Air Transport Projects Quality Assessments by Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)
Copyright (c) 2023 Alharasees Omar, Kale Utku
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Absztrakt
The complex environment of aviation created dynamic air transport systems where the quality is vulnerable and directly sensitive to the supply side due to the high strategic level of driven market environments. The significance of quality quantifications has grown rapidly. Calculating quality factors is not a simple task, due to the heterogeneous, inseparable and incomprehensible characteristics of the system. For this purpose, the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) survey was distributed among two groups of 22 experts of pilots and ATCOs and applied by creating a three-level hierarchy model of the air transport supply quality to evaluate and weigh the critical characteristics. In the hierarchical structure, 4 main criteria, 15 first-level sub-criteria, and 12 second-level sub-criteria were used for the air transport supply quality model.
Kulcsszavak:
Hogyan kell idézni
Hivatkozások
U. Kale, I. Jankovics, A. Nagy and D. Rohács, ‘Towards Sustainability in Air Traffic Management’. Sustainability, Vol. 13, no 10. 2021. Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105451
J. Rohács and D. Rohács, ‘Total Impact Evaluation of Transportation Systems’. Transport, Vol. 35, no 2. pp. 193–202. 2020. Online: https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2020.12640
U. Kale, J. Rohács and D. Rohács, ‘Operators’ Load Monitoring and Management’. Sensors, Vol. 20, no 17. 2020. Online: https://doi.org/10.3390/s20174665
N. Aydin, ‘A Fuzzy-Based Multi-Dimensional and Multi-Period Service Quality Evaluation Outline for Rail Transit Systems’. Transport Policy, Vol. 55. pp. 87–98. 2017. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.02.001
A. Estrada and D. Romero, ‘A System Quality Attributes Ontology for Product-Service Systems Functional Measurement Based on a Holistic Approach’. Procedia CIRP, Vol. 47. pp. 78–83. 2016. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.215
A. Dalkıran, M. Ayar, U. Kale, A. Nagy and T. H. Karakoc, ‘A Review on Thematic and Chronological Framework of Impact Assessment for Green Airports’. International Journal of Green Energy, pp. 1–12. 2022. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2022.2045298
H. Akdag, T. Kalayci, S. Karagöz, H. Zülfikar and D. Giz, ‘The Evaluation of Hospital Service Quality by Fuzzy MCDM’. Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 23. pp. 239–248. 2014. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.06.033
T. L. Saaty, ‘What is the Analytic Hierarchy Process?’ In G. Mitra, H. J. Greenberg, F. A. Lootsma, M. J. Rijkaert and H. J. Zimmermann (eds), Mathematical Models for Decision Support. Berlin–Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 109–121. 1988. Online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83555-1_5
T. L. Saaty, ‘Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process’. International Journal of Services Sciences, Vol. 1, no 1. pp. 83–98. 2008. Online: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
T. Nakagawa and K. Sekitani, ‘A Use of Analytic Network Process for Supply Chain Management’. Asia Pacific Management Review, Vol. 9, no 5. pp. 783–800. 2004. Online: https://doi.org/10.6126/APMR.2004.9.5.02
C. C. Chao and K. T. Kao, ‘Selection of Strategic Cargo Alliance by Airlines’. Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 43. pp. 29–36. 2015. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.01.004
J. Rezaei, P. B. M. Fahim and L. Tavasszy, ‘Supplier Selection in the Airline Retail Industry Using a Funnel Methodology: Conjunctive Screening Method and Fuzzy AHP’. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 41, no 18. pp. 8165–8179. 2014. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.07.005
D. Zietsman and M. Vanderschuren, ‘Analytic Hierarchy Process Assessment for Potential Multi-Airport Systems – The Case of Cape Town’. Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 36. pp. 41–49. 2014. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2013.12.004
G. Bruno, E. Esposito and A. Genovese, ‘A Model for Aircraft Evaluation to Support Strategic Decisions’. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 42, no 13. pp. 5580–5590. 2015. Online:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.02.054
H. Oktal and A. Onrat, ‘Analytic Hierarchy Process-Based Selection Method for Airline Pilot Candidates’. International Journal of Aerospace Psychology, Vol. 30, no 3–4. pp. 268–281. 2020. Online: https://doi.org/10.1080/24721840.2020.1816469
C. A. Havle and B. Kılıç, ‘A Hybrid Approach Based on the Fuzzy AHP and HFACS Framework for Identifying and Analyzing Gross Navigation Errors during Transatlantic Flights’. Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 76. pp. 21–30. 2019. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2019.02.005
B. Kılıç and C. Ucler, ‘Stress among Ab-Initio Pilots: A Model of Contributing Factors by AHP’. Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 80. 2019. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2019.101706
T. L. Saaty, ‘How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process’. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 48, no 1. pp. 9–26. 1990. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
T. L. Saaty, Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the AHP. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications. 1994.
T. L. Saaty, ‘A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures’. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 15, no 3. pp. 234–281. 1977. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
T. L. Saaty, ‘Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process’. Scientia Iranica, Vol. 9, no 3. 2002.