Combustion Gas Examination of a Battery Housing in Electrically Driven Heavy Goods Vehicle

doi: 10.32565/aarms.2023.3.5


Nowadays, electrically propelled vehicles are becoming more and more popular. Due to the propulsion system, the risks derived from the operation have changed, compared to the conventionally driven vehicles. The investigated vehicle has the same, new risk factor originating from the behaviour of rechargeable energy storage system (RESS) during combustion and there is only a minority of available literature dealing with the investigation of the battery housing. According to our assumption the housing is a fire comburent material that hinders the work of first responders. In this research we conducted the laboratory examination of a prismatic LiFePO4 battery cell and battery pack cover used in electrically driven vehicles during burning. Combustion gases were collected and were evaluated with the help of gas chromatography. Our results show that plastic housing and cell covers are not recommended in automotive industrial use, because of their comburent characteristics, also the combustion gases are severely harmful. This paper includes the method of sampling, the experiment itself and the results.


electromobility electric heavy good vehicle operational safety battery fire combustion gases

How to Cite

Apagyi, A., Kuti, R. and Papp, C. (2023) “Combustion Gas Examination of a Battery Housing in Electrically Driven Heavy Goods Vehicle”, AARMS – Academic and Applied Research in Military and Public Management Science. Budapest, 22(3), pp. 77–90. doi: 10.32565/aarms.2023.3.5.


Aydemir, Muhammed – Glodde, Arne – Mooy, Robert – Bach, Gordon (2017): Increasing Productivity in Assembling Z-Folded Electrode-Separator-Composites for Lithium-Ion Batteries. CIRP Annals, 66(1), 25–28. Online:

Buysse, Claire – Miller, Josh (2021): Transport Could Burn Up the EU’s Entire Carbon Budget. The International Council on Clean Transportation, 09 April 2021. Online:

Dorsz, Adam – Lewandowski, Mirosław (2020): Analysis of Fire Hazards Associated with the Operation of Electric Vehicles in Enclosed Structures. Energies, 15(11). Online:

Düser, Dominic – Schramm, Thomas (2019): Battery Housing for Lithium-ion Batteries. ATZheavy Duty Worldwide, 12(3), 36–39. Online:

Egelhaaf, Markus – Wolpert , Dieter – Lange, Thomas (2014): Fire Fighting of Battery Electric Vehicle Fires. In Andersson, Petra –Sundstr öm, Björn (eds.): Proceedings from 3rd International Conference on Fires in Vehicles – FIVE 2014. Borås: SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden. 221–230.

European Commission (2021): Reducing CO₂ Emissions from Heavy-duty Vehicles. Online:

Larsson, Fredrik – Andersson, Petra – Mellander, Bengt-Erik (2014): Are Electric Vehicles Safer than Combustion Engine Vehicles? In Sandén, Björn – Wallgren, Pontus (eds.): Systems Perspectives on Electromobility. Göteborg: Chalmers University of Technology. 33–44.

Larsson, Fredrik – Andersson, Petra – Blomqvist, Per – Mellander, Bengt-Erik (2017): Toxic Fluoride Gas Emissions from Lithium-ion Battery Fires. Scientific Reports, 7, 1–14. Online:

Schmerler, Rico – Gebken, Tobias – Kalka, Sebastian – Reincke, Tobias (2017): Multifunctional Battery Housing for Electric Vehicles. Lightweight Design Worldwide, 10(5), 26–31. Online:

Sun, Peiyi – Bisschop, Roeland – Niu, Huichang – Hua ng, Xinyan (2020): A Review of Battery Fires in Electric Vehicles. Fire Technology, 56(4), 1361–1410. Online:


Download data is not yet available.