A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE THEORY OF DATA PROTECTION PROVIDED BY HUNGARIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN COMPARISON WITH GIOVANNI BUTTARELLI'S „PRIVACY 2030”

Observations on Buttarelli’s Privacy 2030 in the Context Of Data Protection in Hungary

  • Páll Imre Borisz
doi: 10.32575/ppb.2024.1.11

Absztrakt

European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) Giovanni Buttarelli’s posthumous manifesto, „Privacy 2030: A New Vision for Europe”, places data protection in a global context. In his view, a digital underclass has emerged with members who have no access to the necessary informations to understand the logic of the algorithmic decisions affecting them and their privacy. Competition and data protection authorities within the EU cooperate and share their informations about their investigations. While data maximisation is clearly unsustainable from an environmental perspective, within the EU, data minimisation is a core principle of data protection law. Personal data should serve the public interest of state and society rather than private companies based mostly in the US and China.

In case of its proper enforcement, GDPR may be an effective tool of transparent data processing in the EU, and can serve as a model for the rest of the world. Enforcement is duty of the member states’ authorities. Therefore, Buttarelli’s views and Hungarian data protection’s legal tools are worth a comparative analysis.

Kulcsszavak:

Data protection, GDPR, Public administration, Privacy, European Union, New technologies, Democracy

Hivatkozások

BALKIN, Jack M. (2016): Information Fiduciaries and the First Amendment. University of California Davis Law Review, 49(4), 1185–1234.

BALKIN, Jack M. (2020): The Fiduciary Model of Privacy. Harvard Law Review Forum, 134(11), 11–33. Online: https://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/134-Harv.-L.-Rev.-F.-11.pdf

BUTTARELLI, Giovanni (2019): Privacy 2030: A New Vision for Europe. Online: https://iapp.org/media/pdf/resource_center/giovanni_manifesto.pdf

DPC (2023): Data Protection Commission announces conclusion of two inquiries into Meta Ireland. 4 January 2023. Online: https://www.dataprotection.ie/en/news-media/data-protection-commission-announces-conclusion-two-inquiries-meta-ireland

EDPB opinion 39/2021 (December 14, 2021). Online: https://edpb.europa.eu/system/files/2022-01/edpb_opinion_202139_article_582g_gdpr_en.pdf

FARRELL, Maria (2019): Afterword: A Cage Went in Search of A Bird. In BUTTARELLI, Giovanni: Privacy 2030: A New Vision for Europe. [s. l.]: IAPP, 35–36. Online: https://iapp.org/media/pdf/resource_center/giovanni_manifesto.pdf

HARARI, Yuval Noah (2014): Sapiens. London: Vintage Books.

HARARI, Yuval Noah (2017): Homo Deus. London: Vintage Books.

JAYARAM, Malavika (2019): Afterword: The Future is Already Distributed – It’s Not Evenly Just. In BUTTARELLI, Giovanni: Privacy 2030: A New Vision for Europe. [s. l.]: IAPP, 31–32. Online: https://iapp.org/media/pdf/resource_center/giovanni_manifesto.pdf

KOLBERT, Elizabeth (2015): The Sixth Extinction. London – New Delhi – New York – Sydney: Bloomsbury.

NAIH (2021): A Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság Beszámolója a 2021. évi tevékenységéről. Budapest: Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság. Online: https://naih.hu/eves-beszamolok?download=507:naih-beszamolo-a-2021-evi-tevekenysegrol

NAIH equal opportunities policy (June 15, 2022)

PANETTA, Rocco (2019): Afterword: Privacy 2030: To Give Humans a Chance. In BUTTARELLI, Giovanni: Privacy 2030: A New Vision for Europe. [s. l.]: IAPP, 37–40. Online: https://iapp.org/media/pdf/resource_center/giovanni_manifesto.pdf

PATYI, András (2017): A közigazgatási működés jogi alapjai. Budapest: Dialóg Campus.

POLONETSKY, Jules (2019): Afterword: A Mission Greater Than Compliance. In BUTTARELLI, Giovanni: Privacy 2030: A New Vision for Europe. [s. l.]: IAPP, 33–34. Online: https://iapp.org/media/pdf/resource_center/giovanni_manifesto.pdf

RODOTÁ, Stefano (2004): Privacy, libertà, dignità. Discorso conclusivo della Conferenza internazionale sulla protezione dei dati. Online: https://www.privacy.it/archivio/rodo20040916.html

RODRIK, Dani (2012): The Globalization Paradox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

ROTENBERG, Marc (2019): Afterword: The Future of Privacy and a Vibrant Democracy. In BUTTARELLI, Giovanni: Privacy 2030: A New Vision for Europe. [s. l.]: IAPP, 29–30. Online: https://iapp.org/media/pdf/resource_center/giovanni_manifesto.pdf

SARTORI, Giovanni (1987): Theory of Democracy Revisited I–II Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.

SZABÓ, Endre Győző (2022): A védelmi lépcső elmélete. Budapest: Ludovika.

ZUBOFF, Shoshana (2019): Afterword: Many Facets of the Same Diamond. In BUTTARELLI, Giovanni: Privacy 2030: A New Vision for Europe. [s. l.]: IAPP, 41–42. Online: https://iapp.org/media/pdf/resource_center/giovanni_manifesto.pdf

Constitutional Court of Hungary’s decisions

/2019 (III. 5.) AB decision

/2022 (III. 23.) AB decision

Court decisions

Kúria’s judgement No. Kfv.II.37.001/2021/6.

Budapest-Capital Regional Court's judgement No. 105.K.706.125/2020/12.

NAIH decisions

NAIH/2020/974/4. Online: https://www.naih.hu/files/NAIH-2020-974-hatarozat.pdf

NAIH-85-3/2022. Online: https://www.naih.hu/hatarozatok-vegzesek/file/517-mesterseges-intelligencia-alkalmazasanak-adatvedelmi-kerdesei

Letöltések

Letölthető adat még nem áll rendelkezésre.