Hierarchy of Human Rights in the Russian Constitution
Does a hierarchy exist?
Copyright (c) 2026 Valeriya Sitnikova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Absztrakt
Human rights are among modern governance’s most powerful and universally accepted principles, designed to uphold individual dignity, liberty, and equality. Around the world, constitutions serve as the ultimate legal guarantees of these rights, ensuring that governments respect and protect the fundamental rights of their citizens. However, while human rights are universal, their interpretation and priority can vary significantly across countries. At the heart of these differences is a key question: does the Constitution prioritise certain rights over others, establishing a hierarchy that affects how those rights are implemented, balanced, and sometimes limited?
The question of hierarchical rights in constitutional law is not simply a matter of legal theory; it has profound implications for justice and governance. A constitution’s approach to prioritising rights can shape how courts resolve conflicts, influence how laws are applied, and impact citizens’ daily lives. In countries with an explicit hierarchy, certain rights are considered sacrosanct, serving as fundamental principles that must be respected by all other rights. In other countries, rights are treated as fundamentally equal, with any conflicts resolved on a case-by-case basis based on context and judicial discretion.
This article aims to examine the Russian Federation’s Constitution, how it is structured, and answer the question: is there a hierarchy of human rights in the Russian Constitution?
Knowing whether or not there is a hierarchy of human rights in the Russian Constitution is essential to understanding how Russia balances individual freedoms with state power. The hierarchy clarifies which rights the Constitution protects most vigorously, guiding judicial decisions, informing legal predictability, and revealing the values that shape Russian governance. For citizens, activists, and lawyers, this understanding helps navigate the legal system because it highlights rights that may receive greater protection versus those that may be curtailed in favour of collective interests. Furthermore, understanding this hierarchy provides a lens through which Russia’s approach can be compared with other legal systems and places the country’s human rights system in a global context.
Kulcsszavak:
Hivatkozások
ALEXANDROVA, M. A. (2010): «История Конституции Российской Федерации» (History of the Constitution of the Russian Federation). Государственная власть и местное самоуправление (State Power and Local Self-Government), № 11. (in Russian).
ALEXY, R. (2002): «Теория конституционных прав» (A Theory of Constitutional Rights). Oxford: Oxford University Press. (in English).
AFANASIEV, V. (1982): «Звезда свободы. История альманаха А. Бестужева и К. Рылеева, 1823–1825» (Star of Freedom. History of the Almanac by A. Bestuzhev and K. Ryleev, 1823–1825). Москва: Советская Россия (Moscow: Soviet Russia). (in Russian).
AVAKYAN, S. A. (2000): Конституция России: природа, эволюция, современность (The Constitution of Russia: Nature, Evolution, Modernity). Москва: Российское юридическое издательство (РЮИД). (in Russian).
BARKOVA, O. N. (2012): “История развития и принятия Конституции РСФСР 1925 г.” (History of the Development and Adoption of the 1925 RSFSR Constitution), История государства и права (History of State and Law), № 4, pp. 132–135 (in Russian).
BAIBAKOV, S. A. (2012): Modern Views on the Development of the Draft of the Third Constitution of the USSR (1977): On New Archival Materials. Bulletin of Moscow University, Series 8, History, (5), 128–149.
BÖCKENFÖRDE, E. W. (1991): State, Society and Liberty: Studies in Political Theory and Constitutional Law. New York / Oxford: Berg / St. Martin’s Press.
BOGDANOVICH, Modest I. (1869): History of the Reign of Emperor Alexander I and Russia in His Time. St. Petersburg: F. S. Sushchinskiy.
BOWRING, Bill (2013): Law, Rights, and Ideology in Russia. Landmarks in the Destiny of a Great Power. London: Routledge.
BYCHKOV, A. I. (2012): “Историко-правовая характеристика Конституции СССР 1936 г.” (Historical and Legal Characteristics of the 1936 USSR Constitution), История государства и права (History of State and Law), № 8, pp. 17–19 (in Russian).Council of Europe (2022): Russia Ceases to be a Party to the European Convention on Human Rights on 16 September 2022. 23 March 2022. Online: https://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/-/russia-ceases-to-be-a-party-to-the-european-convention-of-human-rights-on-16-september-2022
DWORKIN, Ronald (1986): Law’s Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
European Court of Human Rights (2021): Analysis of Statistics 2021. Strasbourg: Council of Europe European Court of Human Rights.
European Court of Human Rights (2022): Annual Report 2021. Strasbourg: Council of Europe European Court of Human Rights.
HALMETOV, A. I. (2012): «Конституция России: альтернативные проекты и современное развитие» (Constitution of Russia: Alternative Projects and Modern Development). Право и государство: теория и практика (Law and State: Theory and Practice), № 3, 60–64. (in Russian).
HOFFMANN, Stefan-Ludwig (2011): Human Rights in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
HOGG, Peter W. (2012): Constitutional Law of Canada. Toronto: Carswell.
KOMMERS, Donald P. – MILLER, Russell A. (2012): The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany. Durham: Duke University Press.
LANGFORD, Malcolm – COUSINS, Ben – DUGARD, Jackie – MADLINGOZI, Tshepo eds. (2013): Socio-Economic Rights in South Africa: Symbols or Substance? New York: Cambridge University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139108591
LESIN, A. V. (2009): «Этапы и закономерности развития конституционного законодательства СССР, РСФСР и союзных республик в советский период» (Stages and Regularities of Development of the Constitutional Legislation of the USSR, RSFSR, and Union Republics in the Soviet Period). Право и политика (Pravo i Politika), № 2. (in Russian).
MAROCHKIN, Sergei Yu (2011): International Law in the Courts of the Russian Federation. Chinese Journal of International Law, Volume 6, Issue 2, JULY 2007, Pages 329–344.
MARINO, I. (2008): «Конституционная комиссия Съезда народных депутатов РСФСР: некоторые закономерности из истории Конституции Российской Федерации» (Constitutional Commission of the Congress of People’s Deputies of the RSFSR: Some Regularities from the History of the Constitution of the Russian Federation). Вестник Пермского университета (Vestnik of Perm University), 22(6). (in Russian).
MEHTA, Pratap Bhanu (2014): The Indian Supreme Court and the Articulation of Constitutional Rights. In DIXON, Rosalind – GINSBURG, Tom (eds.): Comparative Constitutional Law in Asia. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 233–251.
MIRONENKO, S. V. (2017): Alexander I and the Decembrists: Russia in the First Quarter of the 19th Century. Choosing the Path. Moscow: Kuchkovo Pole.
PIHOYA, R. G. (2003): «История государственного управления в России (X–XXI вв.)» (History of State Administration in Russia (10th–21st Centuries)). Москва: Российская академия государственной службы при Президенте РФ (Изд во РАГС). (in Russian).
ROSENFELD, Michel – SAJÓ, András eds. (2012): The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
RUMYANTSEV, O. G. (2008): «Реализация Конституции: от идей к практике развития конституционного строя» (Implementation of the Constitution: From Ideas to the Practice of Development of the Constitutional Order). Москва: (Moscow). (in Russian).
RYAN, Alan (2020): On Politics. A History of Political Thought from Herodotus to the Present. New York: Norton.
SADURSKI, Wojciech (2014): Rights Before Courts: A Study of Constitutional Courts in Postcommunist States of Central and Eastern Europe. Dordrecht: Springer.
SAVELIEV, Denis (2021): «Аналогичная правовая позиция» Отсылки к другим делам
в текстах судебных актов арбитражных судов [Similar Legal Position. References to Other Cases in the Texts of Arbitration Court Judicial Acts]. Санкт-Петербурге: Институт проблем правоприменения при Европейском университете. Online: https://enforce.spb.ru/images/analit_zapiski/saveliev_links_to_cases.pdf
SHAPIRO, Martin – STONE SWEET, Alec (2002): On Law, Politics, and Judicialization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
SHERSHNEVA, E. A. (2008): «Проблема закрепления формы государственного единства в Конституции СССР 1936 г.» (Problem of Fixing the Form of State Unity in the Constitution USSR of 1936). Право и закон (Law and Law), № 9. (in Russian).
TUMANOV, D. Y. (2012): «Система прав и свобод по Конституции РСФСР 1918 г.» (The System of Rights and Freedoms under the Constitution of the RSFSR of 1918). Вестник Саратовской государственной академии права (Vestnik of Saratov State Academy of Law), 83(1). (in Russian).
VAN DIJK, Pieter – VAN HOOF, Fried – VAN RIJN, Arjen – ZWAAK, Leo (2018): Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights. Cambridge: Intersentia.
Legal sources
Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany (1949): Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Berlin: Federal Ministry of Justice.
Council of Europe (1950): European Convention on Human Rights. Rome: Council of Europe.
Constitution (Fundamental Law) of the Russian Federation 1978.
Constitution (Fundamental Law) of the Russian Federation (1992): Adopted at the Extraordinary Seventh Session of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR of the Ninth Convocation on April 12, 1978, with Amendments and Additions. Moscow: Supreme Soviet of the Russian Federation.
Constitution of South Africa (1996): The Bill of Rights, Chapter 2. Pretoria: Government of South Africa.
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1996. Online: https://www.gov.za/documents/constitution/constitution-republic-south-africa-1996-04-feb-1997
Russian Federation (1998): «Federal Law on the Ratification of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the Protocols to it» (Federal Law No. 54 FZ of 30 March 1998). Москва: [official publisher/government publication].
United States Constitution (1787): The Bill of Rights, Amendments I–X. Washington, D.C.: National Archives.
Case Law
Brown v. Board of Education (1954): Supreme Court of the United States, 347 U.S. 483
Government of the Republic of South Africa v. Grootboom (2000): South African Constitutional Court, Case CCT 11/00
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973): Supreme Court of India, 4 SCC 225
Roe v. Wade (1973): Supreme Court of the United States, 410 U.S. 113