Weaponising Innovation

A Comparative Analysis of U.S. and Chinese Techno-Nationalist Approaches

doi: 10.32567/hm.2025.4.10

Abstract

In contemporary geopolitical competition, the close interconnection between technology, innovation, and national security is theoretically framed by the concept of techno-nationalism. At the core of these processes lies the great-power strategic rivalry between the United States and the People’s Republic of China, in which defense innovation and the pursuit of technological superiority are regarded as prerequisites for both national security and economic competitiveness. The comparative analysis of defense innovation ecosystems highlights structural differences in national research and development models, as well as the divergent logics of financing and strategic governance. The study further reviews the emergence and theoretical foundations of techno-nationalism and explores its practical manifestations in the context of great-power competition. The analysis demonstrates that efforts toward technological autonomy and strategic sovereignty have become central drivers of geopolitical, economic, and scientific dynamics, shaping the 21st-century global order increasingly along techno-nationalist lines.

Keywords:

Emerging and Disruptive Technologies Defense Innovation Defense Research and Development Strategic Competition Techno-nationalism

References

Az Európai Parlament és a Tanács (EU) 2021/697 rendelete (2021. április 29.) az Európai Védelmi Alap létrehozásáról és az (EU) 2018/1092 határozat hatályon kívül helyezéséről (2024). Az Európai Hivatalos Lapja, L 170, 149–187. Online: https://op.europa.eu/hu/publication-detail/-/publication/d94a6745-ebaf-11ee-8e14-01aa75ed71a1/language-hu?utm_

BATEMAN, Jon (2022): U.S. – China Technological „Decoupling”: A Strategy and Policy Framework. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Publications Department. Online: https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2022/04/us-china-technological-decoupling-a-strategy-and-policy-framework?lang=en#the-evolution-of-us-thinking-and-policy

BEAVER, Wilson (2025): China’s Defense Budget Is Bigger Than You Think. The Heritage Foundation, 2025. április 17. Online: https://www.heritage.org/china/commentary/chinas-defense-budget-bigger-you-think?utm_

BICKELL, Eleni G. et al. (2024): Federal Research and Development (R&D) Funding: FY2025. CRS Report. Online: https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48307?utm=

BLEVINS, Emily G. (2025): Federal Research Security Policies: Background and Issues for Congress. CRS Report. Online: https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48541

BODA Mihály (2022): A hibrid háború etikája: az igazságos hibrid háború elmélete. In M. SZABÓ Miklós (szerk.): A hadtudomány aktuális kérdései napjainkban I. Budapest: Ludovika, 95–108. Online: https://doi.org/10.36250/00973_06

BODA Mihály (2025): A multipoláris nemzetközi rendtől a poliarchikusig – a „hadszíntérháború”-tól a hibrid háborúig. Kézirat.

CHAN, Kyle et al. (2025): Full Stack: China's Evolving Industrial Policy for AI. RAND Expert Insights, 2025. június 26. Online: https://doi.org/10.7249/PEA4012-1

China Aerospace Studies Institute (CASI) (2025): In Their Own Words: 2025 China's National Security in the New Era. [H. n.]: China Aerospace Studies Institute. Online: https://bit.ly/46AGWk4

CLAPP, Sebastian (2022): Emerging Disruptive Technologies in Defence. European Parliamentary Research Service. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_ATA(2022)733647

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) (2022): DARPA Seeks Proposals to Forge the Future of U.S. Microelectronics Manufacturing. Online: https://www.darpa.mil/news/2022/future-microelectronics-manufacturing

DING, Jeffrey – XIAO, Jenny W. (2023): Recent Trends in China’s Large Language Model Landscape. Centre for the Governance of AI. Online: https://cdn.governance.ai/Trends_in_Chinas_LLMs.pdf

FANG, Tianyu – HWANG, Tim (2023): The Rise of Techno-Nationalism. Online: https://www.newamerica.org/oti/reports/the-rise-of-techno-nationalism/

FEAKIN, Tobias – SEGAL, Adam (2025): Brave New Techno-Nationalist World. Foreign Policy, 2025. június 4. Online: https://foreignpolicy.com/2025/06/04/trump-tech-policy-techno-nationalism/?utm_

FETTER, Steve – SANKARAN, Jaganath (2024): Emerging Technologies and Challenges to Nuclear Stability. Journal of Strategic Studies, 48(2), 252–296. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2024.2433766

GALLO, Marcy E. (2021): Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency: Overview and Issues for Congress. CRS Report. Online: https://sgp.fas.org/crs/natsec/R45088.pdf

GORECZKY Péter (2024): Nyitottnak maradni, de mennyire – erősödő techno-nacionalizmus a világban. Világgazdaság, 2024. július 29. Online: https://www.vg.hu/velemeny/2024/07/nyitottnak-maradni-de-mennyire-erosodo-techno-nacionalizmus-a-vilagban?utm=

HADDAD, Christian – VORLÍČEK, Dagmar – KLIMBURG-WITJES, Nina (2024): The Security-Innovation Nexus in (Geo-) Political Imagination. Geopolitics, 29(3), 741–764. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2024.2329940

HÁBER Péter (2022): A hibrid hadviselés elméletének tömör összefoglalása a hazai szakirodalom alapján. Felderítő Szemle, 21(4), 72–94. Online: https://hhk.uni-nke.hu/document/hhk-uni-nke-hu/2022_4_Felder%C3%ADt%C5%91%20Szemle.pdf

HOROWITZ, Michael C. – KAHN, Lauren (2021): DoD's 2021 China Military Power Report: How Advances in AI and Emerging Technologies Will Shape China’s Military. Council on Foreign Relations. Online: https://www.cfr.org/blog/dods-2021-china-military-power-report-how-advances-ai-and-emerging-technologies-will-shape

KANIA, Elsa B. (2019): Minds at War. China’s Pursuit of Military Advantage through Cognitive Science and Biotechnology. PRISM, 8(3), 82–101. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26864278.pdf?refreqid=fastly-default%3A246290d30dc0d9c005b36c4079a51dd5&ab_segments=&initiator=&acceptTC=1

KANIA, Elsa B. et al. (2021): How Should the U.S. Respond to China’s Military-Civil Fusion Strategy? ChinaFile, 2021. május 22. Online: https://www.chinafile.com/conversation/how-should-us-respond-chinas-military-civil-fusion-strategy

KISVÁRI Tamás (2024): Kína hosszú távú stratégiája. In GÖRBE Attiláné – ZÁN Krisztina (szerk.): Kína – A Középső Birodalom. Budapest: Katonai Nemzetbiztonsági Szolgálat, 204–225. Online: https://bit.ly/4uaMWdC

KRACH, Keith – CHIANG, Mung – ASHLEY FORD, Christopher (2020): Briefing on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation’s Intent To Invest $12 Billion in the U.S. and on the CCP’s Ability To Undermine U.S. Export Controls. Online: https://bit.ly/4bjlxOW

LEE, Ji-Young – HAN, Eugeniu – ZHU, Keren (2022): Decoupling from China: How U.S. Asian Allies Responded to the Huawei ban. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 76(5), 486–506. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2021.2016611

LEE, Lizzi C. (2024): China’s Big Fund 3.0: Xi’s Boldest Gamble Yet for Chip Supremacy. The diplomat, 2024. június 6. Online: https://thediplomat.com/2024/06/chinas-big-fund-3-0-xis-boldest-gamble-yet-for-chip-supremacy/

LIANG, Xiao et al. (2025): Trends in World Military Expenditure, 2024. SIPRI Publications, 1–12. Online: https://doi.org/10.55163/AVEC8366

MCFAUL, Cole – BRESNICK, Sam – CHOU, Daniel (2025): Pulling Back the Curtain on China’s Military-Civil Fusion. How the PLA Mobilizes Civilian AI for Strategic Advantage. CSET, 2025. szeptember. Online: https://cset.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/CSET-Pulling-Back-the-Curtain-on-Chinas-Military-Civil-Fusion.pdf

MOK, Charles (2023): The Party Rules: China’s New Central Science and Technology Commission. The Diplomat, 2023. augusztus 23. Online: https://thediplomat.com/2023/08/the-party-rules-chinas-new-central-science-and-technology-commission/

MOSLEY, Brian (2024): FY24 Budget Update. CRA News, 36(4). Online: https://bit.ly/40GNXwe

National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBS) (2025): China’s Expenditure on Research and Experimental Development (R&D) Exceeded 3.6 Trillion Yuan in 2024. Online: https://www.stats.gov.cn/english///PressRelease/202502/t20250207_1958579.html?utm

Nature (2020): Editorial: DARPA ‘Lookalikes’ Must Ground Their Dreams in Reality. Nature, 579, 173–174. Online: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00690-5

O’HANLON, Michael E. (2025): Achieving „Peace through Strength” in the 2020s. Brookings, 2025. február 21. Online: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/achieving-peace-through-strength-in-the-2020s/?utm

PANYUE, Huang szerk. (2022): Xi's Vision Leads to Success. Online: http://eng.mod.gov.cn/xb/News_213114/TopStories/4923634.html?utm

REDING, D. F. – EATON, J. (2020): Science & Technology Trends 2020–2040. Brussels: NATOScience & Technology Organization Office of the Chief Scientist NATOHeadquarters. Online: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1131124.pdf

REMEK Éva (2023): Változó biztonság, változó biztonságfelfogás. In: ZACHAR Péter Krisztián – BARNA Attila (szerk.): Titkos cikkek az örök békéhez. Ünnepi tanulmányok a 70 éves Fülöp Mihály tiszteletére. Budapest: Ludovika, 337–349. Online: https://doi.org/10.36250/01132_27

SARGENT, John F. – SHEA, Dana A. (2020): Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP): History and Overview. Online: https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R43935

SHERMAN, Justin (2019): Essay: Reframing the U.S.China AI „Arms Race”. Online: https://www.newamerica.org/cybersecurity-initiative/reports/essay-reframing-the-us-china-ai-arms-race/introduction

Silk Road Hungary (2025): Kína tudományos és technológiai fejlődése új lendületet ad az ipari innovációnak. 2025. július 28. Online: https://silkroadhungary.hu/2025/07/kina-tudomanyos-es-technologiai-fejlodese-uj-lenduletet-ad-az-ipari-innovacionak-2/

SOARE, Simona R. – POTHIER, Fabrice (2021): Leading Edge: Key Drivers of Defence Innovation and the Future of Operational Advantage. International Institute of Strategic Studies Research Papers. Online: https://www.iiss.org/globalassets/media-library---content--migration/files/research-papers/2021/11/defence-innovation_oct-2021_s10.pdf

SULLIVAN, Ian M. (2024): Three Dates, Three Windows, and All of DOTMLPF-P. Military Rewiew, 104(1), 14–25. Online: https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/English-Edition-Archives/January-February-2024/Sullivan/Journals/Military-Review/utm/

SZÖLLŐSI Annamária (2025): A reziliencia a biztonság kontextusában. Hadtudományi Szemle, 18(2), 161–177. Online: https://doi.org/10.32563/hsz.2025.2.10

The White House (2022): National Security Strategy. Online: https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Biden-Harris-Administrations-National-Security-Strategy-10.2022.pdf

The White House (2025a): President Trump is Leading with Peace Through Strength. Online: https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/2025/03/president-trump-is-leading-with-peace-through-strength/?utm

The White House (2025b): Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Restores the United States Department of War. Online: https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/09/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-restores-the-united-states-department-of-war/

The White House (2025c): President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Online: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/presidents-council-of-advisors-on-science-and-technology/

The White House [é. n.]: Office of Science and Technology Policy. Online: https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/?utm

TIAN, Nan et al. (2024): Trends in World Military Expenditure, 2023. SIPRI Fact Sheet, 2024. április. Online: https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2024-04/2404_fs_milex_2023.pdf

U.S. Department of Defense (2022): National Defense Strategy of the United States of America. Online: https://media.defense.gov/2022/Oct/27/2003103845/-1/-1/1/2022-NATIONAL-DEFENSE-STRATEGY-NPR-MDR.PDF

U.S. Department of Defense (2023): National Defense Industrial Strategy. Online: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-D-PURL-gpo234254/pdf/GOVPUB-D-PURL-gpo234254.pdf

U.S. Department of Defense (2024a): Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China. Online: https://media.defense.gov/2024/Dec/18/2003615520/-1/-1/0/MILITARY-AND-SECURITY-DEVELOPMENTS-INVOLVING-THE-PEOPLES-REPUBLIC-OF-CHINA-2024.PDF

U.S. Department of Defense (2024b): National Defense Industrial Strategy Implementation Plan for FY2025. Online: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-D-PURL-gpo234260/pdf/GOVPUB-D-PURL-gpo234260.pdf

U.S. Department of War (2023): Chief Digital & Artificial Intelligence Office Celebrates First Year. Online: https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3464012/chief-digital-artificial-intelligence-office-celebrates-first-year/

U.S. Department of War (2024): CDAO and DIU Launch New Effort Focused on Accelerating DOD Adoption of AI Capabilities. Online: https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3996199/cdao-and-diu-launch-new-effort-focused-on-accelerating-dod-adoption-of-ai-capab/

U.S. Department of War (2025a): Statement on the Development of the 2025 National Defense Strategy. Online: https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/4172735/statement-on-the-development-of-the-2025-national-defense-strategy/

U.S. Department of War (2025b): DIU’s Thunderforge Project to Integrate Commercial AI-Powered Decision-Making for Operational and Theater-Level Planning. Online: https://www.diu.mil/latest/dius-thunderforge-project-to-integrate-commercial-ai-powered-decision-making

U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) (2024): Hypersonic Weapons: DOD Could Reduce Cost and Schedule Risks by Following Leading Practices. Report to Congressional Committees. Online: https://www.gao.gov/assets/880/870416.pdf

VIGLIAROLO, Brandon (2022): Darpa Says US Hypersonic Missile Is Ready for Real World. The Register, 2022. április 6. Online: https://www.theregister.com/2022/04/06/darpa_hypersonic_missile/

VIGLIAROLO, Brandon (2025): It Begins: Pentagon to Give AI Agents a Role in Decision Making, Ops Planning. The Register, 2025. március 5. Online: https://www.theregister.com/2025/03/05/dod_taps_scale_to_bring/?utm

VUK, Pavel (2025): Editorial: Disruptive Technologies. Contemporary Military Challenges, 27(1), 13–18. Online: https://doi.org/10.2478/cmc-2025-0002

WONG LEUNG, Jennifer – ROBIN, Stephan – CAVE, Danielle (2024): ASPI’s Two-Decade Critical Technology Tracker: The Rewards of Long-term Research Investment. Barton ATC: ASPI. Online: https://bit.ly/4rPT6hE

World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (2025): Global Innovation Index 2025: Innovation at a Crossroads. Genf: WIPO. Online: https://doi.org/10.34667/tind.58864

YAN, Ming (2023): How Techno-Nationalism Affects Technological Decoupling Between China and the U.S. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 10(3), 10–13. Online: https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v10i3.11782

ZHANG, Lin – LAN, Tu (2022): The New Whole State System: Reinventing the Chinese State to Promote Innovation. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 55(1), 201–221. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X221088294