Full Issue
Foreword
Study
The Dilemmas of EU Competitiveness Foreign Direct Investment and Foreign Trade
Despite the prevalence of discourse surrounding the concept of competitiveness, recent reports on the European Single Market and competitiveness frequently neglect to underscore the pivotal role of foreign direct investment (FDI) and foreign trade. The present study aspires to address this gap by undertaking a comprehensive analysis of FDI and foreign trade trends within the European Union (EU) from 2005 to 2023. This analysis will be conducted by comparing these trends with those observed in the United States and China, in addition to examining the EU’s internal economic dynamics. The statistical analysis reveals a multifaceted relationship between FDI, foreign trade, and the EU’s competitiveness. Significant variations in the EU’s FDI structure are identified: inward and outward investments exhibit different growth rates, and certain member states function as intermediaries, which can result in resource allocation challenges. In the context of foreign trade, the EU confronts mounting competition from China, persistent internal trade imbalances, and a continued reliance on substantial foreign value-added content. While the EU performs well in service exports and medium-tech manufacturing, it lags behind in high-tech and primary product exports. The study concludes that the development of a comprehensive competitiveness strategy is essential to address these challenges and enhance economic resilience.
" ["hu_HU"]=> string(1529) "Bár a versenyképesség széles körben tárgyalt fogalom, az európai egységes piacról és a versenyképességről szóló legújabb jelentések gyakran nem hangsúlyozzák eléggé a külföldi közvetlentőke-befektetés (FDI) és a külkereskedelem meghatározó szerepét. Ez a tanulmány ezt a hiányosságot igyekszik pótolni az EU 2005 és 2023 közötti FDI- és külkereskedelmi trendjeinek elemzésével, az Egyesült Államokkal és Kínával való összehasonlításával, valamint az EU belső gazdasági dinamikájának vizsgálatával. A statisztikai elemzés rávilágít az FDI, a külkereskedelem és az EU versenyképessége közötti összetett kapcsolatra. Jelentős különbségeket tár fel az EU FDI-struktúrájában: a befelé és kifelé irányuló befektetések eltérő mértékben alakulnak, egyes tagállamok pedig közvetítő szerepet töltenek be, ami problémákhoz vezethet. A külkereskedelem terén az EU-nak szembe kell néznie a Kína által támasztott egyre erősebb versennyel, a belső kereskedelmi egyensúlytalanságokkal és a tartósan magas külföldi hozzáadott értéktől való függőséggel. Noha az EU jól teljesít a szolgáltatás- és a közepes technológiai színvonalú export terén, a csúcstechnológiai és elsődleges termékek exportjának tekintetében lemaradásban van. A tanulmány szerint elengedhetetlen egy átfogó versenyképességi stratégia kialakítása e kihívások kezelésére és a gazdasági ellenálló képesség növelésére.
" } ["subtitle"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(43) "Foreign Direct Investment and Foreign Trade" ["hu_HU"]=> string(59) "Külföldi közvetlentőke-befektetés és külkereskedelem" } ["title"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(34) "The Dilemmas of EU Competitiveness" ["hu_HU"]=> string(46) "Az Európai Unió versenyképességi dilemmái" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["hu_HU"]=> string(52) "Csontos Tamás Tibor, Éltető Andrea, Sass Magdolna" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "hu_HU" ["authors"]=> array(3) { [0]=> object(Author)#751 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(10311) ["email"]=> string(23) "csontostomi96@gmail.com" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(8111) ["seq"]=> int(1) ["userGroupId"]=> int(201) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5366-8309" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(40) "HUN-REN, KRTK, Világgazdasági Intézet" } ["biography"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(7) "Csontos" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(12) "Tamás Tibor" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "hu_HU" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } [1]=> object(Author)#755 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(10322) ["email"]=> string(29) "elteto.andrea@krtk.hun-ren.hu" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(false) ["publicationId"]=> int(8111) ["seq"]=> int(1) ["userGroupId"]=> int(201) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2793-2281" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(40) "HUN-REN, KRTK, Világgazdasági Intézet" } ["biography"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(8) "Éltető" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(6) "Andrea" ["hu_HU"]=> string(6) "Andrea" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "hu_HU" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } [2]=> object(Author)#749 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(10323) ["email"]=> string(29) "sass.magdolna@krtk.hun-ren.hu" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(false) ["publicationId"]=> int(8111) ["seq"]=> int(1) ["userGroupId"]=> int(201) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6819-6041" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(40) "HUN-REN, KRTK, Világgazdasági Intézet" } ["biography"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(4) "Sass" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(8) "Magdolna" ["hu_HU"]=> string(8) "Magdolna" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "hu_HU" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(2) { ["hu_HU"]=> array(5) { [0]=> string(14) "Európai Unió" [1]=> string(17) "versenyképesség" [2]=> string(39) "külföldi közvetlen beruházás (FDI)" [3]=> string(16) "külkereskedelem" [4]=> string(28) "belső egyensúlytalanságok" } ["en_US"]=> array(5) { [0]=> string(14) "European Union" [1]=> string(15) "competitiveness" [2]=> string(31) "foreign direct investment (FDI)" [3]=> string(13) "foreign trade" [4]=> string(19) "internal imbalances" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#753 (7) { ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(42818) ["id"]=> int(6578) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "hu_HU" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(8111) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }Strategic Narrative Divergence The Evolving Narratives of the EU and China on Global Security amid the Ukraine War
This article examines how the Russia–Ukraine conflict has influenced the strategic narratives of the European Union and China, transforming their discursive approaches to global security and international order. Drawing on constructivist theoretical framework, the study analyses official statements, policy documents, and diplomatic communications from 2022 through 2024 to demonstrate how both actors have recalibrated their narratives in response to the changing geopolitical landscape. The findings reveal that while the EU has shifted towards a more securitised narrative framework, emphasising territorial integrity and collective defence, China has maintained strategic ambiguity while promoting alternative governance paradigms. The analysis identifies three key developments: the intensification of narrative divergence between the EU and China, structural changes in their diplomatic alignments, and the emergence of competing visions for global governance. These evolving narratives have significant implications for international relations, suggesting an acceleration of bloc politics, technological decoupling, and competing economic frameworks. The study also highlights a fundamental tension between the EU’s traditional self-conception as a normative power and contemporary geopolitical realities, particularly as it adapts to new security imperatives while maintaining its commitment to democratic principles. These findings contribute to our understanding of how strategic narratives not only reflect but actively constitute international relations and influence the evolution of global order in an increasingly multipolar world.
" } ["subtitle"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(83) "The Evolving Narratives of the EU and China on Global Security amid the Ukraine War" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(30) "Strategic Narrative Divergence" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["hu_HU"]=> string(17) "Lóránt Szabolcs" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(Author)#752 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(10029) ["email"]=> string(31) "lorant.szabolcs@stud.uni-nke.hu" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7924) ["seq"]=> int(2) ["userGroupId"]=> int(201) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1707-0544" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(32) "a:1:{s:5:"hu_HU";s:7:"NKE-HDI";}" } ["biography"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(8) "Lóránt" ["hu_HU"]=> string(8) "Lóránt" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(8) "Szabolcs" ["hu_HU"]=> string(8) "Szabolcs" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(2) { ["hu_HU"]=> array(6) { [0]=> string(14) "Európai Unió" [1]=> string(5) "Kína" [2]=> string(24) "stratégiai narratívák" [3]=> string(21) "orosz-ukrán háború" [4]=> string(16) "nemzetközi rend" [5]=> string(18) "biztonságpolitika" } ["en_US"]=> array(6) { [0]=> string(14) "European Union" [1]=> string(5) "China" [2]=> string(20) "strategic narratives" [3]=> string(23) "Russia-Ukraine conflict" [4]=> string(19) "international order" [5]=> string(15) "security policy" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#763 (7) { ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(42819) ["id"]=> int(6579) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(7924) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }Freedom of Movement for Rainbow Families The Question of Cross-Border Recognition
This study explores how European Union law currently guarantees the right of same-sex married couples to freedom of movement and residence, what additional rights may be derived from this fundamental freedom, and what types of legal and political measures are necessary to ensure that rainbow families enjoy the right to free movement in cross-border situations within the EU.
Under EU law, Member States are now required to recognise the parenthood established in another Member State, particularly when it concerns the exercise of rights deriving from Union citizenship – such as the right to enter and reside in another Member State, the right to equal treatment, and the right to obtain travel documents for a child. However, EU law does not impose an obligation to recognise parenthood established in another Member State for the purposes of rights deriving from national law, such as inheritance, maintenance or parental responsibility.
It is assumed that EU law on the free movement of persons – as a non-discriminatory fundamental right – places an obligation on Member States to recognise same-sex marriages concluded in other Member States. This recognition ensures the cross-border portability of such marriages as a civil status throughout the EU. Furthermore, the refusal to recognise a same-sex marriage concluded abroad may be interpreted as an obstacle to the free movement of Union citizens. Such a restriction on a fundamental freedom is difficult to justify on grounds of public policy, public interest and/or national identity.
The method used to confirm or invalidate the hypothesis is through the analysis of the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). Particular significance is attributed to two CJEU cases addressing the freedom of movement for rainbow families: the Coman and Pancharevo judgments.
" ["hu_HU"]=> string(2195) "Jelen tanulmány vizsgálja, hogy az uniós jog jelenleg hogyan biztosítja az azonos nemű házaspárok szabad mozgáshoz és tartózkodáshoz való jogát, hogy milyen további jogok származtathatók ebből az alapvető szabadságból, és milyen típusú jogi és politikai lépésekre van szükség, ami biztosíthatja a határokon átnyúló esetekben a szivárványcsaládok szabad mozgáshoz való jogát az Európai Unióban.
A tagállamoknak az uniós jog értelmében ma már kötelezően el kell ismerniük a más tagállamban megállapított szülői jogállást, különösen a szabad mozgáshoz való uniós jogból eredő jogok – mint egy másik tagállamba való beutazáshoz és tartózkodáshoz való jog, az egyenlő bánásmódhoz való jog és a gyermek úti okmányainak beszerzéséhez való jog – alkalmazása esetén. Az uniós jog ugyanakkor nem írja elő a más tagállamban megállapított szülői jogállás elismerését a gyermek nemzeti jogából eredő jogai, például az öröklési, tartási vagy felügyeleti jogok szempontjából.
Feltételezhető, hogy a szabad mozgásról szóló uniós jog (mint megkülönböztetésmentes alapvető jog) kötelezettséget ró a tagállamokra az azonos nemű párok egy másik tagállamban kötött házasságának elismerésére vonatkozóan, ezáltal biztosítható az azonos nemű párok házasságának határokon átnyúló elismerése – mint családi állapot – az Európai Unióban. Továbbá, hogy az azonos nemű pár külföldön kötött házasságának el nem ismerését az uniós polgárok szabad mozgásának akadályaként is lehet értelmezni, illetve ezen alapvető szabadság korlátozása nehezen igazolható a közrendre, a közérdekre és/vagy nemzeti identitásra hivatkozással.
A hipotézis megerősítésére vagy érvénytelenítésére használt módszer az Európai Unió Bírósága (EUB) és az Emberi Jogok Európai Bírósága (EJEB) joggyakorlatának elemzésén keresztül történik. Az ügyek között különös jelentőség tulajdonítható a szivárványcsaládok mozgásszabadságát érintő két EUB-ügynek, a Coman- és a Pancharevo-ügynek.
The Limits of the Protection of the Rule of Law in Preliminary Reference Procedures
The principle of effective judicial protection has evolved from a general principle of EU law into a principle of constitutional nature linked to the rule of law. The preliminary ruling procedure of the EU has played an essential role in this development, as the ECJ has adapted for the purpose of the protection of judicial independence, the rules on assessing its jurisdiction, and the admissibility of preliminary questions. The ECJ has adopted a broad meaning to the EU law relevance of the case required for the jurisdiction of the ECJ, while restricting its jurisdiction for the enforcement of effective judicial protection as a constitutional principle. Uncertainties regarding the admissibility of the preliminary questions indicate the limited nature of preliminary ruling procedure in overtaking the role of protecting EU values, as well as the challenges that direct effect of general principles can pose in practice.
" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(83) "The Limits of the Protection of the Rule of Law in Preliminary Reference Procedures" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["hu_HU"]=> string(14) "Horváth Dóra" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(Author)#772 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(11) { ["id"]=> int(10304) ["email"]=> string(24) "dori.horvath14@gmail.com" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(8106) ["seq"]=> int(4) ["userGroupId"]=> int(201) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(83) "a:1:{s:5:"hu_HU";s:57:"Közigazgatás-tudományi Doktori Iskola NKE / ÁNTK KTDI";}" ["hu_HU"]=> string(83) "a:1:{s:5:"hu_HU";s:57:"Közigazgatás-tudományi Doktori Iskola NKE / ÁNTK KTDI";}" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(8) "Horváth" ["hu_HU"]=> string(8) "Horváth" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(5) "Dóra" ["hu_HU"]=> string(5) "Dóra" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(11) { [0]=> string(15) "judicial system" [1]=> string(26) "principle of effectiveness" [2]=> string(11) "rule of law" [3]=> string(28) "preliminary ruling procedure" [4]=> string(21) "preliminary reference" [5]=> string(25) "European Court of Justice" [6]=> string(12) "jurisdiction" [7]=> string(21) "judicial independence" [8]=> string(23) "direct effect of EU law" [9]=> string(29) "fundamental rights protection" [10]=> string(51) "Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#767 (7) { ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(42821) ["id"]=> int(6581) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(8106) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }Central Asian Perceptions of the EU Insights from ATLAS.ti Analysis of Mass Media in Kazakhstan and Tajikistan
The research explores the perception of the EU in Central Asian mass media, specifically focusing on Kazakhstan and Tajikistan comparatively. Four news agencies, two from each country, were selected, and news articles related to the EU published between 2019 and 2023 were collected. The guiding question for this study is: How is the EU portrayed in mass media in Kazakhstan and Tajikistan? To answer this question, a mixed-method approach was employed, and collected data were analysed using ATLAS.ti, a computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software. The main finding from this analysis is that in Kazakhstan, the EU is predominantly portrayed as an economic powerhouse, highlighting its significant contributions to economic development through initiatives, partnerships, and investments. Tajikistan’s media emphasises the EU’s role as a security partner and humanitarian supporter, particularly addressing regional challenges originating from Afghanistan. These findings demonstrate that Central Asian mass media primarily regard the EU as an economic power, with limited recognition of its role in security sector reform and trade norms, and its normative power is barely visible in the region.
" } ["subtitle"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(74) "Insights from ATLAS.ti Analysis of Mass Media in Kazakhstan and Tajikistan" } ["title"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> string(35) "Central Asian Perceptions of the EU" } ["copyrightHolder"]=> array(1) { ["hu_HU"]=> string(17) "Nosirkhon Qodirov" } ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["authors"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(Author)#773 (6) { ["_data"]=> array(15) { ["id"]=> int(9509) ["email"]=> string(26) "qodirovnosirkhon@gmail.com" ["includeInBrowse"]=> bool(true) ["publicationId"]=> int(7584) ["seq"]=> int(5) ["userGroupId"]=> int(201) ["country"]=> string(2) "HU" ["orcid"]=> string(37) "https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9462-4454" ["url"]=> string(0) "" ["affiliation"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(46) "a:1:{s:5:"hu_HU";s:20:"University of Szeged";}" ["hu_HU"]=> string(46) "a:1:{s:5:"hu_HU";s:20:"University of Szeged";}" } ["biography"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["familyName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(9) "Nosirkhon" ["hu_HU"]=> string(9) "Nosirkhon" } ["givenName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(7) "Qodirov" ["hu_HU"]=> string(7) "Qodirov" } ["preferredPublicName"]=> array(2) { ["en_US"]=> string(0) "" ["hu_HU"]=> string(0) "" } ["submissionLocale"]=> string(5) "en_US" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) } } ["keywords"]=> array(1) { ["en_US"]=> array(5) { [0]=> string(2) "EU" [1]=> string(12) "Central Asia" [2]=> string(10) "Perception" [3]=> string(20) "economic cooperation" [4]=> string(16) "security partner" } } ["subjects"]=> array(0) { } ["disciplines"]=> array(0) { } ["languages"]=> array(0) { } ["supportingAgencies"]=> array(0) { } ["galleys"]=> array(1) { [0]=> object(ArticleGalley)#774 (7) { ["_data"]=> array(9) { ["submissionFileId"]=> int(42822) ["id"]=> int(6582) ["isApproved"]=> bool(false) ["locale"]=> string(5) "en_US" ["label"]=> string(3) "PDF" ["publicationId"]=> int(7584) ["seq"]=> int(0) ["urlPath"]=> string(0) "" ["urlRemote"]=> string(0) "" } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(true) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_submissionFile"]=> NULL } } } ["_hasLoadableAdapters"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataExtractionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_extractionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) ["_metadataInjectionAdapters"]=> array(0) { } ["_injectionAdaptersLoaded"]=> bool(false) }