. Online: https://iapp.org/media/pdf/resource_center/giovanni_manifesto.pdf
HARARI, Yuval Noah (2014): Sapiens. London: Vintage Books.
HARARI, Yuval Noah (2017): Homo Deus. London: Vintage Books.
JAYARAM, Malavika (2019): Afterword: The Future is Already Distributed – It’s Not Evenly Just. In BUTTARELLI, Giovanni: Privacy 2030: A New Vision for Europe. [s. l.]: IAPP, 31–32. Online: https://iapp.org/media/pdf/resource_center/giovanni_manifesto.pdf
KOLBERT, Elizabeth (2015): The Sixth Extinction. London – New Delhi – New York – Sydney: Bloomsbury.
NAIH (2021): A Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság Beszámolója a 2021. évi tevékenységéről. Budapest: Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság. Online: https://naih.hu/eves-beszamolok?download=507:naih-beszamolo-a-2021-evi-tevekenysegrol
NAIH equal opportunities policy (June 15, 2022)
PANETTA, Rocco (2019): Afterword: Privacy 2030: To Give Humans a Chance. In BUTTARELLI, Giovanni: Privacy 2030: A New Vision for Europe. [s. l.]: IAPP, 37–40. Online: https://iapp.org/media/pdf/resource_center/giovanni_manifesto.pdf
PATYI, András (2017): A közigazgatási működés jogi alapjai. Budapest: Dialóg Campus.
POLONETSKY, Jules (2019): Afterword: A Mission Greater Than Compliance. In BUTTARELLI, Giovanni: Privacy 2030: A New Vision for Europe. [s. l.]: IAPP, 33–34. Online: https://iapp.org/media/pdf/resource_center/giovanni_manifesto.pdf
RODOTÁ, Stefano (2004): Privacy, libertà, dignità. Discorso conclusivo della Conferenza internazionale sulla protezione dei dati. Online: https://www.privacy.it/archivio/rodo20040916.html
RODRIK, Dani (2012): The Globalization Paradox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ROTENBERG, Marc (2019): Afterword: The Future of Privacy and a Vibrant Democracy. In BUTTARELLI, Giovanni: Privacy 2030: A New Vision for Europe. [s. l.]: IAPP, 29–30. Online: https://iapp.org/media/pdf/resource_center/giovanni_manifesto.pdf
SARTORI, Giovanni (1987): Theory of Democracy Revisited I–II Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
SZABÓ, Endre Győző (2022): A védelmi lépcső elmélete. Budapest: Ludovika.
ZUBOFF, Shoshana (2019): Afterword: Many Facets of the Same Diamond. In BUTTARELLI, Giovanni: Privacy 2030: A New Vision for Europe. [s. l.]: IAPP, 41–42. Online: https://iapp.org/media/pdf/resource_center/giovanni_manifesto.pdf
Constitutional Court of Hungary’s decisions
/2019 (III. 5.) AB decision
/2022 (III. 23.) AB decision
Court decisions
Kúria’s judgement No. Kfv.II.37.001/2021/6.
Budapest-Capital Regional Court's judgement No. 105.K.706.125/2020/12.
NAIH decisions
NAIH/2020/974/4. Online: https://www.naih.hu/files/NAIH-2020-974-hatarozat.pdf
NAIH-85-3/2022. Online: https://www.naih.hu/hatarozatok-vegzesek/file/517-mesterseges-intelligencia-alkalmazasanak-adatvedelmi-kerdesei