Weaponising Innovation
A Comparative Analysis of U.S. and Chinese Techno-Nationalist Approaches
Copyright (c) 2026 Szöllősi Annamária

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract
In contemporary geopolitical competition, the close interconnection between technology, innovation, and national security is theoretically framed by the concept of techno-nationalism. At the core of these processes lies the great-power strategic rivalry between the United States and the People’s Republic of China, in which defense innovation and the pursuit of technological superiority are regarded as prerequisites for both national security and economic competitiveness. The comparative analysis of defense innovation ecosystems highlights structural differences in national research and development models, as well as the divergent logics of financing and strategic governance. The study further reviews the emergence and theoretical foundations of techno-nationalism and explores its practical manifestations in the context of great-power competition. The analysis demonstrates that efforts toward technological autonomy and strategic sovereignty have become central drivers of geopolitical, economic, and scientific dynamics, shaping the 21st-century global order increasingly along techno-nationalist lines.
Keywords:
References
Az Európai Parlament és a Tanács (EU) 2021/697 rendelete (2021. április 29.) az Európai Védelmi Alap létrehozásáról és az (EU) 2018/1092 határozat hatályon kívül helyezéséről (2024). Az Európai Hivatalos Lapja, L 170, 149–187. Online: https://op.europa.eu/hu/publication-detail/-/publication/d94a6745-ebaf-11ee-8e14-01aa75ed71a1/language-hu?utm_
BATEMAN, Jon (2022): U.S. – China Technological „Decoupling”: A Strategy and Policy Framework. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Publications Department. Online: https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2022/04/us-china-technological-decoupling-a-strategy-and-policy-framework?lang=en#the-evolution-of-us-thinking-and-policy
BEAVER, Wilson (2025): China’s Defense Budget Is Bigger Than You Think. The Heritage Foundation, 2025. április 17. Online: https://www.heritage.org/china/commentary/chinas-defense-budget-bigger-you-think?utm_
BICKELL, Eleni G. et al. (2024): Federal Research and Development (R&D) Funding: FY2025. CRS Report. Online: https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48307?utm=
BLEVINS, Emily G. (2025): Federal Research Security Policies: Background and Issues for Congress. CRS Report. Online: https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48541
BODA Mihály (2022): A hibrid háború etikája: az igazságos hibrid háború elmélete. In M. SZABÓ Miklós (szerk.): A hadtudomány aktuális kérdései napjainkban I. Budapest: Ludovika, 95–108. Online: https://doi.org/10.36250/00973_06
BODA Mihály (2025): A multipoláris nemzetközi rendtől a poliarchikusig – a „hadszíntérháború”-tól a hibrid háborúig. Kézirat.
CHAN, Kyle et al. (2025): Full Stack: China's Evolving Industrial Policy for AI. RAND Expert Insights, 2025. június 26. Online: https://doi.org/10.7249/PEA4012-1
China Aerospace Studies Institute (CASI) (2025): In Their Own Words: 2025 China's National Security in the New Era. [H. n.]: China Aerospace Studies Institute. Online: https://bit.ly/46AGWk4
CLAPP, Sebastian (2022): Emerging Disruptive Technologies in Defence. European Parliamentary Research Service. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_ATA(2022)733647
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) (2022): DARPA Seeks Proposals to Forge the Future of U.S. Microelectronics Manufacturing. Online: https://www.darpa.mil/news/2022/future-microelectronics-manufacturing
DING, Jeffrey – XIAO, Jenny W. (2023): Recent Trends in China’s Large Language Model Landscape. Centre for the Governance of AI. Online: https://cdn.governance.ai/Trends_in_Chinas_LLMs.pdf
FANG, Tianyu – HWANG, Tim (2023): The Rise of Techno-Nationalism. Online: https://www.newamerica.org/oti/reports/the-rise-of-techno-nationalism/
FEAKIN, Tobias – SEGAL, Adam (2025): Brave New Techno-Nationalist World. Foreign Policy, 2025. június 4. Online: https://foreignpolicy.com/2025/06/04/trump-tech-policy-techno-nationalism/?utm_
FETTER, Steve – SANKARAN, Jaganath (2024): Emerging Technologies and Challenges to Nuclear Stability. Journal of Strategic Studies, 48(2), 252–296. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2024.2433766
GALLO, Marcy E. (2021): Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency: Overview and Issues for Congress. CRS Report. Online: https://sgp.fas.org/crs/natsec/R45088.pdf
GORECZKY Péter (2024): Nyitottnak maradni, de mennyire – erősödő techno-nacionalizmus a világban. Világgazdaság, 2024. július 29. Online: https://www.vg.hu/velemeny/2024/07/nyitottnak-maradni-de-mennyire-erosodo-techno-nacionalizmus-a-vilagban?utm=
HADDAD, Christian – VORLÍČEK, Dagmar – KLIMBURG-WITJES, Nina (2024): The Security-Innovation Nexus in (Geo-) Political Imagination. Geopolitics, 29(3), 741–764. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2024.2329940
HÁBER Péter (2022): A hibrid hadviselés elméletének tömör összefoglalása a hazai szakirodalom alapján. Felderítő Szemle, 21(4), 72–94. Online: https://hhk.uni-nke.hu/document/hhk-uni-nke-hu/2022_4_Felder%C3%ADt%C5%91%20Szemle.pdf
HOROWITZ, Michael C. – KAHN, Lauren (2021): DoD's 2021 China Military Power Report: How Advances in AI and Emerging Technologies Will Shape China’s Military. Council on Foreign Relations. Online: https://www.cfr.org/blog/dods-2021-china-military-power-report-how-advances-ai-and-emerging-technologies-will-shape
KANIA, Elsa B. (2019): Minds at War. China’s Pursuit of Military Advantage through Cognitive Science and Biotechnology. PRISM, 8(3), 82–101. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26864278.pdf?refreqid=fastly-default%3A246290d30dc0d9c005b36c4079a51dd5&ab_segments=&initiator=&acceptTC=1
KANIA, Elsa B. et al. (2021): How Should the U.S. Respond to China’s Military-Civil Fusion Strategy? ChinaFile, 2021. május 22. Online: https://www.chinafile.com/conversation/how-should-us-respond-chinas-military-civil-fusion-strategy
KISVÁRI Tamás (2024): Kína hosszú távú stratégiája. In GÖRBE Attiláné – ZÁN Krisztina (szerk.): Kína – A Középső Birodalom. Budapest: Katonai Nemzetbiztonsági Szolgálat, 204–225. Online: https://bit.ly/4uaMWdC
KRACH, Keith – CHIANG, Mung – ASHLEY FORD, Christopher (2020): Briefing on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation’s Intent To Invest $12 Billion in the U.S. and on the CCP’s Ability To Undermine U.S. Export Controls. Online: https://bit.ly/4bjlxOW
LEE, Ji-Young – HAN, Eugeniu – ZHU, Keren (2022): Decoupling from China: How U.S. Asian Allies Responded to the Huawei ban. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 76(5), 486–506. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2021.2016611
LEE, Lizzi C. (2024): China’s Big Fund 3.0: Xi’s Boldest Gamble Yet for Chip Supremacy. The diplomat, 2024. június 6. Online: https://thediplomat.com/2024/06/chinas-big-fund-3-0-xis-boldest-gamble-yet-for-chip-supremacy/
LIANG, Xiao et al. (2025): Trends in World Military Expenditure, 2024. SIPRI Publications, 1–12. Online: https://doi.org/10.55163/AVEC8366
MCFAUL, Cole – BRESNICK, Sam – CHOU, Daniel (2025): Pulling Back the Curtain on China’s Military-Civil Fusion. How the PLA Mobilizes Civilian AI for Strategic Advantage. CSET, 2025. szeptember. Online: https://cset.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/CSET-Pulling-Back-the-Curtain-on-Chinas-Military-Civil-Fusion.pdf
MOK, Charles (2023): The Party Rules: China’s New Central Science and Technology Commission. The Diplomat, 2023. augusztus 23. Online: https://thediplomat.com/2023/08/the-party-rules-chinas-new-central-science-and-technology-commission/
MOSLEY, Brian (2024): FY24 Budget Update. CRA News, 36(4). Online: https://bit.ly/40GNXwe
National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBS) (2025): China’s Expenditure on Research and Experimental Development (R&D) Exceeded 3.6 Trillion Yuan in 2024. Online: https://www.stats.gov.cn/english///PressRelease/202502/t20250207_1958579.html?utm
Nature (2020): Editorial: DARPA ‘Lookalikes’ Must Ground Their Dreams in Reality. Nature, 579, 173–174. Online: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00690-5
O’HANLON, Michael E. (2025): Achieving „Peace through Strength” in the 2020s. Brookings, 2025. február 21. Online: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/achieving-peace-through-strength-in-the-2020s/?utm
PANYUE, Huang szerk. (2022): Xi's Vision Leads to Success. Online: http://eng.mod.gov.cn/xb/News_213114/TopStories/4923634.html?utm
REDING, D. F. – EATON, J. (2020): Science & Technology Trends 2020–2040. Brussels: NATOScience & Technology Organization Office of the Chief Scientist NATOHeadquarters. Online: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1131124.pdf
REMEK Éva (2023): Változó biztonság, változó biztonságfelfogás. In: ZACHAR Péter Krisztián – BARNA Attila (szerk.): Titkos cikkek az örök békéhez. Ünnepi tanulmányok a 70 éves Fülöp Mihály tiszteletére. Budapest: Ludovika, 337–349. Online: https://doi.org/10.36250/01132_27
SARGENT, John F. – SHEA, Dana A. (2020): Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP): History and Overview. Online: https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R43935
SHERMAN, Justin (2019): Essay: Reframing the U.S.China AI „Arms Race”. Online: https://www.newamerica.org/cybersecurity-initiative/reports/essay-reframing-the-us-china-ai-arms-race/introduction
Silk Road Hungary (2025): Kína tudományos és technológiai fejlődése új lendületet ad az ipari innovációnak. 2025. július 28. Online: https://silkroadhungary.hu/2025/07/kina-tudomanyos-es-technologiai-fejlodese-uj-lenduletet-ad-az-ipari-innovacionak-2/
SOARE, Simona R. – POTHIER, Fabrice (2021): Leading Edge: Key Drivers of Defence Innovation and the Future of Operational Advantage. International Institute of Strategic Studies Research Papers. Online: https://www.iiss.org/globalassets/media-library---content--migration/files/research-papers/2021/11/defence-innovation_oct-2021_s10.pdf
SULLIVAN, Ian M. (2024): Three Dates, Three Windows, and All of DOTMLPF-P. Military Rewiew, 104(1), 14–25. Online: https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/English-Edition-Archives/January-February-2024/Sullivan/Journals/Military-Review/utm/
SZÖLLŐSI Annamária (2025): A reziliencia a biztonság kontextusában. Hadtudományi Szemle, 18(2), 161–177. Online: https://doi.org/10.32563/hsz.2025.2.10
The White House (2022): National Security Strategy. Online: https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Biden-Harris-Administrations-National-Security-Strategy-10.2022.pdf
The White House (2025a): President Trump is Leading with Peace Through Strength. Online: https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/2025/03/president-trump-is-leading-with-peace-through-strength/?utm
The White House (2025b): Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Restores the United States Department of War. Online: https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/09/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-restores-the-united-states-department-of-war/
The White House (2025c): President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Online: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/presidents-council-of-advisors-on-science-and-technology/
The White House [é. n.]: Office of Science and Technology Policy. Online: https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/?utm
TIAN, Nan et al. (2024): Trends in World Military Expenditure, 2023. SIPRI Fact Sheet, 2024. április. Online: https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2024-04/2404_fs_milex_2023.pdf
U.S. Department of Defense (2022): National Defense Strategy of the United States of America. Online: https://media.defense.gov/2022/Oct/27/2003103845/-1/-1/1/2022-NATIONAL-DEFENSE-STRATEGY-NPR-MDR.PDF
U.S. Department of Defense (2023): National Defense Industrial Strategy. Online: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-D-PURL-gpo234254/pdf/GOVPUB-D-PURL-gpo234254.pdf
U.S. Department of Defense (2024a): Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China. Online: https://media.defense.gov/2024/Dec/18/2003615520/-1/-1/0/MILITARY-AND-SECURITY-DEVELOPMENTS-INVOLVING-THE-PEOPLES-REPUBLIC-OF-CHINA-2024.PDF
U.S. Department of Defense (2024b): National Defense Industrial Strategy Implementation Plan for FY2025. Online: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-D-PURL-gpo234260/pdf/GOVPUB-D-PURL-gpo234260.pdf
U.S. Department of War (2023): Chief Digital & Artificial Intelligence Office Celebrates First Year. Online: https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3464012/chief-digital-artificial-intelligence-office-celebrates-first-year/
U.S. Department of War (2024): CDAO and DIU Launch New Effort Focused on Accelerating DOD Adoption of AI Capabilities. Online: https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3996199/cdao-and-diu-launch-new-effort-focused-on-accelerating-dod-adoption-of-ai-capab/
U.S. Department of War (2025a): Statement on the Development of the 2025 National Defense Strategy. Online: https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/4172735/statement-on-the-development-of-the-2025-national-defense-strategy/
U.S. Department of War (2025b): DIU’s Thunderforge Project to Integrate Commercial AI-Powered Decision-Making for Operational and Theater-Level Planning. Online: https://www.diu.mil/latest/dius-thunderforge-project-to-integrate-commercial-ai-powered-decision-making
U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) (2024): Hypersonic Weapons: DOD Could Reduce Cost and Schedule Risks by Following Leading Practices. Report to Congressional Committees. Online: https://www.gao.gov/assets/880/870416.pdf
VIGLIAROLO, Brandon (2022): Darpa Says US Hypersonic Missile Is Ready for Real World. The Register, 2022. április 6. Online: https://www.theregister.com/2022/04/06/darpa_hypersonic_missile/
VIGLIAROLO, Brandon (2025): It Begins: Pentagon to Give AI Agents a Role in Decision Making, Ops Planning. The Register, 2025. március 5. Online: https://www.theregister.com/2025/03/05/dod_taps_scale_to_bring/?utm
VUK, Pavel (2025): Editorial: Disruptive Technologies. Contemporary Military Challenges, 27(1), 13–18. Online: https://doi.org/10.2478/cmc-2025-0002
WONG LEUNG, Jennifer – ROBIN, Stephan – CAVE, Danielle (2024): ASPI’s Two-Decade Critical Technology Tracker: The Rewards of Long-term Research Investment. Barton ATC: ASPI. Online: https://bit.ly/4rPT6hE
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (2025): Global Innovation Index 2025: Innovation at a Crossroads. Genf: WIPO. Online: https://doi.org/10.34667/tind.58864
YAN, Ming (2023): How Techno-Nationalism Affects Technological Decoupling Between China and the U.S. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 10(3), 10–13. Online: https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v10i3.11782
ZHANG, Lin – LAN, Tu (2022): The New Whole State System: Reinventing the Chinese State to Promote Innovation. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 55(1), 201–221. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X221088294