International Economic Sanctions and Their Implications
Copyright (c) 2026 Jafaar Sakkour

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Absztrakt
This paper examines the use of economic sanctions as a tool of international policy, focusing specifically on their application to Syria. The study reviews key definitions and types of economic sanctions, highlighting their role in influencing state behaviour while avoiding military intervention. Using a case study methodology, this analysis examines the sanctions imposed by the United States, the European Union, and other international actors since 2011. The paper assesses the economic and humanitarian implications of these measures, including substantial declines in national GDP, disruptions to oil production, inflation, food insecurity, and restricted access to essential medicines. The research also considers the ethical and legal debates surrounding sanctions, emphasising their disproportionate impact on civilian populations rather than political elites. The findings indicate that while sanctions aim to achieve strategic political objectives, their implementation often exacerbates humanitarian crises and undermines human rights. The paper concludes that multilateral coordination and targeted, “smart” sanctions are more effective and ethically justified than broad comprehensive measures. A balanced approach that aligns political goals with humanitarian considerations is necessary for a fair and sustainable application of economic sanctions in international relations.
Kulcsszavak:
Hogyan kell idézni
Hivatkozások
ABUGHRIS, Noura [s. a.]: A Brief History of Economic Sanctions. Carter-Ruck. Online: https://www.carter-ruck.com/insight/a-brief-history-of-economic-sanctions
BALDWIN, David A. (1999): The Sanctions Debate and the Logic of Choice. International Security, 24(3), 80–107. Online: https://doi.org/10.1162/016228899560248
BENGTSSON, Maria (2002): Economic Sanctions Go Smart: A Human Rights Perspective. Master’s Thesis. Linköping: Linköping University. Online: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:18527/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Dentons (2019): EU Sanctions 2018 Year-in-Review. January 2019.
Human Rights Council (2023): Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Negative Impact of Unilateral Coercive Measures on the Enjoyment of Human Rights: Alena Douhan. Fifty-fourth Session. Geneva: United Nations. Online: https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/country-reports/ahrc5423add1-visit-syrian-arab-republic-report-special-rapporteur
KOBAYASHI, Yoshiharu (2017): Economic Sanctions as Foreign Policy. In The Oxford Encyclopedia of Foreign Policy Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.477
LECLERC, Gabija (2023): Impact of Sanctions on the Humanitarian Situation in Syria. Brussels: European Parliamentary Research Service. Online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2023/749765/EPRS_BRI(2023)749765_EN.pdf
METYCH, Michele Economic Sanctions [s. a.]: Encyclopedia Britannica. Online: https://www.britannica.com/topic/economic-sanctions
NASSER, Rabie – MEHCHY, Zaki – ISMAIL, Khalid Abu (2013): Socioeconomic Roots and Impact of the Syrian Crisis. The Syrian Center for Policy Research. Online: https://scpr-syria.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/SCPR_Syria_Crisis_Report_2013_EN.pdf
Office of Foreign Assets Control (2024): Syria Sanctions – Inactive and Archived. Online: https://ofac.treasury.gov/sanctions-programs-and-country-information/syria-sanctions-inactive-and-archived
World Bank (2023): Macroeconomic and Fiscal Assessment of Syria. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.World Bank (2023): Macroeconomic and Fiscal Assessment of Syria. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.
The Carter Center (2020): U.S. and European Sanctions on Syria. Atlanta, GA: The Carter Center. Online: https://www.cartercenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/us-and-european-sanctions-on-syria-091620.pdf
TOSTENSEN, Arne – BULL, Beate (2002): Are Smart Sanctions Feasible? World Politics, 54(3), 373–403. Online: https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2002.0010
UK P&I Club (2011): U.S. Sanctions Against Syria. UK P&I Club, 25 August 2011. Online: https://www.ukpandi.com/news-and-resources/articles/2011/u-s-sanctions-against-syria.
U.S. Energy Information Administration (2011): Over 90% of Syrian Crude Oil Exports go to European Countries. 16 September 2011. Online: https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=3110
United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA) (2024): Dynamics and Unintended Effects of Unilateral Coercive Measures Against the Syrian Arab Republic. Report on the Impact of Sanctions on the Population. Beirut, Lebanon: United Nations. Online: https://www.unescwa.org/sites/default/files/pubs/pdf/dynamics-effects-measures-syrian-arab-republic-english.pdf
Legal sources
United Nations (1948): Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Online: https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
United States Congress (2019): H.R.31 Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act of 2019. Online: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/31