The Restriction of Fundamental Rights for National Security and Its Interpretation by the Constitutional Court of Hungary 2
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract
The question of restricting fundamental rights is coeval with the recognition and protection of fundamental rights by the state. However, the question arises as to where the limitations of each fundamental right lie, how long they can take effect, and when their restriction is necessary and needed. National security interests are a special case of restricting fundamental rights. The debate on the restriction of fundamental rights has been given new impetus by the defence against terrorism in Western Europe, with this debate national security interests have come to the fore, as its constitutional aspects. In Hungary, the Constitutional Court has played primary role in establishing and shaping the content of fundamental rights. One of the priority areas of its interpretative activity is the question and practice of restricting fundamental rights. The second part of the study deals with the case law of the Constitutional Court on the restriction of fundamental rights on the basis of national security considerations and the impact of national security challenges of modern terrorism on legal practice.