Assessment of Biometric Identification – Part II
Copyright (c) 2023 Bak Gerda, Kovács Tibor, Őszi Arnold
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Nowadays, biometric identification is becoming more and more common, as it is present in smartphones and is also used by many businesses that recognise its benefits. This study aims to assess the perceptions and opinions of users on biometric identification. The significance of the research lies in the fact that two studies with similar aims were conducted in 2006 and 2014, also at Óbuda University, which we tried to continue and further develop in the present research. The second part looks at respondents’ attitudes towards biometric identification and acceptance of the systems. Based on the results, it can be said that the users’ knowledge of biometric identification needs to be expanded, as many people still simply use these technologies without the corresponding knowledge and awareness.
Keywords:
How to Cite
References
Bhagavatula, Rasekhar – Ur, Blase – Iacovino, Kevin – Kywe, Su Mon – Cranor, Lorrie Faith – Savvides, Marios (2015): Biometric Authentication on Iphone and Android: Usability, Perceptions, and Influences on Adoption. In Proceedings 2015 Workshop on Usable Security, 8 February, San Diego, CA: NDSS. 1–10. Online:: https://doi.org/10.14722/usec.2015.23003
Buckley, Oliver – Nurse, Jason R. C. (2019): The Language of Biometrics: Analysing Public Perceptions. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 47, 112–119. Online:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2019.05.001
Chau, Angela – Stephens, Greg – Jamieson, Rodger (2004): Biometrics Acceptance – Perceptions of Use of Biometrics. ACIS 2004 Proceedings 28. Online: https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1147&context=acis2004
Dargan, Shaveta – Kumar, Munish (2020): A Comprehensive Survey on the Biometric Recognition Systems based on Physiological and Behavioral Modalities. Expert Systems with Applications, 143, 113114. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.113114
Datta, Priyanka – Bhardwaj, Shanu – Panda, S. N. – Tanwar, Sarvesh – Badotra, Sumit (2020): Survey of Security and Privacy Issues on Biometric System. In Handbook of Computer Networks and Cyber Security. Cham: Springer. 763–776. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22277-2_30
Deane, Frank – Barrelle, Kate – Henderson, Ron – Mahar, Doug (1995): Perceived acceptability of biometric security systems. Computers & Security, 14(3), 225–231. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4048(95)00005-S
Fialka, György – Kovács, Tibor (2016): The Vulnerability of Biometric Methods and Devices. Annals of Faculty Engineering Hunedoara – International Journal of Engineering, 14(3), 45–48.
Földesi Krisztina (2015a): A biometrikus azonosításhoz kapcsolódó averziók feltárására lefolytatott kutatás. Magyar Rendészet, 15(5), 21–35.
Földesi Krisztina (2015b): Paradigmaváltás a biztonságtechnikában – miért alkalmazzunk biometrikus rendszert? Magyar Rendészet, 15(3), 37–48.
Földesi Krisztina – Kovács Tibor (2021): Összehasonlító kutatáselemzés a biometrikus személyazonosító-beléptető rendszerek, eljárások 2006. és 2014. évi társadalmi averzív reakcióinak vizsgálatára. SecureInfo, 2021. december 10. Online: https://www.securinfo.hu/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/20150602_osszehasonlito_elemzes_a_biometrikus_szemelyazonosito_rendszerek.pdf
Furnell, Steven – Evangelatos, Konstantinos (2007): Public Awareness and Perceptions of Biometrics. Computer Fraud & Security, 2007(1), 8–13. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-3723(07)70006-4
IBM (2018): IBM Security: IBM Security: Future of Identity. 2021. december 10. Online: https://www.ibm.com/downloads/cas/PL9VJ9KV
Karatzouni, Sevasti – Furnell, Steven M. – Clarke, Nathan L. – Botha, Reinhardt A. (2007): Perceptions of User Authentication on Mobile Devices. Proceedings of the ISOneWorld Conference. 11–13.
Kovács Tibor (2010): Biometrikus azonosítás. PhD-értekezés. Budapest: Óbudai Egyetem.
Kovács Tibor – Milák István – Otti Csaba (2012): A biztonságtudomány biometriai aspektusai. In Gaál Gyula – Hautzinger Zoltán (szerk.): A biztonság rendészettudományi dimenziói: Változások és hatások. Pécs: Magyar Rendészettudományi Társaság, 485–496. Online: https://www.pecshor.hu/periodika/XIII/kovacsti.pdf
Krupp, Alina – Rathgeb, Christian – Busch, Christoph (2013): Social Acceptance of Biometric Technologies in Germany: A Survey. In 2013 International Conference of the BIOSIG Special Interest Group (BIOSIG). IEEE. 1–5.
Liu, Shanhong (2021): Biometric Technologies – Statistics & Facts. Statista, 2021. október 30. Online: https://www.statista.com/topics/4989/biometric-technologies/#dossierKeyfigures
Neal, Tempestt J. – Woodard, Damon L. (2016): Surveying Biometric Authentication for Mobile Device Security. Journal of Pattern Recognition Research, 11(1), 74–110. Online: https://doi.org/10.13176/11.764
Negri, Nathane Ana Rosa – Borille, Giovanna Miceli Ronzani – Falcão, Viviane Adriano (2019): Acceptance of Biometric Technology in Airport Check-in. Journal of Air Transport Management, 81, 101720. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2019.101720
Otti, Csaba – Valociková, Cyntia (2019): A biztonsági rendszerek felhasználói attitűdje, értékelése és felhasználásának lehetőségei. Hadmérnök, 14(1), 32–41. Online: https://doi.org/10.32567/hm.2019.1.3
Őszi Arnold (2019): A biometrikus azonosítás helye és szerepe az e-kereskedelemben. PhD-értekezés. Budapest: Óbudai Egyetem.
Pai, Chen-Kuo – Wang, Te-Wei – Chen, Shun-Hsing – Cai, Kun-You (2018): Empirical Study on Chinese Tourists’ Perceived Trust and Intention to Use Biometric Technology. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 23(9), 880–895. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2018.1499544
Rui, Zhang – Yan, Zheng (2019): A Survey on Biometric Authentication: Toward Secure and Privacy-Preserving Identification. IEEE Access, 7, 5994–6009. Online: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2889996
Sabhanayagam, T. – Prasanna Venkatesan, V. – Senthamaraikannan, K. (2018): A Comprehensive Survey on Various Biometric Systems. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 13(5), 2276–2297.
Semnani-Azad, Zhaleh – Chien, Shih-Yi – Forster, Yannick – Schuckers, Stephanie – Gan, Houchao: Development of Trust Measure in Biometric Technology. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. HICSS, 2019. 5797–5804. Online: https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2019.699
Suplicz Sándor – Fűzi Beatrix – Horváth Sándor (2006): Írisz felismerésen alapuló beléptető rendszer által keltett attitűdök és averzív reakciók vizsgálata. In 6. Nemzetközi Mechatronikai és Biztonságtechnikai Szimpózium. Budapest: Budapesti Műszaki Főiskola.
Szűcs, Kata Rebeka – Őszi, Arnold – Kovács, Tibor (2020): Mobile Biometrics and their Risks. Hadmérnök, 15(4), 15–28. Online: https://doi.org/10.32567/hm.2020.4.2
Tick Andrea (2018): Az IT biztonságtudatosság szerepe az e-learning hallgatói használati hajlandóságának TAM modelljében magyar oktatási környezetben – A strukturális egyenlet modellezés. Hadmérnök, 13(3), 453–470. Online: https://folyoirat.ludovika.hu/index.php/hadmernok/article/view/3912
Zimmermann, Verena – Gerber, Nina (2017): “If It Wasn’t Secure, They Would Not Use It in the Movies” – Security Perceptions and User Acceptance of Authentication Technologies. In Human Aspects of Information Security, Privacy and Trust. HAS 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer. 265–283. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58460-7_18