Are Traditional IT System Interoperability Solutions Sufficient and Efficient? Thoughts on Novel Solutions

  • Munk Sándor
doi: 10.32567/hm.2022.1.11


In our globalised world the interoperability of organisational IT systems has become an indispensable  condition for the cooperation of organisations, so IT  interoperability is now a priority demand of all application.  In practice, we can essentially only find solutions based on  standardised intermediary representations, but these have a number of limitations, the analysis of which is not covered in the literature. Novel interoperability solutions have also  emerged in connection with the development of  information technology, but little is said about the general  requirements for innovative solutions. This publication  seeks to contribute to these tasks. 


IT interoperability limitations of traditional solutions interoperability infrastructure interoperability services

Hogyan kell idézni

Munk, S. (2022). Are Traditional IT System Interoperability Solutions Sufficient and Efficient? Thoughts on Novel Solutions. Hadmérnök, 17(1), 171–191.


AAP-06, NATO Glossary of Terms and Definitions. Brussels: NATO Standardization Office, 2020.

APP-6 NATO Joint Military Symbology. Edition D Version 1. Brussels: NATO Standardization Office, 2017.

Bicer, Veli, Gokse B Laleci, Asuman Dogac and Yildiray Kabak, ‘Artemis Message Exchange Framework: Semantic Interoperability of Exchanged Messages in the Healthcare Domain’. ACM SIGMOD Record 34, no 3 (2005), 71–76. Online:

Boniface, Mike and Paul Wilken, ‘ARTEMIS: Towards a Secure Interoperability Infrastructure for Healthcare Information Systems’. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 112 (2005), 181–189.

Chituc, Claudia-Melania, ‘Interoperability Frameworks for Networked Information Systems: A Comparative Analysis and Discussion’. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 28, no 1 (2019). Online:

C-M(2005)0016 NATO Policy for Interoperability. North Atlantic Council, 2005.

COM(2010) 744, Towards interoperability for European public services. Brussels: European Commission, 2010.

COM(2017) 134, European Interoperability Framework – Implementation Strategy. Brussels: European Parliament, Council, Economic and Social Committee, Committee of Regions, 2017.

Decision (EU) 2015/2240 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

Della Valle, Emanuele, Dario Cerizza, Irene Celino, Jacky Estublier, Germán Vega, Mick Kerrigan, Jaime Ramirez, Boris M Villazon, Pascal Guarrera, Gang Zhao and Gabriella Monteleone, ‘SEEMP: An Interoperability Infrastructure for e-Government Services in the Employment Sector’, in The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, 4th European Semantic Web Conference, ESWC 2007, ed. by Enrico Franconi, Michael Kifer and Wolfgang May. Berlin–Heidelberg: Springer, 2007, 220–234. Online:

Duan, Yucong, Guohua Fu, Nianjun Zhou, Xiaobing Sun, Nanjagund C Narendra and Bo Hu, ‘Everything as a Service (XaaS) on the Cloud: Origins, Current and Future Trends’. 2015 IEEE 8th International Conference on Cloud Computing, 2015, 621–628. Online:

e-Government Interoperability Framework Version 6.1. Cabinet Office UK, 2005.

European Interoperability Framework – Implementation Strategy. Brussels: European Commission, 2017, 4–5.

Evaluation Study supporting the interim evaluation of the programme on interoperability solutions for European public administrations, businesses and citizens (ISA²). Final Report. European Commission, Directorate General for Informatics, 2019.

Fraga, Alvaro Luis, Marcella Vegetti and Horacio Pascual Leone, ‘Ontology-based solutions for interoperability among product lifecycle management systems: A systematic literature review’. Journal of Industrial Information Integration 20 (2020). Online:

ISO 13606 Health informatics – Electronic health record communication. ISO, 2019.

ISO/IEC 2382, Information Technology – Vocabulary. ISO/IEC, 2015.

ISO/IEC 17788 Information technology – Cloud computing – Overview and vocabulary. ISO/IEC, 2014.

Johannesson, Paul and M Hasan Jamil, ‘Semantic Interoperability Context, Issues, and Research Directions’. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems, Toronto, 1994, 180–191.

Kostoska, Magdalena, Marjan Gusev and Sasko Ristov, ‘An Overview of Cloud Interoperability’. Proceedings of the Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems 8 (2016), 873–876. Online:

Li, Man-Sze, D6.2.1a – Integrated EI Value Proposition – M24 issue. COIN Consortium, 2010.

Li, Man-Sze, Ricardo Cabral, Guy Doumeingts and Keith Popplewell (eds), Enterprise Interoperability. Research Roadmap. Final Version (Version 4.0). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2006.

Liu, Leo, Weizi Li, Naif R Aljohani, Miltiadis D Lytras, Saeed-Ul Hassan and Raheel Nawaz, ‘A framework to evaluate the interoperability of information systems – Measuring the maturity of the business process alignment’. International Journal of Information Management 54 (2020). Online:

MIL-STD-2525D Department of Defense Interface Standard Joint Military Symbology. Defense Information Systems Agency, 2014.

Munk, Sándor, ‘An Analysis of Basic Interoperability Related Terms, System of Interoperability Types’. AARMS 1, no 1 (2002), 117–132.

Munk, Sándor, Katonai informatikai rendszerek interoperabilitásának aktuális hadtudományi kérdései, MTA doktori értekezés. Budapest: Magyar Tudományos Akadémia, 2007.

Munk, Sándor, ‘Interoperability Services Supporting Information Exchange Between Cybersecurity Organisations’. AARMS 17, no 3 (2018), 131–148. Online:

Müller, Florian and Ken Baclawski (eds), Content Management Interoperability Services (CMIS) Version 1.1 Plus Errata 01. OASIS, 2015.

Sharma, Sugam, ‘Evolution of as-a-Service Era in Cloud’. ArXiv, abs/1507.00939 (2015). The SEEMP project. Single European Employment Market-Place. An e-government case study. OASIS.

Webster’s Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language