The Role of Political Power in the Context of International Development Cooperation

doi: 10.32566/ah.2025.2.7

Abstract

The theoretical foundations of development aid and the question of how to provide it correctly and without causing further harm are central to academic thinking on the subject. In this paper, we examine the forms and extent to which soft and hard power manifest themselves in international aid relations. Our line of thinking is based on the consideration that international aid is part of politics in the broadest sense and typically takes place between state actors. Therefore, we first examine power in the international relations system as a whole and then turn to aid cooperation with the aim of highlighting the theoretical conditions that shape regimes and can determine and reinterpret the donor-recipient relationship.

Keywords:

political power solidarity international development and aid humanitarian aid post-development

How to Cite

Solymári, D. (2025). The Role of Political Power in the Context of International Development Cooperation. Acta Humana – Human Rights Publication, 13(2), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.32566/ah.2025.2.7

References

BALÁZS Zoltán (2007): Politikai értékelmélet. Budapest: L’Harmattan.

BARNETT, Michael (2011): Empire of Humanity A History of Humanitarianism. London: Cornell University Press.

BAUER, Peter (1976): Dissent on Development Studies and Debates in Development Economics. Harvard University Press.

BURTON, John (1972): World Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521669

CANAVAN, Joseph E. (1923): Charity in the Early Church. Studies: An Irish Quarterly Review, 12(45), 61–77.

CASSEN, Robert (1994): Does Aid Work? Oxford: Oxford UP.

CHANG, Ha-Joon (2006): Kicking Away the Ladder. London: Anthem Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1gxp77q.31

CHANG, Ha-Joon (2008): Bad Samaritans: The Guilty Secrets of Rich Nations and the Threat to Global Prosperity. London: Random House Business Books.

Demosthenes Speeches 1–17. (2011). (Ford. Jeremy Trevett). Austin: University of Texas Press.

ESCOBAR, Arturo (1995): Encountering Development. The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

FERGUSON, James (1990): The Anti-Politics Machine. London: University of Minnesota Press.

FERGUSON, Niall (2019): A tér és a torony. Budapest: Scolar.

FISICHELLA, Domenico (2000): A politikatudomány alapvonalai. Budapest: Osiris.

GRONEMEYER, Marianne [é. n.]: Helping. In SACHS, Wolfgang (szerk.): The Development Dictionary. London – New York: Zed Books, 55–74.

Harry S. Truman Library, The Point Four Program. Online: https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/library/online-collections/point-four-program

HASLAM, Paul Alexander – SCHAFER, Jessica – BEAUDET, Pierre szerk. (2009): Introduction to International Development: Approaches, Actors, Issues, and Practice. Oxford University Press.

HAYTER, Teresa (1971): Aid as Imperialism. Middlesex: Pelican Book.

HOFFMANN Zsuzsanna (1977): A mos maiorum eszmény parodizálása Plautusnál. Budapest.

MEEBELO, Henry S. (1986): African Proletarians and Colonial Capitalism. Kenneth Kaunda Foundation.

MOYO, Dambisa (2009): Dead Aid: Why Aid Is Not Working and How There Is Another Way for Africa. London: Penguin Books.

NIEDERER, Frances J. (1952): Early Medieval Charity. Church History, 21(4), 285–295. Online: https://doi.org/10.2307/3161670

NUSSBAUM, Martha – SEN, Amartya (1993): The Quality of Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198287976.001.0001

NSEHE, Mfonobong (2013): Bill Gates Criticizes Zambian Economist And She Responds With Fire. Forbes, 2013. május 30. Online: https://bit.ly/4j6eGcl

NYE, Joseph S. (1993): Understanding International Conflicts. An Introduction to Theory and History. [H. n.]: Harpercollins College.

OBUCHI, Keizo (1998): The Asian Crisis and Human Security, Intellectual Dialogue on Building Asia’s Tomorrow. The Japan Center for International Exchange (JCIE), Tokió.

RYAN, Alan (2013): On Politics A History of Political Thought from Herodotus to the Present. London: Penguin Books.

SACHS, Wolfgang (1997): The Need for the Home Perspective. In. RAHMENA, M. et al. (szerk.): The Post-Development Reader. London – New York: Zed Books.

SACHS, Wolfgang (2010): The Development Dictionary. London – New York: Zed Books.

SEN, Amartya (1981): Poverty and Famines An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. Oxford: Oxford UP.

SZÖRÉNYI András (2010): A társadalmi diplomácia (public diplomacy) újraértelmezése a 21. században. Külügyi Szemle, 9(4), 137–156. Online: https://library.hungaricana.hu/hu/view/KULUGY_KulugyiSzemle_2010/?pg=804&layout=s

TAKÁCS László (2013): A római diplomácia. Budapest: Akadémiai.

TARRÓSY István (2011): A globális nemzetközi rendszer „új fizikája”. Le Monde Diplomatique, 3(7), 1–15.

Thucydides (2009): The Peloponnesian War (ford.: Martin Hammond), OUP. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00266021

UHLHORN, Gerhard (2018) [1883]: Christian Charity in the Ancient Church. New York: Charles Scribner’s Son, 120–160. Online: https://archive.org/details/christiancharity00uhlhiala

WEBER, Max (1992): Gazdaság és társadalom 1. A megértő szociológia alapvonalai. Budapest: Közgazdasági és Jogi Könyvkiadó.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.