The Relationship between Geopolitics and Civil Protection

doi: 10.32567/hm.2025.3.9

Abstract

The relationship between geopolitics and civil protection (civil defence) is determined by
the geography, strategic resources and international security environment of countries,
as well as by political will and strategic mentality. Geopolitical analyses have a profound
influence on national civil protection strategies, which have the fundamental objective
of protecting civilians, critical infrastructure, key national assets and strategic resources.
This includes preparing for natural and man-made disasters and coordinating military
protection measures and civil protection efforts to guarantee the security of the population
and the stability of the country in the event of geopolitical tensions and conflicts. Analysing
the geopolitical situation of states is key to understanding defence strategies, particularly
with regard to the potential threats and challenges that may befall the country.
Together, these factors shape and influence the definition of geostrategic objectives, how
countries prepare for potential threats, how they plan to defend against them, and how
they work with other nations to harmonise their geostrategic objectives to achieve common
security goals. Geopolitics and civil protection are thus linked in a complex multinational
and multidisciplinary approach at the local, regional or global level, which is essential to
maintain the prosperity and security of countries in a volatile security environment.

Keywords:

geopolitics civil protection hazards, threats

How to Cite

Somogyi, J. J., & Nagy, S. (2026). The Relationship between Geopolitics and Civil Protection. Military Engineer, 20(3), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.32567/hm.2025.3.9

References

ALLISON, Graham (2017): Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides's Trap? Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

BASSIN, Mark (1987): Imperialism and the Nation State in Friedrich Ratzel’s Political Geography. Progress in Human Geography, 11(4), 473–495. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/030913258701100401

BERNEK Ágnes [Rubicon Történelem] (2024): Az eurázsiai fogalom változásai. YouTube, 2024. január 12. Online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeYEorTQdCw

BLACK, Jeremy (2009): Geopolitics and the Quest for Dominance. [H. n.]: Indiana University Press.

DAVUTOĞLU, Ahmet (2014): Stratégiai mélység: Törökország nemzetközi helyzete. Budapest: Antall József Tudásközpont.

FRIEDMAN, Thomas L. (1990): From Beirut to Jerusalem. [H. n.]: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

FRIEDMAN, George (2009): The Next 100 Years: A Forecast for the 21st Century. New York: Doubleday.

GADDIS, John Lewis (2005): The Cold War: A New History. New York: The Penguin Press. Online: https://ia803100.us.archive.org/33/items/thecoldwaranewhistory/The%20Cold%20War%20%20a%20new%20history.pdf

HERWIG, Holger H. (1999): Geopolitik: Haushofer, Hitler and Lebensraum. The Journal of Strategic Studies, 22(2–3), 218–241. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402399908437762

HUNTINGTON, Samuel (1996): The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. Simon & Schuster.

IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSR Part 7. (2015). Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency. Online: https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/P_1708_web.pdf

KAPLAN, Robert D. (2012): The Revenge of Geography. New York: Random House. Online: https://archive.org/details/TheRevengeOfGeographyWhatTheMapTellsUsAboutComingConflictsAndTheBattleAgainstFate

KENNEDY, Paul (1987): The Rise And Fall of The Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000. New York: Random House. Online: https://cheirif.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/paul-kennedy-the-rise-and-fall-of-the-great-powers-19891.pdf

KISSINGER, Henry (1994): Diplomacy. [H. n.]: Simon & Schuster.

MACKINDER, Halford J. (1904): The Geographical Pivot of History. The Geographical Journal, 23(4), 421–437. Online: https://doi.org/10.2307/1775498

MAHAN, Alfred Thayer (1890): The Influence of Sea Power upon History 1660–1783. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.

MEARSHEIMER, John (2001): The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York – London: Norton.

NAGY Sándor (2019): A lakosságvédelmet érintő kockázatelemzés és kockázatkezelés fejlesztése. PhD-értekezés. Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem. Online: https://doi.org/10.17625/NKE.2019.030

NYE, Joseph S. (2004): Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. Public Affairs.

TOAL, Gerard (1996): Critical Geopolitics: The Politics of Writing Global Space. [H. n.]: University of Minnesota Press.

TSYGANKOV, Andrei P. (2013): Russia's Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity in National Identity. Rowman & Littlefield. Online: https://archive.org/details/russiasforeignpo0000tsyg_c5y0

WALTZ, Kenneth N. (1979): Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Online: https://dl1.cuni.cz/pluginfile.php/486328/mod_resource/content/0/Kenneth%20N.%20Waltz%20Theory%20of%20International%20Politics%20Addison-Wesley%20series%20in%20political%20science%20%20%20%201979.pdf

WENDT, Alexander (1999): Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Online: http://www.guillaumenicaise.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Wendt-Social-Theory-of-International-Politics.pdf