Safeguards of Fair Trial in Constitutional Court Proceedings: Efficient Access to Justice as a Key Factor

  • Váradi Ágnes
doi: 10.32575/ppb.2024.2.10

Abstract

The right to fair trial, which is usually described as an essential starting point of the protection of human rights, as a basic safeguard of the rule of law, as a general principle of EU law and as a certain quality of procedure, plays a crucial role in defining the framework of judicial proceedings in the European states both in criminal and civil matters. The current paper examines how the concept of fair trial applies to constitutional court proceedings, with special regard to the safeguards of an efficient access to such procedures. The study raises questions like: What cornerstones for an efficient access can be identified in the case-law? What are the most typical obstacles of obtaining a decision by a constitutional court? How can a more efficient access to these procedures be promoted? The analysis offers a synthesis of the theoretical background and the general requirements identified by the relevant international and European fora (complemented by references to the related jurisprudence of the constitutional courts of certain EU Member States). This way the study can give useful insights not only into the understanding of the concept of fair trial but also into the possibilities of enhancing the efficiency of constitutional court proceedings.

Keywords:

fair trial constitutional court procedures access to justice legal aid admissibility

References

BÅRDSEN, Arnfinn (2007): Reflections on “Fair Trial” in Civil Proceedings According to Article 6 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Scandinavian Studies in Law, 51, 99–130.

BELL, John – LICHÈRE, François (2022): Contemporary French Administrative Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009057127

BITSKEY, Botond – TÖRÖK, Bernát (2015): Az alkotmányjogi panasz kézikönyve. Budapest: HVG-ORAC.

BOBEK, Michal – ADAMS-PRASSL, Jeremias eds. (2020): The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in the Member States. Oxford: Hart Publishing. Online: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509940943

BRIGHT, Claire (2013): L’accès à la justice civile en cas de violations des droits de l’homme par des entreprises multinationals. Florence: European University Institute.

CLAYTON, Richard – TOMLINSON, Hugh (2010): Fair Trial Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Council of Europe (2020): Respecting Democracy, Rule of Law and Human Rights in the Framework of the COVID-19 Sanitary Crisis. A Toolkit for Member States. [SG/Inf(2020)11]. Online: https://rm.coe.int/sg-inf-2020-11-respecting-democracy-rule-of-law-and-human-rights-in-th/16809e1f40

European Commission (2022): Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. 2022 Rule of Law Report. The rule of law situation in the European Union. Online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52022DC0500

Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) (2021): Resilient Institutions for a Transformative Post-Pandemic Recovery in Latin America and the Caribbean: Inputs for Discussion. Santiago: United Nations.

FRANCIONI, Francesco ed. (2007): Access to Justice as a Human Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199233083.001.0001

GRABENWARTER, Christoph ed. (2022): Europäischer Grundrechteschutz. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Online: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845299457

HARRIS, David – O’BOYLE, Michael – BATES, Ed – BUCKLEY, Carla M. (2023): Law of the European Convention of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198862000.001.0001

KAMBER, Krešimir (2022): The Right to a Fair Online Hearing. Human Rights Law Review, 22(2). Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngac006

KAUFMANN, Claudia – HAUSAMMANN, Christina eds. (2017): Zugang zum Recht: Vom Grundrecht auf einen wirksamen Rechtsschutz. Basel: Helbing Lichtenhahn Verlag.

KRAMER, Xandra – BIARD, Alexandre – HOEVENAARS, Jos – THEMELI, Erlis eds. (2021): New Pathways to Civil Justice in Europe: Challenges of Access to Justice. Cham: Springer.

KRANS, Bart – NYLUND, Anna eds. (2021): Civil Courts Coping with Covid-19. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.

MATYAS, David – WILLS, Peter – DEWITT, Barry (2022): Imagining Resilient Courts: from COVID-19 to the Future of Canada’s Court System. Canadian Public Policy, 48(1), 186–208. Online: https://doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2021-015

MRČELA, Marin (2018): Adversarial Principle, the Equality of Arms and Confrontational Right – European Court of Human Rights Recent Jurisprudence. EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series (ECLIC), 1, 15–31. Online: https://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/6519

OECD (2020): Access to Justice and the COVID-19 Pandemic. Online: https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/view/?ref=136_136486-rcd8m6dvng&title=Access-to-justice-and-the-COVID-19-pandemic

PETERS, Anne – ALTWICKER, Tilmann (2012): Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention. München: C.H. Beck.

REILING, Dory – CONTINI, Francesco (2022): E-Justice Platforms: Challenges for Judicial Governance. International Journal for Court Administration, 13(1). Online: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.445

ROBERTSON, David (2004): A Dictionary of Human Rights (2nd Edition). Abingdon: Routledge. Online: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203486887

ROZAKIS, Christos (2004): The Right to a Fair Trial in Civil Cases. Judicial Studies Institute Journal, (2), 96–106.

ROZHNOV, Oleh (2020): Towards Timely Justice in Civil Matters Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 2/3(7), 100–114. Online: https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-3.2-3-a000028

SETTEM, Ola Johan (2016): Applications of the ‘Fair Hearing’ Norm in ECHR Article 6(1) to Civil Proceedings With Special Emphasis on the Balance Between Procedural Safeguards and Efficiency. Cham – Heidelberg – Dordrecht – New York – London: Springer.

SOYER, Richard (2019): The Right to a Fair Trial. The European Multilevel Approach to Criminal Justice in Austria. Miskolci Jogi Szemle, 14(2), 385–394.

SPANO, Robert – MOTOC, Iulia – LUBARDA, Branko – PINTO DE ALBUQUERQUE, Paulo – TSIRLI, Marialena (2020): Procès équitable: perspectives régionales et internationales / Fair Trial: Regional and International Perspectives. Liber Amicorum Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos. Brussels: Anthemis.

SUMMERS, Sarah J. (2007): Fair Trials: The European Criminal Procedural Tradition and the European Court of Human Rights. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

TELEKI, Cristina (2021): Due Process and Fair Trial in EU Competition Law: The Impact of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Leiden–Boston: Brill–Nijhoff. Online: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004447493

VÁRADI, Ágnes (2014): A joghoz jutás esélyeinek bővítése a polgári perben: A rászorultság értelmezése a perköltség-kedvezmények rendszerében. In FEKETE, Balázs – HORVÁTHY, Balázs – KREISZ, Brigitta (eds.): A világ mi magunk vagyunk…: Liber Amicorum Imre Vörös. Budapest: HVG-ORAC, 544–557.

VÁRADI Ágnes (2016): The Concept of Legal Aid in the Most Recent Case Law of ECJ. In SZABÓ, Marcel – LÁNCOS, Petra Lea – VARGA, Réka (eds.): Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law 2015. The Hague: eleven Publishing, 461–478. Online: https://doi.org/10.5553/HYIEL/266627012015003001022

VÁRADI, Ágnes (2022): Lessons Learned from the Covid-19 Pandemic: Ensuring Access to Justice in Emergency Situations. In KRATOCHVILOVA, Helena – KRATOCHVIL, Radek (eds.): Proceedings of VIAC 2022 in Budapest. Prague: Czech Institute of Academic Education z.s. 14–19.

Venice Commission (European Commission for Democracy through Law) (2020a): Interim Report on the Measures Taken in the EU Member States as a Result of the Covid-19 Crisis and Their Impact on Democracy, the Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights. Online: https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2020)018-e

Venice Commission (2020b): Compilation of Venice Commission Opinions and Reports on States of Emergency [CDL-PI(2020)003-e]. Online: https://rm.coe.int/16809e38a6

Venice Commission (2016): Rule of Law Checklist, Study No. 711/2013, CDL-AD(2016)007rev. Online: https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2016)007-e

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.